Explore every episode of the podcast Reversing Climate Change
| Title | Pub. Date | Duration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The scariest current parallel from Hitler's Mein Kampf | 27 août 2026 | 00:29:24 | |
CW: this episode discusses genocide People reference the Weimar Republic's transition to Nazi Germany often. But I think they're missing perhaps the most relevant and frightening insight from Adolf Hitler's memoir, Mein Kampf. It isn't just that economic uncertainty produces political radicalism. It's that bad things can happen when a group which has dominated a multiethnic empire for a long time is expected to start sharing more political and cultural power with the groups they once ruled. This Episode's Sponsor Resources | |||
| The way of life can be free and beautiful, but we have lost the way—Hitler, Chaplin, & The Great Dictator on climate | 20 août 2026 | 01:03:30 | |
CW: this episode discusses genocide and suicide. I swear I didn't mean to make this episode. All I intended to do was to read the wonderfully moving speech at the end of Charlie Chaplin's The Great Dictator. But somehow that meant that I had to process so much about World War II, the personality of Adolf Hitler, and why monsters can also be boring and/or extremely goofy. This monologue episode wends its way through the particular moment in history this film was made and why that is significant (as well as what the film got wrong as a result), Hannah Arendt, Mel Brooks, Louis Theroux's manosphere documentary, the banality of evil, why so many huge leaders of countries and companies feel so adolescent, how weird the History Channel was with Hitler content when I was a kid, and so much more. There is still so much that didn't make it in, but I think I'll share some more soon, in particular about what I find to be the most terrifying part of Mein Kampf. To be continued... This Episode's Sponsor Resources | |||
| J. Maarten Troost on Kiribati's atolls, climate change, and what travel writing is for RERELEASE | 13 août 2026 | 01:00:36 | |
This podcast has been running for almost a decade. There are some real gems buried in the catalogue that I am happy to have a chance to rerelease. This is one of those episodes. It has a new intro. I recorded it with J. Maarten Troost in April 2020 and published it as S2E9, "Travel writing a disappearing Oceania". It remains a personal favorite of mine. Maarten wrote four travel memoirs: The Sex Lives of Cannibals (2004), about the two years he spent in Kiribati after his partner got a job at an NGO who operated there; Getting Stoned with Savages (2006), about their move to Fiji and Vanuatu; Lost on Planet China (2008) where Maarten ends up wandering around quite a bit of China; and Headhunters on My Doorstep (2013), a Treasure Island retracing written in recovery. We talk about his time in a huge place that very few have visited to the depths he has, and how the world was changing (or maybe beginning to change) since his time in the region. Travel writing when it's good, acknowledges both difference and universality. It helps us understand Other, and mocks the way that we are in taking our Otherness for granted. Maarten does a wonderful job at both. And he hates the f*@!ing Macarena. This Episode's Sponsor Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change (and get rid of the ads on Spotify) Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack J. Maarten Troost at Penguin Random House J. Maarten Troost at BJ Robbins Literary Agency The Sex Lives of Cannibals: Adrift in the Equatorial Pacific (2004) Getting Stoned with Savages: A Trip Through the Islands of Fiji and Vanuatu (2006) Lost on Planet China: One Man's Attempt to Understand the World's Most Mystifying Nation (2008) Headhunters on My Doorstep: A True Treasure Island Ghost Story (2013) What became of the Kiribati land purchase in Vanua Levu Kiribati's Office of Te Beretitenti on the Fiji land purchase Paul Theroux, The Happy Isles of Oceania: Paddling the Pacific (1992) Christina Thompson, Sea People: The Puzzle of Polynesia (Harper, 2019) David Foster Wallace, "Shipping Out," Harper's, January 1996, later collected as "A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again" John Jeremiah Sullivan, "You Blow My Mind. Hey, Mickey!", The New York Times Magazine, 2011 Jon Ronson, So You've Been Publicly Shamed (Picador, 2015) 407: Charles C. Mann on the wizards & prophets of climate change, the first rerelease 326: Confronting our shadow: Jung, the Vietnam War & climate change, w/ Karl Marlantes, the other author episode Maarten's intro name-checks | |||
| 411: Why I love Poppy Russell of Counteract VC's CDR analysis | 07 août 2026 | 00:52:10 | |
There are some people whom you know you just have to read whatever they write next. For me, one of those people is Poppy Russell. This Episode's Sponsor Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change (and get rid of the ads on Spotify) Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Subscribe to the Climate Workers Anonymous Substack "Toxicity: The Invisible Tsunami" by Deep Science Ventures "Between a Rock and a Hard Cost: The Economics of Enhanced Weathering" "Industry has a central role in CDR's next growth phase" | |||
| 410: remove's new Latin American carbon dioxide removal accelerator program—w/ Hans Westerhof & Marian Krüger | 30 juil. 2026 | 00:56:33 | |
There are many startup accelerators out there. There are fewer focused on climate tech. Fewer still for carbon dioxide removal. Lucky for us, remove runs the absolute heck out of their programs. And it's been a true joy of mine coaching startups in them this past year. I can't even believe it, but the time has come for another program... In Latin America! If you are a Latin American carbon dioxide removal project and/or technology developer, you should apply to remove's LatAm cohort. Applications are out now, and there is a chance we might end up working together. I have had nothing but wonderful experiences with the team at remove. They offer focused training, a powerful network, and an unmatched peer group in your cohort. Hoping to see you there! In today's episode, cofounders and managing directors of remove, Marian Krüger and Hans Westerhof, join the show to talk about the program, what it means to be ecosystem builders, and how they aim to grow capacity in the Global South generally and Latin America in particular. This Episode's Sponsor Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change (and get rid of the ads) Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Subscribe to the Climate Workers Anonymous Substack | |||
| 409: D.W. Pasulka on AI, the religion of UFOs, & the future of being human | 23 juil. 2026 | 01:04:02 | |
When I have questions about how technology will change human life, our experience of it, and fundamentally what we are as conscious entities... my first port of call is likely someone like Dr. D.W. Pasulka. She's labored on some of the biggest questions of the humanities only to find the world racing to catch up with her later on disclosure, on artificial intelligence, and presumably on whatever comes next in this beautiful tale told by an idiot. I've been reading Diana's books for years. I forgot how American Cosmic found its way into my hands, but I loved the restrained religious studies orientation of treating unidentified flying object (UFO)/unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) experiencers seriously, the intersection with Marshall McLuhan and media studies, and the forcing function of non-human intelligence like AI bursting onto the scene whether we were ready for it or not. Her new book, The Others: UFOs, AI, and The Hidden Forces Guiding Human Destiny, will be released on July 28th. Grab yourself a copy and dig into some real mind-bending and fun ideas. Even if you think this stuff is far out, as society increasingly takes supernormal/paranormal activity seriously and embeds artificial intelligence in so many places, books like Diana's are going to be key for understanding what is happening to our humanity, our being, and our experience of being. And yet, somehow I only said "ontology" once in this podcast. I guess that religious studies restraint is rubbing off on me. Long live the new flesh! This Episode's Sponsor Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change (and get rid of the ads) Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Subscribe to the Climate Workers Anonymous Substack The Others: UFOs, AI, and The Hidden Forces Guiding Human Destiny, will be released on July 28th "406: Hyperstition, Dialectic, & Carbon Dioxide Removal" on Reversing Climate Change I have way more links on the Substack article about this episode. Come check it out. | |||
| 408: The impossible taxonomy of carbon dioxide removal | 16 juil. 2026 | 00:12:21 | |
If we created an objectively correct and exhaustive categorization of carbon credits, would it solve everything? Would it solve anything? Listen in as I read an essay I recently wrote about the endless quest to perfectly categorize the world, and while that may be a useful project for some purposes, it isn't anywhere close to the main reasons the world looks the way that it does. Listen in and you'll get surrealist sculpture, Michael Polanyi, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Plato. Who can truly say no to an offer like that? This Episode's Sponsor Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Subscribe to the Climate Workers Anonymous Substack Here's the essay on Substack if you'd like to read along and check out the endnotes. | |||
| 407: Charles C. Mann on the wizards & prophets of climate change | 09 juil. 2026 | 00:58:27 | |
I interviewed Charles C. Mann in 2020 about his book, The Wizard and the Prophet: Two Remarkable Scientists and Their Dueling Visions to Shape Tomorrow's World. This episode is a personal favorite of mine. Somehow, I don't believe I've ever rereleased any old episodes. But there are many great ones buried in the archives. I am going to start bringing more of them out that remain relevant. If you aren't familiar with Charles C. Mann, he's written a bunch of great books including 1491 and 1493, both of which I'd recommend. This Episode's Sponsor Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Subscribe to the Climate Workers Anonymous Substack | |||
| Climate Workers Anonymous, introducing a new podcast + collective art project I am curating | 06 juil. 2026 | 00:22:21 | |
Working in climate is hard. We all have things we wish we could say. What if we could actually say them? If you love the Reversing Climate Change podcast, you should check out the new show I'm working on, Climate Workers Anonymous. It came about as my work has become more emotional in nature. Working with so many founders has led me to see that many business problems are less about GTM motions or product-market fit. They're often about identity, attachment, and shame. Being able to speak openly about those feelings, even if anonymously, can be an enormous relief. Moreover, many people in climate have strong feelings about who they do business with, how their companies are structured and make decisions, and maybe think the entire space has deeply lost its way. Can they say that in public? Sure, but that could have career repercussions beyond what many are able and willing to tolerate. And yet, are those feelings any less true? No. They are not. And thus, Climate Workers Anonymous was born. People fill out a Tally survey with their unattributed takes and send it to me to publish in written form on Substack and as audio in your podcast feed—it's the old Carbon Removal Newsroom feed if you're still subscribed to that. Please go check out Climate Workers Anonymous, give it a great rating and review in your podcast apps, subscribe on Substack, become a paying supporter of the show if you believe in what it's doing, and thanks so much for supporting creative media in climate and carbon dioxide removal! And thank you to the legendary PostSecret, which I suspect all elder millennials reading this will know, for showing us the way. Sincerely, Ross Kenyon Resources Subscribe to the Climate Workers Anonymous Substack Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack An amazing rating and review on the podcast apps does a world of good. Would you please do that for me now? Here’s Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube. Subscribe as well while you're there! If you’d like submit your anonymous hopes, fears, or experiences to Climate Workers Anonymous, you can use this Tally survey or email climateworkersanonymous[at]protonmail.com, though I believe the Tally survey is more secure. Do not communicate anything you wouldn’t want a hacker to have access to, including an email address that could be linked to you if you email the account on Protonmail. | |||
| 406: Hyperstition, Dialectic, & Carbon Dioxide Removal | 02 juil. 2026 | 00:43:44 | |
What happens when you care about climate and also want to explore space? What if you love technology but worry we've deeply misunderstood how to relate to it appropriately? What happens when we take the religious claims of others seriously, even when they aren't seen as legitimate as the major faiths? How can philosophy, literary criticism, film, and media studies help solve some of the biggest questions in climate, and maybe even give us all a little bit of extra solace in a time when we sure could use it? Today's a biggie. We talk about some huge concepts, but don't be scared. They're simple enough. You'll get the hang of it while walking your dog and listening to this and soon you'll be able to wow your friends and family with some fancy new $5 words. In all seriousness though, I think these concepts are genuinely useful, and have helped me make sense of my own feelings, how my brain works, and how to understand what it means as a little person to relate to ideality, materiality, and the Antropocene. This Episode's Sponsor Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Subscribe to the Climate Workers Anonymous Substack Read the full transcript and show notes on Substack (soon!) Oh my goodness. There are so many references in this show. I will come back and add them, but if I could only choose one... | |||
| 405: Does Managed MRV imply the existence of Unmanaged MRV?!—w/ Varsha Ramesh Walsh, Offstream | 25 juin 2026 | 00:48:14 | |
What even is MRV, let alone dMRV?! Or Managed MRV?! Doesn't that imply the existence of Unmanaged MRV? If everything is pretty much digital now, do we still need that pesky 'd' letter?! Are there still dudes with clipboards hanging around? In this episode of Reversing Climate Change, host Ross Kenyon sits down with the cofounder and CEO of Offstream, Varsha Ramesh Walsh, to untangle the complicated web of carbon credit data collection. Offstream has evolved significantly after realizing that carbon project developers don't just want another software tool to manage... they want someone to simply get the job done for them. Varsha introduces us to the concept of "Managed MRV," explaining why handing off the heavy lifting of Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification can sometimes be cheaper and far more effective than trying to handle it all in-house. But this show also gets big. Varsha argues that practically every piece of modern infrastructure has the potential to become a carbon dioxide removal or environmental asset. For that to be true, we would likely enter a world where we are all much more persistently observed and quantified, and with rewards and punishments to match. Is the future of carbon crediting one of surveillance capitalism with the social contracts of data sharing to match? Would that solve more problems than it creates? How are we even meant to live?! Varsha also shares her incredibly disciplined approach to information consumption as a founder, offering a highly focused counter-narrative to being "well-informed". Turns out nothing is truly small when you start to poke at it just a little bit. This Episode's Sponsors Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Subscribe to the Climate Workers Anonymous Substack Read the full transcript and show notes on Substack (soon!) | |||
| And was Jerusalem builded here, Among these dark Satanic Mills?—"Jerusalem" by William Blake | 22 juin 2026 | 00:06:24 | |
In the last Reversing Climate Change podcast episode, Tom Mills and I started talking about "Jerusalem ["And did those feet in ancient time"]" by William Blake (1810), and the 1916 hymn by Sir Hubert Parry that seemingly all Brits know in their souls. I only knew about it due to a childhood obsession with the dvd boxset of Monty Python's Flying Circus, where in the S1E4 episode, "Owl-Stretching Time", Eric Idle sings this song while being seduced. Unfortunately, I cannot find a good link to this sketch... I can't say I ever fully understood what was happening beyond just the earnestness and absurdity of the situation, but somehow Tom helped me unlock it. In any case, this is a very very quick dip into Romantic poetry (industrialism bad, nature good; analysis bad, intuition good; simple good, complex bad), William Blake's prominence in films like Jim Jarmusch's Dead Man and HBO's tv series Westworld by way of his poem, "Auguries of Innocence", and how sometimes a work can actually be this simple and stand the test of time. Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Subscribe to the Climate Workers Anonymous Substack | |||
| 404: When will insetting work for carbon dioxide removal?—w/ Tom Mills, Stripe Climate Fellow (former) | 18 juin 2026 | 00:57:22 | |
Everyone knows about offsetting. But what about insetting? Surely, that's easier. If only we could define it... In this episode of Reversing Climate Change, host Ross Kenyon sits down with Tom Mills to dig into the physical reality of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and its intersection with heavy industry, mining, and global agricultural supply chains. Drawing from his experience working in mining governance across Africa and South Asia, Tom shares how the physical, logistical, and geopolitical challenges of heavy industry perfectly parallel the hurdles facing the scaling of CDR today. The conversation explores Tom's journey into carbon removal while living in India, where he realized how the region's unique geology and agricultural needs make it an ideal landscape for scalable climate solutions like biochar and enhanced rock weathering (ERW). Tom was a Stripe Climate Fellow, where he focused on embedding CDR directly into global agricultural supply chains. Tom breaks down why certain premium commodity value chains—specifically coffee—are leading the charge in adopting these practices due to strict European regulations and high consumer engagement. From there, the conversation tackles the messy realities of corporate carbon accounting, untangling the nuances of "insetting" versus "offsetting," and exploring how project developers can monetize non-carbon benefits like yield optimization, nutritional density, and watershed protection. This Episode's Sponsors Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Subscribe to the Climate Workers Anonymous Substack Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Read the full transcript and show notes on Substack "Jerusalem ["And did those feet in ancient time"]" by William Blake. In fact, the episode art for this episode is from the piece that we discuss. Jerusalem, Plate 1, Frontispiece, 1804 to 1820, Bentley Copy E, © Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection. | |||
| 403: How to get max value from carbon market consultants—w/ David LaGreca, EcoEngineers | 11 juin 2026 | 00:57:58 | |
How do you actually work with a consultant without lighting money on fire? That's the question I've been wanting to tackle for a while, because I've seen both sides of this—companies that get incredible leverage from a good consulting engagement, and companies that spend six figures and walk away with a PDF that's out of date by the time they receive it. David LaGreca is a friend of mine and a managing director at EcoEngineers, which is one of the most active advisory firms in the carbon market and energy transition space. Full disclosure: EcoEngineers is a sponsor of this show, but that's actually part of the story here. David and I keep ending up on the same projects from different angles, and we joke about the "Oh, you're already here?" moment that happens constantly in this tiny industry. We've both watched founders navigate the hire-vs.-contract decision badly enough times that I wanted to sit down and actually map it out. David walks through the real math on when a contractor saves you money versus a full-time hire, and it's not the answer most people assume. He talks about how to evaluate whether a consultant actually knows what they're claiming. We get into when you should fire a consultant, why the personality fit matters almost as much as the technical fit, and why refusing to do a feasibility study on your own project is basically the consulting equivalent of being your own foreman/project manager on Grand Designs. If you've seen that show, you know how that ends. When the mods are asleep by the end, I have to ask David about El Greco, the LaGreca family's alleged history of being Italian smugglers, and whether David is the El Greco of carbon consulting. He accepted the title. I'm not sure he should have. This Episode's Sponsors Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Read the full transcript and show notes on Substack Listen to the RCC episode with Taylor Insley from Terraset on how to sell in carbon removal: which was the model for this episode Listen to the RCC episode with Martin Freimuller from Octavia: David references this episode on playing nicely in a small market | |||
| 402: Reform vs. Revolution from Microsoft to the Salvage Yard—w/ Drew Wilkinson, Climate Leadership Collective | 04 juin 2026 | 01:01:37 | |
What do you do when you spent 20 years fighting climate change from every angle you could find: community organizing, Sea Shepherd, AmeriCorps, corporate sustainability at Microsoft... and you realize the prevention phase might be ending? Do you keep keynoting conferences about employee engagement while the Amazon CSO brags about marginal improvements to delivery vans the same week they platform the Melania documentary? Or do you get a job at a salvage yard, start building your own shipping container house, and shift your energy from prevention to adaptation? My friend Drew Wilkinson chose the second thing. Drew grew up in Phoenix, got into punk rock at 13, never stopped playing in bands, and somehow that trajectory carried him from DIY shows in Arizona to corporate sustainability at Microsoft, where he helped organize employees into one of the most effective internal climate movements a Fortune 500 has ever seen. His work there helped pressure Microsoft into its 2020 sustainability commitments. He knows what it feels like to make a real difference inside the belly of the beast. But this episode isn't really about that success. It's about what comes after. Drew left Microsoft three years ago and started consulting independently through the Climate Leadership Collective, and the financial instability of that choice has been brutal. He's honest about it in a way that most people in this space aren't: he doesn't know where his next paycheck is coming from, some days he's crippled on the couch with grief and anger, and he knows that the spicy contrarian stuff he posts on LinkedIn (AKA the stuff that makes him uniquely valuable) also sabotages his ability to get hired by the companies he's criticizing. We got into reform versus revolution, whether the system can be sufficiently reformed or needs to be tossed out entirely, the Austrian Catholic farmer who refused to swear the oath to Hitler (A Hidden Life, go watch it!), and whether Anthropic refusing to work with the Department of Defense matters when Sam Altman is waiting in line behind them. Drew brought up the GreenBiz conference panel that was literally three hours on "how to do sustainability without saying sustainability." I brought up the Amazon CSO posting about minor improvements to delivery van emissions the same week they gave the Melania documentary a platform. We both felt sick about it. But we escaped that grim discourse when Drew started talking about his shift from prevention to adaptation. He's building a shipping container house on five acres in the forest outside Seattle, sourcing materials from the architectural salvage yard where he now works a couple days a week. Yesterday he moved several thousand pounds of doors. He came home covered in dirt. And for the first time in a long time, he could touch the problem and touch the solution. Three thousand pounds of doors didn't go to a landfill. That felt better than any spreadsheet ever did, and even though he may not have predicted this is where he'd be... isn't that life? Can we not be amazed and grateful for every surprise? This Episode's Sponsors Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change | |||
| 401: Emotional startup lessons from Nori cofounders—w/ Alexsandra Guerra of Calming Chaos | 29 mai 2026 | 01:00:13 | |
What happens when you ask a startup founder how a decision made them feel and their eyes start to water? What happens when you realize the person who drove you the craziest at your company was right about all the things you dismissed as too woo? What happens when you look at the wreckage of a seven-year startup and realize the business model failed but the mission didn't? Today I'm talking with Alexsandra Guerra, "Alé", one of my former cofounders at Nori. Her voice used to be the intro to this very podcast. She's now a coach for purpose-driven founders through her business Calming Chaos, and we're doing something I've wanted to do for a while: an honest, no-bs conversation about what went wrong between us, what we've learned since, and why the emotional stuff that I used to dismiss is actually what's holding back so much innovation in climate and beyond. Alé shared her story in a way I wasn't expecting. The perfectionism, the imposter syndrome, the hero complex that made her volunteer for work she couldn't sustain, the sensitivity to feedback that followed, the burnout that was inevitable. She traced all of it back to childhood—a father who didn't show up, a mother who told her to stop crying, and a lifetime of performing for love that was supposed to just be there. And then she connected it to how she showed up at Nori, and I have to admit: it explained a lot of things I didn't understand at the time. I did my version too. The compulsive reading that everyone compliments but that's actually a way of never having a quiet moment. The diminishing returns of knowledge versus the increasing returns of wisdom. The times I should have listened to my gut and didn't because I couldn't articulate it analytically. We got into patriarchy, the spiritual emptiness of power-seeking, why my most common piece of advice to founders is to go to therapy, and why Alé believes entrepreneurship is fundamentally a spiritual process. I didn't want that to be true when we were running Nori together. I'm pretty sure she was right the whole time. It just took me awhile to open up to it. This Episode's Sponsors EcoEngineers: a carbon dioxide removal and carbon market consultancy Listen to the RCC episode with Lev Gantly about the history and current status of CORSIA Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack | |||
| 400: What kind of leader does my CDR company need me to be?—w/ Julia Reichelstein, Vaulted Deep | 21 mai 2026 | 00:54:03 | |
What do you do when you're a venture capitalist who can't stop talking about carbon removal at every meeting? You quit and start a carbon removal company, obviously. Three days later you meet the person who's been quietly running one of the largest carbon removal operations nobody's ever heard of. And then you build a company that just signed a nearly 5 million ton deal with Microsoft. That's... a lot of tons. Today's guest is Julia Reichelstein, the co-founder and CEO of Vaulted Deep. They take contaminated organic waste—the stuff nobody else wants, the sludgy, PFAS-laden, moisture-intensive material that's going to landfills or getting spread on land—and they pump it thousands of feet underground where it stays forever. They don't compete for nice clean biomass. They take the actual waste, and they get paid to take it. That's a business model I can get behind. I wanted to talk to Julia because her origin story is unusual. She didn't start with a technology and try to commercialize it. She came from venture capital, from international development in Kenya and Ethiopia, from a place of asking "what actually scales?" And when she found deep well disposal through her now co-founder Omar, she recognized immediately that this was both great waste management and great carbon removal—and that the combination was the thing. But this episode went somewhere I didn't expect. We got into intuition and gut decisions, into what it means to lead a company from a spiritual place without losing business rigor, into "front of brain" versus "back of brain" and why Julia's trail runs keep getting longer the more successful Vaulted gets. I brought up the question of whether CEOs who founded their companies can survive the transition to scaling them, and Julia gave one of the best answers I've heard: "What does the company need me to be?" Not "how do I shape the company around my strengths"—the other direction entirely. We also talked about the mechanics of spinning a company out of an existing one, why there aren't many venture-backed spinoffs (and why that should have told her something), and what it actually looks like to go from two trucks a week to fifty trucks a day. This Episode's Sponsors EcoEngineers: a carbon dioxide removal and carbon market consultancy Listen to the RCC episode with Lev Gantly about the history and current status of CORSIA Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack | |||
| 399: How to Pitch Terraset (and other carbon removal buyers)—w/ Taylor Insley, Terraset | 15 mai 2026 | 01:07:07 | |
What do you think of a developer who pitches a carbon dioxide removal buyer as they are coming out of the restroom? Or can't even enjoy some friendly scones while we all get caffeinated? Or interrupt conversations with business cards?! Forgetting that buyers are people with names and feelings and limited social energy is a tough look to beat. At a recent Carbon Unbound in Vancouver, today's guest—Taylor Insley, the Director of Strategic Planning for Terraset—was on a panel that made a splash: she was telling developers, basically, that the way many of them approach buyers is counterproductive. I wanted to talk to Taylor because she sits in an unusual position. She spent most of her career as a fundraiser, soliciting donors for causes she cares about. Now at Terraset, the turntables have turned. She's the recipient of pitches for tax-deductible and highly catalytic CDR and other climate interventions. And that perspective shift has taught her something about what works and what doesn't that I think is genuinely useful for anyone trying to raise money in this space. But this episode also goes somewhere uncomfortable. We talk about fairness. About whether it should matter that you're charming and diplomatic, or whether the science and economics should be all that counts. About status and in-groups and the fundamental hypocrisy of caring about relationships when you're on one side of the table and resenting them when you're on the other. I brought in the Chinese Imperial Exam, The Godfather, Love on the Spectrum, whether dogs are communists or private property lovers depending upon who has food... It was a lot, but I think we successfully got to the core of this topic. Taylor's single best piece of advice: "Tell me how to do my job better." If you understand what Terraset is trying to accomplish and can help them get there, you're gold. If you're running up with a video of your kiln in a pyrolysis cycle... maybe don't? This Episode's Sponsors EcoEngineers: a carbon dioxide removal and carbon market consultancy Listen to the RCC episode with Lev Gantly about the history and current status of CORSIA Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack The opening scene from The Godfather (TW: SA) | |||
| 398: Scientists vs. Engineers, & the Commercial Pressure on Carbon Dioxide Removal—w/ Erica Dorr & Samara Vantil, Rainbow | 07 mai 2026 | 00:55:51 | |
I wrote two pieces for Rainbow earlier this year. The first argued that carbon markets need field engineers, not just scientists. Erica Dorr, Rainbow's head of science, read it and pushed back: the binary was too clean, the caricatures too neat. I wrote a response piece about her work as a scientist applying her knowledge in carbon dioxide removal. Today I brought both subjects of those essays onto the show to hash it out together. What is science and what is engineering? It sounds like a question from your first week of college, but in carbon removal it maps directly onto how registries set requirements, how projects get certified, how you balance rigor with feasibility, and ultimately whether the whole system holds together or collapses under its own weight. Erica and Samara Vantil, one of Rainbow's environmental engineers on the certification team, walked me through how these two disciplines actually interact on a daily basis at a working carbon registry. The conversation went somewhere I didn't expect. The real tension isn't between science and engineering at all. Those two are closer to each other than either is to the commercial side. The actual friction lives between the technical teams (science and engineering alike) and the commercial pressures of needing to ship credits, sign projects, and keep the lights on. And every decision about where to set a requirement, how many samples to demand, whether to accept a conservative discount or reject a project outright, sits right in that tension. We talked about Charm's decision to reduce sampling, about whether quality discourse has become meaningless repetition, about the optimal number of travel deaths being non-zero, and about how you know whether you're cutting scope for the right reasons or because you're about to lose a deal. These are the questions that everyone in carbon markets faces and almost no one talks about publicly. My sincere thanks to Samara and Erica for engaging with this so openly. These are, as Erica put it, the ultimate questions. This Episode's Sponsors EcoEngineers: a carbon dioxide removal and carbon market consultancy Listen to the RCC episode with Lev Gantly about the history and current status of CORSIA Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack "Why carbon markets need field engineers, not just scientists" (Rainbow blog) "What scientists actually do in carbon removal" (Rainbow blog) | |||
| 397: Should Carbon Dioxide Removal Rejoin the Mainstream Carbon Market?—w/ Martin Freimüller of Octavia Carbon | 30 avr. 2026 | 00:52:11 | |
Martin Freimüller is the co-founder and CEO of Octavia Carbon, a direct air capture company in Kenya. He's been listening to this show since 2020 and credits it, generously, with pulling him into carbon removal in the first place. He's also someone who thought I'd taken a wrong turn lately with grim prognostications, and he had an idea he wanted to talk through. His pitch: carbon dioxide removal is the prodigal son, and it's time to come home. We've spent the last few years building CDR as a separate category, defining ourselves against the "legacy" voluntary carbon market, trashing clean cooking credits and REDD+ and Verra and basically everyone who came before us. Martin thinks that was a mistake, and he includes himself in the indictment. He was on stage a year ago telling investors about DAC's explosive growth. Now he's calling clean cooking founders and asking who their buyers are. He shared some numbers that caught my attention: there are roughly 200 corporates that have ever bought carbon removal. There are about 35,000 buying carbon credits more broadly, and about 3 million individuals. Article 6.2 bilateral deals and 6.4-based transactions are quietly channeling tens of millions of tons of demand per year. The broader VCM is growing. CDR is not, at least not in real revenue recognized terms. Martin's argument is that instead of fighting over the tiny pot of dedicated CDR buyers, we should be figuring out how to sell into the market that actually exists and is expanding. I found this conversation genuinely moving. Martin is doing something rare in this industry: admitting in public that he was wrong about how he positioned his company and his sector, and sharing an idea that benefits everyone, not just Octavia. That's leadership, and I told him so. If you're a carbon removal founder who's tired of hearing that bad startups blame their customers, this one's for you. This Episode's Sponsor Listen to the RCC episode with Lev Gantly about the history and current status of CORSIA Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack 391: How Carbon Removal Loses: The End of "Pre-Compliance" | |||
| 396: Why We All Keep Going to Carbon Unbound—w/ Oli Katz, Unbound Summits | 23 avr. 2026 | 00:59:47 | |
Every industry needs a Schelling point. For carbon dioxide removal, it's Carbon Unbound. Unbound Summits' CEO and Founder Oliver Katz joins host Ross Kenyon to chat about building the CDR industry's flagship in-person events, the economics of conference organizing, why the adaptation event series didn't work, the pay-to-play dynamics of industry speaking slots, and whether carbon removal professionals need to take themselves less seriously. Listeners can get themselves 10% off of Carbon Unbound East Coast in New York City on May 19th-20th by using the discount count: "ReversingClimateChange". This Episode's Sponsor Listen to the RCC episode with Lev Gantly about the history and current status of CORSIA Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Listeners can get themselves 10% off of Carbon Unbound East Coast in New York City on May 19th-20th by using the discount count: "ReversingClimateChange". | |||
| Meet with Triumph and Disaster and treat those two impostors just the same: "If—" by Rudyard Kipling | 20 avr. 2026 | 00:07:44 | |
Sometimes you read a poem on a carbon removal podcast and it's goofy. Sometimes you read a poem and people start writing you wanting to share their own favorites... Matt Schmitt, CEO and co-founder of Structure Climate (a company I formally advise), was inspired by the recent Emily Swaddle episode where we spoke about poems that mean a lot to us. He wrote me immediately to read a poem of his own and share what it means to him and his labor in carbon dioxide removal. The poem is "If—" by Rudyard Kipling, from circa 1895. Matt zooms in on two lines that have stayed with him: the bit about meeting with triumph and disaster and treating those two impostors just the same, and the closing image of filling the unforgiving minute with sixty seconds' worth of distance run. Listen in to hear more about why Matt loves that triumph and disaster are both capitalized; why "treat" is the perfect verb—carrying both the everyday sense and the older sense of negotiating a treaty; why the unforgiving minute is unforgiving (it doesn't care whether you think it is sixty seconds or not, the minute is sixty seconds); why the map is always wrong when the map and the ground disagree, and what that has to do with how we navigate physical, social, and spiritual terrain; and why sharing poetry on a carbon removal podcast feels right even when it's hard to articulate exactly how it ties in... As Matt puts it, we often think what we measure is important not because it's important but because we can measure it. And that doesn't always leave a lot of room for the beauty and spirit we need to do the things we can measure. If you have a poem you'd like to read on the show, drop me a line. Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack The Wikipedia article about the poem Vexed to Nightmare by a Rocking Cradle—The 2026 Horror of W.B. Yeats' "The Second Coming" The beautiful uncut hair of graves—Walt Whitman on the Equality of Death The universal cannibalism of the sea vs. one insular Tahiti—My favorite chapter of Moby-Dick | |||
| 395: Bright Spots in US Federal Policy? Carbon removal as essential American infrastructure—w/ Eli Cain, Carbon Removal Alliance | 14 avr. 2026 | 00:35:57 | |
US federal carbon dioxide removal policy is a fragment of its former self. But are rumors of its death greatly exaggerated? (Sorry, Mark Twain.) Eli Cain, Deputy Director of Policy at the Carbon Removal Alliance, comes on the show to give a reality check on US federal policy for carbon removal. Where is the action still happening, and what do we have to look forward to? Despite a political environment that looks grim from the outside, Eli makes the case that real progress is happening:
When enhanced rock weathering can save farmers money, or carbon mineralization can reduce mining waste liabilities, there is a path forward. We also dig into why 45Q survived the reconciliation process, and what it takes to build durable policy in a volatile political moment. "Every single carbon removal company in our membership is deploying in partnership with industrial players." - Eli Cain, Carbon Removal Alliance This Episode's Sponsor Listen to the RCC episode with Lev Gantly about the history and current status of CORSIA Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack | |||
| 394: Will China Stand Up for Climate Policy & Carbon Dioxide Removal?—w/ Sarah Godek | 09 avr. 2026 | 00:53:12 | |
If the US pulls out of climate action, is there room for China or another country to fill the leadership void? Or without the US, does climate multilateralism fall apart entirely? This episode is a direct response to my recent monologue episode, "How Carbon Removal Loses: The End of "Pre-Compliance"", which walked through the political risks to climate and carbon removal policy in a world where the US pulls back. I looked at Canada, the EU, its various member states, and Japan as possible safe havens. One country I left out was China. So I invited Sarah Godek back on as my "sinologist on call" to help set the record straight. Sarah Godek is a returning guest and very knowledgeable about China. Our previous episode—a conversation about realism and liberalism in geopolitics, born out of a piece she co-wrote with Grant Faber on carbon security—is linked in the resources section and is a useful first step before diving into this one. In this episode, Sarah walks me through China's energy security priorities, the difficult role coal plays in Chinese strategy, Tencent's CarbonX Prize, the absence of a clear institutional home for carbon removal inside the Chinese government, and the much harder question of whether climate multilateralism can survive without American leadership. Listen in to hear more about what the "intangible third thing" of world leadership actually is (Sarah argues it's capability — the ability to make other actors stop) and why the war in Iran is a very different status hit for the US than the war in Iraq was; why a peaceful reunification with Taiwan is still the preferred outcome in Beijing, and what that says about the value of legitimacy; how China's environmentalist movement today more closely resembles the US in the 1960s, and how the principle that "green mountains are gold mountains" shapes Chinese carbon removal policy (heavy on sinks and reforestation, light on engineered CDR); what the 15th Five-Year Plan might or might not change; why China frames historical emissions as a Western problem—"if we didn't break it, why must we buy it?"—and what that means for whether China will ever take the mantle on CDR specifically; and Sarah's closing framing... it isn't that the US leaves a gaping hole the world flounders in. It's that the world will continue on without us, and the risk isn't punishment for not being at the table—it's being on the menu. This Episode's Sponsors Listen to the RCC episode with Lev Gantly about the history and current status of CORSIA Rainbow: a developer-centric carbon removal registry "Why carbon markets need field engineers, not just scientists" on Rainbow "What scientists actually do in carbon removal" on rosskenyon.com Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack 338: Carbon Security & the Geopolitics of Carbon Removal—w/ Sarah Godek "Carbon security and the geopolitics of carbon removal" by Sarah Godek & Grant Faber | |||
| Vexed to Nightmare by a Rocking Cradle—The 2026 Horror of W. B. Yeats' "The Second Coming" | 07 avr. 2026 | 00:32:04 | |
I've had a poem stuck in my head, and it isn't one of biophilia and whimsy. It's about liminality, death, and interregna. Let me read for you one of my favorites and one of the all-time classics of English literature, William Butler Yeats's "The Second Coming". While beautiful for its own sake, I'll also make a case for the defense of useless things, an argument for the horror genre as a serious art form, and a close reading of a poem that has become a kind of shared vocabulary for moments when the center will not hold. I work through the imagery line by line, and connect it to everything from Frankenstein and Genesis's exile from Eden, to Tig Notaro's stage presence, to theriantropic madness from The Office's Michael Scott, to H.P. Lovecraft, to Slavoj Žižek on Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds, and more. The trigger wasn't climate policy rollback or the war in Iran, as you might guess—it was actually thinking about artificial general intelligence, and that the falcon that can no longer hear the falconer. Listen in to hear more about why "The Second Coming" reads as present-progressive horror rather than past-tense lament, why "troubles my sight" is a master class in economy of language, what monsters are actually for (the etymology connects to the Spanish mostrar—to show; which I minorly mispronounce in my freestyling—forgive me!), how Hereditary, The Babadook, and Jordan Peele's films use horror to talk about grief, depression, and race, and why this liminal moment between world orders feels so monstrous: not because the new world has arrived, but because the rough beast is only now slouching toward Bethlehem. "The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born. Now is the time of monsters." - Antonio Gramsci Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack "The Second Coming" by William Butler Yeats Paul Muldoon's reading of "The Second Coming" In Praise of the Useless Life: A Monk's Memoir by Paul Quenon (referenced via Thomas Merton) Slouching Towards Bethlehem by Joan Didion Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World by Margaret MacMillan Paris 1919 (album) by John Cale Pervert's Guide to Cinema — Slavoj Žižek on Hitchcock's The Birds Treaty of Trianon (I didn't mention this by name, but I've been thinking a lot about how it shaped/shapes Central Europe.) Id, ego, superego in Freudian psychoanalysis Michael Scott's theriantrope fantasy/nightmare/prophecy from The Office | |||
| 393: Emily's Language Chat: Storytelling, Silliness, & Surviving the Climate Space—w/ Emily Swaddle, The Carbon Removal Show | 02 avr. 2026 | 01:39:37 | |
This is the kind of episode you put on and laugh along with us. This isn't the one where you'll get super quick tech takeaways within 30 minutes that you can drop at your next meeting. It's something else entirely. Emily Swaddle, co-host of The Carbon Removal Show and one of the funniest people in carbon removal, joins Ross for a wide-ranging conversation about life, art, language, climate communications, and the absurdity of having a career in all of the above. A good chunk of the reason The Carbon Removal Show is so fun is because Emily is so fun, and this episode is basically an extended version of her (in)famous segment on TCRS, "Emily's Language Chat". Emily Swaddle is a storyteller, communicator, and co-host of The Carbon Removal Show alongside Ben Weaver-Hincks and Tom Previte. She's been making the show since 2020, producing deeply researched, highly produced seasons that have become a go-to educational resource for the carbon removal community. Emily brings a unique perspective shaped by her background in the arts, her love of language, and her instinct that the climate conversation needs more humanity, more humor, and far less jargon. Listen in to hear more about why Emily thinks silliness and vulnerability are underrated tools in climate communication, and why we even bother doing this climate work when it isn't the glamorous, high-paying energy executive type work. You'll also hear about the Carbon Removal Show Coalition funding model, the tension between monetizing the natural world and actually caring about it, how British class dynamics show up in language and accent, why being a generalist in a specialist world is both a gift and a curse, and what happens when two podcast hosts stop talking about carbon removal policy and start talking about Disney villain queer coding, Mary Poppins, and whether "rabbit tube" should be a phrase. Special thanks to the team at The Carbon Removal Show for loaning us the perfection that is the "Emily's Language Chat" reggae jingle. "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent." - Ludwig Wittgenstein This Episode's Sponsor Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack The Carbon Removal Show podcast The Carbon Removal Show Coalition Why Would You Say Something So Controversial Yet So Brave? Unruly: The Ridiculous History of England's Kings and Queens by David Mitchell Money can be exchanged for goods and services from The Simpsons "The Darmine Doggy Door" from I Think You Should Leave Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World by David Epstein | |||
| 392: What Will Happen to CORSIA & Carbon Dioxide Removal?—w/ Lev Gantly, partner at Philip Lee LLP | 25 mars 2026 | 01:11:34 | |
Right now, the world's climate policy architecture is under siege. The US has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement and UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Right-wing populism is rising across Europe. And Europe itself is torn between defending against geopolitical threats and sustaining the climate policies it has spent years building. What happens to carbon removal in this environment? And what happens to CORSIA—The Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation from within the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)—when a key moment of judgment arrives this June? Lev Gantly is a partner at Philip Lee LLP, a law firm specializing in carbon markets and climate law, and one of Reversing Climate Change's sponsors. He advises a broad range of clients on emissions reduction and carbon dioxide removal projects, both through natural solutions like biochar and engineered technologies. His deep understanding of international carbon markets, Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, and the evolving regulatory landscape makes him a critical voice on where climate policy is actually heading—and where it can actually survive political pressure. Listen in to hear more about how CORSIA works and why it matters (or doesn't matter so much?) for carbon removal. You'll also learn about the specific moment this June when the EU must decide whether to keep the scheme or revert to its original plan to impose its own emissions trading system on international aviation. Plus, where Lev is actually seeing durable policy support for carbon removal right now—and what it takes to make climate policy sticky enough to outlast a change in government. This Episode's Sponsors Rainbow: a developer-centric carbon removal registry "Why carbon markets need field engineers, not just scientists" on Rainbow "What scientists actually do in carbon removal" on rosskenyon.com Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack | |||
| 391: How Carbon Removal Loses: The End of "Pre-Compliance" | 19 mars 2026 | 00:32:42 | |
The foundational assumption of carbon removal has been the "pre-compliance" story—that the voluntary carbon market and early corporate offtakes are necessary but not sufficient, and that we're all waiting for compliance to automate demand. That story depends on Japan, Canada, the EU, and the UK carrying the torch while the US sits on the sidelines heckling. In this monologue episode, I walk through why I no longer think that story holds. Right-wing populism is surging across every country the pre-compliance story depends on. Energy prices are climbing. Growth is stalling. And voters facing rising costs and security threats don't prioritize abstract, probabilistic, future-oriented problems no matter how catastrophic those problems actually are. This isn't a doom episode. It's a planning episode. If you work on anything strategic in carbon removal or climate tech, you need a clear-eyed view of what the world is actually doing—and a plan for what your company looks like if the world doesn't regress to the mean. "If you want to make an omelette, you've got to break a few eggs." - Joseph Stalin "Where's the omelette?" - George Orwell This Episode's Sponsors Rainbow: a developer-centric carbon removal registry "Why carbon markets need field engineers, not just scientists" on Rainbow "What scientists actually do in carbon removal" on rosskenyon.com Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack 338: Carbon Security and the Geopolitics of Carbon Removal—w/ Sarah Godek 364: Lowering the Onion into Hell: Strategic Realism vs. Christian Pacifism Gilets Jaunes (yellow jackets) | |||
| 390: The Endless Pursuit of Alkalinity—w/ Omar Sadoon, Planetary Technologies | 16 mars 2026 | 00:41:34 | |
Is all of carbon removal really just about alkalinity? There's a case to be made for quite a lot of it. Weathering, ocean alkalinity enhancement, even parts of direct air capture—they all come back to manipulating pH and moving basic materials to where they can cancel out excess acid in the atmosphere and ocean. Omar Sadoon is the Director of Strategic Partnerships at Planetary Technologies, an ocean alkalinity enhancement company working to remove carbon by adding carefully-sourced alkaline materials to the ocean. Listen in to hear about the enormous logistical and scientific puzzle of finding the right alkalinity sources, getting them to the right ocean sites without breaking the LCA, and the lessons learned from Planetary's Cornwall and Tufts Cove projects. It's a show about community engagement, the surprising value of relationships in carbon removal sales, humor, and how Omar's background as a mental health nurse shaped his approach to partnership building. This Episode's Sponsors Rainbow: a developer-centric carbon removal registry "Why carbon markets need field engineers, not just scientists" on Rainbow "What scientists actually do in carbon removal" on rosskenyon.com Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack "Planetary Technologies Cancels Its mCDR Project In Cornwall" in Carbon Herald | |||
| 389: How to Grow Regen Ag without Carbon Credits—w/ Emma Fuller, Cofounder of Fractal Agriculture | 05 mars 2026 | 00:51:12 | |
Sometimes when people think they are coming at an issue from first principles, they're already pretty far downstream. What if rethinking an issue means really blowing past the current framework entirely and figuring out how to get the result in an entirely new way? Emma Fuller is the Cofounder of Fractal Agriculture, a firm which takes minority equity stakes in farmland to help farmers switch to more regenerative practices. Listen in to hear more about how to do business in an extremely creative way that blends customer insights and clever design to reduce friction, correct misaligned incentives, and the bypass the pathologies of the old way of doing things. This Episode's Sponsors Rainbow: a developer-centric carbon removal registry "Why carbon markets need field engineers, not just scientists" on Rainbow "What scientists actually do in carbon removal" on rosskenyon.com Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack | |||
| 388: The Quest to Engineer the Best Carbon Removal Credits—One Year of Residual Carbon w/ Ted Christie-Miller | 26 févr. 2026 | 00:42:11 | |
Carbon removal used to have technology developers who were also project developers. But oh, the times they are a-changin'... What happens when grizzled CDR veterans pluck technology off the shelf and focus on developing projects that produce highly insurable, investable, and offtakeable carbon removal credits? You get something like Residual Carbon. Ted Christie-Miller is the cofounder of Residual and is on the show to discuss the lessons he learned from one year as the carbon partner of numerous projects he has under development, as well as his process of raising funds from family offices. This Episode's Sponsors Rainbow: a developer-centric carbon removal registry "Why carbon markets need field engineers, not just scientists" on Rainbow "What scientists actually do in carbon removal" on rosskenyon.com Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack | |||
| The beautiful uncut hair of graves—Walt Whitman on the equality of death | 23 févr. 2026 | 00:09:33 | |
Sometimes we talk carbon removal. Sometimes we talk poetry. Come let me read you one of my favorite Walt Whitman poems from "Song of Myself" in Leaves of Grass. We'll also explore why it's okay to love only some elements of a work of art, and why Whitman's kaleidoscopic view of grass is so remarkable. A child said What is the grass? fetching it to me with full hands; And now it seems to me the beautiful uncut hair of graves. Tenderly will I use you curling grass, This grass is very dark to be from the white heads of old mothers, O I perceive after all so many uttering tongues, I wish I could translate the hints about the dead young men and women, They are alive and well somewhere, All goes onward and outward, nothing collapses, —From Leaves of Grass (David McKay, Publisher, 1891) by Walt Whitman. Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Song of Myself, 6 [A child said, What is the grass?] from Leaves of Grass | |||
| 387: Carbon Efficiency vs. Everything Else—Are We Solving for the Polycrisis or Climate Change? | 19 févr. 2026 | 00:28:02 | |
Are we trying to get parts per million of greenhouse gases down as quickly as possible? Or are also trying to solve the nested problems of fertility, toxicity, and resilience as well as the systems that got us here in the first place? In this episode, I contrast high carbon-efficiency biomass burial approaches (Biomass Carbon Removal and Storage/BiCRS) with biochar and other methods that sacrifice some carbon efficiency but generate wide-ranging cobenefits. We explore commodification, fungibility, and the dream of a “ton is a ton” carbon market—alongside the discomfort some feel when complex ecological realities get flattened into a single tradeable metric. Is that clarity necessary for scale, or does it repeat the same abstractions that helped create the crisis? Ultimately, this isn’t a fight between good and bad actors. It’s a productive friction between two worldviews: the PPM-obsessed technocrats and the polycrisis systems thinkers each have their own blindspots and their own superpowers. My hope is not to settle the debate, but to help you notice where your intuitions land—and why. " we cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we use when we created them." - Albert Einstein " The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house." - Audre Lorde " If a problem cannot be solved, enlarge it." - Dwight D. Eisenhower This Episode's Sponsors Rainbow: a developer-centric carbon removal registry "Why carbon markets need field engineers, not just scientists" on Rainbow "What scientists actually do in carbon removal" on rosskenyon.com Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack "384: Graphyte's Strategy is a Masterpiece of Simplicity—w/ Barclay Rogers & Hannah Murnen" | |||
| 386: Why Do We Labor in Carbon Removal? | 12 févr. 2026 | 00:50:06 | |
Content Warning: this episode discusses suicide in literature, specifically Judas Iscariot from the Gospel and Javert from Les Misérables. Why do this work? You could be doing so many different things. What calls you to it, and what (or who?!) is doing the calling? In today's monologue show, host Ross Kenyon reflects upon the nature of vocation, aesthetics, and what it means to labor at something as hard as carbon dioxide removal, climate tech, and so many things adjacent. After a first attempt years ago at J. R. R. Tolkien's short story, "Leaf by Niggle," Ross listened to a podcast about it that had been sitting on his phone for years. After revisiting the short story, he was again reminded that art often finds you when the time is ripe. "Leaf by Niggle" is a deceptively deep story, which is unsurprising given how strongly Tolkien disliked allegory, and how mythologically dense Lord of the Rings is. In fact, Lord of the Rings has so much symbolic power that many parts of it defy an easy mapping to theology or mythology. This show dives into some of what Ross has learned now that he's in the middle of my career about what kinds of work to do, how to accept unexpected work with grace, and why creativity might be so much weirder than we usually imagine. This Episode's Sponsors Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Rainbow: a developer-centric carbon removal registry "Why carbon markets need field engineers, not just scientists" on Rainbow "What scientists actually do in carbon removal" on rosskenyon.com Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack "Leaf by Niggle" by J. R. R. Tolkien "222: Leaf by Niggle by Tolkien" from the podcast Classical Things You Should Know | |||
| 385: Polycrisis, Collapse, Rebirth: Is Regenerative Economics Inevitable? —w/ Eugene Kirpichov, Work on Climate | 06 févr. 2026 | 00:57:42 | |
Are we going to figure out how to get along on a highly stressed planet? Or are we unable to break the patterns that have gotten us here in the first place? Are we too hard-nosed or too woo? A secret third thing?! Today's show features Eugene Kirpichov, founder of Work on Climate, a very popular climate community built to help people transition into climate work. But the longer Eugene stared at the nested set of problems humanity is facing, it no longer seemed like a simple issue of employment and greenhouse gases. In fact, it's kind of everything. Daniel Schmachtenberger's work on risk and game theory led Eugene to regenerative economics and an attempt to create a world where economic activity gives more than it takes, and where we aren't constantly lurching from one crisis to the next. This Episode's Sponsors Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Rainbow: a developer-centric carbon removal registry "Why carbon markets need field engineers, not just scientists" on Rainbow "What scientists actually do in carbon removal" on rosskenyon.com Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Eugene's LinkedIn post which inspired the show Thinking in Systems: A Primer by Donella Meadows "Peter Thiel and the Antichrist" by Ross Douthat at The New York Times | |||
| 384: Graphyte's Strategy Is a Masterpiece of Simplicity—w/ Barclay Rogers & Hannah Murnen | 29 janv. 2026 | 00:57:37 | |
So many people think they need to dream up wild new tech to be successful at carbon removal. But one of CDR's most ascendent companies is relentlessly simple. They're so linear that I scrambled to make sure I wasn't missing something... In fact, if you've ever received coaching from me about simplicity, this is where I'm sending you from now on. I recently completed Noah Deich and Dr. Jen Wilcox's UPenn continuing education course, CDR Executive Education Program/Purchasing Carbon Removal Credits. It was wonderful and I highly recommend it. It did require a few homework assignments and a group project based upon a project developer. I chose Graphyte and their work putting waste biomass into bricks, wrapping them in polymer, and burying them underground. This is part of the class of projects called BiCRS (pronounced "bikers"), or Biomass Carbon Removal and Storage. Today's show has Dr. Hannah Murnen, Graphyte's CTO, and Barclay Rogers, Graphyte's Co-Founder and CEO, on to correct my homework from the course. I've never had a show quite like this. My sincere respect to each of them for digging into this with me and sharing their numbers. Not everyone in CDR is willing or able to do that, and I'm so happy we got to do that together. This show also inspired me to make an episode about linearity vs. holistic thinking in CDR. If one focuses on carbon efficiency, Graphyte makes so much sense. But are we optimizing only for solving climate change, or is this a polycrisis that requires a much deeper and interconnected approach? What you choose may say just as much about your values and how you perceive the problem. Stay tuned... This Episode's Sponsor Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack "381: Carbon Removal's False Peak as Mapped by Noah Deich" S2E25: The DAC-up plan for climate change—w/ Dr. Jen Wilcox of Worcester Polytechnic Institute" Graphyte's page on its registry, Isometric The 2024 Project Design Document (PDD) for Graphyte's Loblolly project UPenn's Purchasing Carbon Removal Credits course CDR Executive Education Program Carbon efficiency is how much of the carbon remains after the source material has been converted into a form of carbon removal, e.g. Graphyte loses very little carbon back to the atmosphere between waste biomass, processing, and burial. Biochar has a lower carbon efficiency because more carbon is released during pyrolysis. It isn't the only factor that matters, but has major repercussions for calculating net removals and which project types are suitable for which goals. I had to dig to figure out where I got the Nintendo insight from, but it originates from Richard Rumelt's Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters. | |||
| 383: The Biochar Company Owned by a Data Center Company Owned by Private Equity—w/ Alastair Collier, A Healthier Earth | 20 janv. 2026 | 01:02:38 | |
Are we thinking about biochar financial strategy all wrong? It's not often a good fit for venture capital, but is it actually a great fit for private equity? It might be, at least if you can get the ticket size big enough... Today's guest is Alastair Collier, Chief R&D Officer at A Healthier Earth, a biochar project developer that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pure DC, a data center project developer, who is supported by Oaktree Capital Management, a private equity firm (which in my understanding, does several other things beyond private equity.) Alastair explains how A Healthier Earth went down this road, why he's okay with giving up ownership of his company and accepting a management compensation plan rather than looking to a venture-backed exit, and why more biochar project developers should obsess over conventional business metrics rather than why biochar is going to save the world. Whether one wants to chart the same course or not, it's important for all those who work in carbon removal to know what kinds of deals are possible in what may prove to be a challenging 2026. Listen up, as Alastair has a lot of valuable advice to share in this one. This Episode's Sponsor Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack | |||
| 382: Silicates vs. Carbonates: How the 1996 IPCC Report Created Enhanced Rock Weathering Path Dependency—w/ Dr. Tyler Kukla, CarbonPlan | 15 janv. 2026 | 00:59:32 | |
Some decisions we don't expect to have big consequences. And yet, sometimes you wake up thirty years later in a world deeply altered by that little moment. Today's show is about when that happens in science. Dr. Tyler Kukla is a Research Scientist at CarbonPlan, one of carbon removal's preeminent watchdog nonprofits. He returns to the show to explore how a conservative estimation of how much carbon returns to the atmosphere after agliming with carbonate rock (all of it) in the 1996 IPCC report has led us into a commercial carbon removal future that focuses almost entirely on silicate rock. This isn't a story about whether silicates or carbonates are better for enhanced weathering (it really depends upon a number of geographic factors and design decisions around system boundaries and additionality), but about how some good faith placeholders can reify to such an extent that they do so much more than they were ever expected to. This Episode's Sponsor Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack
"Scaling enhanced weathering in limed fields" by Tyler Kukla "Evidence for carbon sequestration by agricultural liming" by Dr. Stephen K. Hamilton, et al | |||
| 381: Carbon Removal's False Peak as mapped by Noah Deich | 09 janv. 2026 | 00:53:55 | |
Life gotten harder recently? You must have just leveled up. We all thought we were doing the very hard work necessary to scale carbon removal, but was this ultimately a false peak? When you climb to what you think is the top of the mountain only to find a lot more mountain lurking behind it? Today's show is with Noah Deich, a carbon removal mover and shaker with his thumbprint on many of the biggest organizations and policies in the world. He recently completed a year in the prestigious Stripe Climate Fellows program, which selected a cohort of some of the sharpest people in CDR to develop new approaches to grow demand for carbon removal. Noah's effort was an attempt to create an Advance Market Commitment structure like Frontier but for governments rather than corporations. You'll hear how that went in this episode... Noah and host Ross Kenyon also laugh about the old days of commercial carbon removal, their mistaken beliefs (and maybe mostly Ross's), and try to chart a course forward for our crucial but incredibly trying work. This Episode's Sponsors Philip Lee LLP: legal resources for carbon removal buyers and suppliers Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Resources Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack "17: Noah Deich and Giana Amador of the Center for Carbon Removal" | |||
| 380: Ezra Klein's Abundance vs. Paul Kingsnorth's Machine—Wizards & Prophets All the Way Down... | 02 janv. 2026 | 00:41:53 | |
The perennial fight returns... In one corner, there are the wizards: optimists who are betting that technology and economic growth can solve our problems faster than it can create them? In the other corner, prophets: who believe we have deeply lost in our way in ignoring limits and that we need to get ourselves back to the garden. How much wizard and how much prophet do you have contained in your own heart? Today's monologue episode has host Ross Kenyon exploring two recent books: Ezra Klein & Derek Thompson's Abundance, and Paul Kingsnorth's Against the Machine: On the Unmaking of Humanity, regarding how they continue the oldest and deepest fight in environmentalism. This Episode's Sponsors Philip Lee LLP: legal resources for carbon removal buyers and suppliers Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Against the Machine: On the Unmaking of Humanity by Paul Kingsnorth Abundance by Ezra Klein & Derek Thompson "S2E53: Paul Kingsnorth on the shared roots of climate crisis, transhumanism, & immortality" "S2E15: Are you a wizard or a prophet?—w/ Charles C. Mann" 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus by Charles C. Mann Joseph Schumpeter & creative destruction National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) "Anyway, Here's Wonderwall" meme The Kinks Are the Village Green Preservation Society What Technology Wants by Kevin Kelly If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies by Eliezer Yudkowsky & Nate Soares A brief interpretation of some of Peter Thiel's Greta Thunberg antichrist comments "The mountains are calling and I must go." - John Muir “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” - Albert Einstein (attributed) "The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house." - Audre Lorde | |||
| The universal cannibalism of the sea vs. one insular Tahiti—My favorite chapter of Moby-Dick | 27 déc. 2025 | 00:08:44 | |
With a matchup like that, who would win? I love this chapter from Moby-Dick. It so perfectly contrasts sublime beauty of the world and the raw horror of life. I was thinking of it often while on my recent sailing trip aboard the Statsraad Lehmkuhl from Seattle to San Francisco. Sit back and let me read the chapter for you, and may it inspire you to crack open some Herman Melville. Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Chapter 58: Brit, from Herman Melville's Moby-Dick; or The Whale "377: One Week Before the Mast—A Climate Sailing Travelogue from Seattle to San Francisco" "ASMR: Your one-hundred year-old Norwegian tall ship is sailing in the middle of the Pacific Ocean" | |||
| 379: Another Side of Sebastian Manhart... | 23 déc. 2025 | 01:00:36 | |
It's that special time of year to put away worldly cares and focus on family, giving, and... carbon removal? Did I read that right? Come hang with Ross and CDR force of nature Sebastian Manhart to discuss family, parenthood, hope for the future, the quest to expand the moral sphere, and why we should be focusing on trendlines and not headlines. Happy Holidays, however you choose to spend it! This Episode's Sponsors Philip Lee LLP: legal resources for carbon removal buyers and suppliers Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Leila Conner's video podcast of Gigaten with Sebastian Manhart Deutscher Verband für negative Emissionen e.V. (DVNE): one of the many trade organizations for CDR Sebastian has been a major part of | |||
| 378: When Bad Companies Buy Good Carbon Removal | 15 déc. 2025 | 00:37:52 | |
Is the voluntary carbon market a club for saints? Or is it a hospital for sinners? Are we meant to understand all and then to forgive all? How much time are we meant to devote to idealistic abstinence-esque policies for change, and how much of our professional lives should go to harm reduction? Today's show deals with some of the biggest questions in carbon removal and carbon markets, and does it in just the kind of literary-philosophical ways that make this shows its own... whatever it is that it is. Trust me and I'll guide you through the history of the Soviet Union and at least one Warsaw Pact country, David Simon, critical theory, German nuclear policy, the Bill Gates piece that ruffled all feathers one way or another, the Enabled Emissions Campaign, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Vasily Grossman, I Heart Huckabees, and Bicycle Thieves. Some days you hit record and you never quite know what you're going to discover... N.B. The image today is Vaclav Havel's greengrocer from "The Power of the Powerless" as illustrated by his Czech compatriot, Josef Lada, who did the original illustrations for Jaroslav Hašek's incredibly funny,The Good Soldier Švejk, who is a sort of antiwar/pacifistic Amelia Bedelia who messes things up in the Army by being a bit too literal and a bit too eager to follow orders. This Episode's Sponsors Absolute Climate: the only standard that’s developed independent of registries Philip Lee LLP: legal resources for carbon removal buyers and suppliers Listen to the RCC episode with Peter Minor from Absolute Climate Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack The Good Soldier Švejk by Jaroslav Hašek The Death of Stalin film "The Power of the Powerless" by Vaclav Havel; it's abridged here but you can click through to the full thing if you'd like "The Clash of Aristocratic and Bourgeois Virtues in 'The Wire'" by Dr. Bart Wilson Holodomor (the Ukrainian Famine) Katyn Massacre (NSFW: death pit image is first thing on Wikipedia) "The Society of the Spectacle" by Guy Debord "Three tough truths about climate" by Bill Gates Germany closing nuclear power plants | |||
| ASMR: Your one-hundred year-old Norwegian tall ship is sailing in the middle of the Pacific Ocean | 12 déc. 2025 | 00:28:44 | |
Gentle wind, sail, and ocean sounds with looped video taken during a trip from Seattle to San Francisco aboard the Statsraad Lehmkuhl for the One Ocean Expedition. | |||
| 377: One Week Before the Mast—A Climate Sailing Travelogue from Seattle to San Francisco | 09 déc. 2025 | 01:03:03 | |
One could fly to the Bay Area in about ninety minutes, but what if it took a week, enormous amounts of teamwork on a 111-year-old Norwegian sailing barque, and caused a near-universal seasickness in thirty-foot seas? Today's show is a monologue about my experience sailing from Seattle to San Francisco on the Statsraad Lehmkuhl for the One Ocean Expedition. I'm an Executive in Residence at Maritime Blue, which sponsored this leg of the trip to raise awareness of the challenges facing the world ocean, its many inhabitants, and ourselves. The show is about many of the practicalities of living and working among one hundred other scientists and sailors, but it's also about so much more. It's about anxiety, proximity to nature, and a reminder that humans aren't always in charge. And that also, sometimes you don't have to do the thing you really don't want to do, and why that might just be okay. This Episode's Sponsors Absolute Climate: the only standard that’s developed independent of registries Philip Lee LLP: legal resources for carbon removal buyers and suppliers Listen to the RCC episode with Peter Minor from Absolute Climate Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change "ASMR: Your one-hundred year-old Norwegian tall ship is sailing in the middle of the Pacific Ocean" "The Beauty and Terror of the World": a Substack post about the Moby-Dick chapter The Essentials Of Living Aboard A Boat: The definitive Guide for Liveaboards by Mark Nicholas "S2E33: Sailing in the age of climate change—w/ John Kretschmer, author and sailor" Zorba the Greek by Nikos Kazantzakis The Annapolis Book of Seamanship by John Rousmaniere University of Washington School of Oceanography | |||
| 376: The Tragedy of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection—w/ Dr. Shuchi Talati of The Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering | 03 déc. 2025 | 01:21:57 | |
Long a pariah climate solution, Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) is having its mainstream moment. As the climate movement ponders the planet's deep overshoot, more conversations about geoengineering, solar radiation management, global cooling, etc. are taking place in the open. Moreover, for-profit entities are raising venture rounds, with Stardust recently announcing a $60M Series A to commercialize their approach to SAI. This moment is feeling genuinely new, and it feels this way to today's guest Dr. Shuchi Talati of The Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering too. While I believe we should do the research and have the governance ready for possible future deployment lest it be done in a much less responsible way (I do not enjoy writing these words one single bit), I am finding it hard to accept its use as anything less than tragedy. Some felt this way about carbon removal, and I have greater sympathy for that feeling now too. The owl of Minerva flies only at dusk... Is SAI an instance of brave humans deploying life-saving technology? Or Promethean hubris for which we should keep our livers guarded? How much should the profit motive influence SAI deployment, if at all? I don't have all of the answers—nor pretend to–but I can point you to the emotional and spiritual core of it that helps me make sense of being a historical actor with agency at this moment in time. This Episode's Sponsors Absolute Climate: the only standard that’s developed independent of registries Philip Lee LLP: legal resources for carbon removal buyers and suppliers Listen to the RCC episode with Peter Minor from Absolute Climate Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change The Alliance for a Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering "I See a Darkness—The Climate Movement Expects Deep Overshoot" Stratospheric aerosol injection on Wikipedia Man's Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl Dwight D. Eisenhower's Chance for Peace speech "There is only one thing I dread: not to be worthy of my sufferings." - Fyodor Dostoyevsky “Let us first ask ourselves what should be understood by “a tragic optimism.” In brief it means that one is, and remains, optimistic in spite of the “tragic triad,” … a triad which consists of … (1) pain; (2) guilt; and (3) death. This … raises the question, How is it possible to say yes to life in spite of all that? How … can life retain its potential meaning in spite of its tragic aspects? After all, “saying yes to life in spite of everything,” …presupposes that life is potentially meaningful under any conditions, even those which are most miserable. And this in turn presupposes the human capacity to creatively turn life’s negative aspects into something positive or constructive. In other words, what matters is to make the best of any given situation. … hence the reason I speak of a tragic optimism … an optimism in the face of tragedy and in view of the human potential which at its best always allows for: (1) turning suffering into a human achievement and accomplishment; (2) deriving from guilt the opportunity to change oneself for the better; and (3) deriving from life’s transitoriness an incentive to take responsible action." - Viktor Frankl in the postscript to Man's Search for Meaning "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed." - Dwight D. Eisenhower in the Chance for Peace speech | |||
| 375: This CDR Marketplace Bought a Biochar Company. Now What?!—w/ Josiah Hunt of Pacific Biochar & Sophie Westover of Wren | 18 nov. 2025 | 01:03:40 | |
Wren recently purchased a majority stake in Pacific Biochar, one of carbon removal's most prolific credit deliverers. What led to this deal, and will this model be emulated in a 2026 that might find carbon removal companies interested in (or maybe desperate for) deals that prolong runway and keep their companies alive? Wren is one of the oldest marketplaces (and so much more) in carbon removal with a record of doing things differently. Sophie Westover is their Head of Climate and is on the show representing their thinking on this deal. Josiah Hunt is the Founder and CEO of Pacific Biochar. He's been making biochar since before most of us knew it was a thing. He shares a lot of realness about the difficulties of being a project developer—even a successful one—in carbon removal. This Episode's Sponsors Absolute Climate: the only standard that’s developed independent of registries Philip Lee LLP: legal resources for carbon removal buyers and suppliers Listen to the RCC episode with Peter Minor from Absolute Climate Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Become a sponsor by emailing carbon.removal.strategies[at]gmail.com Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack "Wren proudly invests in Pacific Biochar to scale carbon removal" In case you want to see Pacific Biochar on the cdr.fyi supplier leaderboard. "313: Can carbon removal be insured?—w/ Racheal Notto & James Kench, Kita" | |||
| 374: Mining with Microbes: Biomimicry in Copper Extraction—w/ Liz Dennett, PhD, CEO & Founder of Endolith | 13 nov. 2025 | 00:51:07 | |
What if microbes could help us mine responsibly? What if astrobiology—the study of life beyond Earth—held clues for how to fix the way we extract resources on Earth? Today’s guest is Liz Dennett, CEO and founder of Endolith, a biotech startup using microbes to boost copper recovery from mining waste. With a PhD in astrobiology, experience at NASA, and a career spanning oil, gas, and data science, Dennett is one of the most fascinating polymaths in climate tech. This episode dives into how microbes mine metals, why copper is civilization’s next constraint, and what it means to clean up an industry everyone loves to hate. Ross and Liz also explore the moral contradictions of “ethical extraction,” the realities of startup life, and how humor—and humility—might be the best renewable resources of all. This Episode's Sponsors Absolute Climate: the only standard that’s developed independent of registries Philip Lee LLP: legal resources for carbon removal buyers and suppliers Listen to the RCC episode with Peter Minor from Absolute Climate Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Become a sponsor by emailing carbon.removal.strategies[at]gmail.com Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Earth in Human Hands: Shaping Our Planet's Future by Dr. David Grinspoon 47: David Grinspoon, Astrobiologist Geology Cage Match: The Sapiezoic vs. the Anthropocene Cobalt Red: How the Blood of the Congo Powers Our Lives by Siddharth Kara The War BelowLithium, Copper, and the Global Battle to Power Our Lives by Ernest Scheyder Deus ex machina - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. | |||
| We are the Dead—Why I Love Armistice Day | 11 nov. 2025 | 00:23:29 | |
World War I profoundly changed the world. Nation-states replaced empires. Russia went communist. Fascism arrived. The West's claim to being the most civilized peoples on Earth was supremely undermined. And out of so much suffering, we received a holiday prioritizing grief and mercy. This bonus episode is me speed-running World War I and sharing some reflections on Armistice Day, Remembrance Day, Veterans Day, or however you might call it. If you carry any of this grief with you personally, I hope you are able to forgive yourself and others. The choices of this world are not always easy, and we make mistakes. This Episode's Sponsors Absolute Climate: the only standard that’s developed independent of registries Philip Lee LLP: legal resources for carbon removal buyers and suppliers Listen to the RCC episode with Peter Minor from Absolute Climate Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Resources "In Flanders Fields" by John McCrae There are a lot of references in this show. Normally I'd link, but for now, maybe just look some of them up if you feel so inclined. | |||
| 373: Crucial Questions We Must Answer about Adapting to Climate Change—w/ Dr. Susannah Fisher, author of Sink or Swim | 05 nov. 2025 | 00:58:57 | |
Adaptation begins at home. But it doesn't end there. What do you plan on doing with your family as climate change gets worse? Are you already making plans whether to stay or go? How should states respond as people flee disaster? Who should get access to fish stocks as they migrate to new regions? Once one starts asking these questions, they really don't stop... Today's guest is Susannah Fisher, author of the new book, Sink or Swim: How the World Needs to Adapt to a Changing Climate. It's a wonderful catalogue of questions that asks and frames so many crucial discussions around people, nature, and politics. Much of the first half of the show is about how it feels to start thinking about adaptation and resilience rather than more optimistic mitigation work, and why adaptation can bring its own solace. We might not need to panic just yet... and I enjoyed getting some emotional centering from Susannah's deep experience in A&R research and policy work. This Episode's Sponsors Absolute Climate: the only standard that’s developed independent of registries Philip Lee LLP: legal resources for carbon removal buyers and suppliers Listen to the RCC episode with Peter Minor from Absolute Climate Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP Become a sponsor by emailing carbon.removal.strategies[at]gmail.com Sign up for the 9Zero climate coworking space with my referral code Resources Become a paid subscriber of Reversing Climate Change Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack Susannah Fisher's Sink or Swim: How the World Needs to Adapt to a Changing Climate There are various services where you can enter your address and view statistical flood and fire risk. Unfortunately since I last used it the one I used to use has been taken down..." | |||