Every billion-dollar YC company survived a brutal first year after Demo Day. Year One captures those twelve months as they happen, tracking one founder's make-or-break decision per episode: the pivot that saved the company, the co-founder fight that almost killed it, the fundraising round that closed at 2am on a Thursday. Two hosts (one former YC founder, one startup reporter) sit down with recent batch founders while the wounds are still fresh, then bring in YC partners to dissect what went right, what went wrong, and what the founder couldn't see from inside the fog. If you're an aspiring founder, an early startup employee, or an investor trying to understand why 90% of startups stall while a handful become Stripe or Airbnb, this is the show that replaces hindsight polish with the version founders tell each other at 1am on Bookface.
Site
RSS
Apple
Données mises à jour le 09/09/2026
Classements récents
Dernières positions dans les classements Apple Podcasts et Spotify.
Liens partagés entre épisodes et podcasts
Liens présents dans les descriptions d'épisodes et autres podcasts les utilisant également.
Découvrez des podcasts liées à Year One. Explorez des podcasts avec des thèmes, sujets, et formats similaires. Ces similarités sont calculées grâce à des données tangibles, pas d'extrapolations !
Il n'y a pas de contenu associé à ce podcast.
Aucun lien partagé par ce podcast
Qualité du flux RSS
Correct
Score global : 73%
9 Mothers: The $200M That Warped the Batch
Saison 1 · Épisode 25
mercredi 9 septembre 2026 • Durée 16:46
Days before Demo Day, a $200 million valuation for an unnamed S26 startup lands in a YC founder group chat and won't stop spreading. On this episode of Year One, Miles and Grant trace how that single number rewrites every other founder's negotiation in the batch, then reveal the company behind it: 9 Mothers, a counter-drone defense startup out of Austin, and the Palmer Luckey and Garry Tan context (via TBPN) that fueled the hype. They dig into Rebel Fund's data showing over a third of the W26 batch scored in YC's top tier, then pressure-test what that grade actually predicts. Michael Seibel's own 2007 Justin.tv numbers get pulled in as a reality check against today's inflated benchmarks. This one's especially useful for founders mid-fundraise who keep comparing their term sheet to someone else's headline, and for anyone trying to separate real signal from Demo Day noise.
Demo Day+72: How S26 Term Sheets Get Priced
Saison 1 · Épisode 24
mardi 1 septembre 2026 • Durée 17:29
The applause hasn't even faded and the phones are already lighting up. This episode of Year One picks up in the 72 hours after S26's Demo Day, when term sheets start arriving with clocks attached and top companies field hundreds of offers before the weekend is over. The stakes are immediate: sign fast on incomplete information, or risk losing a hot deal while trying to compare offers against a market that suddenly looks like 2021 again.
We break down why default SAFE caps have jumped from $2M-on-$20M to $4M-on-$40M in three years, what YC's own reasoning for same-day asks actually is, and how a generous-looking cap can quietly cost a founder more equity down the road. We also walk through a simple test for telling real investor conviction from manufactured urgency before the inbox even fills up.
Essential listening for founders staring down their own term sheet clock, or anyone trying to understand how Demo Day money actually moves.
Nadia: The Verdict Arrives
Saison 1 · Épisode 23
mardi 25 août 2026 • Durée 15:17
Nadia has just opened the YC decision email she has been waiting on for weeks, and in this episode you hear the exact moment she finds out if her company’s next year is completely rewritten. The stakes are simple and huge: either she’s in and locked into a YC batch, or she has to rebuild the plan she’s been working toward all summer.
You have to hear this one because Nadia reads the verdict out loud, processes it in real time, and immediately loops in her cofounder before she even lets herself react. From there, Miles and Grant bring the YC partner back on mic to break down what this outcome structurally changes for her next 90 days, and what the alternate path would have looked like if the answer had been no. Together they unpack what “useful feedback” really means, what founders who don’t get in actually do next, and how persistence shows up beyond the polished success stories, all through the lens of Year One decisions that compound. Published August 25, 2026, this episode is especially relevant if you’re anywhere near hitting submit on your own YC application.
Nadia: The Ten Days Before August 28
Saison 1 · Épisode 22
mardi 18 août 2026 • Durée 10:57
Ten days before Y Combinator's August 28 decision date, founder Nadia is stuck in the kind of limbo that quietly reshapes how she runs her company. Her Fall 2026 seed round may hinge on a single letter, and on this episode of Year One, hosts Grant and Miles push past the surface to find out if that wait is a real bet or a story she's telling herself. Nadia walks through exactly what she built and cut in her last four weeks, and Grant catches her rounding up a revenue number in a moment that says more than the numbers themselves — raising the question of whether her roadmap was built for customers or for three YC partners in a room. The conversation doesn't stop at acceptance odds; Grant runs the real math on rejection, the investor process she hasn't started, and what a YC partner says separates founders who use uncertainty well from those who freeze in it. Essential listening for any founder currently staring down their own countdown.
Nadia: What the Yes or No Actually Bought Her
Saison 1 · Épisode 21
mardi 11 août 2026 • Durée 12:17
Nadia read the email four times and still couldn't parse it. An ambiguous status update from Y Combinator landed Tuesday night, and what followed was ninety seconds of dead air before she said a word. On this episode of Year One, hosts Miles and Grant trace the exact month leading up to her August 28th decision date: the pilot customer she chased, the six-week feature she killed after it went unused, the ops hire she postponed to protect runway, and the parallel fundraise she quietly shut down without telling half her team. Grant presses on what Nadia won't say directly, including a co-founder question she deflects twice, while Miles brings in YC's own guidance on how partners read the waiting period as evidence, not dead time. They also break down what actually changes operationally the morning a founder gets a yes versus a no. This one's especially relevant if you're mid-application, mid-wait, or making decisions right now that assume an outcome you don't actually control yet.
Nadia: The Verdict Lands August 28
Saison 1 · Épisode 20
mardi 4 août 2026 • Durée 11:41
Founder Nadia submitted her YC Fall 2026 application just before the July 27 deadline, and now she's twenty-four days into total silence, waiting for an interview invite she can't control. In this Year One episode, she reveals the real bets she made during the wait: an engineering hire she paused and can't fully explain, a vague team update that skirted the numbers YC applicants are told to include, and a fundraise she's put on hold, telling investors to wait until after the decision date. When pressed, she goes quiet on whether she was straight with them about her timeline. The hosts bring in reported YC data on acceptance rates and the shift to four annual batches, reframing a possible rejection as a costly quarter rather than a company-ending verdict, then test whether Nadia's rehearsed 'no' plan actually holds up. This one's especially relevant for founders sitting in their own YC silence right now, wondering what their inbox is actually costing them.
Nadia: Betting the Raise on August 28
Saison 1 · Épisode 19
mardi 28 juillet 2026 • Durée 11:21
Eight minutes before the YC Fall 2026 application deadline closed on July 27, Nadia deleted a paragraph about her co-founder — and on this episode of Year One, Miles and Grant press her on whether that was real editing or something else entirely. The stakes are immediate: her one-line pitch went through four rewrites, she bet on a smaller retention number over a bigger one, and two critical figures — her runway and her co-founder's actual equity split — never made it into the application at all. Nadia reveals she has no written plan B, unlike her co-founder, while Grant and Miles walk through YC's real $500K deal terms and what the shift to four batches a year means for her odds. As of Tuesday, July 28, she's still waiting on an interview invite, with a decision due August 28. This one's essential listening for any founder staring down their own YC deadline, wondering what they left out of the document.
Mato: Turning Personalized Demos Into Onboarding
Saison 1 · Épisode 18
lundi 27 juillet 2026 • Durée 17:52
Alexander Benz had a new product category, a cold lead pipeline, and only two minutes to convince confused prospects to try something they had never seen before. The stakes were simple and brutal: fix onboarding or watch high-intent YC-style leads quietly disappear. In this episode of Year One, he walks through how he turned the demo itself into the onboarding experience, from the first over-explained flows that flopped to the personalized, AI-built demo shows that now warm people up before a second call. You have to hear this one because he details the exact sequence: generating a custom podcast based on a prospect’s site, leading with listening before UI, automating a full demo page in minutes, and then using that to shift the second call into implementation instead of persuasion. Along the way, the hosts connect his UX and sales background to classic YC lessons on trust, urgency, and tailoring onboarding for complex products. Published July 27, 2026, this episode is especially relevant if you are a founder designing first-touch onboarding for a product your users have no mental model for yet.
F26: The Application Nobody Finished Yet
Saison 1 · Épisode 17
mardi 21 juillet 2026 • Durée 12:09
Three weeks before her YC application deadline, a founder sat in her kitchen and stopped mid-sentence, realizing her polished traction slide left out the real reason she started the company. With July 27 at 8pm PT closing in fast, this episode of Year One follows her scramble to rewrite the story she almost submitted.
Miles and Grant trace what her draft got wrong: an emotional origin story cut for a single data point, a co-founder dynamic buried in vague language, and a $500k SAFE quietly shaping every sentence she writes. Grant breaks down how YC partners actually read applications like hers, why an unshot one-minute video is now a countdown risk, and why an honest, rougher app often beats an over-polished one. They also unpack the real math behind acceptance odds and what happens if she misses the deadline entirely.
This one's especially relevant if you're staring down your own YC deadline and wondering what to cut, what to keep, and what your application is quietly hiding.
Corgi: The Cease-and-Desist Heard on X
Saison 1 · Épisode 13
mardi 7 juillet 2026 • Durée 12:42
When Papermark founder Marc Seitz accused insurance startup Corgi of copying his open-source dataroom software word for word, the stakes escalated fast: Corgi's own CEO admitted their AI 'vibe-coding' had produced near-identical pages, then responded with cease-and-desist letters, including one over an unrelated joke tweet. On this episode of Year One, Miles and Grant break down what actually happened, why identical wording (not identical code) is the real legal vulnerability, and how this compares to the 2024 PearAI cloning scandal. They dig into Corgi's rapid climb to a $2.6 billion valuation, the seven-day-workweek culture stories swirling around it, and whether repeat litigation spooks enterprise buyers doing due diligence. With Papermark still holding off on a lawsuit, the hosts pose an open question for the AI-native era: does aggressive legal posturing protect founders, or does it eventually cost them. Essential listening for YC founders navigating fast growth, AI tooling, and the fine line between speed and recklessness.