Podcast Notes
This episode looks at why retirement rarely triggers the deepvalues overhaul people expect: research on more than five thousand workers finds that your values stay largely intact after you stop working, but the everyday outlets for expressing them disappear, turning what looks like a“values crisis” into an “expression crisis,” and why leaders with the strongest intrinsic connection to their work often report lower retirement satisfaction; it introduces the Hogan Motives, Values and Preferences Inventory (MVPI) as atool for getting precise about what you value, and walks through four of its ten dimensions that matter most in a retirement transition — Recognition (theneed for visibility, and the risk of feeling invisible once the title and audience are gone), Power (the need for real, not honorary, decision-making authority), Altruism (the drive to contribute, best channeled into generativity like mentoring or building something lasting rather than token volunteering),and Hedonism (the capacity for pleasure and fun, often suppressed after decades of deferred gratification) — before closing with a one-minute exercise: rankingthose four values from most to least true of yourself and checking whether your current retirement plan makes room for the one at the top.
References
Dingemans, E., & Henkens, K. (2014). Involuntaryretirement, bridge employment, and satisfaction with life: A longitudinalinvestigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 575–591.https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1914
Fischer, R. (2017). Personality, values, culture: Anevolutionary approach. Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091944
Hogan, J., & Hogan, R. (1996). Motives, Values,Preferences Inventory (MVPI). PsycTESTS. https://doi.org/10.1037/t03372-000
Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996).Personality measurement and employment decisions. American Psychologist, 51(5),469–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.5.469
Hogan Assessment Systems. (2020). Summary technicalinformation for validity and norm groups: HPI, HDS, and MVPI.https://www.hoganassessments.com
Kim, J. E., & Moen, P. (2002). Retirement transitions,gender, and psychological wellbeing: A life-course, ecological model. Journalof Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B(3), P212–P222.https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.3.P212
Leung, C. S. Y., & Earl, J. K. (2012). Retirementresources inventory: Construction, factor structure and psychometricproperties. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 171–182.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.06.005
Löckenhoff, C. E., Terracciano, A.,& Costa, P. T. (2009). Five-factor model personality traits and theretirement transition: Longitudinal and cross-sectional associations. Psychology and Aging, 24(3), 722–728.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015121
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006).Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: Ameta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1),1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content andstructure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65).Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory ofbasic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
Topa, G., Moriano, J. A., Depolo, M., Alcover, C. M., &Morales, J. F. (2018). Personality and perceived retirement adjustment: Amultilevel meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104, 293–316.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.11.009
