Don’t Tell Me About Yourself – Details, episodes & analysis

Welcome to to the pod - we're glad you're here!

Many hiring teams think interviews are just conversations, but poor interviewer behavior can actively push away top candidates and damage employer brand. In this episode, you’ll learn how common interviewer mistakes hurt hiring outcomes, how candidates actually interpret interview behavior, and what separates red flag interviewers from high-quality hiring managers who create strong candidate experiences and better hiring decisions. Key Takeaways Negative interview experiences directly impact acceptance rates and employer reputation Most bad interviewer behavior comes from lack of training, not bad intent Talking too much prevents real candidate evaluation Power dynamics and ego damage trust and candidate perception Rapid-fire questioning creates stress but doesn’t improve hiring accuracy Non-job-related or illegal questions create legal and brand risk Candidates share negative experiences far more often than positive ones The best interviews feel like two-way conversations, not interrogations Preparation and presence signal respect and professionalism Transparency about process and role increases candidate trust and acceptance Timestamps 00:00 Real example of inappropriate interview question 01:18 Why interviewer behavior impacts hiring outcomes 01:33 The four bad interviewer types overview 01:54 The Rambler explained 03:38 The Power Tripper explained 06:00 The Interrogator explained 08:39 The Walking Red Flag explained 11:33 What makes a green flag hiring manager 15:24 Why candidates remember interview experiences long term 18:24 Real candidate stories and interview mistakes Top Keywords interview mistakes bad interviewers candidate experience hiring manager training illegal interview questions how to interview candidates interview red flags interview best practices employer brand interviews improving hiring decisions

In this live episode, you’ll learn why most companies are overlooking the biggest risk in their hiring process: candidate experience. Daniel Birkholm shares how focusing only on hired candidates ignores the majority of people interacting with your brand and why that can hurt both hiring outcomes and business performance. This is a practical look at how to measure candidate experience, improve hiring quality, and build a more sustainable recruiting strategy. Key Takeaways: Most companies reject 95% of candidates and ignore their experience Poor candidate experience can damage your brand and revenue Happy candidates are more likely to become customers Negative experiences spread faster than positive ones Candidate experience impacts quality of hire Feedback loops are critical to improving hiring Many teams focus too much on efficiency over experience Data-driven hiring leads to better outcomes Candidates can still have a good experience even if rejected Measuring experience helps create more sustainable hiring Keywords: candidate experience, hiring metrics, candidate NPS, recruitment feedback, employer brand impact, hiring strategy data, talent acquisition metrics, candidate journey, recruitment analytics, hiring experience improvement Follow Daniel at https://www.linkedin.com/in/danielbirkholm/ Sponsored by @shakerrecruitmentmarketing

In this live episode, you’ll learn how AI is already reshaping HR and why companies need to act now to keep up. Rosie Parra shares how her team is approaching AI with a focus on education, guardrails, and protecting the human side of work. This is a practical look at what leaders should be thinking about as AI adoption accelerates and expectations shift. Key Takeaways: AI is already here, not something coming in the future Companies that delay AI adoption risk falling behind AI should enhance employees, not replace them Education is critical to help teams use AI effectively Guardrails are necessary to protect sensitive data AI adoption requires both internal and external learning HR teams must balance speed with responsibility Employee experience and retention still matter most Engagement and tenure remain key HR priorities Leaders need to proactively prepare for AI regulations Keywords: AI in HR, AI adoption workplace, HR technology strategy, AI and employee experience, HR leadership AI, AI data privacy HR, workforce engagement metrics, HR innovation strategy, future of work AI, HR digital transformation Follow Rosie at https://www.linkedin.com/in/rosie-parra-295aa831/ Sponsored by @shakerrecruitmentmarketing Learn more www.shaker.com

In this episode, we break down what actually makes someone a great interviewer and why it matters more than most companies realize. We talk about the difference between “gut feeling” interviewing and structured interviewing, why preparation is the foundation of good hiring decisions, and how green flag interviewers create better candidate experiences and stronger hiring outcomes. This episode walks through the behaviors, questions, and preparation that separate strong interviewers from the ones who accidentally sabotage their hiring process. Key Takeaways Great interviewers prepare before the interview begins. Defining success in a role helps teams evaluate candidates objectively. Interviewers should identify both ability and motivation for the role. Interviews should be a two-way evaluation between candidate and employer. Green flag interviewers only ask job-related questions. Hypothetical and leading questions reduce interview accuracy. Behavioral questions reveal real past actions instead of guesses. Gathering information and evaluating candidates should be separate steps. Clear communication and timelines improve candidate experience. Structured interviews reduce bias and improve hiring decisions. Timestamps 00:00 Why great interviewers matter in hiring 01:20 What makes a green flag interviewer 03:00 The impact of candidate experience on hiring 05:10 Preparing before the interview starts 07:30 Defining success and candidate motivators 09:10 Why interviews must be a two-way evaluation 10:50 Avoiding illegal and non-job-related questions 12:20 Behavioral questions and better follow-ups 14:40 Examples of shockingly good interviews 18:00 Fixing common interview questions Keywords green flag interviewer, how to interview candidates, interview training for managers, structured interviewing, behavioral interview questions, hiring best practices, candidate experience, hiring manager training, interview preparation, recruitment interviewing techniques Follow us @expertinterviewers TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@expertinterviewers Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/expertinterviewers/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lornaerickson/

In this episode, we break down why candidates today apply to dozens of jobs at once and why their behavior often looks chaotic to employers. We examine the reality of modern job searching, including long interview timelines, ghosting, unpredictable hiring processes, and the massive amount of unpaid work candidates do just to apply. When you look at the environment candidates are operating in, their behavior starts to make sense. Applying broadly is often risk management, not lack of commitment. We also explore how hiring teams unintentionally create defensive candidate behavior and what simple changes companies can make to rebuild trust in the hiring process. Key Takeaways Candidates apply to many jobs because hiring processes are unpredictable. Lack of communication from companies trains candidates to hedge their bets. Job searching requires significant unpaid work including resumes, research, and interviews. Ghosting is one of the fastest ways to break candidate trust. When companies stay silent, candidates fill the gap with negative assumptions. Defensive candidate behavior often mirrors poor hiring practices. Transparency about timelines and process builds candidate trust. Clear communication reduces ghosting, over-applying, and offer hedging. Recruiters are often blamed for delays caused by internal hiring teams. Trust in hiring improves candidate engagement and acceptance rates. Timestamps 00:00 Why candidates apply to dozens of jobs 01:08 Data on candidate communication gaps 02:08 Why application volume keeps increasing 03:22 The hidden work behind job applications 05:34 Emotional and psychological toll of job searching 07:22 How ghosting damages candidate trust 09:06 How negative hiring experiences spread publicly 10:07 Why candidates sometimes ghost employers 11:38 Why candidates are being told to lie 15:58 Simple ways companies can rebuild candidate trust Follow us @expertinterviewers TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@expertinterviewers Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/expertinterviewers/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lornaerickson/ Keywords candidate experience, hiring process problems, why candidates apply to many jobs, candidate ghosting, hiring communication, job search frustration, hiring transparency, interview process delays, candidate trust, recruitment best practices

In this episode, we dig into one of the most debated questions in hiring right now: should employers consider a candidate’s public online behavior when making hiring decisions? We sit down with Ben Mones, founder and CEO of Fama, to talk about what digital behavior screening actually looks like, where the legal and ethical boundaries are, and why transparency matters for both employers and candidates. We explore how social media has changed workplace risk, what employers are often misunderstanding about online behavior, and how companies can evaluate behavior responsibly without turning hiring into surveillance. Learn more about Fama: https://hubs.ly/Q046ph7k0 Request a demo: https://hubs.ly/Q046pj_Y0 Follow Fama on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fama-tech/ Follow Fama on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/famascreening Follow Fama on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@famascreening Key takeaways: Employers must link online behavior to real workplace impact. Screening should focus on conduct like harassment, threats, or intolerance. Protected traits such as politics or religion cannot be part of hiring decisions. Transparency with candidates is essential when using screening tools. Candidates should be able to see and dispute screening results. Social media now plays a major role in workplace interactions and reputation. Employee-generated content can create legal and compliance risks. Digital behavior signals can help prevent misconduct before it happens. Screening tools should support judgment, not replace it. Safer hiring practices benefit both employers and employees. Timestamps: 00:00 Why online behavior can matter in hiring 01:21 Introducing digital behavior screening 05:45 What digital screening actually analyzes 06:58 Common misconceptions about social media screening 09:06 Legal guardrails and discrimination limits 11:00 Why privacy by design matters in hiring tech 14:21 Candidate transparency and consent 16:32 What companies underestimate about digital behavior risk 18:55 How social media changed workplace interaction 20:47 Risks tied to employee-generated content 24:18 How digital screening can benefit candidates 26:39 Fair criticism of digital behavior screening 30:57 Rapid-fire insights on hiring risk Keywords: digital behavior screening, social media hiring, online behavior in hiring, workplace misconduct risk, candidate transparency, hiring compliance, privacy by design, employment discrimination, employee generated content, workplace safety

Personality assessments are used by nearly 80 percent of Fortune 500 companies and taken by over 100 million people each year. They are marketed as predictive, objective, and data driven. But do they actually predict job performance, or are they replacing interviewer judgment? In this episode, we break down what personality tests measure, what research says about their accuracy, and how hiring teams misuse them. You will learn when assessments help, when they harm, and what to use instead if you want to make better hiring decisions. Key Takeaways: Personality assessments are a multi billion dollar industry used widely in corporate hiring. Most hiring assessments measure traits like emotional stability, dominance, openness, and agreeableness. Many tests rely on self reported answers that candidates can easily game. When used as the deciding factor, personality tests fail to predict job performance up to 95 percent of the time. Hiring managers often use assessments as a security blanket to reduce decision risk. Over reliance on testing can weaken interviewer skill and accountability. Predicting performance requires evidence of past behavior, not personality labels. Structured behavioral interviews are more reliable than trait based screening. Assessments can damage candidate trust when results are not shared transparently. Personality tools work best for employee development, not hiring gatekeeping. Timestamps: 00:48 What personality tests claim to predict 01:27 What hiring assessments actually measure 04:21 How big the assessment industry is 06:40 Why companies rely on personality tests 09:19 How testing can break candidate trust 12:05 Are hiring assessments accurate 16:00 Why past behavior predicts performance 17:27 Better alternatives to personality screening 22:17 When assessments are useful 23:36 Final verdict on hiring tests Keywords: personality assessments in hiring do personality tests predict job performance predictive hiring tools are hiring assessments accurate structured behavioral interviews candidate experience and hiring tests how to predict job performance personality tests vs job performance hiring manager decision making employee development assessments

Most companies believe their employer brand is what they publish on their website, careers page, or mission statement. Candidates believe it is what they see, hear, and experience. In this episode, we break down the difference between the brand you think you are communicating and the brand candidates are actually experiencing. You will learn how job seekers research companies today, why interviews expose brand gaps instantly, and what leaders can do to align reputation with reality before it damages hiring outcomes. Key Takeaways: Over 86 percent of job seekers research company reviews before applying. Younger candidates increasingly use TikTok and AI tools as search engines. Every company has two brands: the intended brand and the experienced brand. Mission statements and employee value propositions rarely influence candidates. Negative interview experiences are the loudest form of employer branding. Interviews are where brand promises get tested in real time. Employees and former employees are more trusted than CEOs. Silence on social media still communicates something about your culture. Forcing employees to post scripted content reduces trust. Fixing reputation starts with auditing public feedback and improving candidate experience. Timestamps: 01:02 Why candidates research companies first 03:13 Intended brand vs experienced brand explained 04:30 Why mission statements do not influence applicants 06:43 The power of negative reviews and Glassdoor 09:43 How interviews expose brand gaps 11:48 Why bad interviews go viral 13:04 Why executives must care about employer brand 17:25 Why employees are more trusted than CEOs 20:35 How to audit and fix reputation issues 25:13 Why interviewing is a public conversation Keywords: employer branding strategy candidate experience Glassdoor reviews job seeker research behavior intended vs experienced brand employee generated content interview process mistakes company reputation management social media employer brand how candidates research companies

How do you compete in today’s job market, especially after a tech layoff? In this episode live from TalentSphere, Megan Dias a career coach shares practical strategies for navigating a competitive hiring landscape shaped by AI, resume overload, and changing recruiter behavior. You’ll learn how to customize your resume effectively, why networking is more important than ever, how to find the “human” in the hiring process, and what job seekers are getting wrong right now. Connect with Megan on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/megandias/ Key Takeaways: AI is reshaping both recruiting and job searching. Job seekers must customize resumes for each role. A generic resume is far less effective in a competitive market. Finding a real human connection in the hiring process increases your odds. Networking on LinkedIn and in professional communities is critical. Many laid-off tech professionals need strategy, not just applications. Career coaching should be individualized, not one-size-fits-all. Understanding industry trends helps job seekers stay competitive. Leveraging existing connections can unlock hidden opportunities. Job searching today requires clarity, positioning, and persistence. Timestamps:00:00 Why Talent Sphere matters in 202601:52 Supporting laid-off tech professionals03:46 Practical strategies for job seekers04:30 Why resume customization matters05:15 Finding the human in hiring06:00 Networking in a digital-first world Keywords:Talent Sphere, career coaching, job market 2026, AI in recruiting, resume tips, networking strategies, job search strategies, candidate fraud concerns, talent acquisition trends, job seekers