Explorez tous les épisodes du podcast Wheat's On Your Mind
Plongez dans la liste complète des épisodes de Wheat's On Your Mind. Chaque épisode est catalogué accompagné de descriptions détaillées, ce qui facilite la recherche et l'exploration de sujets spécifiques. Suivez tous les épisodes de votre podcast préféré et ne manquez aucun contenu pertinent.
Rows per page:
50
1–50 of 101
Titre
Date
Durée
100 Episodes: Wheat’s Past, Present, and Future
13 Oct 2026
00:16:20
Kansas Wheat: 100 Episodes, Lessons That Last
Kansas wheat has a remarkable history, and 100 episodes of Wheat’s On Your Mind reveal how farmers, researchers, and industry leaders continue to shape its future.
Host Aaron Harries and producer Dave Deken celebrate the podcast's 100th episode by revisiting memorable conversations from four seasons of Kansas wheat storytelling. From the arrival of Turkey Red wheat and breakthroughs in wheat genetics to farm families rebuilding after devastating storms, this episode highlights the history, science, and resilience behind Kansas agriculture. Listeners will also hear how wheat producers are creating new markets for their grain and why international trade remains essential to the state's agricultural economy.
Key takeaways:
Discover how Mennonite settlers, Turkey Red wheat, and changing milling technology influenced Kansas wheat production.
Learn why researchers are working to increase wheat protein without sacrificing grain yield.
Hear how a Kansas farm family survived a devastating tornado and experienced the strength of rural community support.
Explore new opportunities for wheat through value-added products, including spirits produced from farm-grown grain.
Understand why export markets, agricultural policy, and preserving wheat history matter to Kansas producers.
Detailed Timestamped Episode Rundown
This rundown follows the transcript and can be used as a guide for listeners, website chapters, or podcast show notes.
00:00–00:42 — Opening Highlights The episode begins with a collection of memorable clips from past interviews. Listeners hear comments about Kansas wheat exports, a farm family's experience during a devastating tornado, and a Kansas distillery using wheat in its products. The opening establishes the breadth of the podcast's coverage, from global markets to personal stories and agricultural innovation.
00:42–01:27 — Celebrating 100 Episodes Aaron Harries welcomes listeners to the 100th episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind. He introduces Dave Deken, the producer responsible for recording and editing the program, and recognizes his contributions to the podcast. Together, they begin reflecting on reaching 100 episodes and the experiences they have shared along the way.
01:27–02:33 — Four Seasons of Kansas Wheat Conversations Dave explains that the milestone came to his attention while working on improvements to the podcast website. He reflects on the remarkable range of guests interviewed over four seasons, including U.S. senators, scientists studying the wheat genome, breeders, producers, and international agricultural representatives. Aaron explains that the variety of interviews reflects the enormous scope of the wheat industry.
02:33–03:46 — Turkey Red Wheat and the Mennonite Legacy Aaron remembers one of his favorite conversations, an interview with Glenn Ediger about Mennonite settlers and the introduction of Turkey Red wheat. The historical discussion explains how hard winter wheat required changes in milling technology. Traditional millstones used for softer wheat were not ideally suited to processing hard winter wheat. The development of steel roller milling helped make the grain more practical for flour production. Aaron considers this a foundational story for understanding the Kansas wheat industry.
03:46–05:12 — From Wheat History to Modern Biotechnology The conversation moves from agricultural history to modern wheat research. Aaron and Dave discuss how wheat science has advanced, including work taking place at universities and in the private sector. Aaron explains that one of the podcast's important responsibilities is translating highly technical research into information the broader agricultural community can understand.
05:12–06:04 — Improving Wheat Protein Without Sacrificing Yield A previously recorded conversation with wheat researcher Mary Guttieri Ph.D. highlights an important challenge in wheat breeding. She describes her work with emmer-derived wheat materials and explains that her goal is to produce commercially competitive yields while improving grain protein. She discusses previous work with a grain protein concentration gene that increased protein by approximately 0.7 percentage points but resulted in a grain yield reduction of about 3%. The example illustrates why improvements in wheat quality must be evaluated alongside their effects on yield.
06:04–06:46 — A Golden Age of Wheat Research Aaron compares modern wheat genetics to working with the basic building blocks of a Lego set. Researchers are learning how individual genetic components influence the performance and characteristics of wheat. He expresses optimism about the possibilities for future breakthroughs and describes the current period as an exciting time for wheat research. Aaron also encourages listeners to suggest topics and guests for future programs.
06:46–07:35 — Farm Families and Agricultural Traditions Dave highlights the importance of conversations with everyday Kansas wheat producers. Aaron discusses wheat as a family tradition, with farms and agricultural knowledge passing from generation to generation. These interviews preserve the history of family operations and reveal how farming practices, relationships, and lessons change over time.
07:35–09:58 — The Wood Family's Tornado Survival Story The hosts revisit a particularly emotional conversation with Ken and Deb Wood. Their farm near Chapman, Kansas, was devastated by a tornado. Ken recalls trying to reach the farm, navigating blocked roads, and ultimately finding Deb safe. The family describes the shock of seeing the destruction and the assistance they received from emergency responders and neighbors. Aaron and Dave reflect on the strength of rural communities and the willingness of agricultural families to help one another during difficult circumstances.
09:58–11:43 — Beyond Flour: New Uses for Kansas Wheat The conversation turns to industrial and value-added uses for wheat. Aaron and Dave revisit an interview with Hayes Kelman of Boot Hill Distillery in Dodge City, Kansas. Kelman explains that the distillery uses grains grown on the farm to produce its spirits. The discussion includes a vodka made with 100% wheat and a bourbon using 51% corn and 49% wheat. The interview provides an example of how farmers can participate in businesses that transform agricultural commodities into finished products.
11:43–12:12 — Innovation Starts With Farmers Aaron connects the Boot Hill Distillery story to the larger importance of innovation in agriculture. He explains that innovation is not limited to research laboratories or universities. Farmers regularly develop new ideas, products, and approaches that create opportunities for their operations.
12:12–13:06 — Senator Jerry Moran on Agricultural Trade Aaron and Dave discuss the value of bringing policymakers onto the podcast. A previously recorded clip features U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran discussing the importance of global markets to Kansas. Moran describes Kansas as an export-dependent state and explains that wheat, agriculture, manufacturing, and energy all contribute to an economy connected to customers beyond its borders. The conversation reinforces why international market access matters to agricultural producers.
13:06–13:58 — Preserving the History of Kansas Agriculture Aaron explains that the podcast serves an additional purpose beyond providing industry information. It is becoming a historical archive. He recalls interviewing former Grain and Feed Association leader Tom Tunnell and explains how recorded conversations preserve experiences that future generations might otherwise never hear. The podcast provides a way to document personal experiences, industry knowledge, and agricultural history digitally.
13:58–15:08 — Dream Guests for the Next 100 Episodes Dave asks Aaron whom he would most like to interview in future episodes. Aaron mentions historical figures he wishes he could have interviewed, including Norman Borlaug, associated with the Green Revolution, and former U.S. Sen. Bob Dole. He also expresses interest in interviewing farmers who have experienced many decades of wheat harvests. Looking ahead, he hopes to continue featuring influential agricultural leaders and individuals who can help tell wheat's story to broader audiences.
15:08–15:59 — A Searchable Archive of 100 Episodes Dave explains that listeners can find previous episodes through wheatsonyourmind.com. The website allows audiences to search the archive for particular subjects and conversations. The hosts reflect on their partnership and express enthusiasm about continuing the podcast.
15:59–16:20 — Closing and Listener Invitation Aaron thanks Dave for his work and encourages listeners to share the podcast. He invites listeners to suggest future subjects or submit questions for guests by emailing kswheat@kswheat.com. The episode concludes with the podcast's closing music.
A quieter wheat market doesn’t mean the opportunities—or risks—have disappeared.
Mike O’Dea of StoneX joins host Aaron Harries and Kansas Wheat CEO Justin Gilpin to examine where wheat prices could go next. They discuss the correction in Kansas City futures, Black Sea shipping disruptions, global wheat demand, milling-quality supplies and why basis may strengthen before futures make their next major move. O’Dea also explains what improved Southern Plains moisture, potential acreage increases and a developing El Niño could mean for wheat producers.
Key takeaways:
Black Sea shipping remains a major source of uncertainty, even as Russian and Ukrainian wheat continues reaching world markets.
Hard wheat basis could strengthen as farmer selling slows and mill demand increases.
Improved moisture could encourage more wheat planting—but strong corn economics may limit harvested wheat acres.
Global demand and production in Europe, South America, China and India could become increasingly important moving toward spring.
Forward contracts and options can help producers protect opportunities, but Southern Plains production risk remains an important consideration.
Detailed Timestamped Rundown
00:00 – El Niño and the long-range weather outlook Mike O’Dea opens with an optimistic comparison to the late 1990s, when U.S. wheat yields were strong, while noting today’s wheat acreage is considerably smaller. 00:23 – Wheat market outlook Aaron Harries introduces O’Dea and asks where the wheat market stands following continued volatility. 01:12 – Futures correction and Black Sea exports O’Dea explains why the pullback in Kansas City futures did not surprise him. Russian and Ukrainian exports remain central to the global wheat outlook. 02:24 – Global demand and European wheat The conversation shifts to weak demand, European cash values and the possibility that demand strengthens during the winter. 04:00 – Basis, spreads and futures O’Dea argues that basis and spreads may lead the next move in hard wheat before flat futures prices respond. 05:00 – Rain and wheat acreage Major precipitation across Oklahoma, Kansas and Colorado improves the production outlook. O’Dea estimates hard wheat acres could rise about 5%, while soft wheat acreage could increase more. 06:25 – Hard wheat balance sheets Reduced exports and increased spring wheat use make the old-crop hard wheat balance sheet look relatively loose. 07:47 – “Black Sea fatigue” O’Dea describes how markets have become less responsive to repeated Black Sea headlines and discusses speculative fund positions. 09:10 – Could KC wheat see fireworks? Market spreads still leave room for volatility, but O’Dea stresses that futures are often the last piece to move. 09:27 – Farmers largely stop selling O’Dea estimates a large share of the Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas and Colorado crop has already been bought, leaving fewer natural sellers on another rally. 10:26 – Milling-quality wheat supplies The group examines hard red winter wheat, spring wheat and Canadian quality. Kansas produced good-quality wheat, although total bushels were limited. 12:33 – Spring basis opportunities O’Dea explains why tightening farmer ownership and stronger mill demand could support hard wheat basis during the spring. 13:24 – Export opportunities Potential non-Black Sea demand could improve the U.S. export picture, while French wheat is already moving into markets such as Yemen. 14:07 – Middle East and China demand Middle Eastern buying and China’s potential need for blending wheat become important wild cards. 16:03 – South America and El Niño Poorer Brazilian quality, Argentina’s crop and the developing El Niño pattern could alter global trade and production. 17:50 – Why 1997–99 matters O’Dea points to strong historical U.S. yields during those years as an encouraging weather comparison. 18:03 – Kansas planting and moisture Gilpin discusses slow planting, strong seed demand and replenished soil moisture following recent rains. 19:23 – Producers captured the rally O’Dea says farmers did a good job taking advantage of higher July wheat pricing opportunities. 19:36 – Input costs and wheat versus corn Higher diesel and other costs reinforce the need to evaluate total return per acre. Better moisture could also encourage some producers to switch intended wheat acres to corn. 20:07 – Forward pricing in the Southern Plains The discussion turns to production risk and why dryland Southern Plains growers are often hesitant to forward contract too much production. 20:55 – Options and risk management O’Dea discusses puts, calls and other strategies that can offer price protection without committing too much uncertain production. 21:38 – Regional differences in farmer selling Soft wheat, spring wheat and soft white wheat growers behave differently because of storage, cropping systems and local basis. 22:20 – Watch commercial buying O’Dea identifies commercial positions as an important indicator. A shift toward commercial buying can provide an early clue that the market is changing. 23:00 – Closing thoughts Harries and Gilpin thank O’Dea and close the episode.
After a brutal wheat harvest and another difficult year for farm economics, why keep planting wheat? For northwest Kansas farmer Mike McClellan, part of the answer is simple: wheat still has a job to do.
McClellan farms in Rooks and Graham counties and serves on the Kansas Wheat Commission and U.S. Wheat Associates boards. He joins Aaron Harries to discuss how his operation has changed since he returned to the farm in 1994, when roughly 80% of its crop acres were wheat, compared with about 20% today.
The conversation also looks beyond McClellan Farms. Mike explains what he has learned about international wheat markets, why export development matters to Kansas producers, how wheat quality affects customers and why passing a farm to the next generation can be especially difficult during years when the economics simply don't work.
Key takeaways:
McClellan Farms has shifted from roughly 80% wheat acres in 1994 to about 20% in recent years as rotations have diversified.
Wheat remains important for crop rotation and residue, even when it isn't the most profitable crop on its own.
The 2026 crop fell far enough below expectations that McClellan had to buy out some forward contracts.
Serving with U.S. Wheat Associates changed McClellan's view of the value of developing long-term relationships with overseas wheat customers.
Farm succession becomes harder when several difficult years make it challenging to bring the next generation into an ownership position.
Detailed Timestamped Rundown
00:00–01:20 — Meet Mike McClellan Aaron introduces Plainville farmer and Kansas Wheat Commissioner Mike McClellan. The cold open recalls McClellan’s memorable introduction to the Commission: a contentious meeting over Innovation Center construction costs followed by a groundbreaking at his second meeting. 01:20–03:03 — A family tradition of agricultural leadership McClellan discusses his father Bob’s involvement with the Kansas Wheat Commission and conservation organizations. Mike later followed him onto the Rooks County Conservation Board. 03:03–04:19 — His mother and the Wheat Hearts The family’s wheat connection included Mike’s mother, Jo Eva, and her involvement with the Kansas Wheat Hearts. Mike recalls her bread baking — particularly a memorable cheese bread recipe. 04:19–05:25 — More than a century on the land McClellan discusses the family farm’s history, including property dating to around 1906 and his grandfather’s work as a stonemason. 05:25–06:16 — A wheat harvest worth forgetting The conversation moves to farming in Rooks and Graham counties and the difficult 2026 harvest. McClellan says he contracted what he thought would be roughly one-third of expected production but ultimately had to buy out some contracts. 06:16–07:24 — From 80% wheat to 20% When McClellan returned in 1994, he estimates approximately 80% of the operation’s crop acres were wheat. Today it is around 20%, with corn, milo and soybeans incorporated into the rotation. Summer fallow has largely disappeared from the operation. 07:24–08:44 — Why experiment with spring wheat? McClellan explains that spring wheat offered another way to work wheat stubble into the rotation ahead of fall crops. Although he doesn't necessarily consider spring wheat profitable by itself, its rotational value matters. He has also found markets that sometimes paid a premium over winter wheat. 08:44–10:07 — Joining the Kansas Wheat Commission McClellan explains why community involvement and his father’s example eventually led him to the Commission in 2011. 10:07–12:07 — Betting on the Kansas Wheat Innovation Center McClellan recalls joining the board just as construction costs for the Innovation Center became a contentious issue. By his second meeting, he was holding a shovel at the groundbreaking. 12:07–14:01 — Why wheat export promotion matters One of McClellan’s biggest changes in perspective involved international marketing. Initially skeptical of the money directed toward U.S. Wheat Associates, he came to see overseas market development as an important investment for Kansas producers. 14:01–16:23 — Learning from the global wheat industry His U.S. Wheat Associates involvement introduced McClellan to farmers producing different wheat classes and to customers around the world. He explains that overseas customers value U.S. wheat quality, although price remains central to purchasing decisions. 16:23–17:48 — Wheat doesn't stop at the elevator McClellan says many farmers don't spend much time thinking about where their grain ultimately goes. The conversation turns to connecting production decisions with end-user quality requirements. 17:48–18:31 — Growing quality, not just choosing it McClellan points to K-State's Wheat Rx work as helping producers understand that quality isn't determined by variety alone; crop management matters, too. 18:31–19:14 — When the farm numbers don't work McClellan describes the pressure created when average yields, production costs and available forward-contract prices don't show a profit. 19:14–21:09 — The difficult mathematics of farm succession Approaching 65, McClellan is considering his own transition. His nephew Cade handles much of the production work, and Mike wants to help him acquire ownership. Several difficult farming years, however, have made building that equity position harder. 21:09–21:59 — Remembering the 2026 crop McClellan reflects on what his father might have thought of the season, including weak wheat stands and severe weed problems where the crop failed to develop enough canopy. 21:59–22:41 — Staying the course Despite the difficult year, McClellan expects his wheat acreage to increase somewhat because of rotation needs. Wheat stubble is needed again on ground that has been planted to fall crops for several years. 22:41–23:07 — Closing Aaron wraps the conversation and provides contact information for Wheat’s On Your Mind.
Getting more wheat from limited water may depend less on finding one breakthrough and more on improving the entire farming system.
Australian farming systems agronomist John Kirkegaard Ph.D. joins K-State wheat and forage Extension specialist Romulo Lollato Ph.D. to discuss what Kansas and Australian wheat producers can learn from each other. They explore farmer-led research, water-use efficiency, fallow management, strategic tillage, crop rotations and the new Profitable Wheat Frontier Network being developed to test ideas with Kansas growers under real-world field conditions.
Key takeaways:
Australian research shows how soil improvement, rotations, fallow weed control and crop management can work together to improve water-use efficiency.
Strategic tillage and deep soil amelioration have produced substantial yield responses on certain problematic Australian soils while remaining part of predominantly no-till systems.
Better summer fallow management helped Australian growers store roughly 2 additional inches of soil moisture and plant about three weeks earlier.
Involving growers and crop consultants from the beginning can accelerate research adoption because producers help identify the problems and test practical solutions.
K-State’s Profitable Wheat Frontier Network aims to use on-farm research, precision agriculture and producer knowledge to identify ways Kansas farmers can increase wheat yield and profit.
Detailed Timestamped Rundown
00:00–02:09 — Introduction and guests Aaron Harries introduces John Kirkegaard Ph.D., an Australian farming systems agronomist and Fulbright Distinguished Chair visiting K-State, and Romulo Lollato Ph.D., K-State wheat and forage Extension specialist. 02:09–03:52 — Why an Australian wheat scientist came to Kansas Kirkegaard explains the similarities between Australian wheat country and the Great Plains, particularly variable weather and production risk, and describes the international collaboration that brought him to Kansas. 03:52–06:48 — Lollato’s Australian sabbatical Lollato explains his nearly five-month stay in Australia and how the collaboration grew from relationships developed through the international Wheat Initiative. 06:48–12:13 — Australian Wheat 101 Kirkegaard explains Australia’s wheat calendar, hard white spring wheat production, export orientation, rainfall limitations, rotations, large farm sizes, no-till production and the importance of measuring yield relative to rainfall. 12:14–17:32 — Putting growers inside the research process Lollato identifies one of his biggest Australian takeaways: growers and consultants help define research problems and develop solutions from the beginning rather than simply receiving recommendations afterward. 17:32–20:28 — Australia’s Extension alternative Kirkegaard describes the shift from government Extension toward private agricultural consultants. He estimates 70% to 80% of Australian grain farmers now work with an adviser of some kind. 20:28–25:28 — Strategic tillage challenges no-till assumptions The discussion turns to deep soil amelioration. Researchers, engineers and growers developed specialized approaches for restrictive sandy soils. Kirkegaard says yield increases of roughly 30% to 40% can make treatments economically attractive when benefits persist five to six years. 25:28–27:05 — Could similar opportunities exist in Kansas? Lollato discusses Kansas soil constraints and the search for interventions that could improve water capture and crop productivity. 27:05–31:48 — The Australian water-efficiency experiment Kirkegaard describes a major grower-led initiative designed to increase water-use efficiency by 10% in five years. Instead of focusing solely on the wheat plant, participants investigated soil, rotations, fallow and crop management. 30:17–31:48 — Two more inches of stored water Strong summer weed control and residue management helped growers enter the growing season with about 40 millimeters — roughly 2 inches — of additional stored moisture. Planting subsequently shifted about three weeks earlier, and Kirkegaard says the investment in strict summer weed control paid 15-to-1 in that project. 31:48–32:23 — “Incremental transformation” Lollato and Kirkegaard explain how small improvements can compound: conserve water first, adjust planting, select an appropriate cultivar, then adjust fertility to support greater yield potential. 32:23–36:23 — Why farmer-led research gets adopted Kirkegaard describes grower groups, research funding, crop simulation modeling and the importance of farmers testing their own ideas rather than simply receiving recommendations. 36:23–40:47 — Kansas’ Profitable Wheat Frontier Network Lollato introduces plans to work directly with Kansas growers using commercial equipment, soil and leaf samples, yield maps, satellite imagery, drones and other precision-agriculture tools. The goal is greater yield, resource efficiency and profit. 40:47–44:01 — An Australian’s view of Kansas weather Kirkegaard reflects on Kansas humidity and extraordinary temperature variability, along with drought and freeze damage observed during the 2026 crop. 44:01–45:27 — What Australia can learn from Kansas Kirkegaard praises the Wheat Quality Tour and Kansas’ integration of producers, researchers, millers, buyers, food companies and other parts of the wheat value chain. 45:27–46:18 — A season built for studying extremes Lollato notes that Kirkegaard came to study climate extremes and encountered drought, freeze, hail and flooding. Harries recalls Manhattan moving from about 10°F to 98°F in six days. 46:18–47:13 — Closing The guests reflect on continued Kansas-Australia collaboration, and Harries directs listeners to Wheat’s On Your Mind and Kansas Wheat.
Bread remains a cornerstone of the American food system, but declining consumption and changing consumer attitudes could have consequences all the way back to the wheat farm.
Josh Sosland, president of Sosland Publishing Company and editor of Milling & Baking News, joins Aaron Harries and Justin Gilpin to examine what more than a century of milling and baking history says about today’s wheat-demand challenge. They discuss declining bread consumption, consumer misinformation, GLP-1 medications, the MAHA movement, the unsuccessful Bread Basket Checkoff effort and why Sosland believes science alone won't be enough to change consumer behavior. The conversation also explores whether Kansas wheat promotion should put greater emphasis on domestic demand alongside traditional export-market development.
Key takeaways:
Declining bread consumption isn't new, but recent trends have made the challenge more concerning.
Research can counter misinformation about grain foods, but changing consumer behavior also requires emotional connection.
Meaningful consumer promotion requires resources on a much larger scale than many current efforts.
Domestic wheat demand has traditionally been viewed as static, while grower promotion concentrated heavily on export growth.
Changing global competition and more specialized domestic markets could create new opportunities for Kansas wheat producers.
Detailed Timestamped Rundown
00:00 — Why bread consumption matters
Josh Sosland opens with the central problem: concerns about Americans not eating enough bread aren't new, but consumption numbers over the past four or five years have become particularly concerning. History also suggests ordinary industry initiatives may not be enough to reverse the trend. 00:40 — Introducing Josh Sosland
Aaron introduces Sosland as president of Sosland Publishing Company and editor of Milling & Baking News. 01:08 — A century of milling and baking journalism
Sosland recounts how his grandfather and two brothers founded Southwestern Miller. The publication emerged as commercial baking expanded and Southwestern millers sought recognition for the bread-making quality of Kansas and Southern Plains wheat. 03:43 — Hard red winter wheat's rise
The discussion connects the publication's origins with the growth of hard red winter wheat production and its transition from primarily household flour toward commercial bread flour. 04:15 — The Great Grain Robbery
Justin introduces one of the remarkable stories in Sosland history: the company's reporting on massive Soviet grain purchases in the early 1970s. 05:06 — Secret Soviet purchases and inflation
Sosland explains how Soviet buyers quietly purchased enormous amounts of U.S. wheat and corn without initially revealing the full scale of their activity. The resulting market disruption became intertwined with the inflationary pressures of the era. 07:09 — “John Smith” and an industry scoop
Sosland tells the story of a mysterious caller identifying himself as John Smith and providing Morton Sosland with Soviet grain-purchase figures that eventually proved accurate. 08:19 — Sosland Publishing today
The conversation covers the company's portfolio, including World Grain, Bake, Baking & Snack, Pet Food Processing, Milling & Baking News and Food Business News. 09:06 — Print versus digital publishing
Sosland explains why print remains important to part of the industry's readership while digital consumption continues growing. 09:48 — Bread consumption's century-old problem
Drawing from decades of archival work, Sosland says concerns about inadequate bread consumption appear repeatedly throughout industry history. 10:59 — Why today's numbers are different
Recent consumption trends are especially concerning. Sosland's lesson from history is that “business as usual” is unlikely to create the scale of change needed. 11:33 — What happened to the Bread Basket Checkoff?
The discussion examines the proposed wheat-flour-foods checkoff. Sosland describes concerns over government involvement, assessment structures and disagreement within the baking sector. 14:03 — What wheat lost without the checkoff
Justin discusses the potential value of having substantial, coordinated resources for consumer communication—particularly as grain foods face new headwinds. 15:32 — Different boats, same rough water
Sosland examines the different approaches taken by grower and baking organizations and argues that organizational separation hasn't eliminated the fundamental challenges facing grain foods. 16:16 — GLP-1 medications enter the equation
Sosland says he initially thought the effects of GLP-1 medications on food consumption might be overstated. He now believes their influence can't be ignored, although he doesn't rank them as the industry's biggest challenge. 17:44 — Winning minds versus winning hearts
This is the episode's central strategic discussion. Sosland credits the Grain Foods Foundation and Grain Foods Research Institute with doing important work to counter myths, but says the industry has a much bigger gap in creating emotional connections with consumers. 18:37 — Why facts aren't enough
Sosland uses an insight from the investment world to illustrate how people make decisions emotionally as well as logically. Correcting misinformation may therefore be necessary without being sufficient. 21:17 — The scale of investment required
A $100,000 initiative may be meaningful for an association, Sosland says, but the larger challenge requires millions of dollars when companies are losing billions in market share. 22:33 — What successful promotion looks like
The conversation turns to commodity promotion and checkoff examples, including industries where coordinated resources and messaging have helped increase consumption. 23:34 — Grapefruit as a warning
Sosland offers grapefruit as a cautionary example of a food once considered a household staple whose consumption dramatically declined. His point: staples can't assume consumers will always be there. 24:05 — MAHA and ultra-processed foods
The hosts address the MAHA movement and criticism of ultra-processed foods. Sosland discusses the power of emotionally compelling food messages and their potential to alter consumer behavior. 25:44 — Consumers still love wheat foods
Despite negative perceptions surrounding bread, Sosland points to pizza, Uncrustables and quality baguettes as examples of wheat-based products that continue to resonate strongly with consumers. 26:40 — Should growers rethink promotion spending?
Sosland turns the interview around and asks whether grower organizations have the right balance between international promotion and domestic-market investment. 26:59 — Why wheat invested overseas
Justin explains that U.S. domestic wheat use has traditionally been considered “static demand.” Export promotion therefore offered an apparent opportunity to add incremental demand and value at the farm gate. 28:00 — New opportunities in domestic wheat
Changing export competition and increasingly specialized domestic relationships may give farmers opportunities to create value through particular varieties, management practices and end-use characteristics. 30:36 — The wheat marketplace has changed
Sosland argues that strategies developed decades ago reflected a very different competitive environment. U.S. wheat now faces additional global competitors while competing domestically with other commodities and foods. 31:28 — Why Kansas invested in exports
Justin traces the Kansas Wheat Commission's history to 1957 and explains how postwar reconstruction and government-dominated international grain buying shaped producer investment in overseas market development. 32:43 — Closing thoughts
The episode concludes with the recognition that wheat is in a period of transition and that producer leaders are actively discussing how promotion and market development should evolve.
The 2026 wheat season showed just how quickly a promising crop can become a test of every management decision a producer makes.
Host Aaron Harries sits down with K-State wheat and forages specialist Romulo Lollato Ph.D., CSIRO farming systems agronomist John Kirkegaard Ph.D. and Dave Deken for a roundtable on the 2026 Kansas and Oklahoma wheat crop. They trace the season from strong fall establishment through drought, unusual heat, freeze damage, hail and harvest rain, then look at the management lessons producers can carry into the next crop. The conversation covers rainfall timing, planting date, grazing, variety selection, wheat genetics, nitrogen management and the value of building more flexibility into wheat systems.
Key takeaways:
Warm fall conditions built strong stands but also contributed to greater water use before spring.
In a water-limited wheat crop, a small amount of rain at the right growth stage can have an outsized impact on yield potential.
Early planting and dual-purpose wheat can create additional grazing and management options when grain production becomes less attractive.
Modern wheat genetics helped damaged plants compensate through secondary tillers and maintain usable grain quality.
Nitrogen, variety and other input decisions should reflect changing yield potential instead of assuming the crop established in fall is the crop that will reach harvest.
Detailed timestamped rundown
00:00 – Cold open — Lollato, Kirkegaard and Deken preview the episode’s central question: what management choices still work when weather pushes a wheat crop to its limits? 00:26 – The 2026 wheat roundtable begins — Aaron Harries introduces the guests and frames the season as an unusually widespread disaster for hard red winter wheat across the Central and Southern Plains. 03:03 – Kansas starts with “hope and despair” — Lollato describes excellent fall establishment, favorable moisture and warm temperatures that created large, well-tillered plants heading into winter. 04:32 – Warm weather becomes a liability — Winter turns dry while temperatures remain above normal. Wheat continues growing and consuming water that will be badly needed later in the spring. 06:00 – Drought and freeze damage stack up — March and April bring dry conditions, rapid crop development and damaging freezes. Later hail adds another layer of yield loss. 08:00 – Rain finally arrives—at harvest — May rainfall comes too late to rescue much of the crop, and subsequent wet conditions prolong harvest in parts of Kansas. 09:22 – Oklahoma’s highly variable crop — Deken describes enormous field-to-field and county-to-county variation, with some producers choosing to keep cattle grazing poor-looking wheat. 11:29 – Heat, low yields and an early harvest — Oklahoma experiences February heat, disappointing yields in several regions and a harvest roughly two weeks ahead of normal. 13:03 – An Australian view of Kansas wheat — Kirkegaard recounts seeing drought and freeze damage firsthand during the Wheat Quality Tour and compares Great Plains conditions with Australian production. 16:25 – Livestock as an “exit option” — Australia’s wheat-sheep systems illustrate how grazing, hay and dual-purpose wheat can create alternatives when grain yield potential deteriorates. 17:35 – Managing risk without the same insurance system — Kirkegaard explains how Australian growers rely more heavily on management flexibility, stored moisture, early sowing and alternative crop uses. 20:08 – Moisture, planting date and variety — Deken shares an Oklahoma perspective that moisture is the first limitation, followed by planting date and then variety selection. 21:24 – Breeding for system resilience — Kirkegaard discusses wheat designed around flexibility: long coleoptiles for deep planting, awnless wheat suited for hay and vigorous short-season wheat. 23:09 – Modern genetics show their value — Harries and Lollato discuss plants recovering from primary-tiller freeze damage and the remarkable ability of wheat to compensate. 23:58 – What could two inches of rain do? — Lollato explains how strategically timed rainfall can dramatically raise yield potential in a water-limited environment. 25:15 – Turning a bad year into better decisions — Research plots allow scientists to study which management practices performed best under the same stresses producers experienced. 26:00 – Smarter nitrogen decisions — Lollato describes research using current conditions and historical weather outcomes to estimate yield potential before major nitrogen investments are made. 27:35 – One more weather threat: tornadoes — The group adds some humor to a season that seemingly delivered every possible weather hazard. 29:02 – El Niño and global weather risk — The discussion shifts to seasonal forecasting, Australia’s El Niño and Indian Ocean Dipole signals, and how forecasts can affect fertilizer purchasing and crop decisions. 32:19 – Are Oklahoma growers coming back? — Deken says most producers he spoke with planned to plant wheat again despite the difficult crop. 33:49 – Why wheat remains in Kansas rotations — Lollato explains wheat’s value beyond grain, including residue, soil-moisture conservation, weed management, rotational diversity and grazing flexibility. 35:29 – Closing thoughts — The panel finishes its post-mortem on 2026 and looks ahead to another wheat season.
America's story cannot be told without agriculture—and few people understand that story better than historian and author Douglas Hurt.
As the United States approaches its 250th anniversary, Hurt joins Aaron Harries to explore how farming helped build the nation. From colonial wheat production and westward expansion to the Homestead Act, land-grant universities, the Dust Bowl, conservation programs, global trade, and today's farm economy, the conversation connects history directly to the challenges facing modern producers.
Key takeaways
Why agriculture drove American economic growth and expansion
How railroads transformed wheat into a global commodity
The lasting impact of the Homestead and Morrill Acts
How Turkey Red wheat changed Kansas agriculture
Why the Dust Bowl permanently reshaped conservation policy
Lessons from the 1970s boom and 1980s farm crisis
Agriculture's role during the Civil War and other conflicts
Why global markets still create opportunities and risks
The importance of research, Extension, and land-grant universities
What history suggests about the future of American farming
Timestamped Episode Rundown
00:00 – Introduction and Douglas Hurt's perspective on the lasting impact of the Dust Bowl and conservation. 00:42 – Douglas Hurt's background, Kansas roots, and career studying agricultural history. 02:52 – Why agriculture is central to understanding American history. 04:10 – Farmer independence and the growing federal role in agriculture. 06:57 – Early history of wheat in colonial America. 08:20 – The Homestead Act and settlement of the Great Plains. 10:30 – The Morrill Act and the creation of land-grant universities. 11:51 – Transition from subsistence farming to commercial agriculture. 13:59 – Turkey Red wheat and its impact on Kansas. 15:21 – Railroads, exports, and the rise of global grain markets. 16:56 – The Dust Bowl, conservation, and the Soil Conservation Service. 21:08 – The Soviet grain deals, Earl Butz, and the 1980s farm crisis. 23:29 – Agriculture's role during the Civil War and wartime economies. 28:05 – Lessons for today's policymakers and producers. 29:58 – Looking ahead: the future of American agriculture. 32:14 – Douglas Hurt's latest books and closing thoughts.
A smaller hard red winter wheat crop will test whether last year’s export buyers were chasing price or choosing lasting value.
Brian Liedl, vice president of overseas operations for U.S. Wheat Associates, joins Aaron Harries and Justin Gilpin to explain how strong 2025/26 wheat exports changed the outlook for Mexico, Nigeria, Indonesia, and other important markets. They discuss why U.S. wheat quality, technical support and customer relationships matter even more in a higher-priced year, along with what tighter HRW supplies, Russian competition and growing global demand could mean for Kansas farmers.
Key takeaways:
Customer retention will be a major priority as U.S. wheat prices rise.
Mexico remains the leading destination for U.S. wheat and a vital HRW market.
Nigeria and Indonesia offer growth opportunities when U.S. wheat can demonstrate better milling and baking value.
Technical support helps overseas millers look beyond the lowest-priced wheat.
Strong global consumption provides reasons for long-term optimism despite intense export competition.
Detailed timestamped rundown:
00:00 – International market-development strategy
Brian Liedl describes his goal of visiting U.S. Wheat Associates offices, meeting overseas staff and reviewing how producer resources are deployed. 00:31 – Introduction to the episode
Aaron Harries introduces Wheat’s On Your Mind, the show’s sponsoring organizations and Liedl’s new leadership role. 01:46 – From the trading pit to U.S. Wheat Associates
Liedl recalls beginning at the Minneapolis Grain Exchange before moving into hedging, wheat merchandising, logistics and international grain trading. 03:12 – A strong year for U.S. wheat exports
The group discusses the combination of a large, high-quality U.S. crop, competitive prices and decades of overseas market development. 04:44 – Why buyers value U.S. wheat
Liedl explains how quality, technical service, baking assistance and dependable customer relationships strengthen the reputation of U.S. wheat. 05:39 – Moving from commercial trading to market development
Justin Gilpin and Liedl discuss the difference between selling wheat commercially and representing the interests of wheat producers. 07:39 – Coordinating U.S. Wheat’s overseas network
Liedl talks about traveling to international offices, meeting staff and aligning market-development strategies. 08:48 – Mexico, USMCA and Nigeria
The conversation turns to Mexico’s importance as a core U.S. wheat customer and Nigeria’s potential as a growing, quality-conscious swing market. 11:39 – Opportunities in Southeast Asia
Liedl discusses Indonesia, the Philippines and other Asian destinations where technical support has helped U.S. wheat establish a valuable niche. 13:20 – Moving the buyer conversation beyond price
Relationships matter, but price remains central. Liedl explains how U.S. Wheat helps customers evaluate margins, product quality and consumer loyalty. 15:20 – The long-term global wheat demand story
Despite major production growth in Russia and other exporting countries, global consumption has remained strong enough to absorb additional supplies. 18:33 – Selling value during a smaller HRW crop
Liedl outlines the milling, protein, moisture and baking characteristics that support the value proposition for Kansas and Southern Plains wheat. 20:18 – Retaining customers and testing new blends
The group discusses customer retention in Mexico, Venezuela, Nigeria, Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa, including possible HRW-HRS blending strategies. 22:25 – Russian wheat competition and higher costs
Liedl explains why Russia will remain a major competitor but may be less willing to aggressively lower prices as production and energy costs increase. 24:07 – Farmer profitability as the guiding goal
The episode closes with Liedl discussing his remaining overseas office visits and emphasizing that producer profitability must remain the industry’s “north star.” 25:20 – Closing and subscription reminder
Federal farm programs are changing, and Kansas wheat producers need to know what those changes could mean at the county office, in the crop insurance conversation and on the farm.
In this episode, Aaron Harries talks with Richard Fordyce, USDA Under Secretary for Farm Production and Conservation, and David Schemm, Kansas FSA State Executive Director, about USDA reorganization, FSA modernization and the push to make farm program delivery faster and less paper-heavy. They discuss One Farmer, One File, modernized acreage reporting, coordination between FSA, NRCS and RMA, trade opportunities, input costs and the current mood across farm country.
Key takeaways:
USDA’s Farm Production and Conservation reorganization is aimed at reducing bottlenecks and improving service delivery, while Fordyce says county and state FSA office operations should continue serving producers.
One Farmer, One File could eventually connect FSA, NRCS, RMA and crop insurance information in a more useful way for producers and staff.
Acreage reporting may move from paper maps and manual entry toward interactive maps, phone-based reporting and, eventually, precision ag data imports.
Crop insurance remains a key risk-management tool, with RMA focused on improving products and looking for better options in underserved crop areas.
Despite tight margins, high inputs and market stress, the guests point to trade, domestic fertilizer production and farm program improvements as reasons for cautious optimism.
Timestamped rundown
00:00–01:54 — Opening clips introduce the themes of USDA reorganization, reducing bottlenecks and improving service from the federal level down to county offices. 01:54–05:18 — Richard Fordyce shares his background as a Missouri farmer, former Missouri Director of Agriculture and former FSA Administrator, including how his family farm continues operating while he serves in a Senate-confirmed role. 05:18–10:21 — Fordyce explains how farm experience shapes government leadership, especially when balancing congressional intent, USDA leadership, stakeholder input and farmer-first decision making. David Schemm adds that Fordyce brings the “heart of a farmer” to the role. 10:21–11:32 — The discussion turns to why farm background matters when explaining programs to producers and making discretionary decisions. 11:32–13:20 — Schemm discusses the workload and producer impact tied to new farm program changes, including base acre allocation and implementation work by FSA staff. 13:20–15:15 — Fordyce addresses USDA reorganization and restructuring, saying the goal is to reduce bottlenecks, improve response time and keep service closer to farmers. 15:15–16:40 — Schemm introduces technology modernization by comparing old and new tractors, arguing that FSA needs 21st-century tools to serve 21st-century producers. 16:40–22:10 — Fordyce gives a detailed explanation of One Farmer, One File, including form consolidation, IT modernization, shared data access, data security, interactive mapping and future precision ag integration. 22:10–23:03 — Schemm says FSA is finally getting “auto steer on our tractor,” emphasizing the excitement among employees and the importance of county-office-level understanding. 23:03–25:57 — Fordyce explains how better coordination between FSA, NRCS and RMA could help serve farmers more efficiently, while also highlighting RMA’s work on crop insurance products. 25:57–27:38 — Schemm discusses the current mood in farm country: tough economics, high inputs and market pressure, but also optimism tied to trade and better times ahead. 27:38–29:46 — Fordyce closes with thoughts on farm budgets, domestic nitrogen production, trade deals and keeping agriculture on the table in international negotiations. 29:46–30:28 — Aaron closes by directing listeners to Farmers.gov and thanking Fordyce and Schemm for joining the show.
Kansas wheat farmers are facing a mixed harvest, fragile margins, and fertilizer markets that are finally easing but still hard to pencil.
Aaron Harries and Justin Gilpin are joined by Mike O’Dea and Josh Linville of StoneX for a wide-ranging market discussion on Kansas harvest progress, hard red winter wheat quality, export competitiveness, fertilizer prices, and crop-input security. They cover what low yields and variable protein may mean for basis, why U.S. wheat is finding new export opportunity, and how producers can think through nitrogen purchases with so much uncertainty still in the market.
Key takeaways:
Kansas harvest started early, stalled with rain and humidity, and is showing wide differences in yield and protein.
Hard red winter wheat has become more competitive in some export channels, including Mexico.
Lower urea prices are helpful, but weak grain prices still make fertilizer decisions difficult.
Buying fertilizer in layers may help spread risk in a confusing market.
U.S. food security depends heavily on imported crop inputs, especially nitrogen, phosphate, and potash.
Timestamped rundown
00:00 — Opening clips
Mike O’Dea previews wheat export competitiveness, while Josh Linville frames the fertilizer market: prices are down, but grain prices are still painful. 00:24 — Episode introduction
Aaron Harries introduces the StoneX roundtable with Mike O’Dea, Josh Linville, and Kansas Wheat CEO Justin Gilpin. 00:42 — An unusual Kansas harvest
The group discusses an early harvest start, test cutting before Memorial Day, delays from rain and humidity, and combines beginning to roll statewide. 01:54 — Field reports on yield and quality
O’Dea shares early Kansas harvest observations, including low protein in parts of central and southern Kansas, stronger numbers farther west, and wide yield variation. 03:00 — USDA numbers and crop size expectations
The conversation turns to harvested acres, USDA yield adjustments, and the possibility of a hard red winter wheat crop around the 490-million- to 500-million-bushel range. 04:14 — Wheat spreads and production history
The group discusses Kansas City-Chicago relationships and compares the current hard red winter wheat situation with previous drought-impacted years. 05:41 — Export competitiveness returns
O’Dea explains how lower Kansas City futures have made U.S. wheat more competitive in some channels, including Mexico, while Black Sea and French values remain key comparisons. 06:33 — Nigeria and global buyers
Gilpin notes recent conversations with a Nigerian trade group and how quickly U.S. wheat competitiveness has changed in just a few weeks. 07:33 — Europe, Russia, and global wheat quality
O’Dea outlines possible quality concerns in southern Russia, heat risk in Western Europe, and the importance of milling versus feed wheat spreads later in the year. 08:18 — Minneapolis wheat contract changes
The discussion shifts to spring wheat, Minneapolis contract changes, and how those changes could affect futures, basis, and spreads. 09:38 — Spring wheat tour outlook
The Wheat Quality Council spring wheat tour is highlighted as a useful event to watch, especially with attention on spring wheat quality. 10:30 — Urea prices fall sharply
Linville explains that NOLA urea has dropped hard from recent highs, but weak grain prices still make the fertilizer-to-grain ratio difficult for producers. 12:23 — Nitrogen demand destruction
Linville says global nitrogen demand likely has been trimmed by a few percentage points, which can still represent a major tonnage shift worldwide. 13:37 — Fertilizer buying advice
The key advice: keep communicating with suppliers, follow both fertilizer and grain prices, and consider buying fertilizer in layers. 15:11 — Crop inputs and food security
The group discusses how U.S. food security depends on imported fertilizer and why that reality is drawing more attention from policymakers. 16:49 — Nitrogen, phosphate, and potash strategy
Linville argues for more domestic nitrogen production, stronger long-term phosphate relationships with allies, and maintaining strong potash trade with Canada. 20:23 — Final wheat market outlook
O’Dea says wheat futures may stay rangebound without a new production or quality problem, but he believes short-term lows may be in. 21:31 — Closing
The episode wraps with thanks to StoneX and a reminder to subscribe and share the podcast.
A farmer-owned wheat, milling, and bakery project in Goodland could change how Kansas wheat reaches the grocery shelf.
In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, Aaron Harries talks with Brian Linin and Alan Townsend, co-founders of Golden Waves Grain, about their plan to receive wheat directly from farmer-owners, mill it into flour, and bake it into bread in one integrated facility. They explain how the model could create new value for wheat producers, strengthen rural jobs, improve traceability, and deliver fresher bread through a different grocery distribution system.
Top 10 takeaways
Golden Waves Grain wants to close the gap between wheat farmers and bread consumers. The project would receive wheat, mill flour, and bake bread in one Goodland facility.
The model is farmer-owned in part. Producer shares include a delivery commitment, giving farmers both an investment role and a grain-supply role.
The facility only needs a portion of local wheat production. The guests say the project would use about 2 million bushels a year, while Sherman County produces far more than that.
The payoff for farmers is both ownership and premium opportunity. Producer investors would receive above-local-market premiums tied to their delivery commitments.
Distribution is central to the business case. The project aims to reduce costs by delivering bread through a warehouse distribution model rather than the traditional bread-truck system.
Freshness is part of the product story. Lennon emphasizes using fresh wheat and fresh flour rather than grain and flour that have been stored for long periods.
The bread process matters. The team is focused on sponge-and-dough baking, a slower method they believe can improve flavor, texture, and eating quality.
Traceability could help farmers tell their story. Consumers may be able to connect the bread back to the farmer-owners who grew the wheat.
The project could be a major rural economic driver. Lennon says the plant is projected to create 141 jobs in the Goodland area.
Golden Waves Grain could create new wheat-quality feedback loops. Townsend says the plant may help identify wheat varieties and production practices that perform best in milling and baking.
Detailed timestamped rundown
00:00–01:52 — Opening and guest introductions
Aaron Harries introduces Brian Linin and Alan Townsend of Golden Waves Grain, a Goodland-based project built around growing wheat, milling it, and baking it into bread in one place. 01:52–04:08 — The Golden Waves Grain elevator pitch
Brian explains the plan: farmer-owners deliver wheat, the facility mills it into flour, and the flour is immediately baked into bread and buns. He outlines the scale, including two bread lines and distribution through Associated Wholesale Grocers. 04:08–06:49 — How the idea started
Alan traces the concept back to 2020 and his experience with 21st Century Bean Processing, a farmer-delivery, value-added model that inspired the wheat project. He also explains how partners including Tony Adams, Dave Owen, Brian Linin, and others came together. 06:49–11:07 — Farmer ownership and capital structure
Brian describes the producer-share model, delivery commitments, wheat premiums, strategic investors, equity raise, bank financing, projected construction cost, and hoped-for timeline to begin baking bread by January 2028. 11:07–13:34 — Why the distribution model matters
Alan explains how the project is designed around reducing costs in the supply chain, especially by moving bread through warehouse distribution instead of the traditional bread-truck model. 13:34–14:52 — Why no one has done this before
Alan says one of the hardest parts is organizing producers around a new value-added wheat model. He compares the future potential of Golden Waves Grain to how the bean company evolved over time. 14:52–18:18 — Product quality and fresh bread
Brian explains why the team believes the bread itself will stand out: fresh wheat, fresh flour, sponge-and-dough fermentation, and a focus on eating experience rather than simply shaving pennies from production cost. 18:18–20:02 — Whole wheat, mids, and byproducts
Alan and Brian discuss mill byproducts and how adding more whole wheat flour into bread formulas could keep more of the wheat kernel in food products rather than sending it out as feed. 20:02–21:16 — Traceability and farmer identity
Alan describes the consumer-facing story: farmers are proud of what they grow, and this project could make them the face behind the bread. 21:16–23:40 — Rural community impact and water realities
Brian and Alan talk about Goodland, job creation, the loss of past rural industries, the Ogallala Aquifer, dryland wheat, and why value-added wheat matters for the long-term future of western Kansas. 23:40–25:44 — Jobs and workforce model
Brian says the project is projected to create 141 jobs and explains the planned shift structure, with 12-hour shifts that could help attract workers from a broader region. 25:44–27:45 — What success looks like
Brian defines success as a profitable, efficient plant that is a reliable bread supplier and a top workplace. Alan adds that success includes making farmers more sophisticated about wheat varieties, baking quality, and production practices. 27:45–28:45 — Kansas support and local companies
The guests discuss support from the state of Kansas and the use of Kansas-based or regional companies involved in construction, milling, flour handling, and bakery systems. 28:45–30:36 — How to learn more
Brian directs interested farmers and investors to Golden Waves Grain’s website, and Aaron closes the episode.
Wheat is being pulled into bigger national conversations about dietary guidelines, school meals and ultra-processed foods.
In this episode, Aaron Harries talks with Erin Ball, executive director of the Grain Foods Foundation, and Leah Johnston, director of nutrition strategies and communications with Wildhive Strategic Communications. They explain how the grain foods industry is responding to changing nutrition guidance, why wheat’s fiber and nutrient contributions matter, and how farmers can help tell a clearer story about wheat’s role in healthy, practical diets.
Key takeaways:
Wheat contributes fiber, plant protein, B vitamins, folic acid, magnesium and other nutrients that are often overlooked.
Grain foods advocates are watching how new dietary guidance could affect school meals, food costs and student acceptance.
The ultra-processed food debate is complicated, and Ball says the science is still unsettled.
Johnston argues the wheat message should focus on nutrition, real meals and consumer relevance—not defensiveness.
Farmers can help by explaining that wheat is a plant-based food that supports better diet quality.
00:00–01:10 — Aaron Harries opens the episode and introduces guests Erin Ball of the Grain Foods Foundation and Leah Johnston of Wildhive Strategic Communications.
01:10–03:44 — Erin explains the Grain Foods Foundation’s mission, its origins during the Atkins-era carbohydrate backlash, and its shift toward investing in nutrition science and consumer communications.
03:44–05:21 — Leah gives the elevator pitch for wheat nutrition, calling wheat an overlooked nutritional powerhouse because of fiber, plant protein, vitamins, minerals and enrichment benefits.
05:21–09:30 — Erin discusses the new dietary guidance and “inverted food pyramid” concern, including research being developed to model nutrition and cost impacts.
09:30–12:22 — Leah explains the communications challenge: rather than arguing with a federal visual, grain foods advocates need to reframe the conversation around real meals, practical benefits and consumer choices.
12:22–16:52 — Erin describes school meal concerns, including cost, cafeteria equipment limitations, student acceptance and the risk of overly limiting grain servings.
16:52–18:19 — Justin Gilpin thanks Erin and Leah, praises the Grain Foods Foundation’s work and raises the issue of ultra-processed foods.
18:19–22:42 — Erin digs into the UPF debate, saying the science is unsettled, definitions remain difficult and the conversation should return to nutrients of concern such as added sugar, sodium and saturated fat.
22:42–24:36 — Leah adds that processing level alone does not tell the full nutrition story and points to research looking at nutrient-dense “healthy grains,” including both whole and refined grain foods.
24:37–28:43 — Erin offers advice for wheat farmers: start with the basics, explain that wheat is a plant, lean into wheat’s plant-based protein story and show how grain foods help people eat more balanced meals.
28:43–29:31 — Aaron closes the episode and directs listeners to subscribe and find past episodes at Wheat’s On Your Mind.
Kansas wheat producers have several farm program changes to keep on their radar, from higher wheat reference prices to 2026 ARC/PLC elections, new base acre opportunities and disaster relief payments.
In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, Aaron Harries talks with David Schemm, state executive director for the USDA Farm Service Agency in Kansas, about how USDA is implementing recent farm program changes and what Kansas producers should watch next. Schemm explains why the updated wheat reference price matters, how 2025 ARC/PLC payments differ from the 2026 election process and why landowners should watch their mail for base acre notices. He also covers Farmer Bridge Assistance, Supplemental Disaster Relief Program payments, farmers.gov tools and how Kansas FSA is thinking about staffing and service in a time of low commodity prices and high input costs.
A key message for producers: stay connected with your county FSA office, make sure landowners are aware of base acre communications and get familiar with farmers.gov for faster access to records, forms and program information.
Key takeaways:
The 2025 ARC/PLC process is different from 2026, when producers will need to make an annual election.
New base acre opportunities are tied to the land, so landowners and tenant farmers need to communicate.
Subsequent crop situations may require a decision about which crop receives updated base acres.
Disaster relief and bridge assistance programs are moving quickly, so producers should check with their county FSA office.
Farmers.gov and login.gov can help producers access records, acreage reports and other USDA tools online.
Timestamped Rundown
00:00 — Opening clip from David Schemm about tight timelines for producers reviewing base acres. 00:12 — Aaron Harries introduces the episode and identifies Schemm as state executive director for USDA Farm Service Agency in Kansas. 00:57 — The conversation opens with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and what it means for Kansas farmers. 01:16 — Schemm explains the importance of the updated statutory reference price, especially for ARC and PLC payments. 02:23 — Schemm reflects on past farm bill testimony and his long-running push for a higher wheat reference price. 03:07 — Aaron notes the new $6.35 wheat reference price and connects it to high input costs. 03:44 — Schemm explains that 2025 ARC/PLC payments are handled differently, while 2026 will require producers to make an election. 04:40 — Discussion of why ARC/PLC payments are delayed until the marketing year average can be finalized. 05:50 — Aaron shifts to new base acres and asks about eligibility and process. 06:07 — Schemm explains FSA’s review of 2019–2023 planted acres and the national process for allocating available base acres. 07:30 — Schemm explains that 30 million additional base acres nationwide will likely be prorated because demand exceeds available acres. 08:30 — Discussion turns to Kansas cropping changes, especially in western Kansas where acreage has intensified beyond old wheat-fallow systems. 09:30 — Schemm says landowners should begin watching for base acre notices around the June 1 timeframe mentioned in the episode. 10:05 — He explains that notices are expected to be structured around opting out, because the default assumption is that eligible acres would be added. 10:20 — Schemm explains the “subsequent crop” issue, where landowners may need to choose between wheat acres and a later crop planted in the same crop year. 11:42 — Aaron emphasizes the need for tenants to communicate with absentee landowners. 12:31 — Schemm clarifies that this process is about adding base acres, not reallocating existing base acres. 13:08 — The conversation moves to the Farmer Bridge Assistance Program and how quickly payments were delivered. 14:28 — Aaron asks about the Supplemental Disaster Relief Program and Stage Two assistance for 2023 and 2024 losses. 15:20 — Schemm explains the SDRP top-up payment, Stage Two focus on shallow and quality losses and possible documentation needs. 16:30 — Schemm notes Kansas was heavily affected by 2023 and 2024 drought losses. 17:00 — Aaron shifts to technology, including “one farmer, one file,” farmers.gov and coordination between FSA, NRCS and RMA. 17:19 — Schemm describes USDA’s modernization push and how login.gov and farmers.gov can reduce trips to the FSA office. 19:15 — Schemm shares an example of a producer pulling FSA-578 acreage records online and sending them directly to a crop insurance agent. 21:00 — Aaron asks how technology connects to USDA reorganization and Kansas FSA staffing. 21:25 — Schemm discusses retirements, staffing needs, workload tools and hiring efforts for county offices, county executive director trainees and farm loan officer trainees. 25:58 — Aaron asks why it is important for farmers to stay in touch with FSA offices during low commodity prices and high input costs. 26:13 — Schemm encourages producers to stay connected because farm program changes, CRP opportunities and new tools are continuing to roll out. 28:40 — Aaron encourages listeners to bookmark farmers.gov. 29:06 — Schemm closes by emphasizing USDA’s focus on serving producers and encouraging farmers to contact county offices or use farmers.gov. 29:58 — Aaron wraps the episode and directs listeners to wheatsonyourmind.com, Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Kansas wheat producers are heading into harvest with drought, freeze injury, possible abandonment, and seed supply questions all on the table. In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, Aaron Harries talks with Justin Gilpin, CEO of Kansas Wheat, and Bryson Haverkamp, CEO of the Kansas Wheat Alliance, about what they are hearing from the field, how newer wheat varieties are holding up, and why growers should start seed conversations earlier than usual.
The discussion also covers wheat streak mosaic virus, the Wheat Quality Council’s Hard Winter Wheat Tour, K-State wheat field days, experimental varieties in the pipeline, and the importance of the next K-State wheat breeder. For producers, the practical message is clear: scout carefully, pay attention to variety performance under stress, talk with seed dealers now, and stay plugged into research and Extension updates before fall planting.
Key takeaways:
Drought and late freeze injury are pressuring hard red winter wheat across Kansas and the broader Southern Plains.
Seed supply could tighten in some areas, so producers should contact local seed dealers and certified seed producers early.
Newer varieties including Providence, Bill Snyder, Territory, KS Homestead CL+, KS Tradition and KS Flintlock are worth watching in stressed fields.
Wheat streak mosaic virus may not be the main yield story this year, but it remains a major long-term threat.
K-State field days and the Wheat Quality Council tour give producers a chance to compare varieties and understand regional crop risk before harvest.
Timestamped rundown
00:00–00:35 — Opening and setup
Aaron Harries introduces Justin Gilpin of Kansas Wheat and Bryson Haverkamp of the Kansas Wheat Alliance for a timely roundtable ahead of a difficult Kansas wheat harvest. 00:35–02:26 — A difficult crop year takes shape
Justin explains how drought, warm winter conditions and late freeze events have changed the outlook for the crop. Unlike 2023, the stress is not limited to western Kansas; it stretches across a larger hard red winter wheat region. 02:26–04:06 — Variety performance under stress
Bryson shares what Kansas Wheat Alliance is hearing from seed producers and breeders. He notes that Providence, Bill Snyder, Territory, KS Homestead CL+, KS Tradition and KS Flintlock are showing promising performance in tough conditions. 04:06–05:44 — Wheat streak is still a major threat
The group discusses wheat streak mosaic virus, triticum mosaic virus and high plains virus. Even if drought and freeze are the dominant issues this year, Justin stresses that virus pressure remains a serious long-term challenge for breeders, researchers and producers. 05:44–07:24 — Seed supply and fall planning
Bryson explains that seed supply concerns are growing in the Southern Plains and beginning to surface in Kansas. His recommendation to farmers is practical: contact local seed dealers and certified seed producers early so growers can secure preferred varieties and help dealers gauge demand. 07:24–09:19 — Wheat Tour expectations
Justin and Aaron discuss the Wheat Quality Council tour, USDA crop estimates, scouting for freeze damage, disease and abandonment. The key issue may not be only yield per acre, but how many acres are actually harvested. 09:19–12:39 — Why the Wheat Tour matters
Justin explains the history and value of the Wheat Quality Council tour. Beyond the crop estimate, the tour connects millers, bakers, breeders, farmers and industry leaders directly with Kansas wheat fields and rural communities. 12:39–14:14 — Field days and Extension resources
Bryson encourages farmers to attend K-State and county Extension wheat field days. These events give producers a chance to see varieties, talk with specialists and compare how wheat is handling local stress. 14:14–15:50 — New experimental lines to watch
The group discusses upcoming and experimental wheat lines, including KS Tradition, KS Flintlock, KS150167-17, 21H36 and 22HD158. Bryson points to these as part of the ongoing variety pipeline. 15:50–16:52 — Breeding progress in a tough year
Justin and Bryson emphasize the value of continued investment in public wheat breeding. Even in a hard production year, the survival and performance of some fields show the progress being made in genetics. 16:52–20:56 — The next K-State wheat breeder
The conversation turns to Alan Fritz’s retirement and the search for the next K-State wheat breeder. Justin compares the role to hiring a head coach because the wheat breeder touches research, Extension, farmers, industry partners and the future of Kansas wheat. 20:56–22:05 — Breeders as the face of wheat
Bryson and Justin note that wheat breeders are often the people farmers see at field days, even though those appearances go beyond their formal job descriptions. That producer connection remains essential. 22:05–23:23 — Final message to farmers
Justin closes by acknowledging the tough production and economic environment. He emphasizes the importance of export relationships, farm safety net tools and continued advocacy for producers and rural communities. 23:23–23:53 — Closing
Aaron thanks Justin and Bryson and directs listeners to previous episodes at Wheat’s On Your Mind.
Maryland wheat farmers juggle humidity, disease pressure, poultry markets, and tighter nutrient rules, yet Jason Scott says there is still room to raise strong wheat and make smart management decisions.
In this episode, Aaron Harries visits with Jason Scott, a sixth-generation farmer from Maryland’s Eastern Shore who grows soft red winter wheat alongside corn, soybeans, malted barley, and sweet corn.
Scott breaks down the Mid-Atlantic production calendar, explains how mandatory nutrient management affects fertilizer timing and recordkeeping, and shares how local poultry demand, flour mills, export markets, and variety selection all shape the economics of wheat in his region.
For Kansas listeners, it is a useful look at what changes when wheat is grown in a humid environment with tougher regulation and a very different end-use market.
Key takeaways:
Maryland wheat is typically planted in mid-October and harvested by mid-June, which helps open the door for earlier, better double-crop soybeans.
Mandatory nutrient management plans and audits shape fertilizer decisions, but Scott says growers have still found ways to improve yields.
Much of the local grain economy revolves around the chicken industry, affecting where wheat, corn, soybeans, and manure all move.
Export promotion still matters to growers whose wheat is mostly consumed domestically because stronger demand lifts the whole wheat market.
Disease pressure, especially scab, remains one of the biggest drivers in wheat variety selection.
Detailed Rundown
00:00:00 - Opening and guest intro
Aaron Harries introduces Jason Scott, a sixth-generation farmer from Hurlock, Maryland, and outlines his farm, leadership roles, and work with U.S. Wheat Associates. 00:00:58 - Where Jason farms
Scott explains where his farm sits on the Delmarva Peninsula, between the Chesapeake Bay and the Atlantic, and why he considers the region Mid-Atlantic rather than New England. 00:01:43 - Climate and disease pressure
He describes a humid, rainy production environment where both northern and southern crop diseases can show up, making the region a unique place for agronomic challenges. 00:03:23 - Wheat calendar in Maryland
Scott walks through the soft red winter wheat season: mid-October planting, winter dormancy, spring fertilizer timing, and mid-June harvest, with a strong push to finish in time for double-crop soybeans. 00:05:24 - Nutrient management rules
He details Maryland’s long-running nutrient management system, including yield-based nitrogen limits, required plans, annual reporting, and the reality of on-farm audits. 00:07:24 - Yield expectations and cropping strategy
Scott says his farm averages around 90 bushels per acre on wheat and has improved performance by placing wheat on better ground while shifting barley onto sandier acres. 00:08:16 - Where the wheat and barley go
Barley is contracted to a Delaware craft malter when it makes grade, while wheat is split between the poultry industry and flour mills in southeastern Pennsylvania. 00:09:45 - Chicken manure as fertility
The conversation turns to poultry litter, which Scott describes as valuable, locally produced fertilizer even as it remains part of a larger environmental debate in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. 00:11:04 - Corn, soybeans, and specialty markets
Scott explains that most local corn goes into the chicken industry, while his soybeans often go to a nearby crush plant, with Plenish high oleic beans earning an identity-preserved premium. 00:12:10 - Farm history, land values, and irrigation
He reflects on century-farm history, sharecropping roots, high land prices, urban pressure, and the major yield difference irrigation makes on sandy soils. 00:15:36 - Public education and policy engagement
Scott talks about speaking with garden clubs, educating urban neighbors, and pushing back on legislation shaped by people with limited understanding of modern crop production. 00:18:08 - Why export work still matters
Drawing on his U.S. Wheat Associates experience, Scott explains why export development helps all wheat classes, even when most Maryland wheat stays in domestic channels. 00:20:20 - Mexico travel story
He shares a side story about being stranded in Puerto Vallarta during cartel-related unrest and flight disruptions, and credits Corteva/Pioneer for getting the group home safely. 00:23:22 - Variety choices and disease management
Scott says Maryland growers rely heavily on private wheat varieties, with scab tolerance and disease package carrying major weight in seed decisions. 00:25:06 - Wrap-up
Aaron closes by thanking Scott for sharing a Mid-Atlantic perspective on wheat production, markets, and advocacy.
Hybrid wheat has long been one of agriculture’s biggest “what ifs.”
In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, host Aaron Harries talks with Dan Wiersma of Corteva about why that may finally be changing — and why Kansas is expected to be the epicenter of the company’s planned hard red winter wheat launch in fall 2027.
Wiersma breaks down the science in plain language, from hybrid vigor and wheat genetics to Corteva’s non-GMO nuclear male sterility system and color-sorting process for seed production.
He also explains what farmers will care about most: yield, risk, grain quality, pricing, and whether hybrid wheat will fit current management systems.
With early products showing a reported 10 percent yield advantage — and up to 20 percent in water-limited environments — this conversation offers a first look at a technology that could reshape wheat production in the years ahead.
Top 10 takeaways
Corteva is targeting fall 2027 for an initial hard red winter hybrid wheat launch, with Kansas positioned as the center of that rollout.
Dan Wiersma says hybrid wheat matters because wheat has lagged behind crops like corn in innovation for decades.
The biggest historical barrier has been economical seed production, not just breeding.
Corteva’s system uses non-GMO nuclear male sterility, which the company says became possible after the wheat genome was published in 2018.
The process relies on a color-based seed sorting system to separate sterile and maintainer seed.
Wiersma says the first commercial products are showing a consistent 10 percent yield advantage.
In water-limited environments, he says the yield edge can rise to 20 percent over leading competitive varieties.
Corteva expects hybrid wheat to fit into current production systems without requiring major management changes at launch.
Pricing will matter, and Wiersma acknowledges farmers will compare hybrid wheat against the long tradition of saving wheat seed.
Grower interest is high, but so is skepticism — especially around price, quality, and real-world performance on their own farms.
Timestamped rundown
00:00–01:06 — Aaron Harries opens the episode, introduces Wheat’s On Your Mind, and gives Dan Wiersma’s background from UW–Madison to Corteva’s global wheat leadership role. 01:15–02:58 — Wiersma explains his job: connecting science, breeding, seed production, marketing, and farmer trust around hybrid wheat. 03:16–04:22 — He lays out the commercial target: a small-scale hard red winter wheat launch in fall 2027, with Kansas as the epicenter. 04:40–05:41 — Wiersma frames hybrid vigor as the “holy grail” of breeding and explains why wheat has remained overwhelmingly non-hybrid. 05:42–07:39 — He dives into wheat biology, including its hexaploid genome, self-pollination, and why older sterility systems struggled economically. He says the 2018 wheat genome publication helped unlock a new approach. 07:40–09:09 — This is the most technical part of the episode: Wiersma explains Corteva’s nuclear male sterility system, blue seed marker, and color sorting process used to produce hybrid seed. 09:16–09:41 — Aaron zeroes in on the core problem: cost. Wiersma agrees and says wheat seed production also has to stay regionally close to where it will be planted. 09:50–11:19 — The headline performance segment: Wiersma says advanced products show about a 10 percent yield bump, with bigger advantages in tougher, water-limited environments. 11:25–12:28 — He outlines the path to launch: parent seed is in the ground, hybrid seed production fields follow, and commercial sale is planned for fall 2027. 12:28–13:22 — Wiersma says the initial rollout will move through the Pioneer brand and dealer network, backed by agronomic support. 13:22–15:03 — Pricing discussion: hybrid wheat will cost more to produce, but Corteva says pricing will be built around farmer value and long-term adoption. 15:03–16:03 — Wiersma shares early farmer reaction: strong interest, but also healthy skepticism about cost, grain quality, and whether the system pencils out. 16:03–16:58 — Looking backward, he reflects on how far wheat management has come through fungicides, plant growth regulators, fertility management, and yield-focused tools. 16:58–17:56 — Looking ahead, he says hybrid wheat is the main leap right now, but future opportunities include disease resistance, nitrogen efficiency, water use efficiency, and potentially stronger grain quality. 17:56–18:35 — Wiersma confirms public breeding programs and universities remain important collaborators in wheat germplasm and science. 18:35–19:32 — Farmers’ practical question gets answered: Corteva does not expect growers to need major management changes to plant hybrid wheat, though studies continue on seeding rates and fertility. 19:33–20:09 — Aaron asks about current resources. Wiersma says there is nothing substantial in print yet, but training, education, and marketing materials are being developed. 20:09–20:41 — The episode closes with a teaser to revisit the story as rollout gets closer.
Mike Spier, the new president and CEO of U.S. Wheat Associates, joins Aaron Harries and Justin Gilpin to talk about the relationships, strategy, and boots-on-the-ground work behind U.S. wheat exports. Spier shares how his career took him from the West Coast grain trade to overseas posts in Egypt, the Philippines, and Singapore, and how those experiences shaped his view of global wheat demand, trade shifts, and customer trust.
The conversation covers strong hard red winter wheat export sales, the rise of private flour mills in markets like Egypt and Indonesia, new opportunities in places such as Bangladesh and Latin America, and how added USDA export promotion funding can help U.S. Wheat Associates expand staff, technical support, and market development. It is a timely look at why long-term relationships, farmer voices, and smart investment still matter in an increasingly competitive global wheat market.
Top 10 takeaways
Mike Spier brings deep overseas and merchandising experience into the top U.S. Wheat Associates role.
U.S. Wheat’s long-term relationships remain one of its biggest competitive advantages.
Global wheat trade has shifted from government buying toward privatized milling and more technical engagement.
Hard red winter wheat has been a major driver of improved export sales this marketing year.
Increased USDA promotion funding gives U.S. Wheat room to expand staff and try more ambitious market-development efforts.
Bangladesh stands out as a meaningful growth market for U.S. wheat. U.S. Wheat publicly announced a multiyear 700,000-metric-ton annual commitment.
Consumer-facing campaigns may become more important as wheat misinformation spreads online.
Logistics still matter: freight, rail competition, and landed cost all shape whether U.S. wheat wins business.
Sustainability matters to buyers, but wheat customers often want credible data before they want formal certification.
Farmer voices are still powerful in export markets because customers trust firsthand production perspectives.
Detailed Timestamped Rundown
00:02–00:46
Aaron Harries opens the episode, introduces Wheat’s On Your Mind, and welcomes Mike Spier, newly installed president and CEO of U.S. Wheat Associates, with Justin Gilpin joining the conversation. 00:46–01:55
Spier outlines his career path: starting in the grain trade, joining U.S. Wheat Associates in Portland, and later serving in overseas offices including Cairo, Manila, and Singapore. 01:55–02:44
He reflects on how overseas work was never the original plan, but became a defining part of his career and his passion for representing U.S. wheat farmers abroad. 02:44–03:09
Spier notes that U.S. Wheat Associates has 13 overseas offices and three U.S. offices: Portland, Arlington, and Manhattan. U.S. Wheat’s staff directory confirms Mike Spier as president and CEO and lists those major offices. 02:57–03:12
The group highlights milestone anniversaries for the Tokyo and Taipei offices, underscoring the long-term relationships U.S. Wheat has built with overseas customers. 03:12–05:22
Justin asks about mentors who shaped Spier’s career. Spier points to John Odes and Dick Prower as especially influential in teaching him both wheat marketing and the realities of working overseas. 05:22–07:25
The conversation turns to the changing global wheat trade. Spier explains how markets such as Egypt and Indonesia shifted from government buying toward privatized milling systems, creating more need for technical training and relationship-based market development. 07:25–09:13
Spier shares his early priorities as CEO: strengthen relationships, expand exports and market share, drive innovation, improve producer outreach, and make better use of new USDA funding. 09:13–10:55
He details staffing changes, including new technical and consulting roles in Brazil, Italy, Casablanca, Singapore, Mexico City, and the Philippines, plus communications support. U.S. Wheat’s current public materials and staff directory reflect the organization’s global structure and leadership team. 10:55–12:59
The group discusses misinformation about wheat and consumer perception. Spier says U.S. Wheat is looking at more consumption-focused campaigns in key markets, building on work in the Philippines and exploring similar efforts elsewhere. 12:59–14:31
Spier says export sales are up year over year, with hard red winter wheat accounting for much of the improvement, even as competition intensifies from Argentina, Canada, Australia, and Russia. 14:31–15:33
They talk about wheat’s diversified customer base and how that gives the industry resilience compared with commodities that depend heavily on just a few markets. 15:13–16:18
Spier credits grower groups and wheat organizations for advocating increased MAP and FMD funding, and says the additional support will allow more activity, more innovation, and more strategic risk-taking overseas. USDA’s export market development programs continue to underpin cooperator efforts, while U.S. Wheat has said recent agreements and outreach are helping expand demand. 16:18–18:14
The discussion shifts to emerging opportunities, including aquaculture feed in Central and South America and the Bangladesh market. U.S. Wheat announced a Bangladesh commitment of 700,000 metric tons annually, aligning with what Spier describes in the episode. 18:14–20:21
Logistics comes into focus, including ocean freight, landed price, and rail competition. Justin raises concerns about freight and transportation costs that ultimately hit wheat farmers’ returns. 20:21–21:45
They address sustainability. Spier says wheat buyers generally want science-based information more than formal certification, though some customers do require more detailed documentation. 21:45–23:49
The value of farmer leadership takes center stage. Spier explains why hearing directly from growers makes a stronger impression on customers than hearing the same message only from staff. 23:49–24:53
Spier recaps a recent trip to Washington, D.C., saying he came away encouraged by support for U.S. wheat farmers and by momentum around programs like Food for Peace. 24:53–25:54
The episode closes with optimism about the year ahead, an invitation to future U.S. Wheat meetings in Manhattan, and a brief salute to retiring Kansas wheat leader Cindy Falk.
Global conflict is colliding with farm economics in this episode of Wheat’s on Your Mind. Host Aaron Harries is joined by Mike O’Dea, risk management consultant at StoneX, and Josh Linville, vice president of fertilizer at StoneX, to unpack the fast-moving fallout from the Iran conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Together, they explain why wheat prices were already moving higher before the latest geopolitical shock, how crude oil is adding fresh volatility, and why current rallies may create marketing opportunities for producers.
The discussion also explores the fertilizer side of the equation in detail. Linville explains how much of the world’s urea and phosphate trade depends on the Middle East, why the spring import window matters so much for U.S. growers, and how delayed buying patterns could worsen supply problems. O’Dea connects those fertilizer risks back to wheat production, protein, corn acres, and broader crop competition, offering listeners a grounded look at how global events can quickly reshape decisions at the farm gate.
Top 10 takeaways
Wheat was already rallying before the Iran conflict due to fund short covering, and crude oil volatility added another layer of support.
The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint for global fertilizer trade, especially urea.
This is landing at the worst possible time for U.S. growers because April is the key fertilizer import arrival month.
Fertilizer risk is broader than nitrogen; phosphate supplies are also vulnerable because several major suppliers are constrained.
Higher fertilizer prices could reduce application rates, trim yields, and create protein concerns in wheat.
Delayed fertilizer buying by farmers, retailers, and distributors may worsen spring bottlenecks.
Even if the conflict eases quickly, logistics and manufacturing delays mean supply chains will not normalize overnight.
Grain rallies tied to fear can reverse quickly, which is why O’Dea frames this as a pricing opportunity rather than a guaranteed long-term bull market.
Crop acreage decisions could shift as producers weigh fertilizer costs, corn demand, soybean oil strength, and competition from canola and pulses.
The episode makes a strong case for more U.S. fertilizer production capacity, though cost and mineral access remain major barriers.
Detailed Timestamped Rundown
00:00–00:15 — Disclaimer
The episode opens with a reminder that it was recorded on March 11, 2026, and that market conditions may have changed since then. 00:16–01:05 — Episode setup
Aaron Harries introduces the show and guests Mike O’Dea and Josh Linville of StoneX, framing the conversation around grain markets, fertilizer markets, and uncertainty tied to the Iran conflict. 01:06–03:36 — Why wheat was already moving higher
O’Dea explains wheat had been rallying before the conflict due to fund short covering and seasonal tendencies. He notes crude oil volatility then added more upward pressure, even though wheat fundamentals still look bearish. 03:37–05:02 — Strait of Hormuz and fertilizer shock
Linville says the closure of the Strait is a major threat because such a large share of global urea exports and significant phosphate trade move through that region. He outlines sharp fertilizer price increases and stresses that this is not just a nitrogen problem. 05:03–05:53 — Why timing matters for U.S. imports
Linville highlights that April is the biggest arrival month for fertilizer imports into the U.S., and even if product were available immediately, shipping lead times mean deliveries would still lag well into April. 06:02–07:48 — China, Russia, Europe, and global supply distortions
The conversation turns to China’s export restrictions, Russia’s shifting fertilizer flows, and Europe’s reduced production capacity after losing access to cheaper Russian gas. The result is a much tighter and more politicized global fertilizer market. 07:49–09:20 — What high nitrogen prices could mean for wheat
Aaron asks how fertilizer costs and availability could affect wheat production globally. O’Dea says lower application rates could trim yields and create quality concerns, especially around protein. 09:21–10:08 — Will farmers delay or cut applications?
O’Dea says it is still early to know, but Linville adds that poor farm finances and delayed purchasing have already created a fragile just-in-time supply situation. 10:08–12:36 — Domestic production and North American options
Linville argues the situation should be a wake-up call for more domestic nitrogen production. He says the U.S. has gas, demand, and strong environmental standards, but new plants are costly and slow to build. He also explains why phosphate is harder to solve due to rock supply constraints. 12:37–14:57 — If the war ends quickly, how fast do markets react?
O’Dea says grain markets can correct fast when fear subsides, though logistics take longer to normalize. He also discusses funds turning net long in wheat and how hard assets may be attracting money. 15:07–16:34 — Why fertilizer may not stay cheap even after a reopening
Linville says a reopening of vessel traffic could trigger an immediate selloff, but the structural supply gap would remain. He expects the U.S. spring price floor has likely been raised regardless. 16:35–17:51 — Acre shifts and competition between crops
O’Dea says higher fertilizer costs and shifting margins could keep support under corn while also forcing a fight for acres among corn, beans, canola, pulses, and other specialty crops. 17:52–19:21 — What StoneX does for customers
The guests close by explaining StoneX’s role in risk management, fertilizer market education, and helping farmers and agribusinesses think beyond flat price toward margin and value relationships. 19:21–end — Wrap-up
Aaron thanks the guests and directs listeners to email Kansas Wheat with questions and find previous episodes online.
Don Keesling has lived through 80 Kansas wheat harvests, and he remembers when harvest was a full-family operation—kids hauling water, older siblings driving trucks, and every load requiring real muscle. In this special episode, Don and host Aaron Harries walk through how wheat harvest used to work, the machinery transitions that changed everything, and why the culture of neighbors helping neighbors feels different today.
Don also shares his decades promoting wheat—especially hard white winter wheat—where taste tests and proof mattered more than talking points. From wheat varieties like Jagger to lessons from the Dust Bowl and the long road to conservation practices like no-till, Don’s stories connect Kansas wheat history to the realities farmers face now: tight margins, changing programs, and the need for practical skills (and a little WD-40).
Top 10 takeaways
Harvest used to be a full-family system—everyone had a job, and it built responsibility fast.
Mechanization didn’t just speed harvest—it changed labor, logistics, and community rhythms.
Handling grain was brutally manual—small loads and lots of shoveling shaped how farms operated.
The “neighbor-helping-neighbor” era has faded, in part because fewer people and fewer kids stay on farms.
White wheat promotion required proof, not persuasion—taste tests and milling performance were the turning points.
Food aid is tied to politics and logistics, not just need; shipping requirements can limit outcomes.
Hybrids and innovations must earn trust—farmers need repeated evidence of ROI.
Variety selection is more than yield—shatter risk, grading quirks, and milling quality can make or break value.
No-till can work—but transition is risky and can be financially painful early on without good management.
Conservation is still “in recovery”—soil formation is slow, and losing good ground is hard to reverse.
Detailed timestamped rundown
00:00–01:00 Intro to Wheat’s On Your Mind; guest Don Keesling (Lyons, KS). 01:00–03:10 “How many harvests?” Don: 80; earliest harvest memories and family roles. 03:10–05:40 Keesling family roots in Kansas; early settlement, corn “was king,” land prices and homesteading era. 05:40–09:30 Harvest equipment evolution: early tractors, steel-to-rubber transition, threshers and early combines. 09:30–12:30 Grain handling realities: small loads, no lift beds, shoveling into bins; elevator deliveries. 12:30–16:10 First self-propelled combine (circa mid-1940s) and the “automatic transmission downhill” mishap. 16:10–19:30 Harvest culture: big meals, excitement until breakdowns; chores and family responsibilities. 19:30–23:30 “Biggest changes”: modern health care; shift away from neighbor-helping-neighbor traditions; fewer kids staying. 23:30–28:30 Don’s wheat promotion journey: love of wheat, milling school, feeding the world; international travel (former Soviet states). 28:30–31:20 Wheathearts, state fair booth, wheat jewelry, Wally Wheat costume story. 31:20–35:40 American White Wheat Growers: selling bread to consumers; proving value to millers/bakeries; taste matters. 35:40–39:30 Food aid, “keep food in food aid,” P.L. 480 and shipping constraints; Senator Dole “Mr. Whitewheat.” 39:30–45:10 Wheat evolution: hybrid wheat attempts (1980s), proving ROI; variety lessons (Wichita shatter). 45:10–50:40 Farming systems shifts: programs and rotations then vs now; adopting no-till and transition pains. 50:40–56:20 Variety stories: Red Chief strength vs milling quality; grading issues with Arkan; K-State variety legacy. 56:20–60:00 Dust Bowl reflections (born shortly after Black Sunday); conservation, soil loss, dams, long recovery. 60:00–62:10 Advice to young farmers: money, mechanical skills, frugality, and a supportive spouse; wrap and contact info.
WOYM - World Fertilizer Prices, Kansas Wheat Reality
17 Feb 2026
00:26:51
Fertilizer isn’t just an input—it’s a globally traded commodity with price signals driven by geopolitics, energy markets, and overseas demand. In this episode, Aaron Harries sits down with Corey Rosenbusch, president and CEO of The Fertilizer Institute, to unpack why fertilizer markets can feel like “three-dimensional chess,” especially for wheat producers balancing tight margins.
Rosenbusch explains how global trade flows shift when conflict disrupts supply chains and when natural gas availability changes the economics of nitrogen production. The conversation dives into why the U.S. is relatively strong in nitrogen production yet still imports key products, why potash remains heavily import-dependent, and how global demand—especially major buyers—can set price direction. He also stresses that while producers can’t control what happens in Beijing or on the Black Sea, they can control efficiency: the 4R framework (right source, rate, time, place), variable-rate strategies, and emerging technologies that help fertilizer go further.
Top 10 takeaways
Fertilizer pricing is global—local conditions are only part of the story.
Natural gas is the “hidden driver” behind nitrogen availability and cost.
The U.S. is comparatively strong in nitrogen production, but still imports meaningful volumes depending on product/year.
Potash remains heavily import-dependent, with Canada as a major supplier.
Phosphate supply is shaped by both U.S. production and imports—don’t judge the market by domestic producers alone.
When geopolitics disrupt supply (or trade routes), “normal” supply/demand logic can break down fast.
China’s production choices can tighten global supply and move prices far from the Plains.
Big centralized buyers (like India, as discussed) can effectively set global benchmarks with massive purchases.
In tight-margin years, stewardship matters more: 4R practices + precision can be the best controllable lever.
Better, farmer-friendly market transparency (TFI and USDA resources) can reduce misinformation and improve decisions.
Timestamped Rundown
00:00–00:59 – Show intro; guest background and credentials. 01:00–01:49 – What TFI is: representing the full fertilizer supply chain; advocacy + industry support. 01:50–03:42 – Fertilizer as a globally traded commodity; U.S. is ~10% of global consumption; potash import dependence. 03:43–06:09 – Russia–Ukraine ripple effects: sanctions, trade flow weirdness, and natural gas as the nitrogen bottleneck in Europe. 06:10–08:20 – China’s influence: export changes, phosphate dominance, and competing demand (including industrial uses). 08:21–11:34 – U.S. domestic production vs imports by nutrient: nitrogen, potash, phosphate; why “turning up production” isn’t simple. 11:35–12:00 – New potash production mentions (Michigan/Utah/New Mexico developments). 12:01–16:12 – Nitrogen imports and Trinidad connection; tariffs and why TFI focuses on facts, not “winners/losers.” 16:13–17:38 – “Political chess”: fertilizer’s role in high-level diplomacy (as described by Rosenbusch). 17:39–18:41 – Domestic production investment: what funding can/can’t do vs. true plant build costs; efficiency tech. 18:42–21:41 – Grower reality: low commodity prices + rising inputs; corn acres as a big U.S. demand driver; focus on stewardship. 21:42–23:31 – Global demand: India’s buying power and how non-U.S. crops can still move fertilizer markets. 23:32–25:34 – New farmer-facing market info resource coming from TFI; call for better USDA fertilizer economist/input transparency. 25:35–26:27 – Wrap-up; where to find episodes and how to contact the show.
Cindy Falk has spent 40 years helping Kansas Wheat connect with consumers through recipes, baking demonstrations, nutrition education, and the beloved Kansas Wheat recipe booklet tradition. In this episode, host Aaron Harries chats with Cindy about her upbringing on a Kansas farm, the “Speak for Wheat” spokesperson program she helped grow, and the behind-the-scenes work of answering baking questions (and busting myths) with a calm, science-first approach.
You’ll also hear how the Kansas Festival of Breads evolved into the National Festival of Breads, turning home bakers into wheat ambassadors through harvest tours, mill visits, and live baking events. As Cindy steps into retirement, she shares what she’ll miss, what she hopes to do next, and leaves listeners with a simple truth that sums up her career: “Bread is the stuff of life.”
Top 10 takeaways
Cindy’s career started with a single phone call in 1985—and turned into 40 years of consumer-facing wheat education.
The “Speak for Wheat” program became a major network of trained ambassadors, many rooted in farming and Extension-style education.
Kansas Wheat’s consumer work isn’t fluff—it’s a strategic use of checkoff dollars to build demand and trust.
Fad diets come in waves; Cindy’s approach was consistent: respond with science, not shouting.
The recipe booklet tradition is a powerful “leave-behind” tool that keeps Kansas wheat in home kitchens year after year.
The Festival of Breads didn’t just crown winners—it created ambassadors through hands-on wheat-to-flour experiences.
Meeting farmers matters: consumers at fairs and events want direct conversations with the people growing the crop.
School nutrition is a key battleground for grain education—whole grains and practical recipes help change menus.
Technology can help the mission: bread machines made baking approachable and boosted flour usage.
Cindy’s legacy is bigger than recipes—she helped protect the reputation of wheat foods during the toughest perception cycles.
Timestamped Rundown
00:01–01:20 — Aaron Harries opens the show, introduces guest Cindy Falk and her 40-year Kansas Wheat career. 01:20–03:16 — Cindy’s upbringing near Laclede, Kansas, farm life, and where her love of baking began. 03:16–03:49 — Family today and travel (including lots of miles to see grandkids). 03:58–05:48 — The 1985 phone call that changed everything: joining “Speak for Wheat,” growth of the spokesperson program, and who those spokespersons are. 06:00–07:07 — Early demos (Kansas State Fair “Neat Wheat Treats”), audiences served, and the “all of the above” message: production + baking + nutrition. 07:11–10:09 — Wheat Foods Council involvement and why domestic marketing matters; emphasizing science-based communication. 10:25–12:20 — Festival of Breads origins in Kansas, commissioners pushing for a national contest, and what made it unique. 12:36–15:16 — The “big years”: hundreds of entries, testing in the kitchen, harvest tours, mill/elevator stops, and large public events (thousands attending). 15:16–16:58 — Kansas State Fair booth strategy: consumers want to talk directly to wheat farmers. 16:58–19:37 — Diet trends through the decades: low-fat era, anti-carb, gluten concerns; responding with facts and research. 18:30–19:25 — School foodservice work and whole grains; outreach tools (including gluten messaging). 19:51–20:30 — The Kansas Wheat recipe booklets: long-running tradition and wide distribution. 21:00–23:01 — Bread machines arrive; Cindy becomes the go-to resource; flour sales benefit. 23:25–24:51 — What she’ll miss: people, organizations, tours, the test kitchen, food styling/photography, international visitors. 24:51–26:12 — Retirement plans: grandkids, community teaching, preservation, travel—and closing line: “Bread is the stuff of life.”
Brian Walker didn’t start in a corner office—he started six weeks out of high school as a “sample jockey” in a flour mill, learning the business from union millers, lab mentors, and long days when the mill ran. More than 45 years later, his career spans Seaboard, Cargill, Ardent Mills, and Miller Milling—and he’s seen the milling industry transform through consolidation, shifting competition, and changing norms around sharing crop-quality information.
In this episode, Brian connects the dots from farm to flour to finished bread: how high-speed bakeries increased stress on dough performance, how ingredient/tool changes (like moving away from potassium bromate and toward enzymes) affected quality, why varieties and disease resistance became even more critical, and how “extended shelf life” reshaped the bread supply chain (and consumer expectations). He closes with practical career advice: work hard, get involved, and show up—because wheat is a people business.
Top 10 takeaways
A milling career can start “anywhere” — curiosity + work ethic can take you global.
Consolidation didn’t just change ownership—it changed how openly companies shared crop-quality insights.
Bread used to be a shorter-shelf-life, local-distribution product; technology stretched time and distance.
Extended shelf life improved softness longevity—but introduced tradeoffs (like needing stronger mold control and perceived flavor shifts).
“Stale returns” shaped the old bread economy—and their decline reshaped retail bread systems.
High-speed bakeries put new stress on dough—raising the premium on protein functionality, not just protein percent.
Ingredient/tool shifts (especially moving away from potassium bromate) rippled all the way back into wheat breeding priorities.
Varieties can change the game: Brian points to Karl (and later Glenn) as stabilizers in tough quality eras.
Disease + food safety issues (like scab/vomitoxin) forced the industry to treat “quality” as a full supply-chain responsibility.
The Wheat Quality Council and crop tours matter because they put real wheat in real hands—building shared understanding fast.
Timestamped Rundown
00:00–00:41 — Welcome + guest intro: Brian Walker’s 45+ years in flour milling. 00:54–02:55 — First job: from pumping gas to mill lab “sample jockey,” long weeks, export-era flour packing memories (including heavy jute bags). 03:12–04:05 — Seaboard context + early exposure to wheat classes and baking in the lab; opportunity expands. 04:05–06:20 — Mentors and mill culture: learning the mill, lab rules, problem-solving mindset, baking fundamentals. 06:20–10:17 — Consolidation era: Cargill/Seaboard as a turning point; why openness about crop quality tightened as competition rose. 10:17–12:18 — What consumers saw in the 80s–90s: many bakeries/brands, shorter shelf life, fierce competition. 12:18–13:35 — 90s “eat right” messaging + folic acid fortification era; growth and capacity expansion. 13:35–16:34 — Early 2000s shocks: low-carb trend + extended shelf life technology reshapes bakeries, distribution, and flavor perceptions. 16:34–18:35 — “Stale returns” explained + why day-old bread stores faded. 19:02–24:25 — Farmer connection: high-speed baking raises quality demands; bromate goes away; varieties like Karl and Glenn help stabilize performance amid disease/food safety issues. 24:25–30:27 — Testing tools: NIR impact, farinograph/mixograph talk, and why loaf volume is still “where the rubber hits the road.” 30:55–37:29 — Giving back: Wheat Quality Council “best kept secret,” National Wheat Foundation work, quality + yield contest efforts, and overseas consulting with millers worldwide. 37:32–39:25 — Career advice: work hard, get involved, show up in-person—wheat is a people business.
WOYM - 2025 Review: Kansas Leads the Wheat Fight Again
06 Jan 2026
00:34:58
2025 didn’t fit in a neat box for Kansas wheat farmers—it was “variability,” from a dry start to long stretches of wet weather that stretched harvest timelines and narrowed fieldwork windows. Kansas Wheat Commission Chair Derek Sawyer and Kansas Association of Wheat Growers President Chris Tanner join host Aaron Harries and Kansas Wheat CEO Justin Gilpin to break down the year’s biggest storylines: how wheat checkoff dollars are invested, what advocacy work is happening in Topeka and Washington, and what’s changing in domestic and international markets.
On the market side, the conversation highlights both bright spots and headwinds—strong export pace and renewed market activity, alongside big global wheat crops pressuring prices. The group also digs into one of the most important agronomic storylines of the year: widespread wheat streak mosaic virus pressure reaching farther across Kansas than many are used to seeing, and what that means for volunteer control, “green bridge” conversations, and variety development. Looking to 2026, their focus stays on profitability—maximizing trade opportunities, doubling down on research and the Kansas Wheat Innovation Center, and building an environment where family farms can thrive, not just survive.
Top 10 takeaways
2025 was defined by “variability,” and weather stretched fieldwork windows in parts of Kansas.
Some operations faced brutal wheat economics, including acres not worth harvesting.
The wheat checkoff’s core mission is profitability, largely through research, breeding, and market development.
Advocacy priorities stay centered on tax, regulation, and transportation, so wheat producers have a strong voice in Topeka and D.C.
Kansas saw a meaningful production rebound (per the conversation), but global supply still pressured prices.
Overseas customers keep emphasizing quality and consistency—and relationships matter as much as bushels.
Wheat streak mosaic virus was a statewide storyline, raising urgency around volunteer control and variety resistance.
The “green bridge” problem is getting harder, especially with tighter rotations, no-till, and cover crops.
Input-cost discipline is the profitability lever farmers can control when market prices aren’t.
2026 focus: move bushels, fund research, expand markets, and push for conditions where family farms can thrive.
Detailed Timestamps
00:00:01 – 00:01:10 | Welcome + who’s at the table Aaron Harries introduces the episode, the two Kansas wheat organizations, and guests Derek Sawyer, Chris Tanner, and Justin Gilpin.
00:01:10 – 00:03:19 | What the Kansas Wheat Commission does Derek explains checkoff stewardship (two cents per bushel) and priority investments: breeding, production education (including WheatRx), and domestic/international market development.
00:03:19 – 00:04:05 | What Kansas Association of Wheat Growers does Chris lays out the advocacy mission in Topeka and Washington, focused on tax, regulatory, and transportation policy.
00:04:05 – 00:07:19 | “Crop report” reality check: central vs. northwest Kansas Derek calls 2025 “variability”—dry start then very wet; harvest dragged out, field days were limited. Chris shares a tough year: the first time he left half the wheat crop unharvested due to poor yield conditions.
00:07:19 – 00:10:40 | Statewide crop + market picture Justin recaps the whirlwind year—organizational transitions, policy attention, and a statewide crop around ~51 bu/acre and ~350M bushels, plus exports running at one of the strongest paces in more than a decade (per the discussion).
00:10:40 – 00:12:20 | What overseas customers say they want Derek shares the repeated message from international buyers: U.S. wheat’s quality and consistency matter, and relationships need maintained.
00:12:20 – 00:15:01 | Policy roller coaster + “farm bill” conversation Chris outlines active issues (USAID/Food for Peace, USMCA review, Snake River dams, rail merger concerns). Derek notes more funding opportunities for international market access efforts, while Chris emphasizes the desire for longer-term certainty.
00:15:01 – 00:20:57 | Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) + the green bridge problem The group flags 2025 as a widespread WSMV year, discusses volunteer control, changing production systems (no-till/double-crop/cover crops), and the need for genetic resistance. Derek also previews the coming conversation around GM traits (including HB4 mentioned in the episode).
00:21:04 – 00:23:00 | Input costs + fertility decisions Derek and Chris talk about profitability being driven by controlling input costs, and how some growers are delaying fertilizer decisions amid volatility.
00:23:00 – 00:26:05 | Exports and trade outlook Justin points to new/renewed relationships and specific bright spots (agreements and follow-through in key markets; Nigeria’s return; caution about over-reliance on inconsistent buyers).
00:26:05 – 00:29:01 | Kansas leadership at the national level Discussion of leadership transitions and Kansas farmers moving through national officer rotations—plus why it matters for wheat’s future.
00:29:01 – 00:34:30 | 2026 resolutions + closing reflections “Maximize opportunity” is the theme: keep markets moving, invest in research and breeding programs, and aim for an environment where family farms can thrive.
00:34:30 – 00:34:53 | Where to learn more Contact and where to find past episodes.
WOYM - Weather Pivots, Wheat Profits, and What’s Next
23 Dec 2025
00:31:36
Private meteorologist and climatologist Brian Bledsoe joins Wheat’s On Your Mind to reflect on the surprising weather turns of 2025 and what Kansas wheat producers should be watching as 2026 approaches. With a strong soil moisture profile and a well-established crop across much of the state, Bledsoe explains why early-season dryness may not spell disaster — especially as global weather patterns begin to pivot.
The conversation dives deep into La Niña and El Niño transitions, historical analog years, polar vortex risks, and long-term climate oscillations shaping agriculture in the High Plains. Bledsoe also shares insight on private weather services, AI-driven forecasting, and why communication — not just data — is critical for helping farmers make confident decisions in an unpredictable weather future.
Top 10 Takeaways
Seasonal forecasts must be revisited as conditions change.
2025 shifted wetter due to unexpected Pacific temperature patterns.
Kansas wheat enters 2026 with a strong soil moisture profile.
La Niña is fading, with El Niño likely developing later in 2026.
March may trend dry, but April moisture looks promising.
Historical analog years suggest spring moisture rebounds are common.
Polar vortex outbreaks remain a risk during La Niña winters.
Long-term climate cycles matter more than single-year trends.
AI enhances forecasting, but experience and communication remain key.
Private weather services are growing as producers seek tailored insight.
Timestamped Rundown
00:01– 01:07 — Show open + guest intro Aaron introduces the podcast, Brian Bledsoe’s background, and the episode focus (2025 recap + 2026 preview).
01:08 – 04:14 — What stood out in 2025 (and why forecasts pivoted) Brian explains how conditions looked dry, then flipped in April; discusses why adapting forecasts matters and how Pacific temps shifted the outcome.
04:15 – 06:04 — What Brian is watching now (ENSO / La Niña status) He clarifies how La Niña/El Niño messaging gets oversimplified, then lays out where La Niña stands now and when it fades.
06:05 – 07:45 — When La Niña/El Niño matters most + 2023 example Brian explains typical timing/impacts and points to 2023 as a recent “pivot year” with sharp Kansas contrasts and hail/water patterns.
07:46 – 10:17 — Analogs: how he uses “history” to forecast Defines analogs, lists the six key analog years (1951, 1965, 1972, 2002, 2009, 2023), and what they suggest for March temps and precipitation.
10:18 – 13:45 — Jan–Apr outlook for Kansas wheat (profile, dryness, then April wetter) Full soil profile as “bridge,” western KS higher dry risk early, lingering La Niña signal, then optimism for a wetter April and better May/June odds; “drought begets drought / wet begets wet.”
13:46 – 17:10 — Polar vortex / extreme cold risk Why La Niña patterns can unlock Arctic air; notes cold mostly staying NE so far; warns about warm winter stretches pushing wheat growth and moisture use; “shouldn’t be 70 on Christmas.”
17:11 – 21:09 — Shifting seasons + climate context + PDO deep dive Brian’s perspective on climate variability, then explains the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), why the ’90s were “golden,” and why the last ~27 years have been more drought-prone/challenging.
21:10 – 25:02 — CO₂, cropping systems, dryline movement, and moisture recycling Discusses politicization/disinformation, then the role of dry soils vs wet soils, vegetation/corn transpiration, and why the dryline’s behavior depends heavily on pattern + soil moisture feedbacks.
25:03 – 28:04 — AI in forecasting + ECMWF vs U.S. model investment AI can improve accuracy, but human interpretation/communication remains key; praises ECMWF as gold standard; criticizes U.S. R&D cuts.
28:05 – 29:11 — Brian’s services + where to find him How he works with producers; points to his site and contact methods.
29:12 – 30:58 — Growth of private weather + NWS cuts + radar needs Explains why private sector is growing, impacts of staffing/funding reductions, and the need to modernize radar coverage for severe weather warnings.
30:59 – 31:32 — Wrap + listener contact info Aaron thanks Brian and shares the email + where to find past episodes.
WOYM - From Classroom to Capitol: Flinchbaugh’s Legacy Lives On
09 Dec 2025
00:36:25
Dr. Barry Flinchbaugh taught generations of farmers, students and elected officials how to think about “alternatives and consequences” in agricultural policy—and he did it with a cigar, a squeaky voice and a room full of laughter. In this episode, host Aaron Harries visits with Jay Armstrong of Armstrong Farms and Dana Woodbury, executive director of the Barry Flinchbaugh Center for Ag and Food Policy, about the man behind the legend and the new center created to carry his work into the future. Jay shares road‑trip stories from his days as Flinchbaugh’s first teaching assistant and explains how their research and statewide meetings helped Kansas voters pass the constitutional change that moved farmland to use‑value appraisal, protecting farmers on the urban fringe.
Dana walks through the mission of the Flinchbaugh Center: engaging students, convening stakeholders, and bringing policymakers the straight facts on complex issues like property taxes, ag labor and water. You’ll hear how the inaugural Flinchbaugh Forum packed a room with more than 200 people hungry for honest conversation, how a new grant is helping involve western Kansas high school students in Ogallala aquifer discussions, and how the Flinchbaugh Fellows program is building a pipeline of Kansas‑trained policy staff for both Topeka and Washington, D.C. The episode closes with a look at the Center’s growing partnership with Kansas State University and how grassroots support can help keep Barry’s purple‑bleeding legacy alive for the next generation of rural leaders.
Top 10 Takeaways
Barry Flinchbaugh’s impact was personal and practical. Jay’s stories show a professor who could scare you on day one, then turn into a lifelong mentor, road‑trip partner and advocate for farmers and students.
The Flinchbaugh Center is about people, not just data. Dana emphasizes that the Center’s core job is to convene stakeholders, sort out what’s really true, and carry those voices—and their analysis of alternatives and consequences—to policymakers.
Kansas’ use‑value property tax reform is a textbook example of Barry’s model. Research, objective extension education, mobilized farm and commodity groups, and then a constitutional amendment campaign protected farmers from being taxed off the land on the urban fringe.
The Center is building a student pipeline into ag policy. Through the Flinchbaugh Fellows program, K‑State students intern with Kansas ag organizations and then in Washington, D.C., meeting alumni working in policy and seeing how Congress actually functions.
Western Kansas water and the Ogallala are priority issues. Supported by a Patterson Family Foundation grant, the Center is convening western Kansas high school students and local stakeholders to talk about Ogallala aquifer policy, self‑regulation and long‑term water security.
Rural voices still want straight talk and facts. The inaugural Flinchbaugh Forum drew more than 200 attendees who said they were hungry for fact‑based discussion and “the truth” about big issues affecting agriculture.
Issue selection is deliberate and collaborative. The Center uses calls with industry and policy leaders, a policy council and a board that includes former U.S. Ag Secretaries and a former Senate Ag Committee chair to pick issues where education can still move the needle.
Barry’s teaching continues through recorded lectures and archives. COVID‑era videos of his final classes and boxes of papers at K‑State will keep his voice and frameworks like “Kings and Kingmakers” alive for new generations of students and fellows.
Kansas State University is a central partner. The Flinchbaugh Chair (Dr. Jennifer Ifft), the College of Agriculture dean and K‑State’s Office of Engagement are all actively involved in the Center’s work, tying it to the land‑grant mission.
The Center’s future depends on grassroots and partner support. Early funding from the Flinchbaugh family and a few key donors is now being expanded through a matching campaign, grants and partnerships with groups like Kansas Wheat and other commodity organizations.
Timestamps
[00:00] Welcome and introductions Aaron opens the show, introduces Wheat’s On Your Mind, and sets up the conversation around the Barry Flinchbaugh Center. Bios for guests: Jay Armstrong (Armstrong Farms, longtime Kansas Wheat leader and former Flinchbaugh teaching assistant) and Dana Woodbury (executive director of the Flinchbaugh Center, Garden City business background and prior agribusiness communications work).
[02:00] Who was Dr. Barry Flinchbaugh? Jay tells the story of taking Barry’s class in 1972, being the Farm Bureau president’s son, and Barry calling him out on day one—cigar, squeaky voice and all. He describes becoming Barry’s first teaching assistant and, unofficially, his driver because “you didn’t want to ride with Barry.”
[06:00] Learning on the road with Barry Jay recalls traveling Kansas for multi‑county extension meetings, long car conversations, and Barry’s blend of bark and deep compassion. Stories from Barry’s Pennsylvania Dutch roots, his time as a county extension agent back east, and even a mafia‑linked family trying to donate to 4‑H.
[09:30] Humor, taxes and building trust with farmers Jay explains how Barry tackled hot‑button issues like property taxes using the “three‑legged stool” of income, sales, and property taxes. Barry would ask producers what their biggest problem was, then challenge them—earning credibility by telling the truth instead of pandering.
[13:00] Dana’s connection and Barry’s legacy dreams Dana shares how Barry literally burst through the second door by her desk in grad school and later helped her make policy connections after graduation. Jay talks about Barry’s wish for an endowed chair and eventually a policy center that would mirror similar work in other regions while focusing on the Midwest.
[17:30] Why a policy center mattered for Kansas farmers Jay walks through the land‑use appraisal story: research on property taxes on the rural‑urban fringe, an extension bulletin, a statewide education tour, and farm groups taking the issue to policymakers and voters. That process led to a constitutional amendment that protected farmers by moving to use‑value appraisal—a model Jay hopes the Center can replicate for today’s issues like water.
[22:00] Mission and vision of the Flinchbaugh Center Dana gives the “elevator pitch”: the Center focuses on student engagement, stakeholder‑driven policy analysis, and getting clear, non‑partisan information to decision‑makers. It’s not a data factory; the emphasis is on bringing affected groups together, sorting fact from noise, and examining policy alternatives and consequences in Barry’s tradition.
[26:00] Flinchbaugh Forum and youth water project Dana recaps the inaugural Flinchbaugh Forum, where more than 200 people packed a room looking for honest conversation about ag issues. She outlines the Patterson Family Foundation‑funded project on the Ogallala aquifer that will convene cohorts of western Kansas high school students, connect them with local stakeholders, and elevate youth voices in water discussions.
[31:00] Inside the Flinchbaugh Fellows program Dana explains how the fellows program pairs K‑State students with Kansas ag organizations in the spring and D.C. internships in the summer to see how policy really gets made—or stalled. Students meet former Flinchbaugh students working in policy, build networks, and often rethink their own career paths in ag policy.
[36:30] Why the Fellows matter to Kansas agriculture Jay notes that too often Kansas lawmakers’ ag staff come from outside the state; the fellows program builds a homegrown pool of talent. Having “Flinchbaugh Fellow” on a résumé signals real policy experience and a shared foundation in Barry’s style of straight‑talking analysis.
[40:00] Choosing issues and staying ahead of politics Dana describes the Center’s issue‑selection process: calls with 12–15 industry and policy leaders, review by a policy council, then deeper vetting by the board. Jay stresses the importance of getting to issues early—before they become so partisan that education is impossible—using ag labor as an example of an issue that’s already too politicized.
[44:00] Ogallala as a model for national work The board includes national leaders like former Ag Secretaries Mike Johanns and Dan Glickman and former Senator Pat Roberts, giving the Center a national reach even as it starts with a regional Ogallala project. Jay hopes the Ogallala work becomes a template for how other aquifer regions can bring multiple water users together to craft workable policy.
[47:00] Preserving Barry’s voice and K‑State partnership Jay and Dana talk about Barry’s papers housed at the K‑State library and the treasure trove of lecture notes and correspondence they hope to mine. COVID‑era recordings of Barry’s final semester of classes are now used to orient fellows to concepts like “Kings and Kingmakers” and “alternatives and consequences.” They highlight deep ties with Kansas State University: the Flinchbaugh chair held by Dr. Jennifer Ifft, the College of Agriculture dean and K‑State engagement staff serving on the board.
[51:00] Funding, grassroots support and closing thoughts Dana outlines the $95,000 matching campaign funded by the Flinchbaugh family, future grant pursuits, and potential partnerships with groups like Kansas Wheat. Jay reflects on Barry’s advice about needing money, kingmaker support and the right staff—and says they’ve found the right person in Dana. Aaron wraps up, promising to post the Flinchbaugh Center website and reminding listeners they can find past episodes at wheatsonyourmind.com or on Apple and Spotify.
WOYM - Farmer-Owned, Community Strong: Modern Co-ops
25 Nov 2025
00:35:34
Farmer cooperatives built much of the grain marketing and input-delivery system that Kansas farmers rely on today—but what does that system look like now, and where is it headed? In this episode, host Aaron Harries sits down with Brian Briggeman, director of the Arthur Capper Cooperative Center at Kansas State University, to trace the cooperative story from railroad dominance and the Capper-Volstead Act all the way to today’s era of consolidation and creative new structures. Brian explains how farmer-owned co-ops use scale to negotiate better prices, provide agronomy services and energy, and keep profits and property taxes anchored in rural communities.
The conversation also tackles the tough questions directors and managers face: how to judge cooperative financial health, when to shed non-core services like tire shops, and how to invest in “speed and space” while still paying patronage and retiring equity. Brian breaks down the Kansas merger landscape, the importance of director education, and the pressures of drought, big crops with limited carry, and intense online price competition. Looking ahead, he highlights the impact of the Section 199A(g) tax deduction, the need for stronger trade policy to open markets for Kansas grain, and the growing challenge of finding operational labor—from truck drivers to elevator staff—in rural America.
Top ten takeaways
Farmer co-ops exist to restore market power. They were created so farmers could pool resources, negotiate better prices and serve as a “competitive yardstick” against more concentrated players like railroads and large buyers.
The Capper-Volstead Act is foundational. It provides limited antitrust exemptions that make it legal for farmers to jointly market their products through cooperatives—without being treated as colluding under Sherman antitrust law.
Kansas has far fewer co-ops, but bigger ones. The state went from 364 co-ops in 1952 to about 54 today, reflecting consolidation, scale economies and the need to attract and retain management talent.
Retiring managers often trigger merger decisions. Many modern mergers start when a long-tenured general manager announces retirement, forcing boards to weigh hiring new leadership versus partnering or merging with neighboring co-ops.
New structures help share talent and risk. Models like Alliance Ag and Grain’s management LLC or marketing alliances such as CoMark and Equity Alliance CEA let local co-ops retain ownership while sharing top-level talent and gaining scale in grain marketing.
Co-op health is about more than patronage. Boards and lenders look at cash flow, liquidity and working capital, alongside patronage and equity redemption, to judge whether the co-op can weather droughts, price swings and changing markets.
“Speed and space” still matter. Investing in faster dumping and more storage capacity remains a critical way co-ops provide value to farmers—especially when big crops meet limited export or domestic demand.
Loyalty is changing, but relationships still count. With smartphones and online bids, farmers can comparison-shop easily, yet co-ops can still win by being a trusted adviser, offering services, risk management and local knowledge—not just price.
Labor is a looming constraint. From truck drivers to elevator operators, co-ops are struggling to fill operational roles, making immigration and H-2A reform important policy issues for the cooperative system.
Policy wins like Section 199A(g) matter. The permanent tax deduction can support higher cash patronage, more timely equity redemptions, and needed capital investments—benefiting both co-ops and their farmer-members.
Segment Time Stamps
00:01 – 01:01 – Intro to Wheat’s On Your Mind and guest bio for K-State ag economist Brian Briggeman, including his background with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and role as director of the Arthur Capper Cooperative Center.
01:02 – 03:36 – What the Arthur Capper Cooperative Center is, why it was created during turbulent times in the 1980s, and how it supports co-ops through research and education. Explanation of who Arthur Capper was and how the Capper-Volstead Act gives limited antitrust exemptions to agricultural cooperatives.
03:36 – 08:14 – History and purpose of farmer co-ops: farmers banding together against railroad power, pooling acres for better prices, and using co-ops as a “competitive yardstick.” Discussion of grain, agronomy, energy, risk management and the deep community role of co-ops as employers, taxpayers and sponsors of local events.
08:14 – 13:18 – The merger trend in Kansas: from 364 co-ops in 1952 to 54 today. How retirements of long-time managers often trigger merger talks, with examples like Alliance Ag and Grain, Kansas and Farmers Cooperative of Cheney, and SEK Co-op with single-location co-ops in Yates Center.
13:18 – 16:32 – Different structural models: management LLCs like Alliance Ag and Grain, plus grain marketing alliances such as CoMark and Equity Alliance CEA. Emphasis on using these structures to access talent and economies of scale.
16:32 – 19:28 – Board education and director development. The role of the Kansas Cooperative Council and the Capper Center in new director training, strategy sessions and helping farmer-directors oversee multi-million-dollar businesses while improving their own farm management skills.
19:28 – 23:06 – How co-ops manage input price volatility and grain market risk: securing supply, matching inventory to farmer contracts and dealing with drought-driven low bushels versus big crops with limited carry. Focus on access to global markets and the importance of basis and spreads.
23:06 – 27:43 – Measuring co-op financial health: cash flow, liquidity, working capital, patronage, equity retirement and capital investment in “speed and space.” How co-ops decide whether to keep non-core services like tire shops and farm stores versus focusing on grain and inputs.
27:43 – 31:22 – Co-op loyalty and competition in an online world: more bids at farmers’ fingertips and pressure to shop around. Discussion of how co-ops can still win by being a trusted advisor and building relationships rather than always being the cheapest.
31:22 – 34:53 – Policy and outlook: the Section 199A(g) tax deduction becoming permanent law and how it supports patronage, equity retirement and CapEx. Importance of trade policy and export markets for revenue, and workforce challenges driving calls for immigration and H-2A reforms.
34:53 – end – The challenge of leadership transition and institutional knowledge as long-time managers retire, along with the need to adapt past practices to a rapidly changing co-op and ag economy. Closing appreciation of the cooperative model as a uniquely American way to strengthen rural communities.
Senior Director of Advocacy at Kansas Farm Bureau—and sixth-generation producer—Ryan Flickner sits down with Aaron Harries to talk policy that actually touches the farm gate. From the Farm Bill stalemate and year-round E15 to trade philosophy and the real cost of inputs, Ryan shares how Kansas “punches above its weight” and why coalitions beat hot takes every time. He also lays out why protein’s a bright spot while row crops are tight, and how policy predictability drives long-term investment on the farm.
Then we get practical: rural apprenticeships that retain good hands, domestic well realities and water rights, and field-level innovation at Flickner Farms—from subsurface drip to 360 Rain and NASA’s FIAT project for identifying high-protein wheat zones. It’s a candid, Kansas-first look at risk, resilience, and the tools that help rural families keep farming.
Top 10 takeaways
Kansas still gets heard in DC by bringing facts from real producers—and by building coalitions over perfection.
Omnibus culture stalls ag wins like year-round E15; regular order would move practical items faster.
2018 Farm Bill was historic for votes, but extensions since then show how gridlock risks “dairy cliff” moments.
Farm policy may need to be “revolutionary,” not just evolutionary—re-examining ARC/PLC, savings accounts, and tax policy’s role.
Trade reality: focus on America’s comparative advantage and diversified buyers; consumers drive outcomes.
Economy right now: row crops tight on inputs; protein sector healthier thanks to low herd and steady demand.
High Plains risk is different—frequent, shallower losses vs. rare, massive hits in other regions—so safety nets must reflect that.
Workforce wins: Rural Kansas Apprenticeship Program helps train/retain talent and grow services (e.g., moving to commercial applicator).
Water is the community linchpin: domestic well quality/rights matter as much as irrigation; awareness and testing are key.
On-farm innovation pays: subsurface drip, 360 Rain, and NASA FIAT can target high-protein wheat and conserve water.
Timestamps 00:01–00:38 | Intro & guest bio — Host intro, Kansas Wheat sponsors; guest: Ryan Flickner, KFB Senior Director of Advocacy and sixth-generation farmer. 01:04–03:18 | From DC staffer to advocate — What changes when you move from being asked to making the ask: relationships, directness, coalition-building. 03:19–06:16 | Kansas delegation & media era — Why Kansas still “punches above our weight,” and how social media/AI changed the information game 06:17–09:28 | Grassroots then vs. now — Standing on “shoulders of giants,” omnibus bills, and the example of year-round E15 getting stuck. 08:10–09:38 | 2018 Farm Bill context — 86–87 Senate votes; why regular order matters; extensions and “dairy cliff.” 09:38–12:15 | Future of farm policy — Evolutionary vs. revolutionary; ARC/PLC limits; farm savings accounts; role of tax policy. 12:16–16:18 | Trade philosophy & “land the plane” — Free/fair trade, America’s comparative advantage, consumer market power, demographics. 21:24–23:49 | Farm economy snapshot — Row crops tight on inputs; cattle strong on low herd + steady demand; optimism on sowing wheat. 25:40–27:49 | High Plains risk explained — Loss patterns vs. Corn Belt; why Kansas producers plan for shallow, frequent hits. 28:05–31:06 | Labor & apprenticeships — Rural Kansas Apprenticeship Program, moving trainees to certified applicators, building retention. 31:19–33:27 | Statehouse outlook — Compressed session; budgets; water will remain central. 32:43–35:40 | Water literacy & quality — Tuttle dredging; household wells; nitrate/TDS surprises; senior rights for domestic wells. 35:40–36:47 | Rural viability warning — Domestic well losses add up; implications for keeping people on the land. 37:07–39:24 | Flickner Innovation Farm — 151 years, subsurface drip since 2001, 360 Rain units, irrigation at ~60% of county average. 39:24–41:47 | NASA FIAT & high-pro wheat mapping; wrap — Using satellite imagery to segregate premium protein; closing thanks.
Kansas Wheat CEO Justin Gilpin sits down with Aaron Harries for a fast-paced, wide-ranging update on the state’s fall harvest and planting season. They cover it all — from field conditions and the importance of fall rains to how flexible winter wheat planting decisions can help farmers manage risk in a volatile market. Justin also shares insights on the ripple effects of the federal government shutdown on agriculture, from export data to USDA research activity.
The episode also celebrates the story behind the new KS Bill Snyder wheat variety — a tribute to legendary K-State coach Bill Snyder and a symbol of Kansas innovation and rural pride. Hear how Kansas leadership is influencing national wheat policy, how U.S. exports are finding fresh markets in Nigeria and Asia, and why global trade ties matter for every farmer in the heartland.
Top 10 Takeaways
Kansas wheat planting is roughly 80% complete, with strong progress in the west and slower movement in wetter areas of the state.
Upcoming rains are critical for helping the new wheat crop emerge and thrive.
Wheat acreage remains stable around 7.4 million acres statewide.
Improved moisture could bring back opportunities for grazing cattle on wheat this fall.
K-State researchers are hard at work planting experimental plots for the next generation of Kansas wheat varieties.
The KS Bill Snyder wheat variety celebrates Kansas pride and agricultural excellence.
The government shutdown is halting USDA reports, funding, and research access, adding uncertainty for farmers.
U.S. wheat exports are up, with Nigeria surpassing Mexico as the top buyer of hard red winter wheat.
Kansas continues to lead nationally through strong participation in US Wheat Associates, NAWG, and industry advocacy.
Timestamps 0:00–2:00 — Fall Weather and Harvest Aaron Harries and Justin Gilpin open with an update on Kansas’s long-awaited fall weather and how it’s affecting harvest and planting progress across the state.
2:00–5:00 — Planting Progress Justin estimates around 80% of Kansas wheat is planted. South-central Kansas has lagged due to wet fields, while western Kansas is right on track.
5:00–7:30 — Importance of Rainfall Farmers are watching closely for upcoming rain that could be critical for wheat emergence and early tillering.
7:30–10:00 — Acreage Outlook Gilpin expects Kansas wheat acres to hold steady near 7.4 million, similar to last year, despite low prices and market uncertainty.
10:00–13:00 — Wheat’s Flexibility Aaron highlights the flexibility of winter wheat—especially valuable in a tight economy—since farmers can delay some fertilizer decisions.
13:00–16:00 — Grazing Opportunities Moisture levels may allow cattle to graze on wheat pastures this fall, something that hasn’t been possible in recent years.
16:00–20:00 — Research and Planting at K-State Aaron shares that K-State wheat breeders, including Dr. Allan Fritz, are busy planting research plots—important work for developing future wheat varieties.
20:00–25:00 — The KS Bill Snyder Variety The conversation shifts to the KS Bill Snyder wheat, named after legendary K-State football coach Bill Snyder. They discuss the variety’s success and the on-field recognition ceremony at a K-State football game.
25:00–33:00 — Government Shutdown Impacts Justin discusses how the federal government shutdown is disrupting USDA reports, research operations, and foreign ag funding programs.
33:00–38:00 — Wheat Exports and Markets Despite challenges, U.S. wheat exports are performing well. Nigeria now leads Mexico in U.S. hard red winter wheat purchases—a major milestone.
38:00–44:00 — Global Competition Global wheat production increases in Australia and Argentina could pressure prices. The U.S. must maintain and grow its export relationships.
44:00–48:00 — Leadership and Industry Meetings Kansas growers prepare for the upcoming US Wheat Associates and NAWG meetings, where leadership transitions and trade strategy will be discussed.
48:00–52:00 — Rail Merger Concerns Justin raises concerns about the potential Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern rail merger and what consolidation could mean for rural freight costs.
52:00–55:00 — Export Goals and Market Outlook Optimism remains for rebuilding U.S. wheat exports to the one-billion-bushel mark, emphasizing long-term trade relationships.
55:00–End — Closing Thoughts Aaron wraps up with appreciation for Kansas leadership and reminds listeners how to contact Kansas Wheat with feedback or questions.
WOYM - Four Crops, One Mission: How Kansas Agriculture Stays Strong
14 Oct 2025
00:55:39
In this special round-table edition of Wheat’s On Your Mind, host Aaron Harries welcomes the CEOs of Kansas Wheat, Corn, Soybeans, and Sorghum — Justin Gilpin, Josh Roe, Caleb Little, and Adam York. Together, they unpack how Kansas’ checkoff and grower associations function, where the dollars go, and how their unified efforts help strengthen markets, research, and advocacy for farmers across the state.
From tackling low commodity prices to building new international markets and investing in next-generation crop research, these leaders share candid perspectives on what’s working — and what’s keeping them up at night. They also discuss Kansas’ leadership in sustainability, the farm bill’s slow rollout, and how farmers are adapting to water and policy challenges. It’s an insider’s look at how collaboration keeps Kansas agriculture resilient, relevant, and rooted in the future.
Top Ten Takeaways
Kansas commodity groups work closely together because most Kansas farmers grow multiple crops.
Checkoff funds support research, market development, and promotion — not lobbying.
Kansas agriculture “punches above its weight” nationally due to strong relationships in DC and collaboration across commodities.
Biofuel and renewable aviation fuel policy highlight how Kansas’ unique climate and infrastructure create opportunities.
China’s trade slowdown has hit sorghum and soybeans hard, but diversification into new export markets is paying off.
Domestic processing growth, such as new soybean crush plants, is improving local basis and farmer profitability.
Food aid and humanitarian programs could help move surplus commodities while supporting global needs.
Kansas research leadership at K-State continues to deliver real solutions, from pest control to drought resilience.
Farmers want markets, not aid, but short-term relief may be needed until 2026 farm bill changes take effect.
Water quantity and quality remain long-term challenges that require a united, Kansas-based approach.
Timestamps
00:00–03:20 – Introduction of all four Kansas commodity CEOs; overview of checkoff and grower associations. 03:21–07:47 – Each group explains how their state and national checkoffs work and what farmer dollars fund. 07:48–12:04 – Discussion on collaboration across commodities and how Kansas’ diversification strengthens farmers. 12:05–18:08 – How Kansas differs from “I-states” in climate, policy, and biofuel strategy. 18:09–21:52 – Unique Kansas advantages in global markets and export promotion via K-State’s International Grains Program. 21:53–34:20 – Commodity market updates: sorghum exports to China, soybean crush expansion, corn surpluses, wheat prices. 34:21–38:08 – Food aid programs and how humanitarian exports can help move Kansas grain. 38:09–40:31 – Farm bill delays, potential aid, and short-term challenges for Kansas farmers. 40:32–51:24 – Research investments across K-State: sorghum improvement, wheat innovation, corn pest studies. 51:25–55:05 – Water issues and policy engagement: balancing conservation with agricultural needs. 55:06–End – Closing thoughts on cooperation, advocacy, and Kansas’ agricultural legacy.
WOYM - Why Wheat Still Matters: Economic Realities with Tanner Ehmke
30 Sep 2025
00:28:56
When crop prices are down and input costs are still sky-high, how are farmers deciding what to plant? In this episode of Wheat’s on Your Mind, host Aaron Harries talks with Tanner Ehmke, Lead Economist at CoBank, about the tough decisions producers are making right now. Tanner breaks down why wheat still plays a role in many rotations, even when margins are razor-thin. He also explains how export demand—especially from Mexico—is offering a rare bright spot in an otherwise challenging outlook for grains.
From the impact of tariffs and fertilizer costs to the long-term future of wheat in drought-prone areas, Tanner offers insights that blend market analysis with on-the-ground understanding. You’ll also hear how Farm Credit lenders and co-ops are adapting, what global players like Russia and Australia mean for U.S. producers, and what financial warning signs are flashing as we head into 2026.
It’s an episode full of clarity, context, and common sense for rural and ag-focused listeners.
Takeaways
CoBank serves as a major lender within the Farm Credit System, supporting both local credit associations and cooperatives.
Farmers are choosing crops based on the "least dirty shirt" principle—none are very profitable right now.
Tariffs and elevated input costs are squeezing farm margins despite lower commodity prices.
Wheat may gain ground in acreage due to lower production costs and available moisture.
Russia’s and Australia’s crop sizes heavily impact global wheat prices and U.S. acreage trends.
Mexican demand and rail logistics are driving strong wheat export performance.
Corn acreage saw surprising growth, but future USDA revisions are likely to reflect weather damage.
Lower irrigation capacity could boost small grains like triticale, rye, and wheat in the High Plains.
The livestock side of agriculture is faring well, while row crop farmers face mounting financial stress.
Co-ops benefit from higher volume harvests, but grain sorghum faces pricing and export challenges.
Timestamps
00:01 – Introduction to Tanner Ehmke and CoBank's mission 03:25 – Profitability decisions for Kansas crop producers 05:34 – Impact of input costs and tariffs on farmer choices 07:23 – Wheat acreage outlook and Russia's influence 09:36 – Fertilizer and input cost projections 11:24 – Export markets and Mexico's strategic importance 13:12 – Corn yield and acreage revisions 17:05 – Water scarcity and small grains potential 19:08 – Financial health of the ag economy and chapter 12 filings 24:44 – Co-ops and grain elevators: recovering from drought years 26:02 – Key economic indicators to watch: Fed, dollar, exports 27:37 – Where to find Tanner’s insights and subscribe to his newsletter
WOYM - Farm to Pharma: Biotech Roots in Rural Kansas
16 Sep 2025
00:34:17
Tritica Biosciences, a rural Kansas startup founded by Brandi and Dr. Chris Miller, is turning heads—and wheat germ—into revolutionary biotech. Backed by a $29 million grant from ARPA-H, their mission is to create shelf-stable, cell-free protein synthesis platforms using Kansas-grown wheat. Imagine insulin production powered by wheat embryos, all done on-site and without needing traditional bioreactors. It’s happening just east of Manhattan, Kansas.
What began in a 100-square-foot lab in a converted barn is now a scalable biotech enterprise with a 10,000+ square-foot facility, multiple partners, and global potential. In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, the Millers explain the science, the story, and the significance behind their work. From food security to pharmaceuticals, this is a game-changing look at wheat’s future beyond the grain bin.
Key Takeaways
Tritica Biosciences uses wheat germ to power cell-free protein synthesis.
Their proprietary process maintains shelf-stable wheat embryos.
Applications range from insulin production to cosmetics and pet food.
The process requires no living cells and avoids traditional fermentation.
Their facility started in a garage and now spans 10,000+ square feet.
The process is sustainable—leftover wheat is still food-grade.
Kansas hard red winter wheat is a major part of their current research.
The project is funded by a $29M ARPA-H grant with 5 partners.
Their technology may lead to localized protein drug manufacturing.
Tritica is actively hiring and expanding their team and capabilities.
Timestamps
00:01 – Introduction and guest bios 02:04 – Founding story of Tritica Biosciences 03:27 – Building their facilities from the ground up 05:10 – Chris’s early work with wheat and Celiac research 06:36 – What is ARPA-H? 08:00 – The uniqueness of their wheat germ extraction process 10:17 – What is cell-free protein synthesis? 13:16 – Turning wheat germ into shelf-stable scientific material 15:06 – Pharmaceutical potential and real-world applications 19:11 – The role of wheat variety in protein synthesis 20:44 – Beyond pharma: cosmetics, pet food, and food industry possibilities 24:07 – Enzymes, APIs, and green chemistry 27:15 – Project goals, commercialization, and future scale-up 30:08 – Collaborations with AI-driven protein design 33:25 – How to follow their work and stay connected
WOYM - Boost Bushels & Bragging Rights: Your Guide to the Wheat Yield Contest
02 Sep 2025
00:26:42
In the latest Wheat’s On Your Mind podcast, Aaron Harries chats with Anne Osborne, Executive Director of the National Wheat Foundation, about the value and impact of the National Wheat Yield Contest. Anne shares how the contest encourages U.S. wheat farmers to push for both higher yields and better quality, while also promoting innovation through tools like digital yield submissions. Whether you're in spring or winter wheat country, irrigated or dryland, there's a category for you—and the contest could even improve your long-term productivity.
Anne also gives us a look into the other initiatives driven by the National Wheat Foundation, from leadership development to on-farm education for congressional staff. She shares inspiring stories of Kansas farmers and how contest data is shaping best practices across the country. Tune in to learn how you can participate, what to expect, and why growing great wheat isn’t just possible—it’s happening now.
Takeaways
The National Wheat Yield Contest began in 2016 and now receives hundreds of entries annually.
The contest focuses on yield and quality, promoting sustainable wheat production.
A new “digital yield” category allows growers to submit data via precision ag tools.
Kansas has consistently performed well in the contest, with winners even during challenging years.
Growers must use new seed and be Kansas Wheat members to enter.
National winners are rewarded with a trip to the Commodity Classic and recognition.
Contest participation leads to long-term yield improvements—even 20 bu/ac increases.
The foundation supports education through leadership training and congressional outreach.
Data from the contest helps track trends like row spacing and variety performance.
Entering the contest helps growers innovate and share knowledge with others.
Timestamps:
00:01 – Introduction to Anne Osborne and her ag background 01:18 – What the National Wheat Foundation does 02:22 – Funding sources and history of the foundation 03:19 – Launch of the National Wheat Yield Contest 03:54 – Goals of the contest: yield, quality, and profitability 05:12 – Contest entry categories: spring/winter, irrigated/dryland, digital 06:10 – Entry process and requirements 07:49 – What winter wheat growers need to know before entering 08:50 – Incentives and benefits for participants 10:10 – Adding a quality component to the contest 12:03 – Regional surprises in grower practices (like no herbicides!) 14:00 – The digital yield category explained 16:11 – Kansas participation history and standout winners 18:05 – Sharing best practices and where to find contest data 20:11 – Row spacing and seeding trends from contest data 21:09 – Yield potential: where are we heading? 22:50 – Final encouragement to enter and try something new 23:20 – Other National Wheat Foundation programs: leadership, education, advocacy
WOYM - Trade Deals, Tariff Troubles, and Wheat Strategy
26 Aug 2025
00:37:36
This week on Wheat’s On Your Mind, we welcomed back Justin Gilpin and Dalton Henry for a robust roundtable on trade, tariffs, and the global wheat outlook. They unpacked why current U.S. wheat export numbers are encouraging—especially for hard red winter wheat—and discussed efforts to regain market traction in areas like South Africa and Southeast Asia. The team also reflected on how the U.S. is competing globally amid rising challenges from Russia and other exporters.
Dalton gave insight into new trade frameworks with countries like Indonesia and Vietnam, as well as how non-tariff barriers like weed seed protocols can pose silent threats to trade. Meanwhile, Justin emphasized the need for a long-term, national vision to support U.S. wheat exports and logistics. Whether it’s shipping infrastructure or trade policy, this episode offers a comprehensive look at the forces shaping wheat’s future on the global stage.
Key Takeaways
Hard red winter wheat exports are rebounding thanks to low prices creating competitive advantages abroad.
South Africa and Southeast Asia are bright spots for U.S. wheat exports.
Russia remains the primary export competitor, particularly in African markets.
Retaliatory tariffs haven’t severely impacted wheat, unlike other commodities.
MOUs with Indonesia, Vietnam, and Bangladesh are helping establish long-term trade relationships.
China’s wheat import future remains unpredictable due to domestic production priorities.
Black Sea peace could stabilize markets, but Russia's wheat pricing strategies might shift.
Non-tariff barriers like weed seeds and diseases remain key hurdles, with growing focus on science-based solutions.
Japan’s regulators are visiting Kansas, showing strong institutional ties to U.S. wheat systems.
A national wheat strategy is needed to address logistics, infrastructure, and global competitiveness.
Timestamps 00:01 – Introduction and wheat export context 01:10 – Justin Gilpin on export strategy and market gains 03:17 – Global wheat competition: Russia, Australia, Ukraine 05:12 – Dalton Henry on tariffs and retaliatory trade dynamics\ 07:11 – New purchase commitments from Indonesia, Bangladesh, Vietnam 09:32 – Discussion on China’s role and potential trade shifts 10:55 – Impacts of peace in the Black Sea region 16:01 – Tackling non-tariff trade barriers like phytosanitary regulations 24:20 – Japanese trade delegation and SPS concerns 27:14 – GMO wheat and Japan’s regulatory interests 28:28 – Farmer leadership and trade policy evolution 32:09 – US-flag vessel shipping and national infrastructure needs 36:41 – Call for a unified U.S. wheat export strategy
WOYM - Wheat: The Grain at the Center of Civilization
19 Aug 2025
00:27:04
In this special episode, Aaron Harries speaks with renowned food historian Rachel Laudan about the deep roots of wheat in human civilization. Growing up on a farm near Stonehenge, Rachel’s unique background—combined with her expertise in history, science, and philosophy—provides a rich and thoughtful perspective on how wheat shaped the rise of empires, economies, and everyday life. Rachel unpacks how early humans learned to transform difficult, scratchy seeds into food, why processing grain was historically women's labor, and how wheat became the backbone of global nutrition and political power.
From ancient metates in Mesoamerica to the industrial roller mills of the 19th century, this conversation dives deep into the story of how wheat evolved from a wild seed to a symbol of civilization. Rachel also sheds light on the politics of white bread, the muscle power of grain grinders, and how wheat’s utility in food security shaped empires from Rome to modern America.
Key Takeaways
Early grain consumption dates back 20,000+ years—far before formal agriculture.
Processing grain into edible food required intense physical labor, mostly done by women.
Ancient civilizations relied on stored grain for year-round sustenance.
Gluten in wheat allowed for more diverse and appealing food products.
Wheat became a preferred grain in major empires due to its versatility and storability.
White bread historically symbolized wealth and status.
Industrial roller mills drastically reduced bread costs in the 1800s.
Governments worldwide encouraged wheat consumption for perceived health benefits.
Wheat has played a central role in food aid and international stability.
The importance of harvest and grain supply remains as vital today as ever.
Timestamps
00:01 – Introduction and Rachel's background 03:17 – Why Rachel focused on food history 05:41 – The challenges of early grain use 07:38 – Human labor behind grain processing 10:04 – Women's role in grain grinding 12:16 – Rise of wheat as the preferred grain 14:19 – Bread types across empires 17:41 – Wheat and political stability 21:44 – Industrialization and global wheat demand 22:53 – Wheat in food aid and global security 25:06 – Rewriting women’s history through food 26:21 – Personal memories of harvest season
In this special episode, Aaron Harries welcomes back David Schemm, newly reappointed State Executive Director of the USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA) in Kansas. Schemm reflects on his goals from his first tenure and outlines his vision for his second, emphasizing efficiency, legacy, and adapting to evolving farm technologies. With boots-on-the-ground experience both as a farmer and policymaker, Schemm offers a unique perspective on bridging local farming needs with federal programs.
Listeners will hear firsthand how the FSA is adapting post-COVID, tackling workforce and technology challenges, and striving to improve program delivery statewide. Schemm shares valuable insights on underutilized FSA programs like TIP and Farm Storage Facility Loans, and unpacks potential impacts of the current farm bill discussions in Washington. Whether you’re a beginning farmer or a seasoned grower, this episode delivers practical takeaways you won't want to miss.
What You're Going To Learn
Schemm’s FSA leadership vision centers on enhancing production, embracing heritage, and establishing a legacy.
COVID tested agency resilience and reinforced the importance of flexibility and communication.
The FSA is focusing on increasing efficiency without sacrificing service quality to producers.
Modernization and technology use are key to serving younger, tech-savvy farmers.
The FSFL and TIP programs are valuable yet underutilized resources for producers.
The 2024 farm bill (or farm bill-lite) remains uncertain but critical for row crop stability.
Kansas FSA is emphasizing internal restructuring to address labor and program delivery issues.
Local participation via county committees is vital to ensuring producer representation.
Schemm brings both policy and practical farming experience to the role, shaping responsive leadership.
Beginning farmers can access loans and ownership support through tailored FSA programs.
Timestamps
00:12 – Introduction to David Schemm and his return to FSA 01:14 – Schemm’s farm vision and its influence on FSA leadership 04:51 – Lessons learned from COVID-19 and managing federal agency coordination 06:56 – Changes and challenges in this second term 08:47 – FSA modernization and behind-the-scenes efficiency efforts 14:31 – Loans for beginning farmers and credit access through FSA 15:52 – Farm bill status and what’s at stake for Kansas producers 20:35 – Climate-smart program updates and uncertainty 22:29 – Underutilized programs like TIP and FSFL explained 25:41 – Local engagement: FSA county committees and producer participation 29:30 – Closing remarks and contact information
The 2025 wheat growing season in Kansas will go down as one of the most challenging in recent memory, with widespread viral disease pressure affecting crops statewide. In the latest episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, host Aaron Harries is joined by Kansas State University experts Dr. Kelsey Andersen Onofre and Dr. Romulo Lollato to explain why and how this viral outbreak took hold. From the biological intricacies of the wheat curl mite to the nuances of symptom onset and misdiagnosis, they break down what really happened and why traditional solutions like fungicides didn’t work.
Farmers are encouraged to act early—well before planting—to mitigate these viruses. This means aggressively managing volunteer wheat, being mindful of green bridge hosts, and choosing wheat varieties with known resistance genes. Listeners will also learn how to send samples to the K-State Diagnostic Lab for accurate identification, which will help prevent another viral outbreak in 2026. This episode is a must-hear for producers and ag professionals looking to prepare effectively for the upcoming planting season.
10 Key Takeaways
The 2025 Kansas wheat crop faced extreme yield losses from a three-virus complex.
Wheat streak mosaic, triticum mosaic, and High Plains wheat mosaic can co-infect, worsening symptoms.
All three viruses are transmitted by the wheat curl mite, which survives both summer and winter.
Symptoms often appear in spring but result from fall infections.
Miticides and fungicides offer no effective control once symptoms appear.
Managing volunteer wheat post-harvest is critical to breaking the green bridge cycle.
Certain cropping practices (e.g., double-cropping, cover crops) exacerbate mite survival.
Resistance genes (e.g., Cmc4 and WSM2) help but are not bulletproof—temperature sensitivity and virus specificity matter.
Virus presence in seed is minimal but possible; primary spread is via mites.
Accurate diagnosis through Extension offices or K-State’s Diagnostic Lab is crucial.
Timelines
00:02 – Introduction to the viral disease crisis of the 2025 wheat crop 01:26 – Dr. Andersen Onofre explains the three-virus complex 02:46 – Impact of co-infections on yield loss 03:39 – Role of the wheat curl mite as the common vector 04:21 – Timing and misinterpretation of symptom emergence 06:17 – Biology and survival patterns of the wheat curl mite 08:39 – Weather conditions and unusual symptom expression in 2025 10:15 – Why late-season management is too late 12:55 – Fungicides and miticides: what doesn’t work 14:18 – What mites are doing post-harvest 16:19 – Volunteer wheat and cropping system challenges 18:02 – Green bridge hosts beyond volunteer wheat 22:28 – Variety resistance: current options and limitations 26:51 – Can the viruses be seed-transmitted? 28:07 – Redefining the green bridge kill window 30:14 – Submitting samples for accurate diagnosis 31:53 – Field symptoms and common misdiagnoses 34:36 – Wrap-up and resources
In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, Arron Harries and Justin Gilpin regroup after their insightful conversation with Senator Jerry Moran to unpack the latest in ag policy and harvest developments. With the recent reconciliation bill pushing key wins for Kansas agriculture—including improved crop insurance, better ARC/PLC guarantees, and funding boosts for wheat export programs—this episode offers clear, actionable updates for producers and stakeholders. They also touch on USDA’s revised harvest projections, which reflect a diverse year in the field thanks to disease pressure from wheat streak mosaic and late-season rains.
Listeners also get a broader view of U.S. wheat's role globally, with news of a promising new trade agreement with Indonesia and the ongoing strategic importance of food aid programs like Food for Peace. The episode wraps with a spirited discussion on how the industry can counter high-profile misinformation about bread. Whether you're wrapping up harvest or planning for fall planting, this episode delivers valuable insights and timely reminders to help keep wheat top of mind.
Takeaways:
The reconciliation bill delivered major wins for wheat farmers—especially in ARC/PLC and crop insurance.
Senate ag appropriations include significant funding for Food for Peace and wheat breeding programs.
Harvest variability is high this year, with some areas hit hard by wheat streak mosaic.
K-State’s wheat-free date guidance is key for managing wheat curl mite risks.
Fall wheat acreage might dip slightly due to market conditions and crop rotation factors.
Wheat straw is regaining importance for soil health and moisture retention.
A new multi-year trade agreement with Indonesia marks a positive step for U.S. wheat exports.
There is growing need for a National Wheat Strategy focused on competitiveness and food security.
Misinformation about wheat and bread needs unified industry response.
Wheat continues to be a global staple—supplying 1 in 5 human calories daily.
Timestamps:
00:10 – Recap of conversation with Senator Jerry Moran 01:43 – Breakdown of reconciliation bill highlights 03:37 – Senate ag appropriations: Food for Peace, McGovern-Dole 06:33 – Kansas wheat harvest report and USDA updates 08:35 – Disease pressure and K-State wheat-free dates 09:53 – Acreage forecasts and straw residue value 11:48 – Indonesia trade agreement and U.S. wheat exports 14:33 – National Wheat Strategy and Breadbasket Diplomacy 18:09 – Responding to anti-bread messaging (Joe Rogan discussion) 21:45 – The historical and dietary importance of wheat
In this special episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, Kansas U.S. Senator Jerry Moran joins Justin Gilpin and host Arron Harries to dive into the latest developments affecting wheat producers and rural Kansans. The trio breaks down the July 4th reconciliation bill, including major wins for agriculture—particularly the updated reference prices in Title I of the Farm Bill and expanded crop insurance options for producers. Senator Moran provides an insider’s look at how the reconciliation process enabled faster action, while also discussing the long-term impact of the newly secured disaster relief funding and broader economic support for rural communities.
The conversation expands to cover national security, food aid, and export strategy, emphasizing the global importance of Kansas-grown wheat. Moran highlights programs like Food for Peace and McGovern-Dole, linking moral responsibility with economic benefit. From tariff negotiations to healthcare and rural hospital support, this episode blends ag policy and big-picture strategy in a way that's both practical and powerful for wheat growers and rural advocates.
Key Takeaways:
The reconciliation bill includes a “skinny” farm bill with updated Title I safety net provisions.
Reference prices for wheat have been raised to $6.35/bushel—an 85-cent increase.
Disaster relief and drought assistance are now available via USDA offices.
Farmers can reallocate base acres with a one-time option.
Tax code changes lock in favorable estate tax thresholds for rural producers.
Export programs and food aid initiatives remain central to market development.
U.S. Wheat Associates continue to broker international deals, like with Indonesia.
Agriculture is increasingly seen as a national security priority.
Kansas rural hospitals will benefit from nearly $6 billion in aid.
Research funding, including genomic wheat research, received a boost.
Timestamps: 00:40 – Introduction and Senator Moran’s role in ag policy 02:00 – Overview of the reconciliation bill and farm bill tie-ins 04:45 – Reconciliation vs. regular legislative process 06:30 – Reference price increases and crop insurance updates 09:10 – Drought disaster assistance and USDA rollout 11:30 – Rural tax benefits and estate tax provisions 13:15 – Ethanol, trade, and the importance of exports 16:00 – Food for Peace, McGovern-Dole, and global food aid 18:45 – Agriculture as national security and intelligence insights 21:10 – Funding for rural hospitals and broadband 23:00 – Wheat genetics and research investment updates 24:50 – What’s next: Skinny farm bill and future priorities
In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, host Aaron Harries welcomes Dr. Joseph Awika, a globally respected food scientist and the new department head of Grain Science and Industry at Kansas State University. From his early days in Kenya to directing cutting-edge research in Texas and now Kansas, Dr. Awika brings a unique perspective to advancing grain science. He shares how his work focuses on making grain-based foods healthier, why polyphenols are important, and what the upcoming Global Center for Grain and Food Innovation will mean for students, the industry, and the future of food.
Listeners will also learn about the challenges of recruiting students into agricultural science, the merging of food science with grain science, and why industry collaboration is central to K-State’s future strategy. It’s an inspiring look into how one leader is reshaping an entire academic field from the ground up—literally.
Key Takeaways (10)
Dr. Joseph Awika brings international and interdisciplinary experience to his new leadership role.
The new Global Center aims to enhance research, education, and industry collaboration in grain and food innovation.
Awika's research focuses on improving human health through enhanced grain components like polyphenols.
The new facility will house teaching labs, pilot plants, and spaces for food and pet food research.
K-State is consolidating food science under the grain science department to maximize synergy.
Student recruitment is expected to benefit from the modernized learning environment.
Four core research priorities include human health, sustainability, innovation, and biosecurity.
Pet food and animal health are significant growth areas for the department.
The new center aims to meet the growing demand for skilled professionals in the grain science industry.
Industry wants greater input into curriculum updates to match evolving job market needs.
Timestamps:
00:01 – Meet Dr. Joseph Awika and his path from Kenya to Kansas 01:33 – Academic career and research on grains and human health 04:40 – Construction updates on the Global Center for Grain and Food Innovation 06:04 – What’s inside the new facility: labs, programs, and opportunities 08:07 – Why food science and grain science are joining forces 09:20 – Student recruitment challenges and opportunities 11:22 – Teaching philosophy and goals for the department 12:17 – Four research priorities: health, sustainability, innovation, and security 14:32 – Industry collaboration and the demand for trained professionals 16:00 – Final thoughts and contact information
WOYM - Policy, Protein & Potential: Wheat's Busy Season
24 Jun 2025
00:17:54
In this timely episode of Wheat's On Your Mind, host Aaron Harries catches up with Kansas Wheat CEO Justin Gilpin during a fast-paced and weather-challenged harvest season. From scorching temperatures and high winds to the push to beat the rain, Kansas farmers are experiencing one of the most variable harvests in recent memory. Gilpin shares insights from across the state, noting both the challenges in drought-stressed regions and the surprising successes in the southwest, forecasting a statewide yield between 330 to 350 million bushels.
Justin also provides a behind-the-scenes look at global market dynamics, with Kansas Wheat actively pursuing opportunities in Asia, Africa, and South America. He discusses recent trade missions, the return of U.S. wheat to markets like South Africa, and the strengthening of relationships with millers from Brazil to Vietnam. As international buyers look to U.S. wheat for reliability and quality, Kansas stands ready to meet the call.
Gilpin closes with an update on critical policy discussions in Washington, D.C., including food aid programs, farm bill negotiations, and the importance of the Kansas Wheat Innovation Center. With cutting-edge research, strong partnerships, and farmer-led investment, Kansas is not only growing wheat but also growing the future.
Takeaways:
Kansas wheat harvest is progressing unusually fast due to extreme heat and wind.
Yield outcomes vary greatly across the state, with some areas seeing record highs.
Global buyers are showing renewed interest in U.S. wheat, especially in Africa and Asia.
Relationships remain essential for securing international wheat markets.
Trade missions are bearing fruit, with new sales and revived market interest.
Policy developments in D.C. could significantly impact food aid and farm support.
The Kansas Wheat Innovation Center plays a pivotal role in advancing research and genetics.
Improved wheat quality and volume this year may aid export recovery.
Challenges remain from tariffs, humanitarian aid program changes, and global instability.
U.S. wheat is seen globally as a dependable and high-quality source.
Timestamps:
00:00 – Introduction and weather-driven harvest acceleration 01:22 – Yield variability and harvest window 03:10 – Global market opportunities & wheat demand recovery 08:10 – Hosting South American milling associations 10:29 – Wheat marketing in Africa and Asia 14:07 – Washington, D.C. updates: policy, food aid, farm bill 17:43 – Kansas Wheat Innovation Center and genetic research
In this episode of the Wheat's on Your Mind Podcast, Aaron Harries talks with Lyle Friesen of Friesen Harvesting—a third-generation, family-run custom harvesting business based in Meade, Kansas. Starting with humble roots in 1949, Lyle shares how the operation has grown to include modern John Deere combines and Kenworth trucks, all while maintaining deep-rooted family values and relationships with customers, including one family they've harvested for since the beginning. Listeners get an insider’s view of the logistical and agricultural challenges of a northbound harvest route stretching from Oklahoma to Montana.
The conversation touches on the realities of wheat production across states, crop conditions, equipment evolution, and the often-overlooked difficulties of running a mobile business. Lyle provides candid insights into the labor challenges, the pressure of working with increasingly narrow harvest windows, and why new wheat varieties are changing the custom harvesting landscape. Whether you're in agriculture or simply curious about the lives behind your daily bread, this episode delivers a rich slice of wheat country life.
Key Takeaways
Friesen Harvesting has been operating since 1949 and remains family-run.
Their custom route spans from Oklahoma to near the Canadian border in Montana.
Most of their customers are long-term, with up to 95% repeat annually.
Modern combines and efficiency expectations have significantly changed harvesting.
Drought, hail, and changing wheat varieties are major challenges.
Elevator technology has improved—rarely are there long wait times anymore.
Organic transitions and generational shifts have changed farm operations.
Hiring quality help is one of the biggest ongoing challenges.
Custom harvesting is increasingly difficult for newcomers due to costs.
Family plays a central role both in business operations and road life.
Timestamps
00:01 – Origins of Friesen Harvesting: 1949 to now 02:03 – Overview of their home base in Meade, Kansas 02:24 – Annual harvest route from Oklahoma to Montana 04:20 – 2024 wheat outlook: drought, variability, and expectations 06:52 – Impact of wheat variety changes on harvest timing 08:24 – How equipment and expectations have accelerated harvest pace 12:30 – Elevator logistics and why wheat lines are rare now 14:09 – Financial pressure on custom harvesters and their customers 15:29 – Harvest downtime and family dynamics on the road 17:20 – Starting a custom harvest business today: is it feasible? 18:46 – Tornado chasers, field mix-ups, and life on the road 20:14 – Lyle’s 50th harvest season and reflection
In the latest episode of the Wheat's on Your Mind Podcast, Ben Brown, Extension economist at the University of Missouri, joins host Aaron Harries to break down current challenges and developments in U.S. agriculture. From his family farm in western Missouri to his influence on national ag policy through FAPRI, Ben offers a unique blend of personal insight and professional analysis. The episode covers everything from his Kansas State roots and mentorship by Dr. Barry Flinchbaugh to the evolution of FAPRI as a resource for ag policy evaluation and outreach.
Ben delves into market dynamics, explaining how acreage shifts, international trade, and input costs are reshaping the agricultural landscape. He shares comparative insights on Brazilian production advantages and outlines how current tariffs and a weaker U.S. dollar are influencing export behavior. The episode concludes with a thoughtful discussion of the status of the Farm Bill, the potential for ad hoc assistance, and the resources available to producers seeking clarity during uncertain times. It’s a must-listen for anyone tracking policy and market trends in wheat and beyond.
Ten Takeaways
FAPRI provides data-driven policy analysis to inform legislators but does not create policy.
Missouri producers typically grow soft red winter wheat due to local infrastructure and market logistics.
Cotton and rice are under financial pressure due to global demand and export challenges.
Corn acreage is increasing as it out competes other crops financially in many regions.
Grain sorghum is seeing unexpected acreage gains despite weak prices.
U.S. wheat exports are outperforming expectations amid global uncertainty.
Brazil's ag expansion is driven by favorable currency exchange and lower fixed costs.
U.S. producers may benefit from adapting Brazilian equipment-sharing strategies.
The Farm Bill’s future is uncertain, with budget tensions in Congress stalling progress.
Government payments remain a major support mechanism for farm income.
Timestamps
00:01 – Introduction of guest Ben Brown and his background in agriculture and Extension. 01:21 – Family farm operations and diversified strategy with row crops and cattle. 03:29 – Differences between soft red and hard red winter wheat in Missouri. 04:04 – FAPRI’s history, role in farm policy analysis, and national collaboration. 07:28 – Funding sources for FAPRI and outreach efforts like annual conferences. 10:13 – Reflections on K-State, mentorship by Dr. Flinchbaugh, and the impact of international study in Brazil. 13:45 – Brazil's influence on U.S. and global agriculture. 14:43 – U.S. crop outlooks: pressures on cotton, rice, sorghum, corn; implications for wheat. 20:29 – Impact of government payments on net farm income. 22:23 – Tariffs and trade dynamics for sorghum, corn, wheat; resilience of exports. 26:11 – U.S. dollar trends and implications for global trade. 27:51 – Brazil’s cost advantages and machinery-sharing strategies. 32:17 – Status of the Farm Bill, congressional budget debates, ad hoc assistance potential. 36:50 – CCC funding mechanics and limitations for trade assistance. 39:07 – Contact information and closing remarks.
In this powerful episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, Peter Laudeman of U.S. Wheat Associates and Justin Gilpin of Kansas Wheat take listeners on a firsthand journey through East and Southern Africa, where U.S.-grown wheat becomes a lifeline for hundreds of thousands. From witnessing heartbreaking ration cuts at the Kakuma refugee camp near the South Sudan border to observing port logistics in Mombasa, they share stories that illuminate the vital role American wheat plays in global food aid. Their reflections are both emotional and eye-opening, connecting Kansas farmers to the faces and lives their wheat feeds across the world.
But the journey doesn't stop there. In Lesotho, the pair unexpectedly find themselves amid diplomatic conversations following a major U.S. tariff announcement, turning their visit into a lesson on the complex intersection of trade, aid, and agricultural diplomacy. They wrap up their mission in Cape Town at the Sub-Saharan Buyers Conference, where the conversation shifts to future market opportunities for hard red winter wheat. Whether you're a grower, policy enthusiast, or just curious about the global reach of Kansas wheat, this episode offers rare insight into the human impact of agricultural exports and the critical need for strong, stable food aid programs.
Timestamps
00:00 – Intro and guest overview 01:00 – Purpose of the African food aid journey 02:50 – Why Kenya was chosen for the visit 05:00 – Justin Gilpin’s reflections on visiting refugee camps 07:00 – Inside Kakuma refugee camp and food distribution challenges 08:30 – Mombasa port operations and U.S. wheat logistics 10:15 – Economic ripple effect of U.S. wheat exports 12:00 – Explaining Food for Peace, and. Food for Progress 14:00 – Policy shifts and the push for USDA program leadership 16:00 – Reality of multi-generational refugee life 19:45 – Lesotho visit and unexpected diplomatic attention 24:00 – Sub-Saharan buyers’ conference in Cape Town 26:30 – Reassuring customers amid tariff and trade turbulence 28:00 – Farewell to Peter Laudeman and closing remarks
What does it take to keep farm radio alive and thriving in the heartland? Kyle Bauer, a Kansas radio legend and Hall of Fame broadcaster, joins the Wheat’s On Your Mind podcast to share a front-row account of how he built a rural broadcast empire from scratch, starting with a failing FM station and growing it into a multi-station powerhouse serving over 149 counties. In this candid conversation, Kyle lays bare the trials and triumphs of keeping radio relevant, local, and valuable to farmers and rural listeners alike.
From harvest reports to handmade programming schedules, Kyle opens up about his passion for serving the agricultural community, hiring true radio personalities, and training the next generation, sometimes beginning at age 14! Whether you're tuning in from the cab of a combine or driving down a dusty Kansas road, this episode is a masterclass in grit, growth, and grassroots media done right.
Timestamps
00:01 – Intro and Kyle Bauer’s unexpected path into radio 02:00 – Saving a dying FM station and evolving it into KCYL 03:50 – Acquiring KFRM and building a multi-state farm network 06:40 – Automation, equipment upgrades, and audience expansion 10:00 – The challenge of filling commercial slots with engaging ag content 14:00 – Hiring and training iconic farm broadcasters 17:00 – Keeping farm radio unique, entertaining, and hyper-local 20:00 – Serving advertisers through relevant, trusted content 22:30 – Shifts in listener demographics and podcasting’s role in audio revival 28:00 – Leveraging K-State Extension and growing ag listenership 30:30 – State of farm broadcasting in Kansas vs. the nation 35:00 – The fight to keep AM radio alive in new vehicles 39:50 – Closing reflections and the future of rural radio
In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, Aaron Harries sits down with Jane DeMarchi, president of the North American Millers Association, to explore the vital connection between grain and goodness. Jane shares her rich family history in the baking industry, how NAMA supports millers across the continent, and what it was like to return to the organization at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. They dig into policy priorities, including the future of the Farm Bill, food fortification, ingredient safety, and the evolving landscape of the milling industry.
From the rise of snacking trends and high-tech flour mills to the potential of GMO wheat and regenerative agriculture, Jane provides a comprehensive look at where the industry stands—and where it’s headed. Whether you're a farmer, miller, policymaker, or just love bread, this episode offers key insights into the grain chain and how collaboration across sectors will shape the next era of food innovation.
In this episode, we sit down with K-State wheat breeder Dr. Allan Fritz, a familiar name to many Kansas wheat growers, to talk about the science behind stronger wheat and better protein. Dr. Fritz shares insights from decades of research focused on improving protein and gluten strength—work that’s directly tied to wheat varieties grown right here in the Central Plains. We dig into the story behind the BX7OE protein, a powerful trait first identified in Red River 68 and rooted in the Canadian super strong wheat class, now reshaping how we think about protein and yield.
Whether you're aiming for protein premiums or simply trying to stay ahead of the curve, this conversation highlights the importance of selecting the right varieties, understanding the balance between yield and protein, and staying open to rapid innovation. We also talk about how partnerships with institutions like Oklahoma State are helping accelerate the development of high-performing wheat that meets today’s growing demands. If you're farming in Kansas, this is one episode you won't want to miss.
In this episode, Aaron welcomes Alicia Boor, an agriculture and natural resources agent in the Cottonwood District in Kansas, and a vital member of the K State Research and Extension's Stress and Resiliency Team. Alicia's work focuses on providing educational resources on stress, stress management, and resilience, particularly within the agricultural community. Her efforts are crucial in addressing the unique challenges faced by farmers, who often experience high levels of stress due to the demanding and unpredictable nature of their profession.
Key Insights
- Farmers face unique stressors due to isolation, the desire to be self-reliant, and the stigma around seeking help. - Kansas ranks high in suicide rates, with farmers being particularly vulnerable, emphasizing the urgent need for mental health support in the agricultural sector. - Key indicators of stress and potential mental health issues include changes in habits, withdrawal from social activities, and expressions of hopelessness or suicidal thoughts. - The K State Research and Extension's Stress and Resiliency Team offers various programs, including QPR suicide prevention training and mental health first aid, to support individuals and communities. - Tele-health and resources like the 988 hotline provide accessible and confidential mental health support options for those in rural areas. - Kansas Farm Management Association offers valuable resources, including legal assistance, farm transition facilitation, and financial advice, to help farmers manage financial stress. - Simple practices like deep breathing, physical activity, and building a strong support system can significantly enhance resilience and mental well-being.
WOYM – Wheat: Beyond the Value of the Grain, Part 2
04 Mar 2025
00:28:54
We explore how winter wheat contributes to improved crop yields, soil moisture conservation, and effective weed and disease management, drawing from K-State's long-term studies that demonstrate the benefits of winter wheat in enhancing the productivity and sustainability of cropping systems in Kansas.
Aaron Harries and Dr. Romulo Lollato discuss:
Yield Boosts: Discover how rotating crops with winter wheat can significantly increase yields for sorghum (up to 30 bushels more per acre!) and corn (around 15 bushels more).
Moisture Magic: Learn how wheat residue helps keep precious soil moisture, giving your next crops a head start.
Weed & Disease Control: See how wheat residue naturally fights weeds, even tough ones like Palmer amaranth, thanks to its allelopathic properties.
Soil Health: Find out how wheat residue protects against erosion and improves your soil's overall health.
Aaron Harries spoke with Vince Peterson, the president of U.S. Wheat Associates, who shares insights from his extensive career in the wheat industry and discusses his upcoming retirement in 2025. In this episode, we explore Vince's journey, the evolution of the global wheat market, and his perspectives on the future of wheat production and trade. From his beginnings at General Mills to his leadership at U.S. Wheat Associates, Vince shares valuable insights gained over decades of experience.
- Discover how the wheat market shifted from government to private sector buyers due to global trade agreements. - Understand the impact of events like the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the Iraq wars on wheat trade. - Learn about the importance of providing reliable quality wheat and technical support to developing markets. - Explore the potential for hard white wheat to enhance market competitiveness. - Gain advice on embracing challenges with optimism and flexibility in the agricultural sector.
(00:00:01) - Introduction to Wheat's on Your Mind podcast with Aaron Harries and guest Vince Peterson from U.S. Wheat Associates. (00:00:37) - Vince Peterson's upcoming retirement in 2025 after a long career with U.S. Wheat Associates. (00:00:55) - Vince Peterson's career path before U.S. Wheat Associates and his initial lack of interest in agriculture. (00:02:22) - Peterson's first job out of college was buying wheat for General Mills. (00:03:14) - An offer from a grain export company in Portland, Oregon, led to trading wheat for export. (00:03:47) - Peterson got to know the U.S. Wheat people while working in Asia and Portland. (00:04:10) - Winston Wilson offered Peterson a job with U.S. Wheat in 1985. (00:04:38) - Peterson's role in Egypt as assistant director for the Middle East. (00:05:48) - Peterson's return to Washington D.C. into a role that didn't exist at the time. (00:06:33) - Egypt's wheat imports and its shift to a private sector. (00:07:39) - A snapshot of the global wheat market in 1985 with government agency buyers. (00:08:52) - The shift from government buying agencies to private agencies. (00:10:41) - The Canadian Wheat Board and the Australian Wheat Board going away. (00:13:54) - How US Wheat pivoted after the fall of the Soviet Union. (00:16:22) - The messaging to U.S. wheat customers over Peterson's career. (00:18:07) - Technical assistance as a bedrock of the services that US Wheat provides. (00:19:47) - Larger than life figures Peterson has worked with. (00:22:25) - World leaders Peterson has met in his career. (00:25:08) - Peterson's presentations at Latin American buyers conferences. (00:26:43) - Peterson's crystal ball and his vision for the global wheat market. (00:28:32) - Peterson's thoughts on the next big change coming about. (00:30:49) - How the U.S. can meet the demand and where it fits in the picture. (00:32:33) - Peterson's five wishes to position the U.S. best. (00:35:46) - What's been most rewarding for Peterson. (00:37:03) - Peterson's message for farmers about the next decade or two. (00:38:48) - Best wishes for Vince's retirement.
We discuss the challenges of wheat production in western Kansas, the goals of Dr. Zhang's breeding program, and the advanced technologies being utilized to enhance wheat varieties.What we talk about in this episode...
- Dr. Zhang emphasizes the importance of yield improvement and disease resistance in his breeding objectives.
- He highlights the role of collaboration with local farmers and institutions in enhancing breeding efforts.
- Advanced techniques like double haploids and drone technology are revolutionizing the breeding process.
- Dr. Zhang shares insights on the impact of climate change on wheat production and the need for drought-tolerant varieties.
- He discusses the challenges posed by evolving diseases and the importance of ongoing research.
- Listeners will learn about notable wheat varieties developed under his program, including Joe and KS Dallas.
- Dr. Zhang's future directions include exploring GMO and gene editing to enhance wheat resilience.