Explorez tous les épisodes du podcast Air Quality Matters

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take, where we unpack the latest research shaping our understanding of indoor air and the built environment. This week, we're diving into one of the most complex and urgent environmental dilemmas of our time: the smoke from fires we set on purpose. The paper, Associations between PM2.5 from Prescribed Burning and Emergency Department Visits in 11 Southeastern US States by a team of researchers from Boston University, Georgia Tech, and other institutions, tackles a critical question: In our effort to prevent catastrophic wildfires through prescribed burning, are we creating a different, more chronic health problem from the smoke of these "good fires"? The Environmental Dilemma: Prescribed burning—intentionally setting smaller, controlled fires to clear underbrush—is one of our primary tools to fight the catastrophic wildfires made worse by climate change. But this tool has side effects: smoke containing fine particulate matter (PM2.5). The question is whether we're trading one health disaster for another. The Study: Researchers analyzed over 30 million emergency department visits from 11 southeastern US states over nearly a decade—a region where prescribed burning is common practice. Using sophisticated chemical transport models, they "tagged" PM2.5 in the air to identify which portions came specifically from prescribed fires, allowing them to isolate the health signal of just these controlled burns. The Surprising Findings: Yes, there is a link. On days with high levels of PM2.5 from prescribed fires, there was a statistically significant increase in emergency department visits for upper respiratory infections and, most notably, ischemic heart disease, which went up by about 6%. But here's the counter-intuitive part: For the classic signatures of smoke exposure—overall respiratory admissions, asthma, and COPD—they didn't find a statistically significant increase. This is what makes smoke from prescribed fires different from wildfire smoke. Why the Difference? The nature of the fires themselves. Wildfires are hot, intense, and chaotic, burning everything from the forest floor to the canopy. Prescribed burns are cooler and slower, designed to smolder through underbrush, grass, and leaf litter. This difference in what's burning and how it's burning creates a different chemical cocktail of smoke. Prescribed fire smoke tends to have lower concentrations of pollutants like carbon monoxide and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) compared to wildfire smoke. The Big Takeaway: Not all smoke is created equal. The health impact of PM2.5 is not just about the mass of particles in the air—it's about what those particles are made of, and it depends profoundly on the source. This research doesn't give us an easy answer. It doesn't say prescribed burning is safe or unsafe. Instead, it gives us a much more nuanced picture. It's a powerful reminder that there are no easy wins in environmental management—it's all a game of trade-offs. We're using a tool to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfires, but that tool has its own health risks, and those risks are different. This kind of research is absolutely vital for land managers and public health officials because it helps them understand the specific health impacts of their decisions, allowing for more targeted warnings and a better, more honest conversation about the risks we're actually choosing to manage. Associations between PM2.5 from prescribed burning and emergency department visits in 11 Southeastern US states https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109770 The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: The Prescribed Burning Paradox 00:01:48 The Study Design: Tagging Smoke from Good Fires 00:02:54 The Findings: A Surprising Health Signal 00:04:02 Not All Smoke is Equal: The Chemistry Matters 00:05:32 The Big Takeaway: Environmental Trade-Offs and Honest Conversations 00:06:40 Closing: Thanks and Next Week

In this essential episode, we sit down with Paul O'Sullivan, lecturer in Sustainable Energy Engineering at MTU and co-lead of the MESO Research Group, to explore one of the most pressing—yet often overlooked—challenges in our built environment: how do we design buildings that don't overheat? Paul brings deep expertise in low-energy demand-side technologies, building retrofit strategies, indoor thermal environments, and ventilative cooling. His work sits at the fascinating intersection of thermal comfort, air quality, decarbonization, and the future resilience of our homes, schools, and workplaces. The Central Question We've spent decades designing buildings to be thermally comfortable in winter—airtight, well-insulated, energy-efficient. But in doing so, have we created a new problem? As our climate warms and our buildings become better at keeping heat in, how do we ensure they can also let heat out when they need to—without resorting to energy-intensive air conditioning? Key Topics Discussed: Thermal Comfort vs. Overheating: What's the difference between discomfort and a genuine health risk? Why overheating is not just about temperature, but about duration, vulnerability, and the capacity of a building to respond. The Unintended Consequences of Energy Efficiency: How our drive to decarbonize heating has created buildings that struggle to cool—and why Ireland's cooling season now starts in March. The Cooling Ladder: A design philosophy for tackling overheating—starting with prevention (solar shading, orientation), then modulation (thermal mass, phase-change materials), then dissipation (ventilative cooling), and only finally, supplementary mechanical cooling. Ventilative Cooling and the New CEN Technical Specification: How natural and mechanical ventilation can provide free, sustainable cooling—and why the European standard Paul helped develop is a game-changer for designers. The Performance Gap: Why buildings that look great on paper often overheat in reality—and why simulation tools are struggling to keep pace with the rate of climate change and building innovation. Agency and Adaptation: The power of openable windows, external shutters, and giving occupants control. Why buildings that allow people to adapt perform better—and why we've lost some of that agency in modern construction. This is a conversation about trade-offs, resilience, and the path forward. It's about recognizing that comfort isn't a luxury—it's a fundamental aspect of health, well-being, and productivity. And it's about designing buildings that work with their climate, not against it. DESCRIPTION: HOST: Simon Jones: https://www.linkedin.com/in/simon-air-quality-matters/ GUEST:  Paul O’Sullivan - https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-d-o-sullivan-441b9023/ The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon. Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: Paul O'Sullivan and the Science of Thermal Comfort 00:02:18 Thermal Comfort vs Air Quality: Different Lenses on Indoor Environment 00:04:07 Maslow's Hierarchy: Is Comfort a Luxury or a Necessity? 00:05:34 The Decarbonization Dilemma: Energy Efficiency vs Thermal Comfort 00:09:31 Expectation and Adaptation: The Psychology of Thermal Experience 00:14:29 The Cooling Ladder: A Design Philosophy for Passive Solutions 00:15:44 Where Are We With the Science? Progress and Gaps in Thermal Comfort 00:24:07 Defining Overheating: From Discomfort to Health Risk 00:24:15 The Measurement Challenge: 20 Different Ways to Assess Overheating 00:27:52 Conditioned vs Free-Floating: Two Different Overheating Problems 00:37:09 Ireland's Paradox: Overheating in a Cool Climate 00:37:16 The Building as Battery: Thermal Mass and Night Cooling Strategies 00:52:55 The Performance Gap: Why Simulations Don't Match Reality 01:00:40 The Data Desert: Why We Don't Know How Our Buildings Perform 01:20:50 Behavior and Technology: The Human Element in Building Performance 00:49:07 Ventilation's Role: Free Cooling Potential and Air Quality Trade-offs 00:56:08 Heat Recovery Dilemma: Winter Efficiency vs Summer Cooling Needs 01:10:20 Hybrid Solutions: The Future of Resilient Cooling 01:40:55 Climate Shelters: Schools as Community Heat Wave Refuges 01:43:36 Double Jeopardy: When Heat Waves Meet Power Outages and Poor Air Quality 01:26:51 The MESO Research Group: From Ventilative Cooling to Citizen Science 01:29:44 Window Aerodynamics: The Forgotten Performance Metric 01:34:55 European Standards: Translating Research into Design Tools 01:48:26 Citizen Science: Engaging Occupants in Building Performance Research 01:51:30 The Path Forward: Data, Standards, and Human-Centered Design

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take, where we unpack the latest research shaping our understanding of indoor air and the built environment. This week, we're diving into a paper that tackles a question millions of us have been living with since the pandemic: What actually makes a good home office? The study is titled Home as an Office: Investigating the Associations Between Indoor Environmental Quality, Wellbeing and Performance in Work From Home Settings, and it explores a fascinating tension—between what sensors objectively measure and what people subjectively experience. The Setup: Researchers recruited 95 people working from home in Vancouver and Seattle and used a clever two-pronged approach. On one hand, participants were given desktop monitors that objectively measured PM2.5, total VOCs, CO₂, temperature, humidity, and sound levels—the hard numbers on the physical environment. On the other hand, they conducted detailed questionnaires asking people about their perceptions: Are you satisfied with the lighting? Do you have an ergonomic chair? Does noise from family interrupt you? They also measured outcomes using standardized surveys for psychological wellbeing, physical symptoms, and work performance. The Core Question: Which is the better predictor of wellbeing and productivity—the objective data from the sensors, or the subjective feelings of the occupants? The Surprising Finding: The data from the objective sensors—the actual measured levels of PM2.5, CO₂, and so on—showed predominantly weaker associations with how people felt or how productive they were. Even if CO₂ levels were a bit high or PM2.5 was slightly elevated, in this study it didn't have a strong direct link to reported wellbeing or performance. Why? The authors suggest that indoor environmental quality in most homes was generally moderate, but more importantly, people have agency at home. If you're cold, you can change the thermostat. If the air feels stuffy, you can open a window. This ability to control and adapt seems to weaken the direct link between what a sensor measures and how people actually feel. The Perception-Based Data Tells a Different Story: When researchers looked at subjective perception, they found much stronger connections. Satisfaction with ergonomic furniture, good daylight, and a pleasant workspace aesthetic were all strongly linked to positive wellbeing and performance outcomes. People who felt good about their physical setup felt better and worked better. The reverse was also true. Problems like unwanted interruptions from family, noise from the street, or even persistent kitchen odors were strongly associated with lower psychological wellbeing, reduced vitality, and depressed mood. The Big Takeaway: The paper's core message is not that objective indoor air quality doesn't matter—of course it does, especially at extreme levels. But in the context of working from home, our subjective experience of the space is a much better predictor of our wellbeing and performance than what a sensor might tell us. Perception really is reality here. The feeling of being in control, having a comfortable and aesthetically pleasing space, and not being constantly interrupted—these are not just fluffy nice-to-haves. The study shows they have measurable, statistically significant associations with our mental health and productivity. The Implications: This challenges a purely engineering-led, sensor-driven approach to creating healthy buildings. It tells us we can't just focus on hitting certain parts per million. We need a more holistic, human-centered approach. When we design spaces for home working—or frankly, any space—we need to think just as much about ergonomics, acoustics, privacy, and personal control as we do about ventilation rates. Home as an office: Investigating the associations between indoor environmental quality, well-being, and performance in work-from-home settings https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113310 The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: The Home Office Question We've All Been Asking 00:01:35 The Study Design: Measuring Both Objective and Subjective Reality 00:02:55 The Surprising Finding: Sensors Don't Tell the Whole Story 00:03:32 The Agency Factor: Why Home is Different from the Office 00:04:05 Perception is Reality: The Power of Subjective Experience 00:04:41 The Problems That Matter: Interruptions, Noise, and Kitchen Odors 00:05:07 The Big Takeaway: Beyond Parts Per Million 00:05:53 Implications: A Human-Centered Approach to Indoor Spaces 00:06:40 The Validation: Your Uncomfortable Chair Really Does Matter 00:07:07 Closing: Thanks and Next Week

In this episode, we sit down with Bart Cremers, Group Knowledge Consultant at Zehnder Group International, to explore one of the most critical—yet often overlooked—challenges in advancing indoor air quality: how industry and academia can collaborate more effectively. Bart occupies a fascinating position, straddling the worlds of industry and research, product innovation and scientific rigour. With deep expertise in physics, renewable energy, data analysis, and business development, he has spent years translating fundamental science into real-world ventilation solutions—and feeding real-world performance data back into the research community. The Central Question: We already have the tools and knowledge to deliver clean, healthy indoor air. So why is there still such a persistent gap between what we know works in the lab and what actually happens in people's homes? And how can we unlock the enormous potential that exists when industry and academia work together properly? Key Topics Discussed: The Two Silos: Why industry and academia often work on the same problems but from fundamentally different perspectives—and why bridging that gap is essential for progress. What Industry Brings to Research: Real-world performance data, field monitoring at scale, the ability to tell stories rather than just specs, and the crucial feedback loop between lab performance and lived experience. What Academia Brings to Industry: Scientific rigour, peer review, freedom to explore problems without immediate commercial pressure, and the discipline to ask—and answer—the right questions. The Speed Problem: Why academic research can take five or six years from conception to publication—and by that time, the technology being studied is often two generations out of date. The Performance Gap: Why so much academic research ends up measuring poorly installed or maintained ventilation systems—and what that means for our understanding of what good ventilation can actually achieve. Models vs. Reality: The critical importance of validating simulations and models with real-world data—and how industry can provide the field measurements academia desperately needs. The Minimum Becomes the Maximum: How regulations and standards, by nature, lag behind innovation—and why designing to minimum compliance is a race to the bottom that leaves everyone worse off. The Future: Ventilation as a Service: Why the shift from selling products to selling clean air and healthy outcomes could fundamentally transform the industry—and close the performance gap for good. Multifunctional Systems: The promise and peril of integrating ventilation with heating, cooling, and other building systems—and why we need to get the basics right first. Retrofit and Renovation: Why the next frontier isn't just new build, but bringing healthy indoor air to the billions of existing buildings—and why that requires a completely different approach. Citizen Science: The untapped potential of involving real people in real homes in the research process—not just as data sources, but as co-creators of the questions we need to answer. This is a conversation about friction, opportunity, and the path forward. It's about recognizing that both industry and academia have blind spots—and that the only way to truly advance indoor air quality is to work together, with mutual respect, shared goals, and a willingness to learn from each other's strengths. HOST: Simon Jones: https://www.linkedin.com/in/simon-air-quality-matters/ GUEST: Bart Cremers: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bart-kremers/ The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group - Farmwood - Eurovent - Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon. Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: Bridging Industry and Academia in Air Quality 00:03:17 The Two Worlds: Understanding Industry and Academic Perspectives 00:07:05 The Friction and Opportunity: Why Collaboration is Challenging 00:13:48 Real World vs Lab: The Performance Gap Problem 00:16:00 Communication Challenges: Telling Stories vs Presenting Specs 00:25:14 The Speed Problem: When Research Can't Keep Up with Innovation 00:33:26 The Value Exchange: What Industry Brings to Research 01:00:01 The Installation Crisis: Measuring Poorly Installed Systems 01:04:35 The Minimum Becomes the Maximum: Engineering for Redundancy 01:09:08 Closing the Gap: Training, Education, and Consumer Protection 01:15:31 The Future: Renovation, Smart Controls, and Ventilation as a Service 01:31:40 Multifunctional Systems: The Promise and Complexity of Integration 01:42:52 Closing Thoughts: Building for People in a Complex Future

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take, where we unpack the latest research shaping our understanding of indoor air and the built environment. This week, we're at a paper that tackles a fundamental question: Where exactly should we put indoor air quality sensors? How many do we actually need? And how often should they take readings? The paper is titled Long-term Indoor Air Quality Monitoring in Office Buildings: Data-Driven and Goal-Oriented Recommendations for Sensor Replacement and Sampling Frequency, and it's all about moving from guesswork to evidence-based monitoring strategies. The Problem: Existing standards are all over the place. One might say you need a sensor every 50 square meters, another says 325 is fine. One says sample every 15 minutes, another says 30 is okay. There's a real lack of clear, evidence-based guidance—and if you get it wrong, you're either spending a fortune on equipment you don't need, or you're collecting data that's useless or actively misleading. The Study: Researchers installed 16 sensors across three office sites in Shanghai and collected four years of data on PM2.5, PM10, and CO₂—taking readings every single minute. They then analyzed the spatial and temporal patterns to answer the critical questions: Does a sensor over here tell the same story as one over there? And what information do you lose if you sample every hour instead of every minute? Key Findings: Particulate Matter (PM2.5 & PM10): The dominant driver is outdoor air. Indoor PM levels tracked outdoor levels very closely, meaning infiltration is the key factor. For tracking general trends, you don't need a massive density of sensors—readings from different locations were highly correlated. CO₂: A Completely Different Story: CO₂ is generated indoors by occupants, and the study found huge differences depending on sensor location. Key factors included the type of HVAC system, room size, distance from windows, and proximity to air outlets. A single sensor in a large, complex office space just won't cut it. The Goal-Oriented Approach: Here's where the paper gets clever. The authors argue that we're often trying to do two different jobs with monitoring, and we need to separate them: Job #1 - Temporal Trend Monitoring: Understanding the big picture—daily cycles, seasonal changes, overall average conditions. For this, you can use about one sensor every 150 square meters, and sampling intervals of 90 minutes for PM and 130 minutes for CO₂ are sufficient without losing accuracy. This means less data to store, less energy use, and less maintenance. Job #2 - High Concentration Event Monitoring: Catching the bad stuff—short, sharp spikes in pollution when a meeting room fills up or outdoor smoke floods in. For this, you need much more frequent sampling: every 4 minutes for PM2.5 and CO₂, and every 15 minutes for PM10. You also need more sensors placed strategically in high-risk zones—large rooms, spaces with standalone AC units, and areas far from ventilation sources. The Big Takeaway: There's no single "right" way to monitor indoor air quality—it all depends on your goal. This paper gives us a data-driven framework for making that choice. If you want to understand long-term building performance, you can use a sparse network sampling infrequently. But if your primary goal is health and safety—protecting occupants from pollution peaks—you need a denser, targeted network sampling much more often. This is about being deliberate. It's about monitoring with purpose. Long-term indoor air quality monitoring in office buildings: Data-driven and goal-oriented recommendations for sensor placement and sampling frequency https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113392 The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: The Fundamental Questions of Air Quality Monitoring 00:01:35 The Problem: Inconsistent Standards and Guidance Gaps 00:02:02 The Study Design: Four Years of Data from Shanghai Offices 00:02:38 Particulate Matter Findings: Outdoor Air Drives Indoor Trends 00:03:14 CO2 Findings: The Complexity of Indoor-Generated Pollutants 00:03:47 The Goal-Oriented Approach: Two Different Monitoring Jobs 00:04:37 Trend Monitoring: Less is More for General Performance 00:05:19 Event Monitoring: Frequent Sampling for Health and Safety 00:06:15 The Big Takeaway: No Single Right Way to Monitor 00:06:59 Closing: From Good Ideas to Smart Strategies

To celebrate 100 episodes of the Air Quality Matters podcast, we welcome back our very first guest, the renowned Max, for a wide-ranging discussion on the past two years and the revolutionary future of Indoor Air Quality (IAQ). Max, one of the leading voices in air quality standards, dives into the major themes that have dominated the conversation, including the post-pandemic landscape, the rise of health-focused standards, and the critical importance of Particulate Matter (PM) control. In this episode, you will learn: The Health Convergence: How the medical community and engineering discipline are finally converging to tackle IAQ, driven by the ability to measure environments more accurately. The Post-Pandemic Bubble: Why the huge spike in interest around airborne disease has led to a feeling of "general disappointment" in the industry, and where the real progress is being made. Particulate Matter (PM): The Big Problem, Simple Fix: Why PM is the major component of indoor air harm and how simple engineering controls like filtration are the cost-effective solution. The DALY Revolution: A deep dive into Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) and how Max’s work uses this public health metric to move away from arbitrary ventilation flow rates and quantify the actual harm of indoor contaminants in ASHRAE 62.2. The CO2 Myth: Max’s famously animated argument on why CO2 is not a good indicator of indoor air quality and is, in fact, an international engineering problem. A 9-Year Deadline: Max's personal mission to completely phase out ventilation flow rate requirements from air quality standards in less than a decade. Join us as we reflect on 100 episodes and look forward to a future where we can judge the success of a space by its ongoing performance, not just minimum standards. HOST: Simon Jones: https://www.linkedin.com/in/simon-air-quality-matters/ GUEST:  Max Sherman: https://www.linkedin.com/in/max-sherman-b7301514/ The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take, where we unpack the latest research shaping our understanding of indoor air and the built environment. The State of Indoor Air in Australia 2025, produced by the Thrive Research Centre and key Australian institutions, represents the first real national stock take of indoor air quality in a country that has been measuring outdoor air for decades. The Shocking Reality: Australia has been producing national state of the environment reports for decades, but they have almost exclusively focused on outdoor air. The great indoors—where Australians spend 90% of their time—has been a massive blind spot. This document is the first real attempt to answer a very simple question: What do we actually know about the air inside our buildings? The answer is a bit of a shock. The Big Takeaway: The most important finding of this report is not about specific pollution levels—it's about the sheer vastness of what we don't know. The report's great contribution is that it authoritatively documents our collective ignorance. It holds up a mirror and shows us a reflection that's mostly blank. This report is intended as a baseline, a starting point, and a catalyst for a national conversation and hopefully a national strategy. After decades of focusing on the sky outside, it's time to finally pay serious, coordinated attention to the air in the rooms we actually live, work, and learn in. This isn't just a report. It's the start of a very important piece of work. https://thriveiaq.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/20250909-State-of-Indoor-Air-in-Australia-final.pdf The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: Australia's First Indoor Air Quality Baseline 00:01:35 The Shocking Data Gap: Less Than 0.03% Coverage 00:02:46 Geographic Blind Spots: The Queensland and Western Australia Concentration 00:03:45 Residential Findings: Gas Cookers, Wood Heaters, and Bushfire Smoke 00:04:27 The Hidden Dangers: Formaldehyde and Volatile Organic Compounds 00:05:06 Office Buildings: Traffic Proximity and HVAC Design Matter 00:05:37 The One Take: Documenting Our Ignorance as a Catalyst for Change 00:06:19 Critical Questions for the Future: Building Codes, Infiltration, and Protection 00:07:01 Closing: A Call to Action for Indoor Air Quality

In this landmark episode, we sit down with Dr. Esther Sternberg, a professor of medicine, scientist, and internationally recognized pioneer in the science of mind-body interaction, healing spaces, and the role of place in well-being. Dr. Sternberg's groundbreaking work has influenced how we think about healthy buildings today. Her books—Healing Spaces, The Balance Within, and Well at Work—have become foundational texts for architects, designers, and health professionals seeking to create environments that don't just do no harm, but actively support human flourishing. The Central Question: There's a critical difference between designing spaces to do no harm and designing spaces to support well-being. We have the tools and knowledge to ensure clean air, excellent ventilation, and non-toxic materials—but what about resilience? What about the third leg of the stool: our own capacity to thrive, perform, and heal? Key Topics Discussed: From Immune Response to Environment: Dr. Sternberg's remarkable journey from studying brain-immune connections in rats to discovering how the built environment shapes stress, performance, and health—starting with a single patient and a personal healing experience in Crete. Spirituality in the Workplace: Why this was the hardest chapter to write in Well at Work, and how concepts like flow, focus, rituals, and going offline are essential—not fringe—elements of peak performance and well-being. The Stress-Performance Rainbow: Understanding the relationship between stress and flow. Why the goal is not to eliminate stress, but to find your "middle of the rainbow"—where focus, energy, and performance peak without burnout. Agency and Control: Why giving people choices—over light, sound, temperature, and workspace—is one of the most powerful levers for reducing stress and enhancing resilience. The fighter pilot analogy that explains it all. The Seven Domains of Integrative Health: Sleep, stress and relaxation response, environment, movement, relationships, spirituality, and nutrition—and how each can be embedded into the design and operation of buildings. The GSA Studies: How wearable health devices and continuous environmental monitoring revealed the precise conditions—decibel levels, humidity ranges, light exposure—that optimize health, reduce stress, and improve sleep quality in office workers. Healing Spaces and Virtual Nature: From hospital rooms in Dublin to immersive nature experiences with Studio Elsewhere—how technology and thoughtful design can bring restorative environments to those who need them most. The Contrarian Path: Dr. Sternberg's story of fighting scientific dogma, being denied promotion for work that "had no relevance to human health," and ultimately proving that the brain and immune system are intimately connected—and that place matters profoundly. https://www.linkedin.com/in/esther-sternberg-m-d-8a957927/ https://esthersternberg.com/ HOST: Simon Jones: https://www.linkedin.com/in/simon-air-quality-matters/ GUEST: Dr. Esther Sternberg The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: Meeting Esther Sternberg and the Science of Well-Being 00:02:04 Beyond Do No Harm: Designing Spaces for Well-Being 00:02:32 The Foundation: Clean Air and the 30-Year Cycle of Recognition 00:07:01 Spirituality in Buildings: Focus, Flow, and Belonging 00:12:36 The Science of Flow: Stress, Performance, and the Rainbow Model 00:21:08 Engineering for Performance: Choice, Movement, and Active Office Design 00:25:56 The Athlete Analogy: Building Resilience Through Strategic Stress 00:29:10 Virtual Nature and Reset Spaces: The 15-Minute Dose Effect 00:34:42 Chronic Stress and Burnout: Why Rest is Not Optional 00:34:01 Sustainability of Flow: Body Chemistry and Time Limits 00:56:49 Control and Agency: The Jet Fighter Pilot Lesson 00:58:44 Circadian Light: From Blue to Red and the Morning Advantage 01:02:15 The Given That Isn't: Why Buildings Still Cause Harm 00:38:32 Community and Belonging: The Antidote to Isolation 00:52:26 Acoustics and Culture: The Surprising Variability of Sound Preferences 01:10:09 The Economic Case: Return on Investment for Well-Being 01:18:42 Dr. Sternberg's Journey: From One Patient to the Built Environment 01:29:21 Fighting Dogma: The Politics of Science and Strategic Credibility 01:40:01 The Crete Revelation: Personal Healing and the Seven Domains 01:44:17 GSA Studies: Measuring the Built Environment's Impact on Health 01:53:22 The Future: From Mandates to Magnetic Spaces 01:55:50 Technology and Innovation: From Dublin to Studio Elsewhere 01:58:35 Closing: Building the Army of Advocates

The quality of air in our schools is directly shaping our children's health, attendance, and ability to learn. The Paper:Impact of Air Quality including Thermal Conditions on Educational Buildings on Health, Wellbeing and Performance by Duncan Grassie and researchers from the UK Health Security Agency and Eurovent. This scoping review is essentially a stock take—gathering all existing research to map out what we know, where the evidence is strong, and where the gaps remain. The Fundamental Question: Children spend approximately 30% of their waking hours in educational buildings—breathing air and experiencing thermal conditions they have absolutely no control over. What is the collective evidence telling us about how these environments are shaping their health, attendance, and crucially, their ability to learn? The Paper Impact of Indoor Air Quality, Including Thermal Conditions, in Educational Buildings on Health, Wellbeing, and Performance: A Scoping Review https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12080261 The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: Understanding Scoping Reviews and Educational Environments 00:01:49 The Three Pillars: Health, Absenteeism, and Performance 00:02:00 Health Impacts: The Respiratory Connection 00:02:50 The Absenteeism Crisis: Quantifying Lost School Days 00:03:46 Academic Performance: The CO2 and Temperature Effect 00:04:56 Solutions Part 1: Source Control as the First Line of Defense 00:05:32 Solutions Part 2: Ventilation as the Critical Intervention 00:06:11 The Economic Case: A $4 Million Investment with $110 Million Returns 00:06:30 The One Take: From Evidence to Action and Our Responsibility 00:07:44 Closing: Thanks and Next Steps

In this essential episode, we dive deep into the complexities shaping the European built environment with an industry expert from Eurovent (YR-VENT), the European industry association for Indoor Climate (HVAC), Process Cooling, and Food Cold Chain technologies. We tackle the core tension in Europe: reconciling the immense pressure for decarbonization with the political and social need for affordable housing. Is the EU's flagship Green Deal facing a legislative backlash? We explore the realities of the 'Fit for 55' package, the polarising effects on national politics (like in Germany), and how geopolitical shifts and inflation are changing market priorities. Key Topics Discussed: The EPBD Shift: Moving from a focus purely on energy consumption to a holistic Sustainable Buildings Directive that integrates Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ), occupant well-being, solar readiness, and sustainable mobility. IEQ: The Post-Pandemic Reality: Why the massive public awareness of indoor air quality during COVID-19 failed to translate into widespread market changes in schools and residential settings. Smart Systems & Complexity: The future of integrated HVAC systems, the inevitable comparison to complex modern cars, and the new digital skillset required for installers and maintenance personnel. The Risk of "Affordable" Building: A warning against short-sighted construction that focuses on upfront cost, leading to long-term issues like mold and poor health outcomes, and how institutional finance is now demanding IEQ data to mitigate asset risk. Circular Economy & EPDs: The pressing need for the HVAC industry to standardize and harmonize Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) to accurately calculate embodied carbon and operational carbon for new mandatory building requirements. About Eurovent (YR-VENT): As a coordinating body for the HVAC industry, YR-VENT represents manufacturers across heat pumps, chillers, air filters, and more. We discuss their role in monitoring legislative developments, driving market education, and running the independent third-party performance certification scheme to build confidence in product claims. What are your thoughts on the tension between sustainability and affordability? Let us know in the comments! HOST: Simon Jones: https://www.linkedin.com/in/simon-air-quality-matters/ GUEST: Stijn Renneboog: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stijn-renneboog-42893613b The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon. Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: Europe's Built Environment at a Crossroads 00:02:39 The Housing Crisis vs Climate Action: Finding Balance 00:17:46 EPBD Evolution: From Energy to Holistic Sustainability 00:25:44 Making the Invisible Visible: Monitoring Indoor Air Quality 00:32:48 Sweden's Success: Ventilation Inspections Drive Energy Renovations 00:35:36 Beyond Minimums: The Market Opportunity for Better Air Quality 00:41:59 Technology Integration: The Promise and Complexity of Smart Buildings 00:48:01 Lessons from Singapore: Separating Conditioning from Ventilation 00:57:03 The COVID Legacy: Why Awareness Didn't Translate to Action 01:09:28 Follow the Money: How Finance is Driving Health in Buildings 01:16:30 Eurovent's Mission: Bridging Policy and Practice 01:32:10 The Embodied Carbon Challenge: Harmonizing Standards for Impact

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take, where we unpack the latest research and reports shaping our understanding of indoor air and the built environment. This week, I'm diving into the seventh edition of a critical annual report that reads like a global health check—not for people, but for policy. The State of Global Air Quality Funding 2025, produced by the Clean Air Fund and the Climate Policy Initiative, follows the money trail to reveal whether our global investments actually align with our stated goals for clean air, health, and climate action. The diagnosis? It's deeply concerning and frankly contradictory. The Shocking Reality: While the world talks endlessly about the air pollution health crisis, direct funding for outdoor air quality projects has plummeted by 20%, now representing just 1% of all international development funding. Meanwhile, fossil fuel-prolonging funding—money that actively entrenches our dependence on fossil fuels—has surged by 80% in a single year, reaching $9.5 billion. The Contradiction in Action: In 2023, development funders spent more than 2.5 times more money on projects that prolong fossil fuel use than on projects specifically designed for clean air. It's like trying to bail out a sinking boat with a teacup while someone else uses a power drill to punch holes in the hull. Case Study - Bangladesh: A country with some of the world's worst air pollution received $1.1 billion more in fossil fuel-prolonging finance than in all air quality projects combined. The contradiction is staggering. The Glimmer of Hope: Funding for projects with air quality co-benefits—like metro systems or renewable energy where clean air is a happy side effect—rose by 7% to nearly $29 billion. The report argues we need to stop letting clean air be a happy accident and integrate air quality targets into these massive projects from the beginning. The Inequality Crisis: Just three countries (Philippines, Bangladesh, China) received 65% of all direct outdoor air quality funding. Meanwhile, of the 10 countries with the world's highest PM2.5 concentrations, seven received less than $1 per person in total air quality financing. Sub-Saharan Africa's situation is particularly dire, with funding dropping by 91% and now receiving less than 1% of the global total. The Fundamental Question: This report isn't just a collection of data—it's a mirror held up to our global priorities. And right now, that reflection shows a world trying to treat a disease with one hand while actively feeding it with another. Air pollution isn't just an environmental or health issue, but a fundamental development challenge. The question this report leaves us with: What are we going to do to change the picture? The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website.

I sit down with two of the most influential actors in the indoor air quality sector, Georgia Lagoudas (Science Policy Expert and Bioengineer) and Bronwyn King (Australian Radiation Oncologist & Anti-Tobacco Campaigner), the principals behind the recent landmark air quality event at the UN General Assembly in New York. This event launched the Global Pledge for Healthy Indoor Air—the first international effort to formally recognise clean indoor air as a basic human right essential to health and well-being. In this powerful conversation, they break down: The Problem: Why, despite all the science and technology, we still don't have clean air in our schools, hospitals, and workplaces. The Water Analogy: How we expect clean water but accept unsafe air. The 6 Pillars of the Pledge: How clean indoor air stitches into Human Rights, Health, Pandemic Preparedness, Climate Resilience, Workplace Safety, and Inclusion. The Cost of Inaction: Why the long-term health impact of poor indoor air is comparable to tobacco exposure. The Future: How Air Club and the Global Pledge plan to create "Fear Of Missing Out" among governments and organisations to drive real change. Join the Movement & Take Action:  https://www.airclub.org/ GUESTS: Georgia Lagoudas: https://www.linkedin.com/in/georgialagoudas/ Bronwyn King: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bronwyn-king The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: The Global Pledge for Healthy Indoor Air 00:02:30 Why a Pledge and Why Now 00:05:46 Creating Global Solidarity Through Advocacy 00:21:13 Air Quality as a Fundamental Human Right 00:22:56 Health Impacts: Beyond the Lungs 00:23:48 Pandemic Preparedness and Building Resilience 00:25:16 Climate Resilience and Wildfire Smoke 00:26:36 Workplace Safety and Accessibility Rights 00:38:38 The Invisibility Problem and Communication Challenge 00:47:05 Economic Impacts and the Cost of Inaction 01:03:18 Taking Action: From Pledges to Practice 01:10:53 Building the UN Coalition 01:19:10 Air Club and the Path Forward

Does fixing ventilation in homes actually make people with asthma healthier? The answer is an emphatic yes – but the type of system you install makes all the difference. This episode unpacks a remarkable two-year study from Chicago that followed 51 adults with physician-diagnosed asthma across 40 homes, tracking their health before and after different ventilation interventions. The researchers didn't just install equipment and hope for the best – they meticulously measured asthma control month by month using standardized health scores, while simultaneously monitoring indoor air pollutants to understand exactly what was changing. The results are striking. Across all intervention types, participants saw a 6.3% improvement in asthma control scores – enough to shift the proportion of people with well-controlled asthma from 57% to 75%. But here's where it gets fascinating: the gold standard balanced ventilation systems with energy recovery (MVHR/ERV) delivered an 8.4% improvement, pushing 86% of participants into well-controlled territory and eliminating poorly controlled asthma entirely in that group. Meanwhile, simpler exhaust-only systems still helped but delivered less than half the benefit. The Smoking Gun: Nitrogen Dioxide The study identified a clear culprit: nitrogen dioxide from gas cooking. For every standard deviation decrease in indoor NO2 levels, asthma control improved by 7.1%. In a study where 90% of homes had gas stoves, this finding directly links the pollutants we generate indoors to measurable health outcomes. It's not just about bringing in fresh air – it's about diluting and removing the combustion byproducts that accumulate in our homes. Perhaps most powerfully, the greatest improvements occurred among those who needed it most: participants over 45, Black and African American residents, and households earning less than $75,000 annually. These groups started with worse asthma control, meaning the intervention delivered its biggest impact precisely where health disparities are greatest. From Building Codes to Therapeutic Environments This isn't just another academic exercise – it's real-world evidence that transforms how we think about home ventilation. The study shows that properly designed mechanical ventilation isn't a luxury or just about meeting codes; it's a direct public health intervention that can reduce health inequalities. The benefits aren't immediate – they build over months and years – but they're substantial and measurable. The implications are profound. When a ventilation upgrade can eliminate poorly controlled asthma in a group of sufferers, we're not talking about marginal gains. We're talking about transforming homes from environments that exacerbate illness into therapeutic spaces that actively support health. And crucially, this intervention works best for those who are suffering most – offering a concrete pathway to address health equity through better housing. This research moves us beyond theoretical arguments about air quality to hard evidence: engineering our indoor environments is healthcare by another name. For the millions living with asthma, especially in communities already facing health disparities, this study offers hope that relatively straightforward home improvements can deliver life-changing results. Effects of residential ventilation and filtration interventions on adult  asthma outcomes The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

In this special episode, we sit down with the founders and champions of World Ventilate Day (November 8th) to dissect the critical difference between air quality and ventilation. They reveal why their focus is on action, agency, and empowering everyone—from homeowners to governments—to take control of their indoor environments. Key Discussion Points: Action vs. Nuance: Why the day focuses on ventilation (the action) rather than the more nuanced conversation around air quality. The Agency Angle: How ventilation provides agency at every level, from national governance to managing your own home. Beyond Air Quality: Why ventilation is critical not just for air, but for managing a building's thermal environment, humidity, comfort, and energy. The Pandemic's Legacy: The shocking realisation during COVID that "we haven't got a clue" about the ventilation in our buildings, and the danger of apathy today. The Collaboration Imperative: Discussing the theme 'Collaborate to Ventilate' and the need for engineers and building users to work together. What We're NOT Talking About: The panellists share their most pressing overlooked topics, including the destructive power of apathy , the complexity of real-world ventilation , and the urgent need for competence and accountability in the industry. Reframing Success: Why we need to measure the performance and outcomes of ventilation, not just the existence of a product. Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: World Ventilate Day and Its Mission 00:02:25 Why Ventilation, Not Just Air Quality? 00:06:25 The Origins: How World Ventilate Day Began 00:09:02 The Pandemic Wake-Up Call: What We Didn't Know 00:17:10 Breaking Down Engineering Barriers Through Collaboration 00:21:56 Ventilation Engineers: The Hidden Health Heroes 00:23:45 The Lungs as Filters: A Powerful Analogy 00:28:57 The Future of World Ventilate Day: Going Global 00:34:21 Fighting Apathy: The Destructive Power of Indifference 00:38:12 The Complexity Challenge: Beyond Simple Solutions 00:43:52 The Competence Crisis: When Good Intentions Go Wrong 00:49:16 Reframing Success: From Products to Performance World Ventilate Day: November 8th.  Find out more and get involved: https://www.worldventil8day.com/ Cath Noakes Henry Burridge Nathan Wood #81 - Nathan Wood #15 Cath Noakes #7 Henry Burridge The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website.

Why is it so difficult to prove that mold makes people sick when millions of people clearly suffer in water-damaged buildings? The association is undeniable. The causation? That's where things get complicated. This episode unpacks a fundamental challenge that has plagued the mold and health field for decades – the seemingly simple but scientifically complex distinction between association and causation. We know with certainty that people in damp, moldy buildings experience more respiratory symptoms, asthma exacerbations, and various health complaints. The 2004 Institute of Medicine report established this definitively, finding "sufficient evidence of an association" between visible mold and respiratory symptoms. But proving that mold directly causes these problems? That's an entirely different scientific mountain to climb. The core challenge lies in what scientists call the Bradford Hill criteria – the gold standard for establishing causation in epidemiology. To prove mold causes illness, we'd need to demonstrate a clear dose-response relationship (more mold equals more illness), temporal relationships (exposure before symptoms), biological plausibility, and ideally, experimental evidence. But here's the rub: mold exposure in real buildings is never just mold exposure. It's a complex soup of fungal spores, bacterial endotoxins, volatile organic compounds, allergens, and chemical emissions from degrading materials. How do you isolate the effect of one component in this biological cocktail? The Exposure Assessment Black Hole Perhaps the most maddening aspect is our inability to accurately measure what people are actually exposed to. Unlike a drug trial where you know exactly what dose someone received, mold exposure is invisible, variable, and cumulative. A single air sample tells you almost nothing about someone's exposure over weeks or months. Spore counts fluctuate wildly based on humidity, disturbance, and time of day. Some people might react to dead spores or fragments that don't even show up in standard tests. Others might be sensitive to mycotoxins at levels far below what we can reliably detect. This measurement problem creates a vicious cycle. Without good exposure data, we can't establish dose-response relationships. Without dose-response relationships, we can't prove causation. Without proven causation, there's less funding for better measurement tools. And round and round we go. The Human Variability Factor Then there's the inconvenient fact that people react differently to the same environment. Genetics, immune status, age, pre-existing conditions – all these factors influence whether someone develops symptoms in a moldy building. This heterogeneity makes it nearly impossible to predict who will get sick and how sick they'll get, further muddying the causation waters. The episode explores how this scientific uncertainty has real-world consequences. Insurance companies exploit the causation gap to deny claims. Building owners hide behind the lack of "proof" to avoid remediation. Meanwhile, people suffering in water-damaged buildings are told their symptoms might be "all in their head" because science can't definitively prove the mold is making them sick. The Path Forward Despite these challenges, the scientific consensus is clear on one point: water-damaged buildings are unhealthy environments that should be remediated, regardless of whether we can prove specific causal pathways. The precautionary principle applies – we know enough about the associations to act, even if we can't draw straight lines from exposure to illness. This One Take reveals why the mold and health field remains so contentious and why simple questions like "is mold making me sick?" don't have simple answers. It's a sobering reminder that in environmental health, the gap between what we observe and what we can scientifically prove often feels insurmountable – not because the connections aren't real, but because reality is far more complex than our measurement tools and study designs can capture. Damp Indoor Spaces and Health (2004) The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

When Worlds Collide: Tropical Wisdom Meets Temperate Challenges In this wide-ranging discussion, Chandra brings over 35 years of experience from Singapore's hot, humid environment to share insights that challenge conventional thinking about ventilation and comfort. As one of three pioneers who established Singapore's indoor air quality research unit in the early 1990s, his team's tagline – "energy efficient, healthy buildings" – has guided decades of innovation in tropical building design. The conversation reveals striking contrasts: while European buildings might operate at 21-23°C, Singapore's newest net-zero buildings maintain comfort at 26-27°C using elevated air speeds from ceiling fans. This isn't just about energy savings – it's a fundamental rethinking of how we achieve thermal comfort. As Chandra explains, tropically-acclimatized people actually prefer air movement, unlike those from colder climates who perceive it as draft. Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: Meeting a Legend of Indoor Air Quality 00:02:08 Air Quality as a Human-Centered Challenge 00:23:17 Making the Invisible Visible: Sensors and Awareness 00:42:58 Hot and Humid Climates: Engineering Lessons from Singapore 00:52:50 Decoupling Ventilation from Cooling: A Revolutionary Approach 01:00:55 Net-Zero Buildings and Adaptive Comfort 01:12:25 Global Equity and Simple Solutions 01:23:30 Building Preparedness and Future Resilience Chandra Sekhar - LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/professor-chandra-sekhar-singapore/ The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take as we explore a fascinating convergence of finance, health, and real estate that's reshaping how Wall Street thinks about buildings. What happens when the financial markets discover that healthy buildings aren't just good for people – they're good for portfolios? This episode unpacks a compelling business case that's turning heads in boardrooms and investment committees worldwide. We dive into groundbreaking research from the International WELL Building Institute that fundamentally reframes how we think about building costs through a simple but powerful concept: the 90-9-1 rule. Think about it: for a typical business, only 1% of costs go to energy, 9% to real estate, and a staggering 90% to people – salaries, benefits, human capital. Yet for decades, the entire green building movement has obsessed over shaving pennies off that 1% energy slice while ignoring the massive opportunity sitting in the 90%. As the research reveals, a mere 1% improvement in productivity through better indoor environmental quality is financially equivalent to eliminating your entire energy bill. The Numbers That made Wall Street Take Notice The evidence is striking. Harvard's COG-fx study shows that enhanced ventilation and lower VOCs can boost cognitive function scores – translating to $6,500-7,500 per employee annually in improved productivity. That's not theoretical; that's measurable impact on decision-making, creativity, and performance. Buildings with health certifications like WELL command 4.5-7.7% higher rents and secure lease terms over a year longer than their conventional counterparts. This isn't just about feeling good – it's about financial fundamentals. But here's where it gets really interesting: the financial markets themselves are now rewarding healthy buildings with cheaper capital. Sustainability-linked loans and social bonds are tying interest rates directly to achieving health and wellness targets. When your building's WELL certification can literally reduce your borrowing costs, you know the market has crossed a tipping point. Beyond Productivity: The Hidden Costs of Unhealthy Buildings The report goes deeper than just productivity gains. It tackles the twin demons of absenteeism (people not showing up) and presenteeism (people showing up but functioning poorly). Poor air quality, inadequate lighting, and thermal discomfort create a constant drain on organizational performance that most companies never even measure. Fix these issues, and you're not just adding value – you're plugging leaks that have been hemorrhaging money for years. The conversation also explores specific strategies that deliver returns: biophilic design that goes beyond token plants to create genuine connections with nature, daylighting that improves both work performance and sleep quality, and ventilation strategies that keep people sharp throughout the day rather than suffering through afternoon brain fog. The ESG Revolution's Next Chapter Perhaps most significantly, this shift represents the maturation of ESG investing. While the 'E' (environmental) has dominated for years, the 'S' (social) is finally being recognized as financially material. How companies treat their most valuable asset – their people – directly impacts long-term viability and profitability. Top-tier corporations engaged in the war for talent are actively seeking and paying premiums for spaces that support employee wellbeing. This episode reveals how investing in healthy buildings has evolved from a nice-to-have amenity to a strategic imperative. The business case is no longer theoretical – it's robust, quantified, and being proven daily in real estate markets worldwide. When Wall Street starts betting on healthy buildings, you know we've reached an inflection point where doing good and doing well are finally, undeniably aligned. IWBI Investing in Health Pays Back The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

Join us for an enlightening conversation with Bill Bahnfleth, ASHRAE Fellow, former president, and professor at Penn State's Department of Architectural Engineering, who perfectly bridges the gap between rigorous science and practical application in the built environment. Where Are We Now in the Ventilation Journey? In this wide-ranging discussion, Bill offers a sobering assessment of our post-pandemic reality. Despite COVID being what should have been "the reset" for indoor air quality awareness, we're watching that attention rapidly fade. As he travels globally in his role as an ASHRAE Distinguished Lecturer, Bill observes a consistent pattern: buildings designed to bare minimums, maintenance treated as an afterthought, and a massive gulf between what academic conferences discuss and what actually happens in real buildings. The conversation reveals how regional differences shape ventilation practices – from Europe's long-standing ventilation focus to markets where outdoor air is considered too energy-intensive to be viable. Yet one universal truth emerges: the tyranny of minimum standards becoming maximum targets, and the persistent failure to maintain even basic system performance. Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: The State of Indoor Air Quality Post-Pandemic 00:02:00 Global Perspectives on Ventilation Challenges 00:26:15 The Medical Community's Missing Voice 00:36:59 ASHRAE's Evolution and Global Expansion 00:58:05 Standard 241: Born from Crisis 01:05:27 Equivalent Clean Air: A New Paradigm 01:11:04 Building Resilience and Modal Operations 01:16:15 Risk Assessment vs. Simple Thresholds 01:31:05 The Technology Balance: Benefits and Byproducts 01:44:44 Accessibility Rights and Indoor Air Quality

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take as we dive into a German medical guideline that fundamentally challenges how we think about mold diagnosis and testing. What if everything we've been told about measuring mold to prove it's making us sick is wrong? This episode unpacks the 2023 AWMF Mold Guidelines, a comprehensive consensus document from the German Association of Scientific Medical Societies that brings together hygienists, immunologists, dermatologists, and other experts to cut through decades of confusion about indoor mold exposure. Their message is both radical and refreshingly simple: stop chasing spores, start fixing dampness. The guideline drops several bombshells that challenge conventional wisdom. First, they state unequivocally that if you can see mold, you don't need to sample it – just remove it. Environmental measurements of mold, mycotoxins, or microbial VOCs? They declare these "rarely useful" for medical diagnosis. In fact, they go so far as to say that monitoring mycotoxins in indoor air has "no indication in medical diagnostics." For an industry that's built around testing and quantification, this is revolutionary. The Focus Shift: From Lab Tests to Leaks The document's core philosophy centers on the precautionary principle: mold shouldn't be tolerated indoors, period. Not because we can definitively prove it causes specific diseases, but because it represents a hygiene problem with potential health risks. The primary recommendation isn't complex – identify the moisture source and fix it. The building, not the lab report, becomes the focus of intervention. When it comes to health effects, the guideline draws clear boundaries. They recognize two categories: general irritant effects (itchy eyes, runny nose, mood disturbances) and specific clinical conditions, which are overwhelmingly allergic reactions and, rarely, infections in immunocompromised individuals. Notably absent from their list of proven associations are chronic fatigue syndrome, neurotoxic effects, and autoimmune diseases – conditions often attributed to mold but lacking sufficient scientific evidence for causation. Diagnosing Without Air Samples For doctors facing patients who believe mold is making them sick, the guideline prescribes a traditional allergy workup: detailed medical history, skin-prick tests, specific IgE antibody measurements, and if necessary, provocation testing. It's the same process used for pollen or dust mite allergies – no air sampling required. They even provide a list of diagnostic methods to avoid, including bioresonance procedures and mycotoxin blood tests, firmly planting their flag in evidence-based medicine. The document identifies clear risk groups requiring special protection: severely immunosuppressed patients, those with cystic fibrosis, and people with existing asthma. For these individuals, mold isn't just an irritant – it can pose serious infection risks. The Uncomfortable Truth Perhaps most striking is the guideline's honesty about what we don't know. They acknowledge that we lack established health-based guideline values for mycotoxins in air, can't draw clear dose-response relationships between measured concentrations and symptoms, and simply don't have the science to support many claimed mold-illness connections. This isn't dismissive – it's scientifically honest. The implications are profound for building managers, indoor air quality professionals, and anyone dealing with mold complaints. The message is clear: stop endlessly measuring what we can't interpret and start addressing the root cause – moisture. It's a pragmatic, precautionary approach that prioritizes action over analysis paralysis. This episode reveals how Germany's medical establishment is pushing back against the tendency to overcomplicate mold issues, offering instead a clear-eyed, evidence-based framework that separates what we know from what we merely suspect. For anyone navigating the murky waters of mold and health, this guideline offers a much-needed compass. AWMF mold guideline “Medical clinical diagnostics for indoor mold exposure” – Update 2023 AWMF Register No. 161/001 The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

Welcome to Air Quality Matters as we illuminate a revolutionary that's been quietly transforming how we think about infection control in our built environment. In this episode, we dive into the world of far UVC light with Janet Price, Chief Science Officer at Visium, who brings an exceptional blend of molecular biology expertise and real-world application experience to this fascinating conversation. The Invisible Warrior Against Invisible Threats Far UVC represents a specific wavelength of light (222 nanometers) that exists beyond our visible spectrum – a form of energy that naturally occurs in space but never reaches Earth's surface due to atmospheric absorption. What makes this technology so compelling is its dual-action mechanism: it simultaneously damages both DNA/RNA and proteins in pathogens, essentially fighting a war on multiple fronts against viruses, bacteria, and even mold spores. Yet remarkably, this same light that devastates single-cell organisms can't penetrate the dead skin layer protecting our living tissue – making it safe for continuous human exposure. Janet walks us through the science with remarkable clarity, explaining how these krypton gas-filled lamps produce their precise wavelength and why that specificity matters. Unlike the broad-spectrum mercury bulbs used by Wells nearly a century ago, today's far UVC technology delivers targeted germicidal action without the risks associated with traditional UVC exposure. The conversation reveals how a minute of exposure can inactivate 50% of flu viruses in a space, potentially reducing transmission risk by up to 91% in typical office settings. The Path Forward Perhaps most thought-provoking is Janet's perspective on what's needed for widespread adoption. Like Wells before her, she recognises that the technology works – the science is clear, the standards are emerging (UL 8082 certification now exists specifically for far UVC devices), but the epidemiological evidence at the population scale remains elusive. We need, as she puts it, someone willing to create "the cleanest town in the world" to demonstrate what's possible when we treat our air as seriously as we treat our water. The conversation also confronts uncomfortable truths about our post-pandemic fatigue and the funding cliff that's left many promising technologies stranded. Yet Janet's optimism is infectious – she sees a future where cleaning our air requires nothing more from people than showing up and breathing, where invisible light fights invisible threats without anyone having to change their behavior. This episode offers both a masterclass in emerging technology and a rallying cry for those who believe indoor air quality deserves the same attention we've given to clean water and food safety. It's essential listening for facility managers, healthcare administrators, engineers, and anyone curious about how we might finally win the war against airborne pathogens – not through behavior change or constant vigilance, but through the simple application of the right wavelength of light. Janet Price - LinkedIn Visium The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take as we look into one of the more contentious debates in environmental health – a controversy that's suddenly captured mainstream attention following Jordan Peterson's recent diagnosis with Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (CIRS) linked to mold exposure. When a prominent public intellectual gets this diagnosis, it forces us all to confront an uncomfortable question: what do we really know about the health effects of water-damaged buildings? This episode unpacks the deep divide between two competing narratives about mold and chronic illness. On one side, Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker and his followers describe CIRS as a biotoxin-triggered condition affecting genetically susceptible individuals – about 25% of the population who lack the ability to clear these toxins from their bodies. Their detailed protocol, complete with specific biomarkers like transforming growth factor beta-1 and visual contrast sensitivity tests, has reportedly helped thousands recover from debilitating symptoms: extreme fatigue, brain fog, chronic pain, and respiratory issues that conventional medicine couldn't explain. On the other side stands the medical establishment – the CDC, WHO, and major medical colleges – who don't recognize CIRS as a valid diagnosis. Their argument rests on fundamental toxicology: the dose makes the poison. While nobody disputes that mold causes allergies, asthma, and respiratory infections, mainstream scientists argue that the mycotoxin concentrations in typical water-damaged buildings are orders of magnitude below levels that could cause systemic toxic effects. They point to a critical weakness in the CIRS evidence base: virtually all supporting research comes from Shoemaker's own clinical group, with no large-scale independent validation. The Australian Government's Response: A Pragmatic Policy? Perhaps the most illuminating perspective comes from Australia's formal 2018 inquiry into biotoxin-related illnesses. They listened to everyone – desperate patients, CIRS practitioners, and peak medical bodies. Their conclusion was nuanced: while they sided with mainstream medicine in not recognizing CIRS as a valid diagnosis, they didn't dismiss the patients. Instead, they created a national clinical pathway that takes exposure histories seriously while grounding treatment in evidence-based medicine – a framework for providing compassionate care without endorsing a scientifically contested diagnosis. The episode explores how this creates a self-perpetuating cycle: without mainstream acceptance, it's nearly impossible to secure funding for large studies, but without those studies, mainstream acceptance remains elusive. High-profile cases like Peterson's might finally break this deadlock, forcing the urgent, focused research effort needed to provide clear, independently verified answers. The Universal Agreement Despite the fierce debate over mechanisms and diagnoses, one thing unites all parties: mold is harmful, and remediation of water-damaged buildings must always be the first course of action. Whether you believe in CIRS or stick to conventional medicine, everyone agrees that fixing the environment comes first. This One Take tries to offer a balanced exploration of a polarising topic, acknowledging both the genuine suffering of patients seeking answers and the scientific rigour required to establish new medical paradigms. It's essential listening for anyone trying to navigate the complex intersection of environmental health, medical controversy, and the very human need for answers when conventional medicine falls short. As the Latin phrase reminds us: sola dosis facit venenum – the dose makes the poison. The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters as we conclude our special series from Healthy Buildings 2025 in Hyderabad with a fascinating conversation that reframes how we think about the air we breathe. What if we started thinking about air quality as our 'inhalable diet'? This compelling question drives our discussion with Tanya Kaur Bedi, assistant professor at the School of Planning and Architecture in Bhopal, who brings a uniquely personal and practical perspective to indoor environmental quality. The conversation begins with a powerful comparison: while we meticulously track our 1,500-2,000 daily calories, we completely ignore the 10,000-15,000 litres of air we breathe every day. As Tanya points out, we're having an inhalable diet right now as we speak, as we sleep, as we work – yet it remains the least discussed aspect of our health. Her own journey into this field began with a personal mystery: persistent acne that disappeared only when her roommate changed her perfume, revealing how our daily 'breakfast' of air can profoundly impact our health without us even knowing. From an architectural perspective, Tanya reveals how air quality is beginning to reshape India's real estate landscape. Friends with infants developing pulmonary issues are being told by doctors to leave Delhi – not as a suggestion, but as the primary medical intervention. This migration pattern, though still emerging, signals a fundamental shift in how Indians value clean air versus economic opportunity. The Middle-Income Reality Perhaps most revealing is Tanya's research into middle-income Indian homes. These families rely almost entirely on natural ventilation, adjusting their lives to the environment rather than controlling it through mechanical systems. In summer, entire families might sleep in the one air-conditioned room they can afford. This means for most Indians, the quality of outdoor air directly determines their indoor exposure – a sobering reality when Delhi regularly tops global pollution charts. The discussion takes a fascinating turn into the composition of household dust. While outdoor dust contains traffic emissions and construction particles, indoor dust tells a different story – it's full of microplastics from degrading bottles and bags, pet dander, and chemical emissions from furniture. As Tanya notes, you can know about a person's life from their dust, making it a kind of environmental diary we never read. Design Solutions and Cultural Practices As both architect and interior designer, Tanya advocates for conscious limitation – the idea that more isn't always better when it comes to materials and finishes. She reveals practical design strategies: rounded furniture corners that prevent dust accumulation, avoiding recessed lighting that becomes a heating element for trapped particles, and the radical simplicity of using local, known materials like mud and bamboo over complex chemical products. The conversation also celebrates existing Indian practices that support air quality – the daily dusting, mopping and sweeping rituals that might seem obsessive but actually serve a vital health function. Yet it also confronts uncomfortable truths: the lower your income, the fewer choices you have about materials and location, creating an inequitable distribution of air quality risks. The Path Forward Tanya's current research into the seasonal aspects of our inhalable diet – how festivals, weather patterns, and cultural practices create different exposure profiles throughout the year – offers a uniquely Indian perspective on air quality science. Her focus on residential spaces addresses a critical research gap, as homes remain the least studied yet most important environments for long-term health. The conversation concludes with a call for awareness and agency. While we might not control our environment completely, we can trust our senses more, ask questions about the products we bring into our homes, and make small behavioural changes that accumulate into healthier spaces. As India's 1.4 billion people become more aware of their inhalable diet, the potential for market transformation is enormous. This episode offers a fresh lens for understanding air quality – not as an abstract environmental issue, but as a daily consumption choice as fundamental as the food we eat. It's a perspective that makes the invisible visible and the complex actionable, perfect for anyone seeking to understand how architecture, culture, and health intersect in one of the world's most challenging air quality environments. Tanya - LinkedIn The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take – the series where complex research gets distilled into digestible insights in just one recording. What if fixing damp and mould in buildings doesn't actually pay for itself? This provocative question drives a groundbreaking study from Finland that dares to put a price tag on one of housing's most persistent problems. The research team tackled a massive question: when you add up all the costs of remediating moisture-damaged buildings against all the benefits – health improvements, energy savings, climate impact – does the investment make financial sense? They focused on Finland's aging housing stock from the 1960s-80s, where structural moisture damage from permeable exterior walls creates deep-seated mould problems that go far beyond surface condensation. Two remediation strategies went head-to-head in their analysis. The first: rip everything out and rebuild with modern, energy-efficient materials – a 50-year solution costing billions. The second: a clever two-stage approach that first seals buildings from the inside to stop mould exposure, then delays the expensive rebuild by a decade. The researchers monetized everything they could – prevented asthma cases using disability-adjusted life years, reduced heating bills, even the social cost of carbon. The shocking result? Both approaches showed massive financial losses. The immediate rebuild lost €5.9 billion over 50 years, while the delayed approach fared even worse at €6.4 billion. The upfront remediation costs simply dwarf the €1.2 billion in health benefits and modest energy savings. But here's the crucial twist – the study couldn't include property value increases. A properly remediated, healthy home is worth significantly more than a damp, mouldy one. This missing piece could completely flip the calculation from loss to gain. The paper's real contribution isn't the negative number; it's providing the first comprehensive framework for evaluating these investments. This Finnish study forces us to confront an uncomfortable truth: the traditional cost-benefit analysis might tell us fixing buildings doesn't pay, but it also reveals we're not counting everything that matters. It pushes policymakers to ask better questions about the total value of maintaining safe, healthy housing – including the preservation of massive national assets tied up in our building stock. Sometimes the most valuable research doesn't provide answers but gives us better ways to frame the questions. And in the battle against damp and mould, that might be exactly what we need.

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters as we continue our special series from Healthy Buildings 2025 in Hyderabad, India. In this second instalment, we dive deep into the perspectives of both emerging researchers and industry leaders who are shaping the future of indoor environmental quality in one of the world's most dynamic regions. The Next Generation of Research First, we hear from three exceptional young scientists tackling frontier challenges in air quality. Sachin Dhawan from IIT Delhi reveals groundbreaking work developing automated pollen samplers – technology that could finally help India understand why seasonal asthma peaks coincide with pollen seasons, despite having virtually no monitoring data. As he points out, while pollen allergies affect 50% of Europeans, India can't even quantify its problem without proper measurement tools. Sandeep Budde shares a deeply personal journey from watching his coal miner father cough through nights to investigating how pharmaceutical industries release toxic gases into neighbourhoods during 2-4 AM when atmospheric conditions mask their activities. His work creating digital twins of neighbourhoods reveals a shocking truth: wealthier residents in larger, partitioned homes face higher pollutant exposure than those in simpler dwellings due to negative pressure zones that concentrate contaminants. Aprisia Murran from Indonesia brings an architect's perspective on post-occupancy evaluation, driven by her own asthma that mysteriously disappeared during two years studying in the Netherlands. Her work with vulnerable communities reveals how creativity and collective action can overcome financial constraints in addressing overheating and ventilation challenges. Industry at the Frontlines The industry panel features three leaders tackling different aspects of India's air quality challenge. Karthikeyan Elumalai from Testo India emphasises the critical gap in validation – buildings are commissioned but rarely verified to perform as designed. Kapil Kapoor from Vayugard Climate Tech highlights the shift from reactive HEPA filtration to predictive, IoT-enabled solutions that address the reality that we breathe 11,000 liters of air daily. Rahul Kappor from Camfil India champions the concept of total cost of ownership, noting that while filters represent only 15% of lifecycle costs, energy consumption accounts for 80%. The Road Ahead All participants converge on key themes: the desperate need for continuous monitoring rather than intermittent testing, the importance of maintenance as a professional discipline, and the power of regulation to drive change. As India's disposable income rises and awareness grows, the next five years promise a transformation from cost-sensitive to solution-sensitive markets. The conversation reveals both universal challenges – the disconnect between design and operation, the invisibility of air quality problems – and uniquely regional ones, from Delhi's seasonal pollution crises to the challenge of serving 1.4 billion people across diverse climates and cultures. Yet what emerges most powerfully is the passion and innovation driving change, whether through cutting-edge pollen detection, community-based retrofits, or reimagining filtration as a health investment rather than a maintenance cost. This episode offers a rare window into how the world's most populous nation is tackling its air quality crisis through a powerful combination of grassroots innovation, scientific advancement, and industry evolution. The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect -  The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take – the series where complex research gets distilled into digestible insights in just one recording. How do we know if those expensive school ventilation upgrades actually worked? This question drives a fascinating study from the Journal of Building and Environment that offers a practical roadmap for districts managing hundreds of buildings. The research team deployed a massive monitoring campaign across 48 schools, installing simple internet-connected CO2 sensors in 138 classrooms. Their clever approach: capture baseline performance before district-wide renovations, then measure again afterward. But raw CO2 data from classrooms is notoriously messy – a chaotic zigzag of peaks and valleys that tells you everything and nothing at once. The breakthrough came through automation. Researchers developed an algorithm that could scan mountains of data and identify the patterns that matter: the morning build-up when students fill the room and their breathing drives CO2 higher, and the decay periods during lunch or after school when ventilation systems clear the air. From these patterns, they extracted two critical metrics – daily maximum CO2 concentration (the simple pass/fail test we aim to keep below 1000 ppm) and air change rates (the gold standard showing how often the room's air volume gets replaced). The results delivered both good news and a reality check. Post-renovation, peak CO2 levels dropped by over 230 ppm on average – a clear win. But here's the kicker: even after spending all that money, 57.5% of schools still exceeded the 1000 ppm threshold. The equipment was installed, but it wasn't configured correctly, operated properly, or maintained adequately. Welcome to the perpetual challenge of ventilation systems. The paper's real value isn't in proving renovations help – it's in demonstrating that continuous monitoring transforms ventilation from a reactive scramble to proactive management. When classroom 2B hits 1500 ppm every afternoon, you know to check the damper settings. When the library's air change rate suddenly halves, something's clogged. This isn't fancy academic exercise; it's an affordable, scalable tool ensuring that investments in healthy air actually deliver results, day after day. The lesson is clear: installing new systems is just the beginning. The real work lies in the continuous feedback loop of measure, identify, adjust, and verify. Only then can we bridge that all-too-common gap between design performance and real-world operational reality.

Join us for this special collaboration with the AIVC as we revisit Technical Note 68, a landmark document on residential ventilation and health that's nearly a decade old but more relevant than ever. Why does indoor air quality matter as much as traffic safety or smoking cessation? Arnold Janssens from Ghent University introduces this deep dive into TN68, joined by three experts who shaped and continue to advance this critical field: Pawel Wargocki (DTU), one of the original editors; Valérie Leprince (CEREMA), with extensive knowledge of global ventilation standards; and Ben Jones (Nottingham University), who's carried forward the harm-based approach to indoor air quality. The conversation reveals a striking truth: particulate matter in our homes causes harm on a scale comparable to major public health concerns, yet remains largely invisible to both occupants and policymakers. The panel explores how the groundbreaking harm analysis in TN68 is finally bearing fruit, with ASHRAE's new health-based compliance pathway and Europe's updated Energy Performance of Buildings Directive incorporating these principles. From the failure of ventilation systems to deliver prescribed flow rates, to the promise of performance-based standards, to the role of air cleaning as a fourth pillar of ventilation strategy - this discussion unpacks the complex reality of managing indoor air quality. The experts debate whether our current half-air change per hour standard is adequate, why cooker hoods might be our most important yet most neglected ventilation equipment, and how smart systems could redirect airflow to bedrooms where we spend a third of our lives. Perhaps most importantly, they address the fundamental challenge: how do we make the invisible visible? How do we give people agency over their indoor environment when they can't see or feel the pollutants affecting their health? The conversation concludes with each expert's vision for the next decade - from making ventilation a respected trade to achieving real-time visibility of indoor air quality in every home. This episode is essential listening for anyone involved in building design, ventilation, public health, or simply interested in understanding the air they breathe for 90% of their lives.

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take – the series where complex research gets distilled into digestible insights in just one recording. Should we mandate indoor air quality standards for all public buildings? This deceptively simple question sits at the heart of a fascinating scientific debate unfolding in the pages of prestigious journals. In this episode, we dive into a perspective piece from the Journal of Indoor Environments that challenges the rush toward simplified global air quality mandates. The story begins with a headline-grabbing proposal in Science magazine: after everything COVID-19 taught us, shouldn't we enforce mandatory standards for PM2.5, CO2, and minimum ventilation rates in all public spaces? It sounds straightforward, measurable, protective. But as our discussion reveals, the reality is far more complex. Drawing from the International Society of Indoor Air Quality's massive database – containing over 840 different limit values from 40+ countries – we discover we're not starting from scratch. A third of these are already legally enforceable regulations. So why reinvent the wheel? More importantly, why leave out critical pollutants like formaldehyde and radon that many countries already regulate? The conversation exposes uncomfortable truths about proposed standards. That suggested ventilation rate of 14 litres per second per person? It's double what many countries currently require for schools. In developing nations relying on natural ventilation, or urban areas with poor outdoor air quality, such mandates could be economically impossible and environmentally counterproductive – doubling energy consumption and carbon emissions. Is income actually the single biggest barrier to improved air quality? This question becomes central as we explore how a standard that only works for new, high-tech buildings isn't really a global solution at all. The path forward isn't abandoning standards but embracing nuance. The 'adopt and adapt' model emerges as the pragmatic approach – taking WHO guidelines and modifying them for local climates, building stocks, economic realities, and cultural practices. It's a call for collaboration over prescription, for building on decades of existing work rather than starting fresh, and for creating frameworks flexible enough to work everywhere. In the quest for better indoor air, this episode reminds us that sometimes the perfect can't be the enemy of the good – especially when 'good' has to work for everyone, everywhere.

Send us a text (https://www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/2264976/open_sms) Richard Blakeway, Housing Ombudsman for England, takes us on a profound journey through the evolving landscape of social housing complaints and the critical issue of damp and mould that has transformed the sector. "Home is a really emotional place," Richard explains, capturing the essence of why housing complaints differ from those in other sectors. With an inquiry reaching the Ombudsman approximately every 20 seconds, the scale of housing issues becomes starkly apparent. As an advocate for fairness, the Housing Ombudsman exists to address power imbalances between landlords and residents, particularly in a housing crisis where residents have limited choice and voice. The conversation delves into how the Ombudsman's spotlight on damp and mould has shifted industry practices. Before the tragic death of Awaab Ishak, the Ombudsman noticed they weren't seeing enough damp and mould complaints relative to other housing quality indicators – suggesting these serious issues weren't being adequately addressed. The subsequent cultural shift has been remarkable, with Richard noting: "One thing I have seen less of is tenant blaming... that suggests there's been a change in behaviors." Perhaps most revealing is his insight into what good practice looks like – culture, leadership, curiosity, and empathy forming the foundation for effective housing management. The implementation of Awaab's Law this autumn represents a pivotal moment, though Blakeway cautions against treating it as a "bolt-on" rather than integrating it into a comprehensive framework for housing quality. Looking toward the future, he  emphasizes the importance of data and technology in moving from reactive to predictive maintenance models. While complaint volumes continue to rise (35% increase in the last financial year), he hopes to eventually see the uphold rate decline ahead of case volumes – indicating real improvement in local resolution and rebuilding trust. The Housing Ombudsman Richard Blakeway LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-blakeway-7a869253/) Awaabs Law (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/awaabs-law-draft-guidance-for-social-landlords/awaabs-law-draft-guidance-for-social-landlords) Support the show (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Airqualitymatters) Check out the Air Quality Matters (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast) website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones/featured) The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with. Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) Aereco (https://www.aereco.co.uk/) Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) Ultra Protect (https://www.ultra-protect.co.uk/air-quality-matters) Zehnder Group (https://www.zehndergroup.com/?utm_source=SoMe&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=AQM_p%20odcast) The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with. SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) & InBiot (https://en.inbiot.es/?utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text (https://www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/2264976/open_sms) Ever wondered if that tiny spot of mold in your bathroom corner actually matters? A study from France just answered this question with a resounding yes – and the findings should make us all reconsider how we think about household mould. Mouldy area size and asthma symptom score and control in adults: the  CONSTANCES cohort Drawing from an impressive pool of over 28,000 adults, researchers have established something both alarming and actionable: even the smallest visible mold growth significantly increases asthma risk in adults. This isn't just about massive infestations; the study reveals a clear "ladder of risk" where each step up in mold coverage – from mere spots to larger areas – progressively worsens asthma symptoms and control. People living with any visible mold were approximately 40% more likely to have current asthma and poorer symptom control. What makes this research particularly valuable is its practical approach. Rather than treating mold as a simple yes/no question, researchers asked participants to estimate contaminated areas using everyday references (like comparing 0.2 square meters to three sheets of paper). They found that mould in bedrooms and living rooms – where we spend most of our time – had the strongest health impacts. The message is clear: mold isn't just a maintenance or aesthetic issue; it's a health hazard from the moment it appears, and its impact scales with its size. For housing providers, healthcare professionals, and anyone who lives in a building (which is all of us!), these findings transform how we should approach even minor mold growth. That little patch in the corner isn't just unsightly – it's actively affecting respiratory health.  Mouldy area size and asthma symptom score and control in adults: the  CONSTANCES cohort (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.122254) Support the show (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Airqualitymatters) Check out the Air Quality Matters (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast) website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones/featured) The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with. Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) Aereco (https://www.aereco.co.uk/) Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) Ultra Protect (https://www.ultra-protect.co.uk/air-quality-matters) Zehnder Group (https://www.zehndergroup.com/?utm_source=SoMe&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=AQM_p%20odcast) The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with. SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) & InBiot (https://en.inbiot.es/?utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

From Healthy Buildings in India 2025, Air Quality Matters sits down in this series of podcasts from the event. In part 1, we talk to three of the next generation of researchers looking at the science of IEQ from the region and three Industry Leaders at the coal face right now. Innovation, collaboration and knowledge sharing are themes that cut through the conversation here, from personalised ventilation systems to microplastics in the air we breathe, to thermal comfort and vernacular design of buildings in Nepal. A fascinating discussion with three up-and-coming minds from the field of research. Then we sat down with leaders from Air Quality Monitoring, Ventilation systems and filtration to discuss air quality in the trenches! The problems being solved today and where this is going. Huge thanks to. Kumar Naddunuri - https://www.linkedin.com/in/kumar-naddunuri-b6a66716/ Sruthy Robert - https://www.linkedin.com/in/sruthy-robert/ Prativa Lamsal - https://www.linkedin.com/in/prativa-lamsal-a00092250/ and Tervinder Singh - Director - Astberg Ventilation Pvt Ltd - https://www.linkedin.com/in/tervinder-singh-51827616/ Vitalii Matiunin - Co Founder and CEO - Airvoice - https://www.linkedin.com/in/vitaliimatiunin/ Deepak Nanaware - Head of Engineering and Marketing Middle East & India - AAF - https://www.linkedin.com/in/deepak-nanaware-97317142/ Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with. Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with. SafeTraces & InBiot All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

What if the very standards designed to keep us comfortable in buildings are actually making us unhealthy? This provocative question lies at the heart of groundbreaking research from Delft University of Technology.

It challenges the fundamental assumptions that have guided building science for decades. Even when our buildings meet all current standards for temperature, lighting, acoustics, and air quality—and even when occupants report feeling comfortable—the fact remains that spending 90% of our lives indoors may be harming our health.

The problem stems from our reliance on simplistic "single dose-response" models that isolate individual stressors like CO2 or temperature. These models fail on three fronts: they prioritise preventing short-term discomfort over promoting long-term health, they ignore how environmental factors interact with each other, and they're based on an "average person" who doesn't actually exist. The thermal comfort example is particularly striking—our pursuit of thermally neutral environments might be contributing to obesity by never challenging our bodies to regulate their own temperature.

Professor Bluyssen advocates for a shift toward "situation modeling"—a holistic approach that considers the entire context of environment, individual, and activity. Her field studies reveal just how diverse our environmental preferences are, even within shared spaces like classrooms. When a teacher opens a window, it might please some students while making others miserable by letting in traffic noise.

The path forward isn't about finding magic numbers for ventilation rates or perfect temperatures. It's about creating flexible, adaptive spaces that accommodate our diverse needs and give us greater control over our environments. Though this approach is more complex, it represents our best chance at designing indoor spaces that truly support human health and wellbeing rather than merely preventing immediate discomfort.

The need to go beyond the comfort-based dose-related indicators in our
IEQ-guidelines

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

Is world of ambient air quality monitoring is in a deadlock. Despite having targets and technology, air pollution remains a persistent urban challenge. 

Why aren't things changing? This question drives Maxime Interbrick, co-founder of Sparrow Analytics, whose company is pioneering a revolutionary approach to environmental intelligence by deploying mobile sensors on vehicle fleets.

In this conversation, Maxime reveals how mobile monitoring provides a fundamentally different perspective than traditional static sensors. While government-operated reference stations offer precise measurements at specific points, they miss the dramatic variations in pollution levels from street to street. Sparrow's approach combines mobile sensors mounted on postal vehicles and delivery fleets with AI analysis to create comprehensive pollution maps showing street-level variations in real-time.

The results are surprising – between 60-80% of city areas actually have good air quality. The problem isn't that entire cities are polluted; it's that we lack the granular data to identify the "healthy paths" through our urban environments. This insight transforms how we might approach urban navigation, especially for vulnerable populations like children with asthma or elderly residents. Rather than avoiding cities altogether, we can make informed choices about when and where to travel.

Maxime shares fascinating examples from their deployments, including discovering dangerously high pollution levels behind a school where older children were dropped off – caused by carpet dust in buses – and identifying extreme urban heat islands where temperature variations of 10-15 degrees occur within the same street. These discoveries enable practical, immediate interventions rather than waiting years for infrastructure changes.

What makes this approach particularly powerful is how the data can be integrated into platforms people already use – navigation apps, fitness trackers, health applications, and real estate services. Instead of creating another dashboard nobody checks, Sparrow envisions environmental intelligence becoming as routine as checking the weather. For cities struggling with pollution, this offers a path forward that empowers individuals while informing better urban planning.

Have you checked your neighborhood's air quality today? Perhaps it's time to start. Follow Sparrow Analytics' journey as they expand across Europe and the United States, bringing environmental int

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

Have you ever wondered how researchers measure something as subjective as your comfort in a building? The latest episode of Air Quality Matters takes a surprising step back from specific pollutants to examine one of the most fundamental yet overlooked tools in indoor environmental research: the questionnaire.

When scientists ask you to rate how stuffy a room feels or how comfortable the temperature is, they're relying on scales and questions that may be fundamentally flawed. Marcel Schweiker's paper "10 questions concerning the usage of subjective assessment scales" exposes the messy reality behind these seemingly simple measurements. From the "wild west" of inconsistent scales across studies to the profound problems of language translation, we discover why comparing results between different research projects is nearly impossible under current practices.

The episode dives deep into the philosophical core of measurement itself. What are we actually capturing when someone circles a number on a comfort scale? Rather than obtaining clean data, we're glimpsing a complex psychological construct filtered through cultural expectations, sense of control, and even social desirability bias. A person who knows they can open a window will perceive air quality differently than someone who feels trapped in the same conditions. The podcast explores alternative measurement approaches including physiological signals and behavior observation, but concludes that questionnaires remain essential - if properly designed.

For anyone interested in buildings, air quality, or the science of human comfort, this episode offers a fascinating look at how the research community must evolve to better capture our messy, subjective experience of indoor environments. It's a call for more thoughtful, critical approaches to the science that shapes the buildings where we spend 90% of our lives. Listen now to gain a fresh perspective on what it truly means to measure comfort in the built environment.

Ten questions concerning the usage of subjective assessment scales in research on indoor environmental quality

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

When we talk about air pollution, we often think of it as an environmental issue – something that affects our skies and lungs. But the reality is far more complex and concerning. What if I told you that the particles you breathe in right now could be traveling through your bloodstream to every organ in your body?

Sir Stephen Holgate, a distinguished physician and leading expert in respiratory medicine, joins us to unpack the multisystemic nature of air pollution. With over 50 years of research experience and a knighthood for his contributions to medical research, he explains how particulate matter doesn't just irritate our lungs – it passes through them into our circulation, delivering harmful chemicals to our brain, heart, liver, and beyond.

"These very small particles get into the bloodstream and they circulate to every organ of the body," he explains. "It accelerates the aging process of those tissues or organs." This understanding has led researchers to now associate approximately 700 different diseases with air pollution exposure.

The conversation takes us from the scientific mechanisms of how pollution damages our bodies to the broader societal implications. We explore the inequalities in exposure, with disadvantaged communities bearing the greatest burden while having the least say in regulations. He makes a compelling case that breathing clean air should be considered a human right, much like access to clean water.

Perhaps most fascinating is the discussion of our body's barrier functions and how modern environments have overwhelmed these natural defenses. Sir Stephen Holgate shares remarkable research comparing traditional farming communities like the Amish, who have virtually no allergies or asthma, with genetically similar populations who adopted modern Western lifestyles. The difference? Their relationship with the natural world and the microorganisms that shape our immune systems.

Whether you're concerned about your health, interested in environmental justice, or simply curious about why asthma rates have skyrocketed in the UK, this conversation offers invaluable insights into how we might create healthier communities by cleaning up the air we all share. 

Sir Stephen Holgate

Sir Stephen Holgate - Imperial Alumni Awards

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

What's the true financial value of a healthier workplace? This episode of Air Quality Matters dives into research from the University of Cambridge that quantifies exactly how much companies are willing to pay for healthier office environments.

The research reveals a significant "health premium" of 4-6% for buildings certified under health-focused standards like WELL and Fitwell. This represents a tangible financial incentive for property owners to invest in features that enhance indoor air quality, lighting, comfort, and other elements that benefit human health beyond just energy efficiency.

But here's where it gets fascinating: when comparing indoor health factors to outdoor characteristics, neighbourhood walkability emerged as an even stronger driver of rental prices than building certifications. Companies clearly value locations where employees can easily walk to amenities or use public transit. Meanwhile, the counterintuitive finding that higher outdoor air pollution sometimes correlates with higher rents reveals how economic density in city centres often outweighs environmental concerns.

The holistic message is clear: the market increasingly values healthy environments both inside and outside buildings, even when these factors aren't explicitly advertised. For developers and building owners, this means considering the entire health ecosystem, not just isolated features. You simply can't build a healthy building in an unhealthy location and expect to maximise its value.

Whether you're in commercial real estate, workplace design, or just interested in the economics of health and sustainability, this episode offers valuable insights into how the market is beginning to quantify the long-understood but previously unpriced value of healthier spaces for workers.

Indoor and outdoor health factors in the pricing of commercial real estate:
A hedonic analysis of U.S. office buildings

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

The journey from visible smog in Beijing to sophisticated indoor air quality monitoring systems spans just a decade, but the transformation has been remarkable. In this eye-opening conversation, Liam Bates, CEO and co-founder of Kaiterra, shares how personal experience with air pollution sparked a mission that evolved from consumer devices to enterprise-level building solutions.

We explore why Kaiterra made the strategic decision to pivot from a successful B2C business selling the popular Laser Egg monitor to focusing entirely on commercial applications. This shift reveals fundamental truths about how building data becomes valuable only when it drives meaningful action—a journey that begins, not ends, when sensors are installed.

The discussion challenges outdated approaches to building performance testing, making a compelling case for continuous monitoring that captures the dynamic nature of occupied spaces. Rather than eliminating the need for specialists, this technology revolution allows experts to focus their skills where they matter most: solving complex problems identified through ongoing data collection.

The most profound insights emerge when Liam frames air quality monitoring not as a luxury or an ROI calculation, but as a fundamental health and safety requirement. Just as we wouldn't question the value of smoke detectors or fire sprinklers, the ability to see and manage the air we breathe represents a basic obligation to protect human health.

Whether you manage commercial properties, design buildings, or simply care about creating healthier indoor environments, this conversation will transform how you think about the invisible elements that impact our wellbeing every day. The future of healthy buildings isn't about collecting more data—it's about using that data to create spaces where people truly thrive.

Liam Bates - LinkedIn

Kaiterra

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

What happens when the UK's medical establishment declares air pollution a public health emergency? The Royal College of Physicians' latest report "A Breath of Fresh Air" delivers a wake-up call that transforms how we understand pollution's impact on our bodies and minds.

The science has evolved dramatically since their 2016 assessment. While annual pollution-related deaths in the UK have decreased to approximately 30,000, this statistic merely scratches the surface. The report reveals how air pollution harms us throughout our entire lives—starting before conception by affecting egg and sperm quality, continuing through pregnancy with links to miscarriage and low birth weight, and persisting across the lifespan.

Most alarming is the growing evidence connecting air pollution to brain health. Ultra-fine particles don't just damage our lungs; they cross into our bloodstream and travel to our brains, potentially contributing to everything from learning difficulties in children to depression in adolescents and dementia in older adults. This isn't just an environmental concern—it's a mental health crisis hiding in plain sight.

The report also spotlights a disturbing "triple jeopardy" facing vulnerable communities who experience the highest pollution levels, suffer greater susceptibility to harm due to compounding factors like poor housing, and typically contribute least to creating the problem. As other nations adopt stricter standards aligned with updated WHO guidelines, the UK risks falling behind in addressing this fundamental social justice issue.

Medical professionals are being called to action, urged to incorporate air pollution awareness into patient care just as they once transformed the conversation around smoking. The solutions exist—from clean air zones to better indoor ventilation—but require greater urgency from society and policymakers. Listen now to understand why clean air isn't just an environmental luxury but a medical necessity, and stay tuned for our upcoming interview with the report's author, Sir Stephen Holgate.

A Breath Of Fresh Air Report

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

The gap between what we know and what we build has never been more troubling. While we have centuries of construction knowledge at our fingertips, today's housing often fails at the most fundamental levels of health, comfort, and efficiency.

Sarah Daly, Head of Strategic Partnerships and Sustainable Communities at Agile Homes, brings a refreshing perspective to this challenge. With her extensive background spanning sustainability, communications, and strategic leadership, Sarah cuts through the noise to address why our approach to sustainable housing needs radical reinvention.

"Words like sustainability and eco have been hijacked and weaponized," Sarah explains, pointing to how terminology has become a barrier rather than a bridge to understanding. The conversation explores how we've reached a critical juncture where the housing crisis pushes quantity over quality, creating homes that actively harm occupants through poor indoor air quality and substandard construction.

The discussion delves into the alarming reality that most new housing fails to meet even basic performance standards, with up to 80% of buildings showing significant non-compliance. Sarah reveals how developers "game the system," knowing they can often evade responsibility once properties change hands. "You've got more consumer rights buying a cheese sandwich in a supermarket than spending hundreds of thousands on a house," she notes pointedly.

What makes this conversation truly powerful is Sarah's pragmatic vision for change. Now working at "the pointy end of the spear" with Agile Homes, she demonstrates how building to Passive House standards should simply be the baseline, not an aspirational goal. Through community-based transformation projects, needs-led design, and a focus on long-term value rather than short-term costs, Sarah illustrates a pathway forward that prioritises human outcomes alongside environmental goals.

Sarah Daly - LinkedIn

Agile Property

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

We explore the scientific approach behind ASHRAE Standard 241, developed to address airborne infection control in buildings during profound uncertainty. The standard represents a paradigm shift in how engineers design ventilation systems to manage risks from infectious aerosols.

• Confronting the challenge that viral emissions from infected individuals vary across seven orders of magnitude
• Abandoning deterministic models in favor of Monte Carlo simulations that embrace uncertainty
• Setting a specific risk target: keeping infection probability below 0.1% in 96% of scenarios
• Creating the concept of eACH (equivalent clean airflow rate) as a universal currency for clean air
• Revealing that older standards like ASHRAE 62.1 were significantly inadequate for infection control
• Establishing different ventilation requirements based on space type and occupancy patterns
• Acknowledging that even well-designed systems cannot eliminate risk completely

Risk modeling for ASHRAE Standard 241-2023 — Control of infectious
aerosols

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

Simon Jones sits down with Andrew Sutton, co-founder and Chief Innovation Officer at SERO, to explore the challenges and opportunities in retrofitting UK housing stock and how these parallel the challenges in ventilation and air quality.

• Current retrofit efforts suffer from political cycles creating boom-bust patterns that make scaling difficult
• Approximately half of a typical £35,000 retrofit cost is already in planned maintenance budgets
• We need to move from product-based specifications to outcome-based approaches focusing on healthy environments, affordability, and carbon reduction
• Data-driven building monitoring is transforming how we evaluate success, creating feedback loops that drive quality improvements
• We should reframe retrofit as normal home improvement rather than a specialist activity
• Bringing in private finance, particularly pension funds seeking long-term returns, can help smooth out funding cycles
• New business models can share savings between residents and landlords, generating income streams for further improvements
• By aggregating electrical generation and storage capabilities across housing portfolios, homes can function as distributed power stations
• Construction often responds well to clear requirements when they know they'll be measured and held accountable
• SERO focuses on creating pathways for homes that map steps to achieve net-zero carbon, healthy, affordable living environments

Andrew Sutton LinkedIn

SERO 

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

Lidia Morawska's  paper provides a pragmatic framework for using low-cost PM2.5 sensors in regulatory indoor air quality monitoring, solving the longstanding problem of affordable compliance without sacrificing accuracy. This clever calibration system transforms inexpensive sensors into reliable monitoring networks by using yearly reference calibrations of key sensors and applying correction factors across similar devices.

• Low-cost sensors have revolutionized air quality monitoring but face accuracy challenges with PM2.5 measurement
• Traditional reference monitors are too expensive and complex for widespread indoor deployment
• Morawska's framework uses a network approach with designated reference sensors
• Annual calibration of key sensors against reference instruments provides correction factors for the entire network
• The system could include a central database of correction factors to prevent duplication of effort
• This approach enables dynamic ventilation control based on reliable PM2.5 measurements
• The framework moves us from "guessing and hoping" to "measuring and knowing"
• Implementation would provide accountability and evidence for meeting health-based building standards

Application of PM2.5 low-cost sensors for indoor
air quality compliance monitoring

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

Microbiologist Vinod Kumar Sikar shares his journey of bridging the gap between microbiology and engineering to improve indoor air quality, particularly in healthcare settings throughout India. He explains how the Healthy Buildings Conference coming to Hyderabad this August will foster multidisciplinary collaboration and knowledge-sharing essential for solving complex indoor environmental challenges.

• Fine dust particles in India serve as vehicles for microorganisms, particularly fungal spores, creating unique indoor air quality challenges
• Western building standards cannot be directly applied to Indian conditions due to different climatic zones, building construction methods, and microbial ecology
• The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical need for multidisciplinary collaboration between engineers, medical professionals, and scientists
• Decontamination through methods like hydrogen peroxide is often more effective than filtration alone, as filters can accumulate living microorganisms
• The ISIAC Healthy Buildings 2025 Conference in Hyderabad will feature oral presentations, workshops, keynote speakers, and special sessions for students
• An Indian chapter of ISIAC will be launched during the conference to continue building networks and sharing knowledge after the event
• India's healthcare sector is growing rapidly with over 55,000 hospitals, creating significant demand for indoor air quality expertise

Register for the ISIAC Healthy Buildings Conference 2025 in Hyderabad, India (August 18-22) at healthybuildings2025.org before July 31st to secure your spot at this landmark event bringing together global and local experts in indoor environmental quality.

Vinod Kumar Sekar LinkedIn

Healthy Buildings 2025 

Air Indoor Assessment Pvt Ltd

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

Can you trust those affordable radon detectors? Do you really need to wait a whole year to know if your home has dangerous radon levels?

The latest episode of Air Quality Matters tackles these critical questions through a deep dive into groundbreaking research by Joan F. Ray and colleagues. Their paper, "Performance Evaluation of Radon Measurement Techniques in Single-Family Homes," challenges conventional wisdom about radon testing and brings encouraging news for homeowners everywhere.

We explore how this invisible, odorless radioactive gas poses serious health risks as the leading cause of lung cancer among non-smokers, yet detecting it has traditionally been a slow, expensive process. The study's real-world field testing across 20 Swiss homes reveals two game-changing findings: first, three-month winter measurements correlate remarkably well with full-year averages, potentially eliminating the need for year-long testing periods; second, affordable consumer-grade electronic monitors, while less precise than professional equipment, still perform adequately for their intended purpose.

This democratisation of radon detection puts powerful health monitoring capabilities directly into homeowners' hands without breaking the bank. The research provides a pragmatic path forward, expanding our toolkit beyond rigid protocols to smarter, faster ways of ensuring our living spaces are safe. From my personal experience using both traditional and electronic monitoring methods, I can affirm that consumer-grade products work effectively when used properly – focusing on monthly rather than daily averages to account for radon's fluctuations.

Performance evaluation of radon measurement techniques in
single-family homes

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

"The lungs of our buildings are failing us." These sobering words from ventilation expert Nathan Wood capture the essence of a critical conversation about the silent crisis happening behind our walls. 

After inspecting countless ventilation systems across the UK, Nathan reveals the disturbing reality that approximately 75% of residential ventilation systems are fundamentally failing to perform as designed, not just minor issues, but catastrophic failures that compromise health and safety.

Unlike plumbing leaks that create visible puddles or electrical faults that trip breakers, ventilation failures operate invisibly, silently harming occupants over years or decades. While regulations and standards continue to evolve, the practical reality on the ground shows an industry plagued by poor installation practices, inadequate maintenance, and a profound lack of accountability. 

From flexible ducting crushed beyond functionality to fans venting into wall cavities rather than outside, these aren't isolated incidents but systemic failures documented daily.

The conversation explores why this crisis persists despite the solutions being relatively straightforward. A perfect storm of factors contributes: no established pathway to competency for installers, housing organisations without dedicated ventilation maintenance budgets, manufacturers focused on product sales rather than performance outcomes, and consumers who don't know what questions to ask. The experts propose practical solutions, including outcome-based specifications, proper training pathways, manufacturer accountability for installation quality, and reframing ventilation as a "safety critical aspect" of building performance.

Nathan Wood LinkedIn 

Farmwood 

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

What makes someone download an air quality monitoring app and actually keep using it? The answer might surprise you. 

In this eye-opening exploration of a fascinating study from Indonesia, we dive deep into the psychology behind environmental technology adoption. The research, published in the International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, reveals that enjoyment—not usefulness—is the single most powerful driver of air quality app usage. 

Examining responses from over 370 users, researchers discovered that creating an engaging, even fun experience trumps both functionality and ease of use. Meanwhile, a person's general attitude toward technology (their "technology readiness") dramatically impacts whether they'll embrace these potentially life-saving tools. Someone who's naturally tech-optimistic approaches these apps completely differently than someone who's privacy-concerned or technology-hesitant.

The implications are profound for developers, public health officials, and anyone working in environmental technology. The study shows that no matter how accurate your air quality data might be, if the experience isn't engaging, users simply won't stick around. It's a powerful reminder that even with the most serious health and environmental technologies, the human elements—enjoyment, habit, and emotion—often determine success or failure.

Has your experience with environmental apps matched these findings? Try paying attention to which apps you actually use regularly versus those that sit forgotten on your phone, and you might discover your own patterns that confirm this research.

Understanding Behavioral Intention to Use of Air
Quality Monitoring Solutions with Emphasis on
Technology Readiness

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

What really happens in a child's body during a severe asthma attack? Dr. Abigail Whitehouse, pediatric respiratory consultant, takes us on a sobering journey through the physiology of asthma, beginning with a paramedic's memory of a late-night emergency.

The conversation reveals the hidden mechanisms of respiratory distress—airways becoming increasingly constricted as immune cells flood lung tissues, creating a life-threatening situation where medication becomes ineffective and oxygen levels plummet. We learn that asthma development involves a complex interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental triggers that "switch" the immune system's response.

Dr. Whitehouse shares insights from her environmental health clinic, where she's pioneering approaches that look beyond medication to address the root causes of respiratory illness. The discussion uncovers disturbing connections between air pollution, poor housing conditions, and asthma mortality rates, revealing how social inequalities create disproportionate health burdens.

Most powerfully, she challenges the acceptance of ongoing symptoms, emphasising that proper asthma management should aim for complete symptom elimination. For parents, healthcare providers, and anyone concerned about respiratory health, this episode offers critical knowledge about warning signs, proper inhaler use, and the environmental factors that could mean the difference between life and death during an asthma emergency.

Abigail Whitehouse - Linkedin

Abigail Whitehouse

Asthma & Lung UK 

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

Gabriel Rojas and colleagues' comprehensive review examines indoor air quality in over 600 Passive Houses, revealing that properly-designed mechanical ventilation systems generally outperform conventional housing for background pollutants like CO2, VOCs and radon. Quality control makes a dramatic difference - a UK study found 100% of certified Passive Houses met required airflows while only 47% of non-certified MVHR homes even met basic building regulations.

• Certified Passive Houses show consistently better ventilation performance than non-certified buildings with similar technology
• Quality assurance processes are essential, not optional extras
• Cooking pollution creates a significant blind spot in Passive House design
• Recirculating cooker hoods fail to capture harmful PM2.5 particles, which remain trapped in airtight spaces
• New Passive House guidance now strongly recommends extracting cooker hoods venting outside
• Proper makeup air systems must be balanced with kitchen extraction
• Both certification rigor and comprehensive pollutant management are necessary for truly healthy homes

A review of the indoor air quality in residential Passive House dwellings

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

The economic value of healthy buildings represents one of the greatest untapped frontiers in our quest for better indoor environments. While we've mastered the technical aspects of creating healthier spaces, convincing decision-makers to invest remains challenging without clear financial metrics.

Stefan Flagner, an economics researcher with a PhD spanning economics and health sciences, brings a unique perspective to this conversation. As co-author of "10 Questions Concerning the Economics of Indoor Environmental Quality in Buildings," Stefan explores how we can quantify and communicate the return on investment for healthy building initiatives. His research reveals we're at a critical juncture—similar to where energy efficiency stood two decades ago—where the business case exists but needs stronger articulation.

The discussion examines several fascinating aspects of this challenge: the split incentives between building owners and occupants, the difficulty in measuring productivity impacts across different industries, and the need for more robust field studies rather than relying solely on laboratory evidence. Stefan highlights how interdisciplinary approaches combining economics, engineering, and health sciences are essential yet surprisingly rare in research.

What makes this conversation particularly valuable is Stefan's focus on practical applications. Rather than targeting companies already investing in premium spaces, he emphasises reaching conservative business owners with limited capital who need hard numbers to justify investments. The path forward requires better data collection, post-occupancy evaluations, and tools that allow businesses to calculate potential returns based on their specific circumstances. 

Ready to discover how the economics of healthy buildings could transform our approach to indoor environments? This episode provides crucial insights for anyone involved in building design, management, investment, or occupational health.

Stephan Flagner - LinkedIn 

10 Questions 

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

We dive into a fascinating paper that quantifies respiratory disease burden from formaldehyde, damp and mold in English housing. Using Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) as a metric, researchers reveal the hidden health costs of poor housing conditions while highlighting significant data gaps that could mean we're vastly underestimating the problem.

• Formaldehyde exposure in English homes associated with approximately 4,000 new childhood asthma cases (800 DALYs) in 2019
• Official surveys indicate 4% of English homes have significant damp/mold problems
• Damp and mold exposure linked to 5,000 new asthma cases and 8,500 respiratory infections (2,800 DALYs)
• Alternative data suggests up to 27% of homes might have damp issues, potentially making the health burden 3-8 times higher
• Clear pattern of inequality shows low-income households and ethnic minorities bear greater burden
• Research highlights urgent need for better national surveillance of indoor environments
• Paper provides a framework for understanding housing as a quantifiable public health and equity issue

The Burden of Respiratory Disease from Formaldehyde, Damp
and Mould in English Housing

Thanks a million to our sponsors, SafeTraces, and InBiot who make this podcast possible.

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.

Send us a text

The landmark ImpAQS study examining ventilation and air quality in 1,200 Austrian schools reveals widespread failure to meet minimum standards, with at least 25% of classrooms unable to maintain acceptable CO2 levels during operational hours. 

Professor Rob McLeod discusses how this comprehensive year-long study uncovered significant disparities in ventilation effectiveness between schools, creating an "air quality lottery" for students and teachers.

• Comprehensive monitoring of CO2, temperature, and humidity across all nine Austrian federal regions throughout the 2023-2024 school year
• Matched pair study comparing 600 classrooms with visible CO2 monitors against 600 control rooms with hidden sensors
• Only 10% of Austrian schools have mechanical ventilation systems, with most relying entirely on natural ventilation
• CO2 monitors dramatically improve ventilation behaviours, with over 90% of classrooms spontaneously appointing student "ventilation champions"
• Cultural resistance and misconceptions about ventilation creating barriers to proper air exchange
• Occupant density as a critical factor, with special schools providing 3+ square meters per student achieving superior air quality
• Outdoor air pollution near schools often exceeding WHO guidelines, complicating ventilation strategies
• Need for national-level intervention rather than leaving air quality challenges to individual schools
• Disparities between schools creating educational and health inequalities that require systematic triaging of solutions

Rob McLeod - LinkedIn

ImpAQS Report

Support the show

Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

SafeTraces & InBiot

All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.