The 20th century saw unprecedented change: nuclear weapons, satellites, the rise and fall of communism, third-wave feminism, the internet, postmodernism, game theory, genetic engineering, the Big Bang theory, quantum mechanics, widespread birth control, and more. Now imagine all of it compressed into just 10 years.
That’s the future Will MacAskill — philosopher, founding figure of effective altruism, and now researcher at Forethought Research — argues we need to prepare for in his paper “Preparing for the intelligence explosion.” Not in the distant future, but probably in 3–7 years.
The reason: AI systems are rapidly approaching human-level capability in scientific research and intellectual tasks. Once AI exceeds human abilities in AI research itself, we’ll enter a recursive self-improvement cycle, with AI acting autonomously to create wildly more capable systems.
Soon after, by improving algorithms and manufacturing chips, we’ll deploy millions, then billions, then trillions of superhuman AI scientists working 24/7 without human limitations. These systems will collaborate across disciplines, build on each discovery instantly, and conduct experiments at unprecedented scale and speed — compressing a century of progress into years.
Will compares this to a mediaeval king suddenly needing to upgrade from bows and arrows to nuclear weapons to deal with an ideological threat from a kingdom he’s never heard of, while simultaneously learning he’s descended from monkeys and his god doesn’t exist.
What makes this acceleration perilous is that while technology can speed up almost arbitrarily, human institutions and decision making are much more fixed.
Consider the case of nuclear weapons: in this compressed timeline, there would have been just a three-month gap between the Manhattan Project’s start and the Hiroshima bombing, and the Cuban Missile Crisis would have lasted just over a day.
Robert Kennedy Sr, who helped navigate the actual Cuban Missile Crisis, once said that if they’d had to make decisions faster — like in 24 hours rather than 13 days — they would likely have taken much more aggressive, much riskier actions.
So there’s reason to worry about our capacity to make wise choices quickly. And in his paper, Will lays out 10 “grand challenges” we’ll need to navigate to avoid things going wrong.
Will now believes we’re entering one of the most critical periods for humanity ever — with decisions made in the next few years potentially determining outcomes millions of years into the future.
In this wide-ranging conversation, Will and host Rob Wiblin discuss:
- Why leading AI safety researchers now think there’s dramatically less time before AI is transformative than they’d previously thought
- The three different types of intelligence explosions that occur in order
- Will’s list of resulting grand challenges — including destructive technologies, space governance, concentration of power, and digital rights
- How to prevent ourselves from accidentally “locking in” mediocre futures for all eternity
- Ways AI could radically improve human coordination and decision making
- Why we should aim for truly flourishing futures, not just avoiding extinction
Learn more and read the full transcript on the 80,000 Hours website.
This episode was originally released in March 2025.
Chapters:
- Cold open (00:00:00)
- Who’s Will MacAskill? (00:00:43)
- Why Will now just works on AGI (00:01:03)
- Will was wrong(ish) on AI timelines and hinge of history (00:04:21)
- A century of history crammed into a decade (00:09:19)
- Science goes super fast; our institutions don't keep up (00:16:15)
- Is it good or bad for intellectual progress to 10x? (00:21:44)
- An intelligence explosion is not just plausible but likely (00:23:41)
- Intellectual advances outside technology are similarly important (00:30:04)
- Counterarguments to intelligence explosion (00:32:42)
- The three types of intelligence explosion (software, technological, industrial) (00:39:00)
- The industrial intelligence explosion is the most certain and enduring (00:42:01)
- Is a 100x or 1,000x speedup more likely than 10x? (00:53:44)
- The grand superintelligence challenges (00:57:39)
- Grand challenge #1: Many new destructive technologies (01:01:29)
- Grand challenge #2: Seizure of power by a small group (01:09:10)
- Is global lock-in really plausible? (01:11:06)
- Grand challenge #3: Space governance (01:21:50)
- Is space truly defence-dominant? (01:32:19)
- Grand challenge #4: Morally integrating with digital beings (01:36:04)
- Will we ever know if digital minds are happy? (01:45:01)
- “My worry isn't that we won't know; it's that we won't care” (01:50:39)
- Can we get AGI to solve all these issues as early as possible? (01:54:05)
- Politicians have to learn to use AI advisors (02:07:05)
- Ensuring AI makes us smarter decision-makers (02:11:25)
- How listeners can speed up AI epistemic tools (02:15:11)
- AI could become great at forecasting (02:18:54)
- How not to lock in a bad future (02:20:26)
- AI takeover might happen anyway — should we rush to load in our values? (02:32:14)
- ML researchers are feverishly working to destroy their own power (02:41:57)
- We should aim for more than mere survival (02:45:23)
- By default the future is rubbish (02:57:03)
- No easy utopia (03:05:21)
- What levers matter most to utopia (03:15:19)
- Bottom lines from the modelling (03:29:32)
- People distrust utopianism; should they distrust this? (03:33:34)
- What conditions make eventual eutopia likely? (03:38:26)
- The new Forethought Centre for AI Strategy (03:47:15)
- How does Will resist hopelessness? (04:00:42)
Video editing: Simon Monsour
Audio engineering: Ben Cordell, Milo McGuire, Simon Monsour, and Dominic Armstrong
Camera operator: Jeremy Chevillotte
Transcriptions and web: Katy Moore
