Back
Explore every episode of the podcast U.S. Supreme Court 2012 Term Arguments
Dive into the complete episode list for U.S. Supreme Court 2012 Term Arguments. Each episode is cataloged with detailed descriptions, making it easy to find and explore specific topics. Keep track of all episodes from your favorite podcast and never miss a moment of insightful content.
| Title | Pub. Date | Duration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar | 24 Apr 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires the plaintiff to prove their employer would not have taken an action but for the existence of improper motives. | |||
| Metrish v. Lancaster | 24 Apr 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that eliminating the diminished capacity defense retroactively was reasonable. | |||
| United States v. Davila | 15 Apr 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a magistrate judge's improper participation in plea discussions does not warrant vacating a guilty plea. | |||
| Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics | 15 Apr 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that naturally occurring genes cannot be patented, but a creation of a new product in a lab could be patented. | |||
| United States v. Windsor | 27 Mar 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the Fifth Amendment. | |||
| Hollingsworth v. Perry | 26 Mar 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that the proponents of California's same-sex marriage ban (Proposition 8) do not have standing to appeal the decision that made Proposition 8 unconstitutional. | |||
| FTC v. Actavis Inc. | 25 Mar 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that antitrust law applies to reverse payment agreements. | |||
| Oxford Health Plans v. Sutter | 25 Mar 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that an arbitrator did not exceed his power when he interpreted that the parties intended, even if not explicitly, to authorize class-wide arbitration. | |||
| Horne v. Department of Agriculture | 20 Mar 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held the Takings Clause must be evaluated under the capacity in which the Government fines, and the citizens do not need to file a Takings Clause challenge in the Court of Federal Claims. | |||
| Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey | 20 Mar 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act does not override state law regarding transportation of property. | |||
| Sebelius v. Cloer | 19 Mar 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that a person who petitions under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act can recover attorney's fees regardless of if the petition was ultimately successful. | |||
| Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett | 19 Mar 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that federal law preempts state law design-defect claims. | |||
| Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann | 23 Apr 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that Congress’ approval of an interstate water compact does not violate the Commerce Clause and that the compact does respect state lines. | |||
| Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona | 18 Mar 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found the National Voter Registration Act preempted other voter registration requirements. | |||
| Bullock v. BankChampaign | 18 Mar 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that debts arising out of fraud or defalcation in a fiduciary capacity are not dischargeable in bankruptcy proceedings. | |||
| Shelby County v. Holder | 27 Feb 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional. | |||
| American Express Co., et al. v. Italian Colors Restaurant | 27 Feb 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a clause prohibiting class action suits was enforceable even though it would cause costly arbitration. | |||
| Maryland v. King | 26 Feb 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that taking a DNA sample from people who are arrested, but not yet convicted, of a serious crime is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment. | |||
| Peugh v. United States | 26 Feb 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that using the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines at the time of the sentencing for a crime rather than at the time of the offense is a violation of the ex post facto clause. | |||
| Trevino v. Thaler | 25 Feb 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that procedural default will not bar a federal court from hearing a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. | |||
| McQuiggin v. Perkins | 25 Feb 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that proving actual innocence allows a petitioner to pursue habeas corpus relief regardless of a statute of limitations. | |||
| PPL Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue | 20 Feb 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that courts should use a common-sense, substance-based approach instead of a formalistic approach when considering the effect of a foreign tax. | |||
| McBurney v. Young | 20 Feb 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that under the Privileges and Immunities clause and the Dormant Commerce clause, a state can deny access to its public records to citizens of another state. | |||
| Sekhar v. United States | 23 Apr 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that attempting to compel a person to issue a recommendation does not constitute extortion under the Hobbs Act. | |||
| Millbrook v. United States | 19 Feb 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that claims against the United States for the intentional torts of prison officials is not limited to violations made during searches, seizures, or arrests. | |||
| Bowman v. Monsanto | 19 Feb 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that even after its authorized purchase, the reproduction and reuse of a seed violated the patent of the seed. | |||
| City of Arlington v. FCC | 16 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that the courts must apply the Chevron doctrine and defer to an agency's interpretation of its jurisdiction when that jurisdiction is called into question. | |||
| Gunn v. Minton | 16 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that even though federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over patent law cases, state courts can still hear cases related to patent law as long as that it is not the primary issue. | |||
| Koontz v. St. John's River Water Management | 15 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the government may not conditionally approve land-use permits unless the conditions are connected and approximately proportionate to the effects of the proposed land use. | |||
| Levin v. United States | 15 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the Gonzalez Act made an exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act by saying that a claim of the intentional tort of battery may be brought against an armed forces physician. | |||
| Alleyne v. United States | 14 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that a defendant cannot be found guilty of a claim not included in the indictment. | |||
| Boyer v. Louisiana | 14 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether a state's failure to fund counsel for an indigent defendant for five years should be weighed against the state in violation of the right to a speedy trial. | |||
| Maracich v. Spears | 09 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that lawyers may use personal information protected by the Driver's Privacy Protection Act to find potential plaintiffs for a group action. | |||
| Missouri v. McNeely | 09 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment protects against the warrantless taking of a blood sample under exigent circumstances. | |||
| Hillman v. Maretta | 22 Apr 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court found that the Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance Act preempts a Virginia state law regarding beneficiary designation upon divorce. | |||
| Gabelli v. Securities and Exchange Commission | 08 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a five-year statute of limitations period begins at the time the violation is committed. | |||
| Wos v. E.M.A. et al. | 08 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that federal law preempts North Carolina's state law regarding reimbursement of medical expenses from a patient's settlement. | |||
| Descamps v. United States | 07 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that it was improper to apply the categorical approach in which the courts apply elements of a prior conviction with elements of a generic crime in order to enhance a sentence under the ACCA. | |||
| Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Knowles | 07 Jan 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a plaintiff in a class action case cannot stipulate that the potential damages are less than $5 million in order to remove the case from federal jurisdiction. | |||
| Chafin v. Chafin | 05 Dec 2012 | ||
A case in which the Court decided that the return of a child to his or her country of residence pursuant to The Hague Convention, does not make an appeal of that order moot. | |||
| Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center | 04 Dec 2012 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the statute of limitations for filing a claim with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board may be extended up to 3 years. | |||
| Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. | 04 Dec 2012 | ||
A case in which the Court found that transferring polluted water from one portion of a waterway to another portion of the same waterway did not constitute pollution under the Clean Water Act. | |||
| Genesis Healthcare v. Symczyk | 03 Dec 2012 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a collective action suit on behalf of other "similarly situated" employees becomes moot when the individual claim does. | |||
| Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center | 03 Dec 2012 | ||
A case in which the Court found that based on the Clean Water Act, a permit is not necessary for storm water runoff because it is not associated with industrial activity. | |||
| Henderson v. United States | 28 Nov 2012 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the determination of “plain error” is made during the appellate review, not during the trial. | |||
| Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International | 22 Apr 2013 | ||
A case in which the Court held that it was a violation of the First Amendment to withhold funding from non-government organizations if they did not institute an anti-prostitution policy. | |||
| US Airways v. McCutchen | 27 Nov 2012 | ||
A case in which the Court held that when a contract is silent on allocation of relief, the parties' intentions are best determined by the common-fund doctrine. | |||
| Vance v. Ball State University | 26 Nov 2012 | ||
A case in which the Court held that, for purposes of liability for workplace harassment, the definition of "supervisor" is limited to a person empowered to take tangible employment action against the victim. | |||
| FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System | 26 Nov 2012 | ||
A case in which the Court found state-action immunity does not apply if the state's legislature did not clearly articulate intent to allow anticompetitive activity through the Hospital Authorities Act. | |||
| Marx v. General Revenue Corporation | 07 Nov 2012 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure awards costs to the prevailing party unless a statute explicitly states otherwise. | |||
© My Podcast Data · Independent project · Data from Apple & Spotify