Back

Explore every episode of the podcast 中国政辩 Debating China

Dive into the complete episode list for 中国政辩 Debating China. Each episode is cataloged with detailed descriptions, making it easy to find and explore specific topics. Keep track of all episodes from your favorite podcast and never miss a moment of insightful content.

Rows per page:

1–50 of 133

TitlePub. DateDuration
习近平会武统台湾 VS 习近平不会武统台湾 25 Nov 202401:14:46

在激辩中国政治的第九周,滕彪邀请傅志彬和慕容雪村就习近平是否会武力统一台湾展开激烈辩论。两位嘉宾从历史背景、现实政治和国际格局出发,对习近平动武的可能性及其后果进行了深入分析。


中国民主化进程中应该采取非暴力抵抗 VS 中国民主化进程中不应排除暴力反抗25 Nov 202401:22:07

在激辩中国政治的第八周,滕彪和黎安友(Andrew Nathan)邀请胡平和高光俊就中国民主化进程中是否应该采取暴力反抗展开激烈辩论。他们从理论和实践的角度剖析了暴力与非暴力路径在中国民主化进程中的可能性与代价。


高科技有利于专制社会 VS 高科技有利于公民社会 08 Nov 202401:20:57

在激辩中国政治的第七周,滕彪和黎安友(Andrew Nathan)邀请葉浩就高科技有利于专制社会还是公民社会展开激烈辩论。在这场辩论中,葉浩和滕彪主要以中国为例子,分别从不同角度阐述了高科技对于专制社会和公民社会的影响。葉浩指出,高科技的发展在专制社会中往往被用作监控和压制工具,如大数据和人工智能在中国被广泛用于监控公民,强化国家控制。他认为,这种技术集中在政府手中,容易被滥用,从而进一步巩固专制政权的统治。 滕彪则反驳道,高科技虽然在短期内被专制政府利用,但从长远看,信息传播和社交媒体的普及不可避免地会促进公民社会的发展。他指出,技术为公民提供了获取信息、交流思想和组织行动的平台,这些都为未来的民主化创造了可能性。




川普成为美国总统有利于中国的民主化 VS 川普成为美国总统不利于中国的民主化08 Nov 202401:27:11

在激辩中国政治的第五周,滕彪和黎安友(Andrew Nathan)邀请李少民就川普成为美国总统是否有利于中国的民主化展开激烈辩论。在这场辩论中,李少民和滕彪分别从不同角度剖析了川普的行事作风和团队政策,探讨了其在当今美国社会和对中国民主化的影响。




西方对华的接触政策已经失败 VS 西方对华的接触政策没有失败03 Nov 202401:25:32

在激辩中国政治的第六周,滕彪和黎安友(Andrew Nathan)邀请上官乱和夏明就西方对华的接触政策是否已经失败展开激烈辩论。在这场深度对话中,上官乱与夏明分别从不同角度剖析了接触政策的复杂性,探讨了其在当今中美关系中的实际效果。


中国民主化应该先于民族自决 VS 民族自决应该先于中国民主化02 Nov 202401:25:25

在激辩中国政治的第四周,滕彪和黎安友(Andrew Nathan)邀请伊利夏提、马聚、胡平、杨子立就中国民主化是否应该先于民族自决展开激烈辩论。此次辩论探讨了中国民主化与少数民族权利之间的复杂关系,涉及民族自决权、国家统一与民主发展的优先次序。辩论嘉宾们围绕历史、文化和现实政治展开了深入讨论,呈现了不同立场间的激烈交锋。


多数中国民众仍支持中国政府 VS 多数中国民众不支持中国政府17 Oct 202401:22:40

在激辩中国政治的第三周,滕彪邀请和黎安友(Andrew Nathan)和王柯就多数中国民主是否支持中国政府展开辩论。辩论触及了政府合法性与公众舆论的复杂关系,各自从不同视角阐述了“民众支持率”的不同表象和实质。


谈谈中国的排外现象05 Oct 202401:10:15

6月10日,四名美国教师在吉林北山公园遭遇袭击。两周之后,一名中国男子持刀冲向一辆满载日本学生的校车,胡友平女士为保护他们而不幸遇难。这些频频发生的袭击外国人事件与中国的“仇外民族主义”有什么关系?这种狂暴的仇恨情绪又是如何形成的?共产党政权在其中起了何种作用?


中国模式是成功的模式 VS 中国模式是失败的模式05 Oct 202401:22:00

在激辩中国政治的第二周,滕彪和黎安友(Andrew Nathan)邀请李伟东和文贯中就中国模式是否是成功的模式展开辩论。双方围绕经济发展、政治体制的可持续性以及对全球秩序的影响等议题展开激烈讨论,各自从不同视角阐述了“中国模式”成败的关键因素。


郭文贵现象02 Oct 202401:27:23

谁是郭文贵?为什么那么多人相信他、追随他?为什么郭文贵能够横空出世之后又牢底坐穿?他是反共英雄还是超级巨骗? “爆料革命”究竟是意义重大还是一场闹剧?为了反共的目的,就可以欺骗撒谎吗?从心理、道德、法律、政治层面如何解读郭文贵事件?


Who is Guo Wengui? Why do so many people believe in him and follow him? Why can Guo Wengui rise to fame and then fall from grace? Is he an anti-communist hero or a super fraud? Is the "whistleblower revolution" of great significance or just a farce? Is it acceptable to deceive and lie for the purpose of anti-communism? How should the Guo Wengui incident be interpreted from psychological, moral, legal, and political perspectives?


记忆与反思:六四书、影、歌02 Oct 202401:20:57

六四期间,世界各地都举办了轰轰烈烈的纪念活动,这把火似乎烧得更旺了。陈军、滕彪、慕容雪村在这一期中推荐了几十本关于六四的书和一些影视及一些歌曲,帮助您全方位地了解六四是什么,到底发生了什么,以及,应该如何理解这场运动。

During the June Fourth period, grand commemorative events were held all over the world, and this fire seems to have burned even more vigorously. In this episode, Chen Jun, Teng Biao, and Murong Xuecun recommended dozens of books, films, TV shows, and songs about June Fourth to help you fully understand what June Fourth is, what exactly happened, and how to interpret this movement.


我们和国保不得不说的故事(下)02 Oct 202401:34:59

“在他们眼中,我们不是人,只是他们的工作对象。”这一期中,我们继续聊与中国秘密警察打交道的经历和体会,在未来,如果你有可能被他们盯上,请一定听到结尾处,那里有三位资深的“工作对象”总结出的《喝茶宝典》

"In their eyes, we are not human beings, but just their work objects." In this episode, we continue to talk about the experiences and insights of dealing with the Chinese secret police. In the future, if you may be targeted by them, be sure to listen to the end, where three senior "work objects" have summarized the "Tea Drinking Bible."


政治正确的是是非非02 Oct 202401:15:06

在中国,不能有台独、藏独的言论,不能有“侮辱烈士”的言论;在美国,N-word 极少有人再用,对少数群体的歧视性称呼也不能随便使用,这两者是一回事吗?有些话题不应该被自由讨论、甚至不应该进行科学研究吗?应该如何看待西方(特别是美国)的“政治正确(political correctness)”?它的积极意义是什么?它是否已经过头了,以至于妨碍了言论自由和学术自由?


我们和国保不得不说的故事(上)02 Oct 202401:12:27

他们是一群“没有影子”的人,却有着巨大的权力。他们是中国的克格勃、斯塔西,也是社会主义铁拳的象征。平常人很难接触到他们,但假如你说了什么“过头”的话,做了什么“出格”的事,也许就有机会品尝他们的骚扰、侮辱和伤害。本期节目,陈军、滕彪、慕容雪村一起聊聊被喝茶、被软禁、被绑架和殴打的经历,《我们和国保不得不说的故事》第一部分上线,欢迎围观。

They are a group of "shadowless" people, yet they wield enormous power. They are China's KGB, Stasi, and also symbols of the socialist iron fist. It is difficult for ordinary people to come into contact with them, but if you say something "over the line" or do something "out of line," you may have the opportunity to experience their harassment, insults, and harm. In this episode, Chen Jun, Teng Biao, and Murong Xuecun talk about their experiences of being invited for tea, being under soft detention, being kidnapped, and being beaten. The first part of "The Stories We Must Tell About Us and the National Security" is now online. Welcome to listen.


刘晓波逝世7周年02 Oct 202401:27:30

他说自己沒有敌人,却从未停止抗争,直至最后一刻。他一生珍爱自由,却多次入狱,并最終死于监牢之中。7月13日是刘晓波忌辰7周年,在这一期节目中,陈军、滕彪、慕容雪村一起回忆这位挚友与兄长,以及与他有关的一切,欢迎收听。

He said he had no enemies, but never stopped fighting until the last moment. He cherished freedom all his life, but was imprisoned many times and eventually died in jail. july 13th is the 7th anniversary of Liu Xiaobo's death, in this episode, Chen Jun, Teng Biao and Murong Xuecun reminisce about this dear friend and brother, and everything related to him, welcome to listen to the program.


读《乡下人的悲歌》-时代变局中被忽视的伤口02 Oct 202401:45:53

川普提名JD万斯做他的竞选搭档和副总统候选人,让这位出身锈带的贫民之子一夜之间成了举世瞩目的人物,他的旧作《乡下人的悲歌》也再读热销,在这一期节目中,陈军、滕彪、慕容雪村也来点评一下时事,谈谈万斯的崛起,《乡下人的悲歌》,还有相关联的《白垃圾》等著作,以及美国何以走到今天,欢迎收听。

Trump nominated JD Vance as his running mate and vice presidential candidate, making this poor son from the Rust Belt an overnight sensation. His old work "Hillbilly Elegy" is also selling well again. In this episode, Chen Jun, Teng Biao, and Murong Xuecun also come to comment on current affairs, talk about Vance's rise, "Hillbilly Elegy," as well as related works such as "White Trash," and how America has come to today. Welcome to listen.


民主制度适合中国VS民主制度不适合中国02 Oct 202401:22:59

在激辩中国政治的第一周,滕彪和黎安友(Andrew Nathan)邀请林培瑞(Perry Link)和陈军将就民主制度是否适合中国展开辩论。双方围绕中国当前的政治结构、历史传统,以及中国社会在面对民主改革时可能面临的挑战展开深入探讨。他们将阐述各自的观点,分析民主对中国的潜在利与弊,探讨中国的政治未来走向。本次辩论旨在激发对中国政治体制的理性思考,增进对于民主在不同文化背景下的适用性的理解。


In the first week of the Debating Chinese politics, Teng Biao and Andrew Nathan invited Perry Link and Chen Jun to debate whether democracy is suitable for China. The two sides conducted in-depth discussions on China's current political structure, historical traditions, and the challenges that Chinese society may face in the face of democratic reform. They will elaborate on their respective views, analyze the potential pros and cons of democracy for China, and explore the future direction of China's politics. The purpose of this debate is to stimulate rational thinking on China's political system and enhance understanding of the applicability of democracy in different cultural contexts.


关于校园抗议活动的辩论02 Oct 202401:24:09

巴以烽火正炽,世界另一边的抗议运动也如火如荼,这场从哥伦比亚大学蔓延至世界各地的全球运动,究竟是在支持什么、反对什么?是又一波代表正义和勇气的青年运动,还是某些人所说的“文革重来”?本期节目邀请悉尼科技大学冯崇义教授与陈军展开一场公平辩论,欢迎围观。

The flames of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are raging, and protests on the other side of the world are also in full swing. What is this global movement that has spread from Columbia University to various parts of the world supporting and opposing? Is it another wave of youth movements representing justice and courage, or as some say, a "return of the Cultural Revolution"? This episode invites Professor Feng Chongyi from the University of Technology Sydney and Chen Jun to engage in a fair debate. Welcome to watch.


哈维尔和昆德拉的世纪笔战(下)25 Apr 202400:45:27

1968年8月,苏联的坦克碾碎了捷克的自由之梦,哈维尔和昆德拉也因此而“大吵一架”,我们该如何认识那种极端艰难的形势?我们应做些什么?这场争论一直延续到今天,在习近平的高压统治下,我们是该心怀希望,坐以待变,还是该正视时局之难、路途之险,但依旧奋不顾身地反抗?


哈维尔和昆德拉的世纪笔战(上)25 Apr 202400:44:41

1968年8月,苏联的坦克碾碎了捷克的自由之梦,哈维尔和昆德拉也因此而“大吵一架”,我们该如何认识那种极端艰难的形势?我们应做些什么?这场争论一直延续到今天,在习近平的高压统治下,我们是该心怀希望,坐以待变,还是该正视时局之难、路途之险,但依旧奋不顾身地反抗?


今天你“社达”了吗?——聊聊社会达尔文主义25 Apr 202401:05:50

“弱肉强食、适者生存”适合用在人类社会吗?我们要接受成王败寇、枪杆子里出政权的逻辑吗?为什么总有人主张社会达尔文主义?它错在哪里?


体制内健康力量25 Apr 202401:10:10

来聊聊“体制内健康力量”吧,他们是谁?他们有哪些政治主张?他们跟这体制是什么关系?许多人对他们寄予厚望,他们有意愿和能力帮助中国摆脱独裁,走向民主和自由吗?


聊聊“自我审查”25 Apr 202401:05:27

你在上网发言、写文章、参加活动的时候,有没有过自我审查?什么是自我审查?为什么要自审查?过分的自我审查是不道德的吗?自我审查会带来什么后果?


把莫言告上法庭25 Apr 202401:06:27

莫言因“侮辱英烈”被“爱国博主”起诉,一众宵小鼓掌欢呼,这是不是又一次“焚书坑儒”运动?这股妖风邪气从何而来?这是中共部署和怂恿的,还是极端“毛粉”想要的?文革是否正在中国死灰复燃?对现时和未來的中国生活将有什么样的影响?


英雄死于狱中:从纳瓦尔尼到刘晓波06 Mar 202401:02:56

纳瓦尔尼之死,会不会是又一起普京招牌式的政治暗杀?普京为什么要搞政治暗杀?对于纳瓦尔尼之死与刘晓波之死,为什么国际社会的态度迥异?陈军、滕彪、慕容雪村一起探讨“英雄死于狱中:从纳瓦尔尼到刘晓波”,欢迎朋友们收听。

Could Navalny's death be another signature political assassination by Putin? Why would Putin resort to political assassination? Why does the international community react differently to the deaths of Navalny and Liu Xiaobo? Chen Jun, Teng Biao, and Murong Xuecun discuss "Heroes Die in Prison: From Navalny to Liu Xiaobo." Tune in to join the conversation.


中共崩溃论(下)06 Mar 202400:45:20

1989年至今,很多人不断预测,中共会在两三年内或五年或十年内垮台,这些没有应验的“中国崩溃论”一再出现,背后反映了什么?中共会长久统治下去吗?它会不会像齐奧塞斯库那样突然垮台?共产党的崩溃意味着中国的崩溃吗?陈军、滕彪、慕容雪村再度开聊, 一起探讨《中共崩溃论》。

Since 1989, many have continuously predicted that the CCP would collapse within two or three years, or five, or ten years. These unfulfilled 'China collapse theories' keep emerging, what do they reflect? Will the CCP rule for a long time? Could it suddenly collapse like Ceaușescu? Does the fall of the Communist Party mean the collapse of China? Chen Jun, Teng Biao, and Murong Xuecun discuss again, exploring the 'CCP Collapse Theory' together.


习近平的弄权之路06 Mar 202400:46:11

习近平上台后,把各种权力抓在自己的手心,有人因此而指习为“有手腕”,甚至有人说他是“权术高手”,那么,这所谓的“权术”指的究竟是什么?习近平的弄权之路真有那么高明奥妙吗?这种崇拜权术的黑暗哲学是如何形成的,对中国的今天和未来会有什么样的影响?马聚、滕彪、慕容雪村一起聊聊习近平的弄权之路。

After coming to power, Xi Jinping centralized various powers in his own hands, leading some to describe him as "skilful" and even a "master of power tactics." What exactly does this "power tactic" refer to? Is Xi Jinping's path to power really as sophisticated and intricate as some believe? How did this dark philosophy of idolizing power tactics form, and what impact might it have on China's present and future? Ma Ju, Teng Biao, and Murong Xuecun delve into Xi Jinping's power maneuvers.


中共崩溃论(上)14 Feb 202400:51:01

1989年至今,很多人不断预测,中共会在两三年内或五年或十年内垮台,这些没有应验的“中国崩溃论”一再出现,背后反映了什么?中共会长久统治下去吗?它会不会像齐奧塞斯库那样突然垮台?共产党的崩溃意味着中国的崩溃吗?陈军、滕彪、慕容雪村再度开聊, 一起探讨《中共崩溃论》。

Since 1989, many have continuously predicted that the CCP would collapse within two or three years, or five, or ten years. These unfulfilled 'China collapse theories' keep emerging, what do they reflect? Will the CCP rule for a long time? Could it suddenly collapse like Ceaușescu? Does the fall of the Communist Party mean the collapse of China? Chen Jun, Teng Biao, and Murong Xuecun discuss again, exploring the 'CCP Collapse Theory' together.


聊聊支黑14 Feb 202401:11:21

中国人是不可救药的民族吗?中国是一个只配被“核平”的地方吗?这些在互联网上广泛传播的言论,有什么样的心理学和社会学基础?陈军、滕彪和慕容雪村在一起探讨“支黑现象”的由来及影响。

Are Chinese people an incurable nation? Is China a place that only deserves to be 'nuked'? These opinions, widely spread on the internet, what are their psychological and sociological foundations? Chen Jun, Teng Biao, and Murong Xuecun discuss the origins and impacts of the 'anti-China sentiment' phenomenon.


全球视野下的中国公民社会与民主前景---滕彪访谈陈健民教授(上)31 Jan 202400:52:04

在滕彪对陈健民的专访中,他们深入探讨了民主转型的理论和实践,特别是在中国和其他亚洲国家的背景下。陈建民教授分享了他对导师胡安·林茲在民主转型研究中的开创性贡献的看法,并讨论了林茲的理论如何适用于分析后毛泽东时代的中国政治体制。陈教授还探讨了民主化研究的新趋势,包括经济发展与民主化之间的关系,以及公民社会在推动政治变革中的作用。此外,访谈还涉及了威权主义的回潮、民主国家与独裁国家之间的经济依赖,以及大国民主化的特殊挑战。 

陈健民,香港著名学者和活动家, 原香港中文大学教授,“占中三子”之一,现为台湾国立政治大学社会学系客座教授。 

In Teng Biao's interview with Chan Kin-man, they thoroughly explored the theories and practices of democratic transition, especially regarding China and other Asian countries. Professor Chan shared insights on Juan Linz's pioneering contributions to the study of democratic transitions and how Linz's theories apply to China's political system after Mao Zedong. They also discussed new trends in democratization research, the relationship between economic development and democratization, the role of civil society in political change, the resurgence of authoritarianism, economic dependencies between democratic and authoritarian states, and the unique challenges of democratization in large nations. 

Chan Kin-man is a renowned scholar and activist from Hong Kong, formerly a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and one of the "Occupy Central Trio". He currently serves as a visiting professor in the Department of Sociology at National Chengchi University in Taiwan.


全球视野下的中国公民社会与民主前景---滕彪访谈陈健民教授(下)31 Jan 202400:58:13

在滕彪对陈健民的专访中,他们深入探讨了民主转型的理论和实践,特别是在中国和其他亚洲国家的背景下。陈建民教授分享了他对导师胡安·林茲在民主转型研究中的开创性贡献的看法,并讨论了林茲的理论如何适用于分析后毛泽东时代的中国政治体制。陈教授还探讨了民主化研究的新趋势,包括经济发展与民主化之间的关系,以及公民社会在推动政治变革中的作用。此外,访谈还涉及了威权主义的回潮、民主国家与独裁国家之间的经济依赖,以及大国民主化的特殊挑战。 

陈健民,香港著名学者和活动家, 原香港中文大学教授,“占中三子”之一,现为台湾国立政治大学社会学系客座教授。 

In Teng Biao's interview with Chan Kin-man, they thoroughly explored the theories and practices of democratic transition, especially regarding China and other Asian countries. Professor Chan shared insights on Juan Linz's pioneering contributions to the study of democratic transitions and how Linz's theories apply to China's political system after Mao Zedong. They also discussed new trends in democratization research, the relationship between economic development and democratization, the role of civil society in political change, the resurgence of authoritarianism, economic dependencies between democratic and authoritarian states, and the unique challenges of democratization in large nations. 

Chan Kin-man is a renowned scholar and activist from Hong Kong, formerly a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and one of the "Occupy Central Trio". He currently serves as a visiting professor in the Department of Sociology at National Chengchi University in Taiwan.


陈纯:中国思想光谱中的左翼自由主义(下)31 Jan 202400:50:17

在滕彪对陈纯的专访中,陈纯深入讨论了自己对政治哲学的理解,特别是分析哲学风格的政治哲学以及罗尔斯的政治自由主义。他探讨了左翼自由主义的概念及其与中国大陆流行的右翼自由主义的区别。陈纯还分享了自己对政治现象学的看法,以及如何将西方政治哲学理论应用于中国语境中遇到的挑战。此外,访谈还触及了中国政治体制的批评以及陈纯对中国知识分子态度的分析。

陈纯博士,青年学者,研究政治哲学、伦理学、思想史与中国当代政治文化。著有《自由主义的重生与政治德性》、《国家主义的阴影:学者、民粹与少数派》。 

In the interview with Teng Biao, Chen Chun delves into his understanding of political philosophy, particularly analytic philosophy and John Rawls' political liberalism. He discusses the concept of left-wing liberalism and its distinction from the right-wing liberalism prevalent in Mainland China. Chen also shares his views on political phenomenology and the challenges of applying Western political philosophy theories in the Chinese context. Additionally, the interview touches on critiques of the Chinese political system and Chen's analysis of the attitudes of Chinese intellectuals. 

Dr. Chen Chun is a young scholar who specializes in political philosophy, ethics, history of thought, and contemporary Chinese political culture. He is the author of "The Rebirth of Liberalism and Political Virtue" and "The Shadow of Nationalism: Scholars, Populism, and Minorities.


陈纯:中国思想光谱中的左翼自由主义(上)31 Jan 202400:58:26

在滕彪对陈纯的专访中,陈纯深入讨论了自己对政治哲学的理解,特别是分析哲学风格的政治哲学以及罗尔斯的政治自由主义。他探讨了左翼自由主义的概念及其与中国大陆流行的右翼自由主义的区别。陈纯还分享了自己对政治现象学的看法,以及如何将西方政治哲学理论应用于中国语境中遇到的挑战。此外,访谈还触及了中国政治体制的批评以及陈纯对中国知识分子态度的分析。 

陈纯博士,青年学者,研究政治哲学、伦理学、思想史与中国当代政治文化。著有《自由主义的重生与政治德性》、《国家主义的阴影:学者、民粹与少数派》。

In the interview with Teng Biao, Chen Chun delves into his understanding of political philosophy, particularly analytic philosophy and John Rawls' political liberalism. He discusses the concept of left-wing liberalism and its distinction from the right-wing liberalism prevalent in Mainland China. Chen also shares his views on political phenomenology and the challenges of applying Western political philosophy theories in the Chinese context. Additionally, the interview touches on critiques of the Chinese political system and Chen's analysis of the attitudes of Chinese intellectuals. 

Dr. Chen Chun is a young scholar who specializes in political philosophy, ethics, history of thought, and contemporary Chinese political culture. He is the author of "The Rebirth of Liberalism and Political Virtue" and "The Shadow of Nationalism: Scholars, Populism, and Minorities.


Marie Holzmen (侯芷明):我与中国民主运动(下)31 Jan 202400:40:08

在滕彪对Marie Holzman的专访中,Marie 分享了她对中国人权现状的深刻见解。从1975年她首次踏足北京开始,她就对中国产生了浓厚的兴趣。Holzman 讲述了她与中国异议人士的接触经历,探讨了在中国复杂的政治环境中推动人权议题的挑战,并反思了这些问题对全球人权话语的影响。 

Marie Holzman(侯芷明):法国汉学家,教授,记者,翻译家。中国团结基金会(Solidarité Chine)主席 

In an interview with Teng Biao, Marie Holzman shared her profound insights into the human rights situation in China, starting from her first visit to Beijing in 1975. Marie recounted her interactions with Chinese dissidents, the challenges of promoting human rights issues in China's complex political environment, and the impact of these issues on global human rights discourse. 

Marie Holzman is a French sinologist, professor, journalist, and translator. She is the president of the Solidarité Chine.


Marie Holzmen (侯芷明):我与中国民主运动(上)31 Jan 202400:35:54

在滕彪对Marie Holzman的专访中,Marie 分享了她对中国人权现状的深刻见解。从1975年她首次踏足北京开始,她就对中国产生了浓厚的兴趣。Holzman 讲述了她与中国异议人士的接触经历,探讨了在中国复杂的政治环境中推动人权议题的挑战,并反思了这些问题对全球人权话语的影响。 

Marie Holzman(侯芷明):法国汉学家,教授,记者,翻译家。中国团结基金会(Solidarité Chine)主席 

In an interview with Teng Biao, Marie Holzman shared her profound insights into the human rights situation in China, starting from her first visit to Beijing in 1975. Marie recounted her interactions with Chinese dissidents, the challenges of promoting human rights issues in China's complex political environment, and the impact of these issues on global human rights discourse. 

Marie Holzman is a French sinologist, professor, journalist, and translator. She is the president of the Solidarité Chine.


国家、社会与中国的思想图景 - 滕彪专访石井知章(下)25 Jan 202400:28:53

在滕彪对石井知章教授的专访中,石井教授分享了他对中国研究的浓厚兴趣是如何萌生的,以及他的语言学习经历。他详细讨论了自己对马克思、列宁和毛泽东思想的理解,以及他对比较西方和中国马克思主义观点的看法。石井教授还探讨了他对中国政治、社会结构和工人运动的观点,以及他对中国未来民主化进程的思考。此外,视频还包括了石井教授对中国政治体制的批评和他对中国知识分子态度的分析。 

In the interview conducted by Teng Biao with Professor Tomoaki Ishii, Professor Ishii shared how his intense interest in China studies originated and his experience in language learning. He discussed in detail his understanding of the thoughts of Marx, Lenin, and Mao Zedong, as well as his views on the comparison between Western and Chinese interpretations of Marxism. Professor Ishii also explored his perspectives on Chinese politics, social structure, and the labor movement, along with his thoughts on the future process of democratization in China. Additionally, the video includes Professor Ishii's critique of the Chinese political system and his analysis of the attitudes of Chinese intellectuals. 

石井知章(Tomoaki Ishii),政治学家, 日本明治大学商学部教授,兼任韩国高丽大学、美国斯坦福大学、中国南京大学访问研究员。 

Tomoaki Ishii, a political scientist, is a professor at the Faculty of Commerce of Meiji University in Japan. He also serves as a visiting researcher at Korea University in South Korea, Stanford University in the United States, and Nanjing University in China.


国家、社会与中国的思想图景 - 滕彪专访石井知章(上)25 Jan 202400:29:29

在滕彪对石井知章教授的专访中,石井教授分享了他对中国研究的浓厚兴趣是如何萌生的,以及他的语言学习经历。他详细讨论了自己对马克思、列宁和毛泽东思想的理解,以及他对比较西方和中国马克思主义观点的看法。石井教授还探讨了他对中国政治、社会结构和工人运动的观点,以及他对中国未来民主化进程的思考。此外,视频还包括了石井教授对中国政治体制的批评和他对中国知识分子态度的分析。

In the interview conducted by Teng Biao with Professor Tomoaki Ishii, Professor Ishii shared how his intense interest in China studies originated and his experience in language learning. He discussed in detail his understanding of the thoughts of Marx, Lenin, and Mao Zedong, as well as his views on the comparison between Western and Chinese interpretations of Marxism. Professor Ishii also explored his perspectives on Chinese politics, social structure, and the labor movement, along with his thoughts on the future process of democratization in China. Additionally, the video includes Professor Ishii's critique of the Chinese political system and his analysis of the attitudes of Chinese intellectuals. 

石井知章(Tomoaki Ishii),政治学家, 日本明治大学商学部教授,兼任韩国高丽大学、美国斯坦福大学、中国南京大学访问研究员。 

Tomoaki Ishii, a political scientist, is a professor at the Faculty of Commerce of Meiji University in Japan. He also serves as a visiting researcher at Korea University in South Korea, Stanford University in the United States, and Nanjing University in China.


为什么西方常常误解中国政治?滕彪专访林培瑞(下)25 Jan 202400:35:55

在滕彪对林培瑞(Perry Link)教授的专访中,讨论重点放在西方政治家和学者对中国政府和中国共产党的误解及天真看法上。本次访谈深入探讨了中国语言和文化的复杂性,这些通常不为外国人所完全理解,即便是那些自认为是中国问题专家的人也是如此。采访涉及的主题多样,包括语言障碍的影响、西方人的简化观点、中国共产党的角色,以及这些因素如何影响国际理解和中外关系。对话还深入揭示了中国政府和共产党内部的动态,指出了外界常常忽视的细微差别和层次。 

林培瑞(Perry Link),著名汉学家,加州大学河滨分校讲座教授。 

In Teng Biao‘s exclusive interview with Professor Perry Link, the focus is on the misunderstandings and naivety of Western politicians and scholars regarding the Chinese government and the Communist Party of China. The discussion delves into the complexities of the Chinese language and culture, often not fully understood by foreigners, including those who consider themselves experts on China. The interview covers a range of topics, such as the impact of language barriers, oversimplified views of the West, the role of the Communist Party of China, and how these factors affect international understanding and Sino-foreign relations. The conversation also reveals the dynamics between the Chinese government and the Communist Party, highlighting subtle differences and nuances often overlooked by outsiders. 

Perry Link, a renowned sinologist and a Distinguished Professor at the University of California, Riverside.


为什么西方常常误解中国政治?滕彪专访林培瑞(上)25 Jan 202400:42:09

在滕彪对林培瑞(Perry Link)教授的专访中,讨论重点放在西方政治家和学者对中国政府和中国共产党的误解及天真看法上。本次访谈深入探讨了中国语言和文化的复杂性,这些通常不为外国人所完全理解,即便是那些自认为是中国问题专家的人也是如此。采访涉及的主题多样,包括语言障碍的影响、西方人的简化观点、中国共产党的角色,以及这些因素如何影响国际理解和中外关系。对话还深入揭示了中国政府和共产党内部的动态,指出了外界常常忽视的细微差别和层次。 

林培瑞(Perry Link),著名汉学家,加州大学河滨分校讲座教授。

In Teng Biao‘s exclusive interview with Professor Perry Link, the focus is on the misunderstandings and naivety of Western politicians and scholars regarding the Chinese government and the Communist Party of China. The discussion delves into the complexities of the Chinese language and culture, often not fully understood by foreigners, including those who consider themselves experts on China. The interview covers a range of topics, such as the impact of language barriers, oversimplified views of the West, the role of the Communist Party of China, and how these factors affect international understanding and Sino-foreign relations. The conversation also reveals the dynamics between the Chinese government and the Communist Party, highlighting subtle differences and nuances often overlooked by outsiders. 

Perry Link, a renowned sinologist and a Distinguished Professor at the University of California, Riverside.


【中国往何处去在线课程】第24课: 中国会走向民主吗? Part 124 Jan 202400:30:32

在《中国向何处去:政党、国家与国际秩序》的第二十四次专题课中, 滕彪教授与黎安友教授以“中国会走向民主吗”作为主题结束了这一系列的课程。他们首先简单回顾和总结了前二十三次课的课程。之后邀请杨子立和郑旭光,和其他网友发言。他们探讨了中国走向民主化的路径,并分析了影响这个国家政治转型的各种因素。内容包括中国的威权政体、经济挑战、国内外动态、公民权利运动以及技术的影响。讨论还回顾了中国的历史事件,如天安门广场大屠杀,并考虑了民主化努力的未来影响,涵盖了内部和外部的视角。 

In the 24th session of "Where is China Going: Party, State, and Global Order," Prof. Teng Biao and Prof. Andrew Nathan concluded the series with the theme “Will China Move Towards Democracy?." They began by briefly reviewing and summarizing the previous 23 sessions. Guests Yang Zili and Zheng Xuguang, along with other online participants, were invited to join the discussion. They explored the pathways to democratization in China and analyzed various factors affecting the country's political transformation. Topics included China's authoritarian regime, economic challenges, domestic and international dynamics, citizen rights movements, and the impact of technology. The discussion also revisited historical events in China, such as the Tiananmen Square massacre, and contemplated the future implications of democratization efforts, considering both internal and external perspectives. 

时间轴: 

01:18 课程总结 
11:44 中共的血债 
15:30 为什么民主化应该在中国发生? 
21:20 黎安友谈中共政权的韧性和脆弱性


【中国往何处去在线课程】第23课: 中国如何民主? Part 324 Jan 202400:38:51

《中国向何处去:政党、国家与国际秩序》的第二十三次专题,滕彪教授与黎安友教授邀请王天成先生讨论了中国民主化转型。王天成讨论了中国民主化的可能路径和过去的历史事件对民主进程的影响。 他着重讨论了中国民主转型的难点和潜在的转型方式,如高层分裂、公民动员、社会反叛的重要性、非暴力抗争、以及政府与反对派之间的圆桌谈判等。他特别提到了转型前不会有任何有实质意义的改革、对于渐进改革和党内民主的讨论,以及对于民主化后如何选择政府形式的预期(如议会制等)。王天成还讨论了外部世界的影响、中国的内部控制力度、以及民意对于政治体制的看法。此外,嘉宾和主持人也对中国政治改革派的缺失、法治与民主关系、以及台湾民主化对大陆的影响等问题进行了讨论。 总体而言,这是一场关于中国如何走向民主化的深入讨论,涵盖了理论分析、历史经验、以及对未来路径的预测。 

王天成,《中国民主季刊》主编,中国民主转型研究所所长,《大转型》作者。

The 23rd session of "Where is China Heading: Party, State, and International Order" featured Professor Teng Biao and Professor Andrew Nathan inviting Mr. Wang Tiancheng to discuss China's democratization transition. Wang Tiancheng discussed the possible paths to democratization in China and the impact of past historical events on the democratic process. He focused on the difficulties and potential methods of China's democratic transition, such as elite splits, civic mobilization, the importance of social rebellion, non-violent resistance, and roundtable negotiations between the government and the opposition. He specifically mentioned that there would be no meaningful reforms before the transition, discussions on gradual reform and intra-party democracy, and expectations on how to choose a government form after democratization, such as parliamentary systems. Wang Tiancheng also discussed the influence of the external world, China's internal control strength, and public opinion on the political system. Additionally, the guest and hosts discussed the absence of a political reform faction in China, the relationship between the rule of law and democracy, and the impact of Taiwan's democratization on the mainland. Overall, this was an in-depth discussion on how China might move towards democratization, covering theoretical analysis, historical experiences, and predictions for future paths. 

Wang Tiancheng is the chief editor of “China Journal of Democracy”, director of the Institute for China's Democratic Transition, and author of The Great Transformation. 

时间轴: 

00:20 吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸? 
06:54 80年代的变化 
09:52 民主转型的特点 
20:11 法制与民主 
34:00 台湾民主的角色


【中国往何处去在线课程】第23课: 中国如何民主? Part 224 Jan 202400:25:30

《中国向何处去:政党、国家与国际秩序》的第二十三次专题,滕彪教授与黎安友教授邀请王天成先生讨论了中国民主化转型。王天成讨论了中国民主化的可能路径和过去的历史事件对民主进程的影响。 他着重讨论了中国民主转型的难点和潜在的转型方式,如高层分裂、公民动员、社会反叛的重要性、非暴力抗争、以及政府与反对派之间的圆桌谈判等。他特别提到了转型前不会有任何有实质意义的改革、对于渐进改革和党内民主的讨论,以及对于民主化后如何选择政府形式的预期(如议会制等)。王天成还讨论了外部世界的影响、中国的内部控制力度、以及民意对于政治体制的看法。此外,嘉宾和主持人也对中国政治改革派的缺失、法治与民主关系、以及台湾民主化对大陆的影响等问题进行了讨论。 总体而言,这是一场关于中国如何走向民主化的深入讨论,涵盖了理论分析、历史经验、以及对未来路径的预测。

王天成,《中国民主季刊》主编,中国民主转型研究所所长,《大转型》作者。 

The 23rd session of "Where is China Heading: Party, State, and International Order" featured Professor Teng Biao and Professor Andrew Nathan inviting Mr. Wang Tiancheng to discuss China's democratization transition. Wang Tiancheng discussed the possible paths to democratization in China and the impact of past historical events on the democratic process. He focused on the difficulties and potential methods of China's democratic transition, such as elite splits, civic mobilization, the importance of social rebellion, non-violent resistance, and roundtable negotiations between the government and the opposition. He specifically mentioned that there would be no meaningful reforms before the transition, discussions on gradual reform and intra-party democracy, and expectations on how to choose a government form after democratization, such as parliamentary systems. Wang Tiancheng also discussed the influence of the external world, China's internal control strength, and public opinion on the political system. Additionally, the guest and hosts discussed the absence of a political reform faction in China, the relationship between the rule of law and democracy, and the impact of Taiwan's democratization on the mainland. Overall, this was an in-depth discussion on how China might move towards democratization, covering theoretical analysis, historical experiences, and predictions for future paths. 

Wang Tiancheng is the chief editor of “China Journal of Democracy”, director of the Institute for China's Democratic Transition, and author of The Great Transformation. 

时间轴: 

00:56 黎安友对中国民主转型的看法 
10:37 渐进主义的形成背景 
16:47 改革派的消亡 
22:51 中国特色的民主?


【中国往何处去在线课程】第23课: 中国如何民主? Part 124 Jan 202400:25:41

《中国向何处去:政党、国家与国际秩序》的第二十三次专题,滕彪教授与黎安友教授邀请王天成先生讨论了中国民主化转型。王天成讨论了中国民主化的可能路径和过去的历史事件对民主进程的影响。 他着重讨论了中国民主转型的难点和潜在的转型方式,如高层分裂、公民动员、社会反叛的重要性、非暴力抗争、以及政府与反对派之间的圆桌谈判等。他特别提到了转型前不会有任何有实质意义的改革、对于渐进改革和党内民主的讨论,以及对于民主化后如何选择政府形式的预期(如议会制等)。王天成还讨论了外部世界的影响、中国的内部控制力度、以及民意对于政治体制的看法。此外,嘉宾和主持人也对中国政治改革派的缺失、法治与民主关系、以及台湾民主化对大陆的影响等问题进行了讨论。 总体而言,这是一场关于中国如何走向民主化的深入讨论,涵盖了理论分析、历史经验、以及对未来路径的预测。 

王天成,《中国民主季刊》主编,中国民主转型研究所所长,《大转型》作者。

The 23rd session of "Where is China Heading: Party, State, and International Order" featured Professor Teng Biao and Professor Andrew Nathan inviting Mr. Wang Tiancheng to discuss China's democratization transition. Wang Tiancheng discussed the possible paths to democratization in China and the impact of past historical events on the democratic process. He focused on the difficulties and potential methods of China's democratic transition, such as elite splits, civic mobilization, the importance of social rebellion, non-violent resistance, and roundtable negotiations between the government and the opposition. He specifically mentioned that there would be no meaningful reforms before the transition, discussions on gradual reform and intra-party democracy, and expectations on how to choose a government form after democratization, such as parliamentary systems. Wang Tiancheng also discussed the influence of the external world, China's internal control strength, and public opinion on the political system. Additionally, the guest and hosts discussed the absence of a political reform faction in China, the relationship between the rule of law and democracy, and the impact of Taiwan's democratization on the mainland. Overall, this was an in-depth discussion on how China might move towards democratization, covering theoretical analysis, historical experiences, and predictions for future paths. 

Wang Tiancheng is the chief editor of “China Journal of Democracy”, director of the Institute for China's Democratic Transition, and author of The Great Transformation. 

时间轴:

 03:22 外国民主转型研究 
10:44 中国民主转型的主张和假定 
14:17 民主转型的难点 
20:51 中国未来应该怎样民主化


【中国往何处去在线课程】第22课: 西方对华政策的变化 Part 324 Jan 202400:40:14

《中国向何处去:政党、国家与国际秩序》的第二十二次专题,滕彪教授与黎安友教授主要探讨了西方国家对中国政策的变化和其背后的原因。滕彪首先分析了西方国家,特别是美国,如何从最初的接触政策(engagement policy)转向对中国的更为警觉和批判的态度。这种转变主要是由于对中国政府在国际事务中的行为、对人权的侵犯,以及对国内外民主价值的挑战所引起的担忧。他还讨论了中国政府对海外学术自由和言论自由的影响,以及中国在国际组织中的作用。此外,还提到了中国如何利用经济和政治手段在国际上扩大影响,包括通过“一带一路”倡议和在联合国等国际平台上的活动。黎安友介绍了美国各界政府对华的政策和他对接触政策的看法。总体上,他们详细描述了西方国家对中国日益增长的警惕态度,以及这种态度背后的多重因素。

In the 22nd session of "Where is China Going: The Party, State, and Global Order,” Prof. Teng Biao and Prof. Andrew Nathan mainly explored the changes in Western countries' policies towards China and the reasons behind these changes. Teng Biao first analyzed how Western countries, especially the United States, shifted from an initial engagement policy to a more alert and critical stance towards China. This shift was mainly due to concerns over the Chinese government's behavior in international affairs, human rights violations, and challenges to domestic and international democratic values. He also discussed the impact of the Chinese government on academic freedom and freedom of speech overseas, and China's role in international organizations. Additionally, the discussion included how China utilizes economic and political means to expand its international influence, including through the "Belt and Road" initiative and activities in international platforms like the United Nations. Andrew Nathan introduced the U.S. government's various policies towards China and his views on the engagement policy. Overall, they detailed the growing vigilance of Western countries towards China and the multiple factors behind this attitude. 

时间轴: 

00:12 黎安友谈接触政策 
08:00 中国崛起 
11:17 未来10年国际关系的预测 
15:06 台海战争? 
37:10 中共是否遵守国际条约?


【中国往何处去在线课程】第22课: 西方对华政策的变化 Part 224 Jan 202400:26:39

《中国向何处去:政党、国家与国际秩序》的第二十二次专题,滕彪教授与黎安友教授主要探讨了西方国家对中国政策的变化和其背后的原因。滕彪首先分析了西方国家,特别是美国,如何从最初的接触政策(engagement policy)转向对中国的更为警觉和批判的态度。这种转变主要是由于对中国政府在国际事务中的行为、对人权的侵犯,以及对国内外民主价值的挑战所引起的担忧。他还讨论了中国政府对海外学术自由和言论自由的影响,以及中国在国际组织中的作用。此外,还提到了中国如何利用经济和政治手段在国际上扩大影响,包括通过“一带一路”倡议和在联合国等国际平台上的活动。黎安友介绍了美国各界政府对华的政策和他对接触政策的看法。总体上,他们详细描述了西方国家对中国日益增长的警惕态度,以及这种态度背后的多重因素。 

In the 22nd session of "Where is China Going: The Party, State, and Global Order,” Prof. Teng Biao and Prof. Andrew Nathan mainly explored the changes in Western countries' policies towards China and the reasons behind these changes. Teng Biao first analyzed how Western countries, especially the United States, shifted from an initial engagement policy to a more alert and critical stance towards China. This shift was mainly due to concerns over the Chinese government's behavior in international affairs, human rights violations, and challenges to domestic and international democratic values. He also discussed the impact of the Chinese government on academic freedom and freedom of speech overseas, and China's role in international organizations. Additionally, the discussion included how China utilizes economic and political means to expand its international influence, including through the "Belt and Road" initiative and activities in international platforms like the United Nations. Andrew Nathan introduced the U.S. government's various policies towards China and his views on the engagement policy. Overall, they detailed the growing vigilance of Western countries towards China and the multiple factors behind this attitude. 

时间轴: 

00:25 天安门制裁 
01:29 接触政策的失败 
03:30 错误的假设 
10:02 冷战2.0? 
12:23 美国对华政策


【中国往何处去在线课程】第22课: 西方对华政策的变化 Part 124 Jan 202400:26:07

《中国向何处去:政党、国家与国际秩序》的第二十二次专题,滕彪教授与黎安友教授主要探讨了西方国家对中国政策的变化和其背后的原因。滕彪首先分析了西方国家,特别是美国,如何从最初的接触政策(engagement policy)转向对中国的更为警觉和批判的态度。这种转变主要是由于对中国政府在国际事务中的行为、对人权的侵犯,以及对国内外民主价值的挑战所引起的担忧。他还讨论了中国政府对海外学术自由和言论自由的影响,以及中国在国际组织中的作用。此外,还提到了中国如何利用经济和政治手段在国际上扩大影响,包括通过“一带一路”倡议和在联合国等国际平台上的活动。黎安友介绍了美国各界政府对华的政策和他对接触政策的看法。总体上,他们详细描述了西方国家对中国日益增长的警惕态度,以及这种态度背后的多重因素。

In the 22nd session of "Where is China Going: The Party, State, and Global Order,” Prof. Teng Biao and Prof. Andrew Nathan mainly explored the changes in Western countries' policies towards China and the reasons behind these changes. Teng Biao first analyzed how Western countries, especially the United States, shifted from an initial engagement policy to a more alert and critical stance towards China. This shift was mainly due to concerns over the Chinese government's behavior in international affairs, human rights violations, and challenges to domestic and international democratic values. He also discussed the impact of the Chinese government on academic freedom and freedom of speech overseas, and China's role in international organizations. Additionally, the discussion included how China utilizes economic and political means to expand its international influence, including through the "Belt and Road" initiative and activities in international platforms like the United Nations. Andrew Nathan introduced the U.S. government's various policies towards China and his views on the engagement policy. Overall, they detailed the growing vigilance of Western countries towards China and the multiple factors behind this attitude. 

时间轴: 

02:40 国际民主化潮流 
06:10 中共专制对国际秩序的威胁 
08:30 一带一路的政治企图(债务陷阱) 
10:12 中共对外的渗透 
11:04 孔子学院和学术自由 
14:07 操纵联合国机制 
15:57 经济胁迫 
16:41人质外交 
17:32 干涉民主选举 
18:55 骚扰和攻击 
21:47 香港国安法 
22:41海外警察站 
23:25 海外绑架


【中国往何处去在线课程】第24课: 中国会走向民主吗? Part 324 Jan 202400:41:10

在《中国向何处去:政党、国家与国际秩序》的第二十四次专题课中, 滕彪教授与黎安友教授以“中国会走向民主吗”作为主题结束了这一系列的课程。他们首先简单回顾和总结了前二十三次课的课程。之后邀请杨子立和郑旭光,和其他网友发言。他们探讨了中国走向民主化的路径,并分析了影响这个国家政治转型的各种因素。内容包括中国的威权政体、经济挑战、国内外动态、公民权利运动以及技术的影响。讨论还回顾了中国的历史事件,如天安门广场大屠杀,并考虑了民主化努力的未来影响,涵盖了内部和外部的视角。

In the 24th session of "Where is China Going: Party, State, and Global Order," Prof. Teng Biao and Prof. Andrew Nathan concluded the series with the theme “Will China Move Towards Democracy?." They began by briefly reviewing and summarizing the previous 23 sessions. Guests Yang Zili and Zheng Xuguang, along with other online participants, were invited to join the discussion. They explored the pathways to democratization in China and analyzed various factors affecting the country's political transformation. Topics included China's authoritarian regime, economic challenges, domestic and international dynamics, citizen rights movements, and the impact of technology. The discussion also revisited historical events in China, such as the Tiananmen Square massacre, and contemplated the future implications of democratization efforts, considering both internal and external perspectives. 

时间轴: 

02:10 农耕文化能自发产生民主吗? 
04:13 国际社会对中国发展的矛盾心态? 
10:06 文化决定论? 
11:58 对中国民主的期待 
19:13 史蒂芬的发言


【中国往何处去在线课程】第24课: 中国会走向民主吗? Part 224 Jan 202400:23:01

在《中国向何处去:政党、国家与国际秩序》的第二十四次专题课中, 滕彪教授与黎安友教授以“中国会走向民主吗”作为主题结束了这一系列的课程。他们首先简单回顾和总结了前二十三次课的课程。之后邀请杨子立和郑旭光,和其他网友发言。他们探讨了中国走向民主化的路径,并分析了影响这个国家政治转型的各种因素。内容包括中国的威权政体、经济挑战、国内外动态、公民权利运动以及技术的影响。讨论还回顾了中国的历史事件,如天安门广场大屠杀,并考虑了民主化努力的未来影响,涵盖了内部和外部的视角。 

In the 24th session of "Where is China Going: Party, State, and Global Order," Prof. Teng Biao and Prof. Andrew Nathan concluded the series with the theme “Will China Move Towards Democracy?." They began by briefly reviewing and summarizing the previous 23 sessions. Guests Yang Zili and Zheng Xuguang, along with other online participants, were invited to join the discussion. They explored the pathways to democratization in China and analyzed various factors affecting the country's political transformation. Topics included China's authoritarian regime, economic challenges, domestic and international dynamics, citizen rights movements, and the impact of technology. The discussion also revisited historical events in China, such as the Tiananmen Square massacre, and contemplated the future implications of democratization efforts, considering both internal and external perspectives.

时间轴: 

02:05 杨子立的发言
08:16 郑旭光的发言


【中国往何处去在线课程】第21课:中国的外交与国际关系 Part 323 Jan 202400:32:13

《中国向何处去:政党、国家与国际秩序》的第二十一次专题,滕彪教授与黎安友教授邀请赵穗生教授讨论了中国外交与国际关系。赵穗生教授讨论了中国外交决策、习近平的外交政策转型,以及中国与美国的关系。他分析了中国历史上不同领导人的外交风格和战略,特别是习近平时代的变化。他还深入探讨了习近平权力集中对中国外交政策的影响,以及这种集权趋势如何塑造了中国的当前国际地位和关系。此外,黎安友和滕彪还讨论了东升西降,台湾问题和新冷战的准确性以及中国的安全挑战、经济发展与政治安全的平衡。 

赵穗生,丹佛大学国际关系学院终身教授兼美中合作中心主任,哈佛大学费正清中心研究员。 

In the 21st session of "Where is China Going: The Party, State, and Global Order," Professor Teng Biao and Professor Andrew Nathan invited Professor Zhao Suisheng to discuss Chinese diplomacy and international relations. Professor Zhao discussed China's foreign policy decision-making, the transformation of Xi Jinping's foreign policy, and China's relationship with the United States. He analyzed the diplomatic styles and strategies of different Chinese leaders throughout history, with a focus on changes during Xi Jinping's era. Professor Zhao also explored how Xi Jinping's centralization of power has influenced China's foreign policy and shaped its current international status and relations. Additionally, the discussion with Professors Li Anyu and Teng Biao covered topics like the 'Rising East Rising, Declining West narrative, the Taiwan issue, the accuracy of the new Cold War concept, and the balance between China's security challenges, economic development, and political stability. 

Zhao Suisheng is a tenured professor at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, and Director of the Center for China-U.S. Cooperation. He is also a research fellow at Harvard University's Fairbank Center. 

时间轴:

00:10 东升西降靠谱吗?
03:18 台湾问题? 
09:47 新冷战准确吗? 
26:10 中共的强大和脆弱


【中国往何处去在线课程】第21课:中国的外交与国际关系 Part 222 Jan 202400:33:46

《中国向何处去:政党、国家与国际秩序》的第二十一次专题,滕彪教授与黎安友教授邀请赵穗生教授讨论了中国外交与国际关系。赵穗生教授讨论了中国外交决策、习近平的外交政策转型,以及中国与美国的关系。他分析了中国历史上不同领导人的外交风格和战略,特别是习近平时代的变化。他还深入探讨了习近平权力集中对中国外交政策的影响,以及这种集权趋势如何塑造了中国的当前国际地位和关系。此外,黎安友和滕彪还讨论了东升西降,台湾问题和新冷战的准确性以及中国的安全挑战、经济发展与政治安全的平衡。 

赵穗生,丹佛大学国际关系学院终身教授兼美中合作中心主任,哈佛大学费正清中心研究员。 

In the 21st session of "Where is China Going: The Party, State, and Global Order," Professor Teng Biao and Professor Andrew Nathan invited Professor Zhao Suisheng to discuss Chinese diplomacy and international relations. Professor Zhao discussed China's foreign policy decision-making, the transformation of Xi Jinping's foreign policy, and China's relationship with the United States. He analyzed the diplomatic styles and strategies of different Chinese leaders throughout history, with a focus on changes during Xi Jinping's era. Professor Zhao also explored how Xi Jinping's centralization of power has influenced China's foreign policy and shaped its current international status and relations. Additionally, the discussion with Professors Li Anyu and Teng Biao covered topics like the 'Rising East Rising, Declining West narrative, the Taiwan issue, the accuracy of the new Cold War concept, and the balance between China's security challenges, economic development, and political stability. 

Zhao Suisheng is a tenured professor at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, and Director of the Center for China-U.S. Cooperation. He is also a research fellow at Harvard University's Fairbank Center.

时间轴:

00:07 三层外交制定的影响
08:38 外交政策的政治化和官僚机构扩大化
13:24 习将安全置于重中之重
15:47 最后的三个问题
20:54 中共的外交不代表人民的利益


© My Podcast Data · Independent project · Data from Apple & Spotify