Thirty antitrust agencies report on their computational work, in what remains the only account written by the agencies themselves. This edition asked them one question. What have these tools allowed you to achieve that you could not have achieved otherwise?Three developments stand out against earlier editions. With no legal regime in place, agencies have begun writing their own rules on what may go into a model. They are putting figures on their work, reporting precision, recall and false-positive rates, which earlier editions almost never did. And what holds deployment back is access to data and the agreements needed to obtain it.Recorded at the Autorité de la concurrence, Paris, 17 September 2026. Open access, 121 pages. shorturl.at/wmEaWSpeakers:➝ Thibault Schrepel, Associate Professor of Law at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty Affiliate at Stanford CodeX, Director of Stanford Computational Antitrust➝ Alba Ribera Martínez, Assistant Professor in Law and Technology at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Editor-in-Chief of Stanford Computational Antitrust➝ Elodie Vandenhende, Deputy Head of the Digital Economy Unit, Autorité de la concurrence➝ Yann Guthmann, Head of the Digital Economy Unit, Autorité de la concurrence➝ Teodora Groza, Postdoctoral Researcher, Chair for Law and Artificial Intelligence, University of Tübingen#antitrust #competitionlaw #artificialintelligence