Explore every episode of the podcast The Systemic Talent Management Podcast
| Title | Pub. Date | Duration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The One Where Feedback Stops Being One-Way with Peter Berridge | 10 sept. 2026 | 00:36:48 | |
What if the feedback systems you rely on to help your people grow are actually making their performance worse? Research shows that over a third of feedback interventions lead to worse performance. In this episode of the Systemic Talent Management Podcast, Professor David Clutterbuck and Riddhika Khoosal sit down with Peter Berridge (CEO of Shift Positive, Executive Coach, and Author) to unpack why traditional feedback models fail and how to fix them. Peter argues that standard feedback isn't broken by intent, but by design: it isolates individuals, focuses heavily on shortcomings, and hides behind anonymity. Through his Shift Positive® method, Peter introduces a relational framework built on strengths, growth, and allyship, shifting feedback from a one-way evaluation into a collaborative, solution-focused driver of change. Together, they explore how to build a feedback-seeking culture, transform evaluators into developmental allies, and redesign HR systems around a simple truth: we don't change alone, we change in relationship with others. About Our Guest Peter Berridge is CEO of Shift Positive, an Executive Coach and Author. He is the co-creator of the Shift Positive® Method and co-author of Feedback Reimagined, which explores how positive psychology and social support can transform the way organisations approach feedback. Peter holds a Master of Applied Positive Psychology from the University of Pennsylvania and has more than 25 years of experience across executive coaching, facilitation and human resources. Episode Soundbite “Feedback is perspective, it's not truth. And feedback is relative and relational to the person providing it.” - Peter Berridge Timestamps
Follow and Listen Peter Berridge: Shift Positive 360 Professor David Clutterbuck: LinkedIn Profile Riddhika Khoosal: LinkedIn Profile Subscribe: New episodes released fortnightly. Subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts. | |||
| The One Where HR Has an Identity Crisis with Dr. Dieter Veldsman | 27 août 2026 | 00:35:14 | |
Does the world need HR? Absolutely. Does it need HR in the way it exists today? Probably not. In this episode of the Systemic Talent Management Podcast, Professor David Clutterbuck and Riddhika Khoosal are joined by Dr. Dieter Veldsman, Chief HR Scientist at the Academy to Innovate HR (AIHR), to explore why traditional HR models are struggling to keep pace with an increasingly complex, interconnected and AI-enabled world of work, and why HR may be facing an identity crisis of its own. Dieter identifies three critical areas for HR to rethink: mandate, operating model and capabilities. They explore why HR needs to move beyond a linear, process-driven mindset, operate as an integrated line of business, and become clearer about the unique contribution it brings to organisational decision-making. The conversation also looks at how HR can help organisations navigate AI, redesign work around human and technological capabilities, and build responsible governance for the future. About Our Guest Dr. Dieter Veldsman is Chief HR Scientist at the Academy to Innovate HR (AIHR) and Professor of Practice in HR and Organisational Behaviour at the University of Johannesburg. An organisational psychologist, researcher, author and former CHRO, his work focuses on strategic HR, organisational design, talent management and the future of work. He is co-author of Work for Humans: Building Sustainable Employee Experience Strategies. Episode Soundbite “Does the world need HR? I would say absolutely. If you ask me the follow-up question, does the world need HR in the way and the shape and the form that it is today? Then I would say probably not.” - Dr. Dieter Veldsman Timestamps 00:00 - Episode preview: The deep impact of HR beyond standardised processes 01:06 - Welcome and guest introduction: Dr. Dieter Veldsman 01:28 - Dieter's journey: Psychology, consulting, tech, and academia 03:30 - The three critical areas for HR: Mandate, operating model, and capabilities 06:20 - Historical context: Is the HR value gap a new phenomenon? 08:44 - HR's identity crisis: Redefining its contribution 12:18 - Learning what to let go: Why HR can't be everything to everyone 14:42 - Moving from linear process mindsets to systemic thinking 18:52 - What does an organisation actually lose if HR disappears? 20:50 - Claiming space at the table and embedding HR into the business model 24:07 - Running HR as an end-to-end line of business 26:22 - Designing HR around employee needs and experience 28:58 - AI, transparency, work design, and governance 34:25 - Closing advice: Owning HR's unique contribution Follow and Listen Dr. Dieter Veldsman: LinkedIn Profile Professor David Clutterbuck: LinkedIn Profile Riddhika Khoosal: LinkedIn Profile Subscribe: New episodes released fortnightly. Subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts.
| |||
| The One Where We Introduce the Podcast | 13 août 2026 | 00:15:56 | |
In a world that has grown complex, human, and deeply unpredictable, why are most organisations still running on linear HR models? In this introductory episode, co-hosts Professor David Clutterbuck and Riddhika Khoosal launch The Systemic Talent Management Podcast to address the fundamental gap between static corporate processes and complex organisational reality. Unpacking the limits of command-and-control leadership, how quick-fix cultures stall real progress, and why HR must step up to educate decision-makers to view the organisation systemically, David and Riddhika set the stage for an evidence-based journey toward making organisations more agile, transparent, and human-centered. EPISODE SOUNDBITE: "[HR] must become the educators of the organisation so that the system becomes transparent to those who have the influence to make it different." — David Clutterbuck TIMESTAMPS:
| |||
| Trailer - The Systemic Talent Management Podcast | 02 juil. 2026 | 00:01:23 | |
Most organisations don't struggle to develop people because they don't care. They struggle because the systems they're relying on were never designed for the complexity of human beings. | |||