This is the first episode in a new podcast mini-series from me, Mia Birdsong, and
The Nation. More Than Enough is about guaranteed income, deservedness, dignity, and the country America can and should be. We hope youâll subscribe on
Apple Podcasts,
Spotify,
Google Podcasts, or your favorite podcast app. New episodes will premiere each Wednesday. But first, a bit about how this podcast came about.
A few years ago, I found myself in a sun-lit conference room full of policy makers, academics, and social justice advocates talking about what a guaranteed income policy might look like. After more than two decades doing intersectional social justice work, much of it advocating for giving cash directly to people who experience economic injustice, I was excited by the conversation.
This wasnât the first time Iâd heard about guaranteed income. Youâve probably heard about it by now, tooâeveryone from Silicon Valley titans to presidential hopefuls are talking about guaranteed income (also called universal basic income) as a way to deal with increasing automation and runaway inequality. I first heard about the concept in college in the mid-90s through the 1967 writings of Martin Luther King Jr. In the year before King was assassinated, he wrote âthe time has come for us to civilize ourselves by the total, direct and immediate abolition of povertyâ by providing a basic level of material well-being to allow all Americans to truly flourish. To be honest, when I first read that, I thought it sounded ridiculous. Free money went against everything I'd learned about being a respectable citizen. But people change and our ideas evolve. I no longer think guaranteed income is absurd.
When it comes to economic injustice in the United States, we have a well-established practice of talking
people who are poor but not listening to them. We try to solve the problem without talking to the people closest to it. As a result, weâve created a lot of bad policy that treats poor people as a problem to solve instead of the holders of the solutions. (The
problem to solve is wealth hoarding.) Back at that conference a few years ago, I was thrilled about the genuine interest in implementing guaranteed income, with its underlying ethos of self-determination and trusting people to do what is best for them. But I was wary of any movement that didnât include the voices and leadership of the people it was meant to support. So I brought up this critical omission. Instead of being challenged, as I often am, heads were nodding, and I was asked to do something about it. So I did. This podcast is the result.
I reached out to activists, advocates, and service providers across the country to set up workshops with groups of people who are living at the shit end of all our collective money distribution problem. I went to six citiesâfrom Jackson, Mississippi, to Minneapolis, Minnesota, to Los Angeles, California, and heard from more than 100 people. I did a dozen phone interviews with advocates like Ai-Jen Poo of the National Domestic Workers Alliance, Aisha Nyandoro of the Magnolia Motherâs Trust, and Anand Giridharadas, writer of
.
The stories were overwhelmingly powerfulâpartly because of how unnecessarily traumatic and difficult economic injustice has made peopleâs lives, but also because of how innovative, determined, and collaborative people are when it comes to surviving and imagining a better future for themselves, their families, and their communities. When it came to the idea of guaranteed income, what I heard was an overwhelming âyes.â There was a wide range of things people said about the difference it would make in their lives, and none of it was surprising.Â
A woman in Jackson said sheâd go on vacation for the first time in 10 years. That vacation would be driving with her kids two states over to Georgia to visit family her children had never met. A mother from LA said sheâd pay the legal fees necessary to help her parents emigrate to the US. A young man from San Francisco would help his sisters out with diapers and clothes for his nieces and nephews. People talked about paying off debt, going back to school, working less so they could spend more time with their kids, caring for aging parents, saving for a house, buying a car, starting businesses, and taking their family to Disney World. It was all of the regular things people do when they donât have to worry so much about money.Â
As I was having these conversations, I was also talking about guaranteed income to a lot of audiences at conferences and seminars (this is what happens when you become one of, like, four Black people publicly talking about guaranteed income). Most of these audiences were liberal or progressive. And I was struck by the two main concerns that often came up.Â
The first is best summed up as, âBut, how can we pay for it?â Thatâs not really the question people are asking though. We are the wealthiest nation in the world. The question isnât, can we pay for it? But, do we want to? This question is really about who we fundamentally want to be as a nation. Do we want to ensure that everyone has access to the basic human rights that cash can enable? Or do we want to continue to be a country where people are saddled with medical and education debt, working multiple part-time jobs to make ends meet, and living on the street because the rents to damn high?
The second question was, âBut what about X other important super thing (like education or health care)?â And I kept thinking, Why do we think we have to choose? People on the left keep behaving as if we are sitting at someone elseâs table. And we compromise before we even get there. I get it, there are so many pieces that need to come together to get us to the future we actually want and every one will require a fight. But I think we need to demand more, not less. Iâm so pleased to see candidates like Warren, Sanders, and Castro, when he was still in the race advocating for multiple bold policies. We deserve
of it! (Yes, the candidate who is actually talking about guaranteed income, Andrew Yang, is missing from my list. This is because his plan would gut welfare benefits and I think thatâs a non-starter for any genuinely progressive guaranteed income proposal. As youâll hear in the podcast, there are strange bedfellows in the guaranteed income world.)
Guaranteed income isnât a silver bullet (and letâs stop looking for silver bullets, because there are none). But I think it's a policy worth exploring. Perhaps even more importantly, it invites us to have a long overdue conversation about deservedness.Â
Capitalism conspires with racism and sexism to tell us that personhood is earned through paid labor. It tells us that our humanity is conditional. It saw we have to prove ourselves worthy of basic human rights like shelter, food, education, and healthcare. It has us taking pride in working later and not getting enough sleep because demonstrating âproductivityâ is one of its highest virtues. We believe that hard work equals success. We accept the idea that people who arenât successful must not be working hard enough. If they are not working hard enough they are not proving that they are deserving.
It's utter nonsense that people who are poor are not working hardâin the podcast youâll hear from people working multiple jobs, people working exhausting shifts, all just to keep food on the table for themselves and their families . But thatâs not even the point. The point is, we do not have to earn our human rights. A total slacker is just as deserving of a roof over their head, food in their bellies, and access to schools and healthcare.Â
We need a new story of what America is that tells us this: Our worthiness, our value as human beings, is intrinsic to our very existence. Itâs not something we have to earn and not something we can un-earn. We need a story that says success is a collective endeavor, that connection and care are the values we should use to measure our achievements. We need a story that starts with the assertion that there is more than enough for all of us.
Subscribe today on
,
,
, or your favorite podcast app.Â
* * *
