Built For Meaning - Détails, épisodes et analyse

Détails du podcast

Informations techniques et générales issues du flux RSS du podcast.

Built For Meaning

Stephanie Jiroch

Business & Entrepreneuriat

Sciences

Fréquence : 1 épisode/34j. Total Éps: 82

Built for Meaning is a podcast about the psychology of identity, belonging, and the lifelong search for meaning.

Hosted by Stephanie Jiroch, researcher, strategist, and creator of the Donor Identity Framework™, each episode explores why humans do what they do—from the communities we join and the causes we support to the brands we love, the identities we create, and the stories we tell ourselves.

Drawing from behavioral psychology, media psychology, consumer behavior, and real-world research, Built for Meaning uncovers the hidden forces shaping how we connect, contribute, and become.

If you've ever wondered why people stay loyal, why communities thrive, or what truly gives life meaning, you're in the right place.

Lire plusRéduire

Site

RSS

Apple

Données mises à jour le 11/11/2026

Classements récents

Dernières positions dans les classements Apple Podcasts et Spotify.

Apple Podcasts

🇨🇦 Canada - Non Profit
11/11/2026
#60

Spotify

Aucun classement récent disponible

Liens partagés entre épisodes et podcasts

Liens présents dans les descriptions d'épisodes et autres podcasts les utilisant également.

https://brandpsyche.co/brand-story-blueprint
36 partages
https://app.acuityscheduling.com/schedule.php?owner=12413637&amp
15 partages
https://brandpsyche.co/work-with-us
8 partages

https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephaniejiroch
11 partages
https://linkedin.com/in/stephaniejiroch
7 partages
https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarah-gobbs-hill/

Qualité et score du flux RSS

Évaluation technique de la qualité et de la structure du flux RSS.

Qualité du flux RSS

À améliorer

Score global : 63%

Historique des publications

Répartition mensuelle des publications d'épisodes au fil des années.

Year

Derniers épisodes publiés

Liste des épisodes récents, avec titres, durées et descriptions.

The Growth Marketing Strategies Your Non-Profit Needs to Adopt

Épisode 82

mercredi 4 novembre 2026 • Durée 15:52

For most nonprofits, marketing is a support function, something handed to the busiest person on the team and thought about last. I make the case that it should be treated as a growth engine instead, and that means borrowing three strategies from the for-profit world: account-based marketing, brand storytelling, and growth marketing.

I walk through what each one actually means for a nonprofit, why spray-and-pray outreach rarely works, how brand is really the meaning people attach to you plus the experience they have with you, and why acquisition without retention is an expensive way to keep starting over.

I’d love to hear your answer to the question at the end: what’s one marketing strategy from the for-profit world you think more nonprofits should embrace? Tell me at hello (at) stephaniejiroch.com

Related Episodes

Let's stay connected:

➡️ Subscribe to Giving Good, my newsletter dedicated to rethinking donor retention and acquisition.

📩 Built for Meaning on Substack — research, reframes, and practical insights delivered straight to your inbox: SUBSCRIBE HERE

💼 Connect on LinkedIn

Lire plusRéduire

How to Get More From Your Event or Campaign Post-Mortem

Épisode 81

mercredi 7 octobre 2026 • Durée 21:09

After every appeal or event I work on, I make the team sit down for a post-mortem exercise, no matter how it went. It’s Dan Sullivan’s Experience Transformer, and in this episode I walk you through all four parts of it the way I’d walk through it with a client, including why we always start with what worked instead of jumping straight to what went wrong.

I also share some of the research on why debriefs are one of the most affordable ways to get better at this work. And then I end where I always seem to end up: what happens to your donor after they give. Most post-mortems stop at the moment of the gift. I think that’s exactly where the most important part of the relationship begins, and I’ll show you how to fold it into your review so it doesn’t get skipped again.

Let's stay connected:

➡️ Subscribe to Giving Good, my newsletter dedicated to rethinking donor retention and acquisition.

📩 Built for Meaning on Substack — research, reframes, and practical insights delivered straight to your inbox: SUBSCRIBE HERE

💼 Connect on LinkedIn

Sources & citations

Sullivan, D. The Experience Transformer®. Strategic Coach thinking tool. See “What You Can Learn From Failure” and “What To Do When Good People Make Mistakes,” Strategic Coach Multiplier Mindset blog.
Tannenbaum, S. I., & Cerasoli, C. P. (2013). Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 55(1), 231–245.
Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 857–871.
Burk, P. (2003). Donor-Centered Fundraising. Cygnus Applied Research.

The Reason Donors Lapse Isn't What You Think

Épisode 80

mercredi 23 septembre 2026 • Durée 09:23

This week's episode goes after a myth almost every nonprofit believes without checking: that donors mostly leave because of money or because they lost interest in the cause. I walk you through the actual research on donor lapse - including a landmark study of ten thousand lapsed donors - and show that the real driver is almost always what happens (or doesn't happen) in the silence right after a gift. And of course, I connect it back to identity - a gift that never gets acknowledged in a way that reflects who the donor is doesn't get reinforced, and unconfirmed identity evidence fades fast.

Let's stay connected:

➡️ Subscribe to Giving Good, my newsletter dedicated to rethinking donor retention and acquisition.

📩 Built for Meaning on Substack — research, reframes, and practical insights delivered straight to your inbox: SUBSCRIBE HERE

💼 Connect on LinkedIn

Full Citations

Sargeant, A. (2001): Relationship fundraising: How to keep donors loyal. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(2), 177–192. Survey of ten thousand donors finding that only around one in five lapses were driven by financial hardship, with a similar share switching organizations; the remaining, largest share of lapse was linked to feeling unneeded, lack of feedback on gift impact, and inadequate acknowledgment.

Burk, P.: Donor-Centered Fundraising (Cygnus Applied Research). Research spanning over two decades and tens of thousands of donors, finding that acknowledgment and communication quality predict donor loyalty more strongly than gift size or appeal urgency.

Fundraising Effectiveness Project: (Association of Fundraising Professionals / Growth in Giving Initiative). Quarterly and annual donor retention benchmarking data. Sector-wide tracking showing that less than half of first-time donors give a second gift, underscoring the scale of preventable early-stage lapse.

Why Identity Matters So Much: A Deep Dive Into Who We Believe We Are

Épisode 79

mercredi 9 septembre 2026 • Durée 14:24

This week's episode goes back to what identity actually is from a psychological standpoint, why it's such a reliable predictor of behavior, and why that matters so much for anyone doing donor work. Stephanie walks through self-schema theory, possible selves, narrative identity, identity-based motivation, and the extended self — and ties it all back to why the show is called Built for Meaning in the first place.

Let's stay connected:

➡️ Join The 2026 Giving Tuesday Reset: A 10-Day Challenge

📩 Subscribe to Built for Meaning on Substack — research, reframes, and practical insights delivered straight to your inbox: SUBSCRIBE HERE

💼 Connect on LinkedIn

Sources Referenced

Markus (1977): Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 63–78. Foundational research on self-schemas — the mental structures that organize how we process information about ourselves.

Markus & Nurius (1986): Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. Introduces “possible selves,” the imagined future versions of ourselves that motivate present behavior.

McAdams (1993): The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. Foundational work on narrative identity — the idea that we understand ourselves through an internalized life story.

Oyserman (2007, 2009): Identity-based motivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology / Journal of Consumer Psychology. The theory that people are more likely to act, and to persist through difficulty, when an action feels congruent with a currently activated identity.

The Giving Tuesday Advice Every Small Nonprofit Should Ignore

Épisode 78

vendredi 4 septembre 2026 • Durée 10:37

If you've ever walked away from Giving Tuesday feeling like you failed at something that was never really yours to win, this one's for you.

In this episode, I'm breaking down why the countdown-email, blast-every-channel playbook was built by and for nonprofits with six-figure marketing budgets and why running a smaller version of it is setting small teams up to burn out and underperform. I'll unpack the real advantage small nonprofits have that big ones can't buy (hint: it's not reach), and give you three shifts to rethink your approach before the day arrives. Then I'll tell you about a very special, very free, 10-day challenge I'm hosting starting this month to help you build a Giving Tuesday strategy that was actually made for a nonprofit like yours.

Let's stay connected:

➡️ Join The Giving Tuesday Reset: A 10-Day Challenge

📩 Subscribe to Built for Meaning on Substack — go deeper with research, reframes, and practical insights delivered straight to your inbox: SUBSCRIBE HERE

💼 Connect on LinkedIn

Lire plusRéduire

How to Segment Based on Identity, Not Demographics

Épisode 77

lundi 24 août 2026 • Durée 12:12

In this episode, I'm breaking down why most nonprofit segmentation isn't really segmentation at all — it's sorting. Age, gift size, and zip code tell you almost nothing about why someone actually gives, and the research backs that up. I walk through why donors cluster around trust and values far more than demographics, why messages that match someone's sense of self get processed more deeply and persuade more effectively, and I hand you three practical identity lenses — role, values, and relationship-stage — you can layer over your existing donor data this week, no new software required.

Let's stay connected:

📩 Subscribe to Built for Meaning on Substack — go deeper with research, reframes, and practical insights delivered straight to your inbox: SUBSCRIBE HERE

💼 Connect on LinkedIn

Sources Referenced

de Vries, N. J., Reis, R., & Moscato, P. (2015). "Clustering Consumers Based on Trust, Confidence and Giving Behaviour: Data-Driven Model Building for Charitable Involvement in the Australian Not-For-Profit Sector." PLOS ONE, 10(4). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25849547. Found seven distinct donor segments driven primarily by trust and confidence — not demographics or gift size.

Segment validation — Nonprofit Policy Forum. degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/npf-2020-0003. Additional discussion of the seven-segment trust model and its application to donor targeting.

Self-schema matching research. Journal of Consumer Research. Messages matched to a person's self-schema are processed more deeply and are more persuasive than mismatched messages of equal quality — the mechanism underneath why identity-matched fundraising copy outperforms generic copy.

Journal of Medical Internet Research — RCT on content-tailored messaging. A randomized controlled trial found that tailoring message content to individual motivation (versus generic content) produced significantly better behavioral outcomes — cited here as a causal proof point for identity-matched messaging.

5 Email Campaign Mistakes I've Made (And How You Can Avoid Them)

Épisode 76

mardi 28 juillet 2026 • Durée 08:03

Fundraising emails don't usually fail because of one big, obvious error — they fail because of small, easy-to-miss habits that quietly cap performance. In this episode, Stephanie gets personal about five email mistakes she's made over the course of her own career: burying the ask, writing one email to an entire list, leading with the organization instead of the donor, only emailing when there's a need, and never testing a subject line. Each one comes with the fix she actually uses now so you can start sending better emails, today.

Let's stay connected:

📩 Subscribe to the newsletter — go deeper with research, reframes, and practical insights delivered straight to your inbox: SUBSCRIBE HERE

📸 Connect on Instagram — @builtformeaning

💼 Connect on LinkedIn

Lire plusRéduire

Leveraging the Power of Identity in Your Next Appeal: How to Ask For More Money

Épisode 75

mardi 21 juillet 2026 • Durée 09:24

Most fundraising strategies fail for a simple reason: they optimize the ask instead of the identity behind it. This episode unpacks the behavioral science of identity-driven giving — why “just ask for more money” backfires, and what to say instead. Stephanie walks through Bem's self-perception theory, Aaker and Akutsu's identity-based motivation research, and the noun-versus-verb language effect from Bryan, Walton, Rogers, and Dweck — then translates all three into three concrete language shifts you can make in your very next appeal.

Let's stay connected:

✅ Access the free workshop + plug-n-play calculator

📩 Subscribe to the newsletter — go deeper with research, reframes, and practical insights delivered straight to your inbox: SUBSCRIBE HERE

📸 Connect on Instagram — @builtformeaning

💼 Connect on LinkedIn

Sources Cited

Bem, D. J. (1972) — “Self-Perception Theory,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 6. The foundational research showing people often infer their own attitudes and identity by observing their own behavior — meaning an act of giving can shape a donor's self-concept, not just express it.

Aaker, J. L., & Akutsu, S. (2009) — “Why Do People Give? The Role of Identity in Giving,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3). Drawing on Daphna Oyserman's identity-based motivation model, this paper shows giving increases when an appeal activates an identity the donor already holds as central and valued.

Bryan, C. J., Walton, G. M., Rogers, T., & Dweck, C. S. (2011) — “Motivating Voter Turnout by Invoking the Self,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(31). Framing a behavior as an identity (“being a voter”) rather than an action (“voting”) increased real-world turnout in two statewide elections. Note for transparency: a 2016 replication by a separate research team did not find the same effect in a different sample, so the precise size of this result is debated — the episode presents it as directionally suggestive rather than settled fact.

Double Your Donations using my Gift Method™️

Épisode 74

lundi 13 juillet 2026 • Durée 09:45

There's a five-figure sum hiding in your donor database right now — not from donors you haven't met, but from ones who already said yes once.

In this episode, Stephanie Jiroch breaks down the GIFT Method — her four-step framework for calculating exactly how much revenue is recoverable from your existing donor file. Backed by sector data on donor retention and lifetime value, this episode makes the case that second gifts, not new acquisition, are the highest-leverage growth lever most organizations are ignoring.

Whether you're a fundraiser tired of the acquisition treadmill or a nonprofit leader watching grant dollars shrink, this episode hands you the math and a free calculator to run it yourself.

Let's stay connected:

✅ Access the free workshop + plug-n-play calculator

📩 Subscribe to the newsletter — go deeper with research, reframes, and practical insights delivered straight to your inbox: SUBSCRIBE HERE

📸 Connect on Instagram — @builtformeaning

💼 Connect on LinkedIn

Lire plusRéduire

How the Sense of Belonging Drives Donations

Épisode 73

mardi 7 juillet 2026 • Durée 13:40

In this episode, I go underneath the fundraising strategy and into the brain. Why do donors really stay? Not because the cause was worthy but because giving became part of who they are, among people they belong to. We walk through the neuroscience of belonging, the psychology of meaning-making and identity, why most fundraising accidentally signals “you’re an outsider,” and three concrete moves you can make this week to design for belonging instead.

Let's stay connected:

📩 Subscribe to the newsletter — go deeper with research, reframes, and practical insights delivered straight to your inbox: SUBSCRIBE HERE

📸 Connect on Instagram — @builtformeaning

💼 Connect on LinkedIn

------

Sources & further reading

• Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). “Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social Exclusion.” Science, 302(5643), 290–292. — The keystone study: social exclusion activates the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, a region tied to the distress of physical pain.

• Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2004). “Why rejection hurts: a common neural alarm system for physical and social pain.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 294–300. — Follow-up review framing social and physical pain as a shared neural “alarm system.”

• Springtide Research Institute & Clal, “The Belonging Project” pilot survey (2022). — ~1,100 congregants; high-belonging members were 12x more likely to donate and 3.5x more likely to recommend. Belonging measured across four stages: noticed, named, known, needed.

• Institute for Sustainable Philanthropy — Adrian Sargeant & Jen Shang, research on philanthropic psychology and donor identity (incl. Meaningful Philanthropy: The Person Behind the Giving).

Podcasts Similaires Basées sur le Contenu

Découvrez des podcasts liées à Built For Meaning. Explorez des podcasts avec des thèmes, sujets, et formats similaires. Ces similarités sont calculées grâce à des données tangibles, pas d'extrapolations !

À propos Méthodologie Contact Me soutenir Politique de confidentialité Mentions légales

Built For Meaning - Détails, épisodes et analyse

Détails du podcast

Classements récents

Apple Podcasts

Spotify

Liens partagés entre épisodes et podcasts

Other48

LinkedIn5

Qualité et score du flux RSS

Historique des publications

Derniers épisodes publiés

Podcasts et contenus similaires

Podcasts Similaires Basées sur le Contenu

Apple Podcasts

Spotify

Podcasts Similaires Basées sur le Contenu

Other48

LinkedIn5

Instagram8