Fireside Chats with Empathic Futures Lab – Détails, épisodes et analyse

In this episode, Christian and Colter sit down with architect Alex Bahr in the lobby of UIC’s Gallery 400 to discuss speculative architecture, subversive detailing, and alternative means of shaping the built environment. Bahr’s thesis project, the Play of Parts is also explored, check it out at the link below!

The Play of Parts (Portfolio +Thesis) 

https://issuu.com/alexbahr9/docs/alexbahr__thesis_book_pages

Alex Bahr’s Website

https://alexander-bahr.squarespace.com/

This episode’s home base is “AI” or rather...the current iteration of AI which attempts to pass as Intelligent. The idea behind the conversation is really that AI is at the cusp of being quite useful but it still is flopping around, making decisions that are almost right but wrong in silly ways.

Essentially, the conversation is about Dumb AI.

Enjoy.

This week, we started out discussing biases in our media, machine learning, and our world in general. This lead to a discussion revolving around how do you temper the bias in Artificial Intelligences, looking specifically at Amazon's intelligent resume filter.  Do you set up distributed systems that put that check on rogue bias?  How do you establish a transparency and tell people the bias included in particular systems?  We ask all these questions and more in this week's episode

Some related links.

• https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G
• https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-facial-recognition-congress-bias-law-enforcement/
• https://www.wired.com/story/why-men-dont-believe-the-data-on-gender-bias-in-science/
• https://www.wired.com/story/why-ai-is-still-waiting-for-its-ethics-transplant/

This week, Chris and Christian discuss advertising and the media. They begin by trying to define a basis for what media is.  They then contrast the human focused characteristics of media with that of more  natural landscapes.  Following this they question the incentive structures of media and how that might be augmented to introduce a system that is more "fair." From there they discuss a few different ideas about the physical space that media might exist in.  Additionally, is it possible that if people are able to physical connect to their media outlets, do they find them to be more trustworthy and dependable?

A few links for information that was referenced during the discussion:

Regarding Media Incentive Structures

https://medium.com/@SeanBlanda/medium-and-the-reason-you-cant-stand-the-news-anymore-c98068fec3f8 

Regarding the Evolution of Media Environments

https://www.ted.com/talks/zeynep_tufekci_we_re_building_a_dystopia_just_to_make_people_click_on_ads#t-1363330 

We're Back! Season 2 is finally kicking off after a long layoff. We hope to have a good season for you all. 

In this episode, we recap what we did with our Summer. Go over what we have done this fall with our installation in the lead up to today. We go over what are next projects are for Empathic Futures Lab. Finally we touch on the future of this podcast and what sorts of topics we want to addresss. 

It's a bit rambling at times but it does the job of setting up this season. 

Thanks for tuning in and hope you stick around for the real meat of the season next week and beyond. 

In this 20th episode we discuss the role that reputation will play in the future.  We worked from a poignant article written in Fast Company by Gloria Origgi, an Italian philosopher.  In this piece she dissects how she believs that reputation will take over information as the primary driver for how we make decisions.  From here we discuss how reputation and branding interact.  We also discuss the role that biases play in our understanding of reputation, and how you might be able to shift those biases.  But when reputation is so significant you need a real way to verify someone or something is who they say they are.  And we think that is where Foam may come in.  A blockchain system designed to provide proof of location based on interactions in a physical world.  And we discuss more, so tune in to this episode to get the full scoop of ideas.

Reputation Article:

https://www.fastcompany.com/40565050/say-goodbye-to-the-information-age-its-all-about-reputation-now

Foam Protocol, Ethereum Block Chain System:

https://blog.foam.space/introducing-the-foam-protocol-2598d2f71417 

Be sure to check out our weekly newsletter here:  

https://wordpress.us18.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=dbf620955f84c3d9b8321ea7b&id=4d5745e1b3 

And our blog for more information and excitign content:

https://empathicfutures.wordpress.com/ 

In this episode Chris and Christian discuss the architectural detail.  How its meaning has evolved over time, and what its significant might be in today's archtectural landscape.  Using Edward Ford's The Architectural Detail as the primary conversation vehicle, we start by picking apart the 5 definition of architectural detail that he identifies.  Following this we decide to pit two of those definitions against each other and explore the validity of each, the joint vs the autonomous detail.  "What role does the autonomous detail play in the future of design?" and "how might an intimate element of building design be an active participant in the experience of environment?" are among the conversation topics, here.

Partial Intro to The Architectural Detail:

https://issuu.com/papress/docs/architectural_detail_screen 

Ideo's article about AI infused design objects:

https://www.ideo.com/blog/what-the-ai-products-of-tomorrow-might-look-like 

Future Cities Lab:

http://www.future-cities-lab.net/datagrove 

Be sure to check out our weekly newsletter here:  

https://wordpress.us18.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=dbf620955f84c3d9b8321ea7b&id=4d5745e1b3 

And our blog for more information and excitign content:

https://empathicfutures.wordpress.com/ 

This week we got the conversation kicked off with a segway from Molly Wright Steenson's Architectural Intelligence.  Here she introduced both of us to a fresh take on the work of Christopher Alexander, and because of this we decided to dedicate a full episode to exploring the structure of A Pattern Language.  We initially looked at the comparison drawn between Alexander's approach to objectivity in design and Eisenman's approach.  From there we discussed what it means to make a public critically aware and engaged with their physical environment and which approach was better at accomplishing this goal.  This discussion then led us to consider how a language evolves and changes over time.  Chris raised the point about how slang and new words are adopted into a language and how that adoption is applicable in the architectural realm.  Given that we have more parameters in just the last 20 years that we now have to facilitate in design how should a pattern language continue to evolve and augment itself over time, and what agency to individuals have to make this change in their own design decisions.  

 Newsletter signup: https://wordpress.us18.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=dbf620955f84c3d9b8321ea7b&id=4d5745e1b3

Pattern Language Website:

https://www.patternlanguage.com/ 

Christopher Alexander Lecture:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98LdFA-_zfA 

Molly Wright Steenson Architectural Intelligence:

http://www.girlwonder.com/papers-articles 

Empathic Futures Lab Blog by Christian Pepper - Evolved Pattern Language - 1:

https://empathicfutures.wordpress.com/2018/05/09/advanced-pattern-language-1/ 

Are installations the key to unlocking the future of architecture? The small scale at which they operate allows them the flexibility to explore a wider range of ideas and potential solutions. If approached as part of a larger framework of research and exploration, rather than one-off creative outburts, perhaps they can be better used to push our understanding of our environment further, not just in terms of architecture, but in terms of all the disciplines. To not do this is almost a missed opportunity. 

In this episode, our conversations covers those questions above as well as well as perhaps how to answer these questions: "What is the basic value that installation design can provide?",

"Does providing a value hierarchy in discipline much like installation design allow us to see more opportunities?", and other questions.  

Finally here are the links that we referred to in the podcast:

Newsletter signup: https://wordpress.us18.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=dbf620955f84c3d9b8321ea7b&id=4d5745e1b3

Second Story Blog about Responsive Wall

https://blog.secondstory.com/2016/09/20/stepping-into-the-future-of-collaborative-workspaces/ 

Sapient Razorfish Hacking Architecture:

https://admin.podbean.com/empathicfutures/episode/update/id/BD6W4905F45 

Importance of Site Specificity to Design:

http://www.metropolismag.com/architecture/whatever-you-do-dont-call-daniel-buren-art-installation/ 

Light Frieze:

https://admin.podbean.com/empathicfutures/episode/update/id/BD6W4905F45 

Hackable Wall Paint:

https://www.designboom.com/technology/disney-research-smart-wall-04-26-2018/ 

This episode was a sort of rambling discussion on what we mean when we discuss experience. We really just ask how we can nail down an experience and add a little context to what we mean when we discuss experience. It is a topic that is never too far from our discussion points and yet there is no real easy way to define it. It is extremely vague. 

We eventually get to the point where we discuss how we can think about a potential installation that works with and changes according to how people experience space.