Retour
Explorez tous les épisodes du podcast U.S. Supreme Court 2010 Term Arguments
Plongez dans la liste complète des épisodes de U.S. Supreme Court 2010 Term Arguments. Chaque épisode est catalogué accompagné de descriptions détaillées, ce qui facilite la recherche et l'exploration de sujets spécifiques. Suivez tous les épisodes de votre podcast préféré et ne manquez aucun contenu pertinent.
| Titre | Date | Durée | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan | 27 Apr 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the Nevada law requiring elected officials to disqualify themselves when they are asked to vote on matters that present a conflict of interest was constitutional. | |||
| Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. | 26 Apr 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a Vermont statute banning the sale, transmission or use of prescription drug user data violated protected speech of the pharmaceutical research companies, manufacturers and others who use that data. | |||
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes | 29 Mar 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the small group who initiated a lawsuit could not represent all of Wal-Mart's female employees, and therefore could not bring a class action lawsuit against Wal-Mart. | |||
| Fowler v. United States | 29 Mar 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that in order to prove a criminal violation of the federal witness tampering statute when a defendant allegedly kills a witness, the government must prove that the victim would have provided information regarding the crime. | |||
| CSX Transportation v. McBride | 28 Mar 2011 | ||
| Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett | 28 Mar 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the Arizona campaign finance law linking public financing for candidates to the amount spent by their opponents violated the First Amendment's protection of political speech. | |||
| Turner v. Rogers | 23 Mar 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a defendant facing incarceration for civil contempt does not have a constitutional right to a court-appointed attorney under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | |||
| J.D.B. v. North Carolina | 23 Mar 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court ruled that courts should consider the age of a juvenile suspect in deciding whether he or she is in custody for Miranda purposes. | |||
| Fox v. Vice | 22 Mar 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a court may award attorney's fees to civil rights defendants when the plaintiff's suit involves frivolous and non-frivolous claims, but only for the costs incurred due to the frivolous claims. | |||
| Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri | 22 Mar 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that state and local government employees may not sue their employers for retaliation under the First Amendment's Petition Clause when they petition the government on matters of private concern. | |||
| Davis v. United States | 21 Mar 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies to a search that was authorized by precedent at the time of the search, but was subsequently ruled unconstitutional. | |||
| Tolentino v. New York | 21 Mar 2011 | ||
A case the Court dismissed, which would have considered whether an individual's motor vehicle records may be used as evidence if the police consulted those records only after making an illegal stop of the individual's vehicle. | |||
| McNeill v. United States | 25 Apr 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a federal sentencing court must determine whether an offense under state law is a "serious drug offense" within the meaning of the Armed Career Criminal Act by consulting the maximum sentence applicable at the time of the defendant's conviction. | |||
| Bullcoming v. New Mexico | 02 Mar 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a blood-alcohol test admitted without the actual testimony of the person who prepared the results violates a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment rights under the Confrontation Clause. | |||
| Ashcroft v. Al-Kidd | 02 Mar 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that former Attorney General John Ashcroft was entitled to qualified immunity. | |||
| Camreta v. Greene | 01 Mar 2011 | ||
A case which the Court vacated in part and remanded in favor of the defendant without addressing the Fourth Amendment question at issue. | |||
| Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States ex rel. Kirk | 01 Mar 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a whistleblower may not use information obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests to allege violations of the Federal Claims Act by a government contractor. | |||
| DePierre v. United States | 28 Feb 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the term "cocaine base" encompasses every form of cocaine that is classified chemically as a base. | |||
| Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. | 28 Feb 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that patents on inventions that arise from federally-funded research do not automatically go to university where the inventor worked. | |||
| Freeman v. United States | 23 Feb 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a federal judge has the authority to reduce a criminal sentence after the U.S. Sentencing Commission amended the Sentencing Guidelines if the judge has already accepted a plea agreement. | |||
| Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A. | 23 Feb 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court ruled that induced infringement under the patent clause requires knowledge that the induced acts constitute patent infringement. | |||
| Bond v. United States | 22 Feb 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a defendant, convicted under a federal statute, has a right to challenge his/her conviction based on the unconstitutionality of the statute. | |||
| United States v. Tinklenberg | 22 Feb 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the time between the filing of a pretrial motion and its disposition is excluded from the deadline for commencing trial under the Speedy Trial Act. | |||
| Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co. | 25 Apr 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that securities fraud plaintiffs need not prove loss causation in order to obtain class certification. | |||
| FCC v. AT&T Inc. | 19 Jan 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that corporations do not have a right of personal privacy that would prevent the disclosure of public records handed over to federal agencies. | |||
| Astra USA v. Santa Clara County | 19 Jan 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that health care providers cannot sue drug makers for overcharging public hospitals for prescription drugs. | |||
| General Dynamics Corp. v. United States | 18 Jan 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that neither the government nor the contractor could pursue litigation because of the risk that state secrets might be revealed. | |||
| Stern v. Marshall | 18 Jan 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the Bankruptcy Court did not have the constitutional authority to enter judgement on the petitioner's counterclaim. | |||
| Smith v. Bayer Corp. | 18 Jan 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the federal court exceeded its authority under the relitigation exception to the Anti-Injunction Act when it prevented a group of plaintiffs from proceeding with a class-action lawsuit over a cholesterol-lowering drug. | |||
| Sykes v. United States | 12 Jan 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a conviction for resisting arrest counts as a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act. | |||
| Kentucky v. King | 12 Jan 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held the exclusionary rule, which forbids the use of illegally seized evidence except in emergency situations, applies when the emergency is created by lawful police action. | |||
| J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro | 11 Jan 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a consumer cannot sue a foreign manufacturer in state court over a product that the foreign company marketed and sold in the United States. | |||
| Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown | 11 Jan 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a consumer cannot sue a manufacturer in a U.S. court when the manufacturer's only connection with the U.S. is that another company sells its products in the country. | |||
| Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano | 10 Jan 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a plaintiff could state a claim based on a pharmaceutical company's non-disclosure of adverse event reports, even though the reports are not alleged to be statistically significant. | |||
| United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation | 20 Apr 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the fiduciary exception to the attorney-client privilege does not apply to the general trust relationship between the United States and the Indian Tribes. | |||
| Montana v. Wyoming and North Dakota | 10 Jan 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court held that Montana did not violate the Yellowstone River Compact by leaving less water in the river for Montana's uses. | |||
| Chase Bank USA v. McCoy | 08 Dec 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the Truth In Lending Act did not require Chase Bank to provide notice of interest rate increases that occurred because of customer default. | |||
| Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Whiting | 08 Dec 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that Arizona laws requiring employers to verify the employment eligibility of their employees through a federal database was not unconstitutional. | |||
| Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP | 07 Dec 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that an employer violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts by firing the fiancee of an employee who complains about workplace discrimination. | |||
| Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders | 07 Dec 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a service provider cannot be held liable for statements for which they are not directly responsible. | |||
| Pepper v. United States | 06 Dec 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that when a defendant's sentence has been set aside on appeal, a district court may consider evidence of the defendant's rehabilitation after the initial sentences, which may support lesser sentencing guidelines. | |||
| Henderson v. Shinseki | 06 Dec 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that missing the deadline for filing a notice of appeal with the Veterans Court did not bar a plaintiff from making a claim. | |||
| Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart | 01 Dec 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a federal court may hear a lawsuit for prospective injunctive relief against state officials brought by another agency of the same state. | |||
| Milner v. Department of the Navy | 01 Dec 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that documents related to the effect of explosions from Navy exercises did not qualify for withholding under Exception 2 of the Freedom of Information Act. | |||
| Brown v. Plata | 30 Nov 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that a court order requiring California to reduce its prison population to remedy unconstitutional conditions in its correctional facilities did not violate the Prison Litigation Reform Act. | |||
| American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. Connecticut | 19 Apr 2011 | ||
A case in which the Court that held the Clean Air Act bars suits by governmental bodies and private parties seeking to curb emissions from utilities via the federal common law. | |||
| CIGNA v. Amara | 30 Nov 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut did not have the authority to reform CIGNA's pension plan. | |||
| Wall v. Kholi | 29 Nov 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the one-year window of time in which an inmate may file a habeas challenge to their sentence in federal court after conviction is delayed while a state court considers an inmate's request for a sentence reduction. | |||
| Walker v. Martin | 29 Nov 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court held that the California rule requiring state habeas petitions to be filed "as promptly as the circumstances allow" constitutes an independent state ground that is adequate to bar habeas relief in federal court. | |||
| Flores-Villar v. United States | 10 Nov 2010 | ||
A case in which the Court affirmed the decision of the lower court without addressing the constitutional question at issue, which was whether Nguyen v. INS permit gender discrimination. | |||
© My Podcast Data · Projet indépendant · Données issues d'Apple & Spotify